tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post8836888948035720532..comments2024-03-27T01:27:21.576-08:00Comments on The Immoral Minority: Why Babygate matters.Gryphenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02356503547155430235noreply@blogger.comBlogger99125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-69850455203069907952009-10-10T15:48:28.934-08:002009-10-10T15:48:28.934-08:00Even IF Bristol did have the child, why not adopt ...Even IF Bristol did have the child, why not adopt outright, keep secret the parentage and go on with life instead of such a convoluted tale of deception? It all seems so unsavory and for what end? At what cost? Just do not get it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-92140908157687512142009-08-03T14:45:41.089-08:002009-08-03T14:45:41.089-08:00What a load of crap. The DNC had access to Gov. Pa...What a load of crap. The DNC had access to Gov. Palin's medical. They would have discovered as conspicuous by their absence the chart notes from pre-natal care, exams, the AMIO done to discover Trig's downsyndrome which was disclosed prior to his birth when it was announced she was in fact having a baby when she was 7 months along? It was not until the RNC that Bristol's pregnancy was announced and Trigg was already born and several months old. There are two babies in the Palin household now; Trig and his nephew Tripp. Only a few months apart. Triggs birth certificate is avaiable at the State Vital Statistics office.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-83957195679955393192009-07-10T16:13:40.572-08:002009-07-10T16:13:40.572-08:00I believe insurance fraud is a very serious crime....I believe insurance fraud is a very serious crime. <br /><br />It seems clear to me that no woman in her right mind would do what Sarah claims she did after her water broke -- give a speech that was more important than going to a hospital, fly from Texas to Anchorage, and then drive to Wasilla to have a very private location to "give birth."<br /><br />Don't you imagine Trig's medical care is being pick up by taxpayers under Sarah's coverage as her so-called son?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-45765363957305337982009-06-05T19:22:20.670-08:002009-06-05T19:22:20.670-08:00One thing that bugs me - IF Trig is Sarah's na...One thing that bugs me - IF Trig is Sarah's natural born baby and IF she is aware the rumors persist, why not release some photos, a birth certificate, a doctor's interview? Even if she is too proud to answer the Troofers directly, there is such a thing as a media 'leak'. But, alas, nada. Just a bunch of inconsistencies. I waver on some of the 'evidence' pro and con b/c I think a hoax of this magnitude is just too far fetched. But then I always come back to this - The Wild Ride story makes no sense. And as equally crazy as the Wild Ride story is the TV interview at her office with a newborn preemie. Makes no sense at all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-82737508221911672862009-06-05T13:03:41.618-08:002009-06-05T13:03:41.618-08:00AMEN SISTER! Why don't you pass this on to her...AMEN SISTER! Why don't you pass this on to her blind followers! It is HER STORY in her words! I have seen one person try to defend it at palin deception and she sounded ridiculous....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-9393550148911184262009-06-05T08:26:18.794-08:002009-06-05T08:26:18.794-08:00I am another proud trig troofer checking in. Desp...I am another proud trig troofer checking in. Despite the overwhelming pictorial (and other) evidence at Palin Deceptions and numerous other sites, I was late to the troofer party. I wanted to give SP every benefit of the doubt. I made excuses for her varying sizes and shapes shown throughout her "pregnancy.' I was able to find reasons for the "disappearance" of Bristol during the gestation of Trig. Nothing could push me into a SURE conclusion on this issue. That is, until I listened to SARAH herself on audio tape. I am of the opinion that NO mother, NO woman, NOT EVEN SARAH would travel umpteen hours from Texas (leaking fluid) and then, knowing she will be birthing a Down's baby - PASS the well-equipped Anchorage Hospital and continue to drive to the MatSu hospital (which is not equipped to deal with many of the issues this baby faced, including a hole in his heart). THEN, this premie DS infant is taken out into the world (to her office) a few days later! This is Sarah's story! NOT the story of the mean ol' bloggers and "haters!" Only ONE person has convinced me that SP's pregnancy was a hoax, only ONE PERSON! SARAH PALIN.ellanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-73782887079765661302009-06-04T14:42:10.931-08:002009-06-04T14:42:10.931-08:00Patrick, check out Geoffrey Dunn at huffington. he...Patrick, check out Geoffrey Dunn at huffington. he writes regular articles on Sarah palin and he is coming out with a book next year. your summary says it all. Sarahs the one who is going to need an waaaambulance soon. she thinks she has done everything to cover her tracks, but i don't think so.lisabethnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-11973065399792731872009-06-04T10:19:45.387-08:002009-06-04T10:19:45.387-08:00Anon 7:28
Of course you are entitled to your opin...Anon 7:28<br /><br />Of course you are entitled to your opinion. Others come here or to other blogs and say they that they believe Trig is Sarah's. But that is not what you have been doing here or at TOPIX. You act as if you know the Palins, as if you know for a fact the truth. You even speak for them by saying it doesn't bother her. That is what you should not be doing. I am sure everyone would love to hear your opinions of why you don't believe this and you even can be mad at Gryphen. But you attack people here and at Topix and you make sweeping generalizations about who is behind keeping this story alive. It is not just bloggers. I am NOT a blogger. And, I know many reporters are working on and have worked on this story. But if no one is willing to talk and if birth and adoption records are sealed, there is not much else one can do. You also make comments like this doesn't bother Sarah at all and she is ready. How do you know that when you don't know her personally?<br />By the way, many people think otherwise who do know her.<br /><br />Many in the MSM do know / believe Trig is not Sarah's. I know that for a fact because of my career choice. <br /><br />If you have proof otherwise, feel free to share it. But I / or anyone else does not have a burden of proof here on this blog. That is your own issue. Plenty of facts actually have been provided. This is not a court of law. We are discussing what we think and encouraging people who might know something to talk. People are afraid of the reprecussions.<br /><br />Just relax, don't be so angry about this. You have a right to your opinion but you don't have to attack Gryphen, other bloggers and people who are very deeply concerned about Sarah's LIES to the public.<br /><br />To Patrick, you have put everything together VERY well in your post. Have you sent that to various people in the media? Andrew Sullivan, Esquire magazine writers, other investigative journalists who write about Sarah Palin ongoing (see Huffington Post). It would be a good idea for you to do that. Thank you for your posting.Nancy - Virginianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-90063418945741045402009-06-04T09:14:38.298-08:002009-06-04T09:14:38.298-08:00Aaaawwwww... Somebody sounds like a sore loser.
Sh...Aaaawwwww... Somebody sounds like a sore loser.<br />Shall we call the whaaambulance?<br /><br />I told you you would find nothing...lol.<br /><br />Hope the pizza was good at least.Anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14022210256777582592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-87321709809342687012009-06-04T09:05:25.872-08:002009-06-04T09:05:25.872-08:005:40 AM, Sarah ---- I don't see there is "...5:40 AM, Sarah ---- I don't see there is "proof" either way. What I don't get, at a very elementary level, is why those like yourself cannot confront and explain the simplest questions if you believe SP's stories. It is clear the FBI needs to be more involved, possibly RICO will apply to one of her gates, before the "proof" is PROOF. <br /><br />You must have an opinion or answer for say the "wild ride" and other perplexing behaviors. You can also let us know how you see and explain the "square belly" video where Sarah Palin pats that so called baby. How do you explain the "flat to big belly" photos, Sarah on 3-26-2008 to the very pregnant looking Sarah on 4-13-08 (There are others) <br /><br />It is not only about absolute proof, it is also about lack of discussion and answers. You could easily explain your version of the "flat to big belly" photos. You and others by being silent make Sarah look all the more connected to a criminal conspiracy. <br /><br /> Why won't you or anyone stand up for Sarah Palin and shed some light on the "wild ride" stories, "square belly" video, "flat to big belly" photos? Keep it simple and show that you can confront and stand up for the Sarah you think you know. You make it look like Sarah has no friends, just operatives. Some of you say that the Palins are fine with the questions about the apparent abuse of babies and the Trig/Tripp birth questions. I don't have a problem with her being over confident and thinking she will always be untouchable. What arrogant crook isn't? <br /><br />These matters are not about a popularity contest either. Bernie Madoff was a great guy everyone trusted until one day... The bigger they are, the harder they fall. If she needs to be a little more plumped up before she goes, such is life. I don't know that the Johnston's will be the ones to burst babygate open, who knows what and when they will contribute? They may end up backing the abusive baby treatment and stories for Sarah. Going by her "wild ride" and her weird 'stage mother' abuse of her offsprings she could be the one to burst babygate open all on her own. If she was a tv star she would have to deal with the Dept of Labor and those who protect working children. As political props her children have no protection and they were abused in front of the world. <br /><br />There are a million reasons why more people are more determined then ever to end the lies and more reasons why silence is so deafening. <br /> http://tiny.cc/v0jbECHILD ABUSE alertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-23985057119920288672009-06-04T07:15:32.399-08:002009-06-04T07:15:32.399-08:00Sarah (7:02),
Maybe you are right. I really don&#...Sarah (7:02),<br /><br />Maybe you are right. I really don't know who gave birth to Trig, and I am not blinded by hate. But as a mom of two, I keep coming back to this:<br /><br />Palin, as a 44-year-old in preterm labor with a known DS baby, and with a broken bag of waters (which increases the risk of infection)chose not to get checked out at a hospital in Texas. She said she knew her body and knew she wasn't in full-blown labor. But all labors are different, and it is incredibly common for a 3rd, 4th or 5th delivery to happen more quickly than previous ones. <br /><br />Look what happened to the wife of Louisiana Governor Jindal: her third child arrived so quickly that she delivered at home, within minutes of waking up with labor pains. Labor with her first two kids had been long and drawn out.<br /><br />http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14374539/<br /><br />So... back to Palin.... she flies home to Alaska, and instead of going to the hospital in Anchorage with a full Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, she goes all the way to Mat Su Hospital to deliver. Her Dr. has full privileges at both hospitals. Mat Su Hospital is a small regional hospital that doesn't do high-risk obstetrics. They do not even deliver twins there. <br /><br />In my experience, obstetrics in the 21st century is all about "abundance of caution". I had a c-section with my second child because he was in the breech position (bum first). There is a slighter risk of complication with that kind of delivery and most docs just won't take that risk any more. I have numerous friends who have given birth over age 40 and they were definitely monitored more closely by their docs, and their deliveries were automatically considered "high-risk" because of age (despite overall good health). That is called "abundance of caution". So, my mind simply boggles at the last leg of the "wild ride", especially. No NICU for a preterm DS baby, w/the mom being the most powerful person in the state? Come 'on.Amyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08190305455104909615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-69633148358020928242009-06-04T05:25:04.627-08:002009-06-04T05:25:04.627-08:00"And where is Willow these days?????"
1..."And where is Willow these days?????"<br /><br />1. babysitting Bristol's kids<br /><br />2. practicing the same "abstinence" that worked so well for her sister<br /><br />3. plotting her eventual escape from Wasilla, her control freak mother, and the rest of the family dog and pony showindy_girlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05846998274875545333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-29235587455329043962009-06-04T04:19:04.999-08:002009-06-04T04:19:04.999-08:00We are in an strange situation right now: At the m...We are in an strange situation right now: At the moment, none of the main "concerned parties" (the Palin's, Heath's, Johnston's etc.) talk in public about the "oddities" of the Trig-pregnancy. There is nobody that the MSM could "quote" right now.<br /><br />However, on the other hand, there is a mountain of circumstancial evidence already available. One can choose to ignore it, but if you look closely at the circumstancial evidence, it is not too difficult to figure out what is going on in general.<br /><br />Some of the "highlights" are:<br /><br />1. In TV-interview on September 2, 2008, the ADN-columnist Michael Carey mentioned a conversation with a lawyer who he "likes very much" and who is a "very smart guy", who claimed that the faked-pregnancy story was the "absolute truth":<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA-M2NfFAjU<br /><br />2. There are dozens of pictures available, showing Sarah distinctly non-pregnant during the "pregnancy" in months 6-8, for example:<br /><br />On March 1, 2008:<br /><br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/3043593247/sizes/o/in/set-72157611175050476/<br /><br />On March 14, 2008:<br /><br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/3042086538/in/set-72157611175050476/<br /><br />On March 26, 2008:<br /><br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/3068746423/in/set-72157611175050476/<br /><br />3. It is already established that Sarah is unwilling (and unable, IMO) to provide any evidence that she is Trig's mother. Andrew Sullivan wrote on December 5, 2008:<br /><br />"I begged the McCain campaign by private email and in a private meeting to give me something - anything - to kill the story off. I promised to run any evidence that would blow this out of the water. That offer still stands. Please make me look like an idiot for asking these questions. But they didn't offer a thing, asserting that even asking the question was an outrageous reputation-destroying offense."<br /><br />http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/12/a-fourth-pictur.html<br /><br />4. The travel records for Bristol, Willow and Piper for 2007/2008 show that Bristol was not travelling at all from mid-October 2007 to mid-February 2008, unlike Willow and Piper. <br /><br />Download the travel records here:<br /><br />http://www.box.net/shared/9cogbgnkko<br /><br />During this time, Bristol was notably absent at major events, for example at the state of the union address on January 15, 2008 - Todd, Willow and Piper were there:<br /><br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/3352741902/<br /><br />5. Recently discovered pictures confirm that Bristol gained a lot of weight between June 2007 and September 2007. Also, on September 14, 2008, an official Christmas picture for 2007 of the Palin family was taken, which then was apparently only used in one magazine, and it was only possible to locate this picture after an intense search. On this official Christmas picture, Bristol's belly "sticks out". See the whole set of pictures here:<br /><br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/sets/72157617829708238/<br /><br />6. When Cathy Baldwin-Johnson agreed to be interviewed by the ADN in 2008 regarding the Trig-pregnancy, she appeared to the interview together with her lawyer! Contrary to "popular belief", CBJ has never ever stated in public that she delivered Trig, and she also declined to do so in this conversation with the ADN. Apart from this, CBJ strictly rejects all interview requests, and has always done so, as far as I know.<br /><br />There is much, much more...but anybody who gets not suspicious after looking at this "circumstancial evidence" really walks through life with his/her eyes closed.Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06342444888520052108noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-90006861847183273462009-06-03T21:50:36.615-08:002009-06-03T21:50:36.615-08:00One last thing.
I love the antiquated use of the ...One last thing.<br /><br />I love the antiquated use of the word 'womb'. That's a non-existent piece of anatomy. Its a bible word. The real part of the body is the uterus. This is the part of the body where female mammals carry their young until birth. I would suggest that C4P followers update their language and their reading materials, cause every time you use the 'w' word, you give yourself away as an ignorant irrelevancy. Come join the rest of us in the 21st century - repeat after me: Uterus. Sure, knew you could!Maevenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-46976101790876010402009-06-03T19:48:01.456-08:002009-06-03T19:48:01.456-08:00The Palins DO care about this issue. Anyone who sa...The Palins DO care about this issue. Anyone who says they don't, does not know them. She never thought the rumors would go on. This does effect .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-52409064597956291122009-06-03T19:28:50.508-08:002009-06-03T19:28:50.508-08:00To Nancy-Virgina
Don't I have a right to an o...To Nancy-Virgina<br /><br />Don't I have a right to an opinion as well? Or do you want to shut me up because my opinion is different from yours. What a republican thing to say!<br /><br />I don't agree with anything in your post, that is my opinion. I think the facts fit in more with my opinion than they do yours, but again that is just my opinion, which I am allowed to have, which you would seem to want to take away from me, because I don't agree with you. <br /><br />And you do have the burden of the proof, you are the ones begging for anyone important to take you seriously. You are the ones making the accusation. You MUST provide proof for that to happen.<br /><br />Just because I might say Obamas balls are green, doesn't mean he has to show them to me to prove me wrong. I would have to have some kind of proof for him to acknowledge me at all. I guess I could say since he won't show them to me, they must be green, but that would just be silly now wouldn't it.<br /><br />I'm not trying to change minds here. That would never happen without Gryphen doing the DNA test himself!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-64404450259479306252009-06-03T19:02:24.650-08:002009-06-03T19:02:24.650-08:00Sorry to burst your bubbles Sarah Haters but littl...Sorry to burst your bubbles Sarah Haters but little Trig came straight out of Governor Palin's uterus, whether you like it or not, agree with it or not, believe it or not!<br /><br />If Sarah did not give birth to Trig than who? Todd? You people are the most ignorant hateful bunch of losers...Any of you know how to count months?<br /><br />Any of you know that it is impossible for Bristol to give birth to Trig and Tripp?<br /><br />Wait, maybe little Trig was dropped off by a stork, is that better for ya?<br /><br />The problem with you guys is that your hatred for the woman takes away any rational ability to see facts as they are, which is too bad, it says all about all of you.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01805437503220776138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-62145990792337195802009-06-03T18:22:27.636-08:002009-06-03T18:22:27.636-08:00Patrick is right, the most likely scenerio is that...Patrick is right, the most likely scenerio is that Trig was born Dec.07/Jan.08. In my opinion he was only presented to the public 4/08 after being born prematurely. <br /><br />Look at these charts for growth rates of DS boys by height and weight: http://tinyurl.com/qbbj63<br /><br />It makes it obvious that Trig easily could have been born early and appeared newborn in April 08.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-46408225921195807672009-06-03T17:16:19.122-08:002009-06-03T17:16:19.122-08:00Not that it really matters, but babies are not con...Not that it really matters, but babies are not conceived in the uterus: it happens in the fallopian tube(s). Usually. In the case of IVF (sperm and egg meet in the vitro [a little glass dish] outside the woman's body), the fertilized egg is placed into the uterus, where one fervently hopes it will implant itself. Some do, some don't, for reasons that are not well understood. Some think there could be a benefit to that meeting in the tube and then the gentle ride down to the uterus, propelled and caressed by the finger-like tendrils in the tubes. Only 30-40% of IVF procedures result in a live-birth pregnancy, for reasons that are not well understood. Just sayin.'Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-61931102670089586942009-06-03T17:12:09.817-08:002009-06-03T17:12:09.817-08:00The crease in Down Syndrome is called a Simian Cre...The crease in Down Syndrome is called a Simian Crease. Straight across the palm of the hand. Kids without Down's can have it (from positioning in the uterus) Kids with Down's have it. It's one of the signs of Down's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-2907430298689396652009-06-03T16:47:28.824-08:002009-06-03T16:47:28.824-08:00I find it amusing on so many levels that Sarah Pal...I find it amusing on so many levels that Sarah Palin weilds the power that she does. Her strength is illusory, she's wholly void of integrity, and she sucks as a person/parent/liar. She must be a major embarrasment to her children and an even bigger disappointment to those people who want to believe in her purported Christianity. Shame on Sarah Palin for worshiping herself at the expense of an entire state. What a fraud. On the other hand, I am continually amused by her and her kooky, pathetic family and all those brainy supporters she has.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-75006786624872164172009-06-03T16:25:21.541-08:002009-06-03T16:25:21.541-08:00To ANON 2:21. It is now very clear who you are. ...To ANON 2:21. It is now very clear who you are. You write at topix all the time as either Lisa in AK or Free Alaska. You are obsessed with the Palins, yet you don't know them personally as you admitted on TOPIX. You are mostly mad because Gryphen hasn't found the proof and you feel he baits people and takes their money. You spend all of your time on that place knocking people who give their opinion. Don't they have a right to their opinion? You are an extremely angry person. Every post you write is like this one above you wrote-HOSTILE.<br /><br />Also everything you are saying is bullshit. It is not just the "bloggers" that have an accusation. The accusation is everywhere. It has been written about by several reporters and magazines. Please don't come back and waste your anger on telling me the MSM doesn't get into it. We already know you hate bloggers, so you can go away now. And sorry to tell you but all of this and other things that Sarah does DO effect her. Her ratings are down and all of this does effect the Palins. If you don't know them, how do you know whether this talk effects them or not?<br /><br />I am not the Anonymous you are responding to above, so I am not the one who said they have "the proof" . For me it is my opinion based on a lot of facts , that she is not the birth mother. I am not a blogger by the way, yet you call me that because I write her. Not everyone who writes comments is a blogger. And.. how do you know that that anonymous is not a relative of Palin's? It sounded like they knew a lot , maybe a member of her church??<br /><br />If you hate Gryphen so much and if you hate "bloggers" so much, why do you keep showing up everywhere just to vent your anger at bloggers. Many of us with the opinion are not bloggers. You don't know who we are, do you? Some of us might be reporters or maybe we work with the attorney generals office in DC, you don't know, do you? The people here BELIEVE that Trig is not Sarah Palin's son. And that is their opinion. I can see very easily why they have that opinion. Anyone who has common sense can see it. Also many Americans do know about this. Stop making so many generalizations. We don't have a burden of proof. We aren't lawyers and this is not a court!<br /><br /> It is a waste of your energy to be here to tell you the truth. You are not changing anyone's mind. You are angry, annoyed and defensive. Why are you involved then?. And you know what.......perhaps that anonymous person above does know something and is afraid to tell......<br /><br />We know you have to have the last word, so we'll wait for it with baited breath. Give us some more nastiness and tell us bloggers (NOT) off so more.Nancy - Virginianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-90539523531439318062009-06-03T14:21:45.209-08:002009-06-03T14:21:45.209-08:00"Dear ANONYMOUS, I know for a FACT that Sarah..."Dear ANONYMOUS, I know for a FACT that Sarah is NOT the mother of Trig, but Bristol is. It is going to come out. If you think posting simple little ridiculous comments like this will stop the truth from coming out you are wrong. It is going to come out. You are welcome to post your proof, and so is Sarah or Bristol Palin. It would be very very easy for them to provide proof. The reason they don't, is because they are lying."<br /><br />Really, and when will this happen? How long have you been trying? Even though you think you have proof? You still have come up with nothing. You have nothing new now. So do tell when will it come out? I can gaurantee Palin is prepared if you try and that is a big if. Even Gryphen who is in the middle of it all can't do it.<br /><br />There is no reason to provide proof since the burden is yours to prove. It is your accusation. The accusation is not hurting the Palins right now, why would they acknowledge it and bring any kind of attention to it? Most people don't even know the bloggers have an accusation. No the burden of proof is yours...good luck...lol.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-20284903425336959602009-06-03T14:16:48.685-08:002009-06-03T14:16:48.685-08:00To Anon 12:24, I don't see an Anon post at 5:4...To Anon 12:24, I don't see an Anon post at 5:40. Is your information correct? I am trying to follow all of this......<br /><br />Also, I have to respond to luna's comment which was "very few infants can have their hearing tested and be fit with hearing aids." <br /><br />Luna, this is not true at all. This is my career by the way. All babies can be tested if they go to a major medical center. Most of them have the equipment to do this. There is no reason for a child like Trig to not have a hearing test. It should have already been done. It does not require the baby's response. There are many new tests now where the baby can even be asleep and you measure their brainwaves and other factors.lisabethnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9361564.post-15453959703024019292009-06-03T13:24:19.606-08:002009-06-03T13:24:19.606-08:00advocate + Kajo,
you are correct, of course, I mi...advocate + Kajo,<br /><br />you are correct, of course, I mixed it up. The correct statement in my comment should have been indeed that Trig was most likely born in "December 2007 or January 2008".<br /><br />Anon at 10:21: I fully agree - the issues that Sarah cannot refute, she ignores. And then she uses the classic trick of every skilled magician: The big movement conceals the little movement. The "big movement" was the "wild ride" - for a long time, everybody was fixed on it. But the "wild ride" was just a huge distraction. It is very likely that Trig was born much earlier. <br /><br />By the way: Sarah had a pretty big schedule on the 17th April 2008 at the conference in Texas. She was not there "just to hold a speech". See her official schedule on 17th April 2008 in my flickr with additional comments - here is the link to my flickr photostream - look at the first two images:<br /><br />http://www.flickr.com/photos/32527116@N06/<br /><br />(Sarah's schedule on the 18th April 2008 is also very interesting - see the impressive amount of interviews which the Palin family gave on this day...)<br /><br />Bristol was completely out of sight from mid-October 2007 to mid-February 2008 and didn't travel at all during this time (and the mid-February event, the AHA luncheon in Fairbanks on 15th February 2008, is disputed - no pictures of the Palin children from this event have been found so far, despite the extensive efforts of the palindeception team. We contacted a number of people who organised the event, and just met a wall of obstruction. No pictures were provided.). According to the travel records, Bristol was there, but no proof can be found.Patrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06342444888520052108noreply@blogger.com