Saturday, June 30, 2007

Two American servicemen are being charged with murder in Iraq.

......the military announced that two American soldiers were charged with the premeditated murder of three Iraqis and with planting weapons on the bodies to cover up the slayings, which took place between April and June near Iskandariyah, 30 miles south of Baghdad.

Staff Sgt. Michael A. Hensley from Candler, N.C., was jailed Thursday in Kuwait, facing three counts each of premeditated murder, obstructing justice and wrongfully placing the weapons. Spc. Jorge G. Sandoval, arrested at his home in Laredo, Texas, faces one count each of premeditated murder and planting a weapon, the military said.

This is just adding fuel to the anti-American fire.

Our carelessness and lack of compassion for the people whose country we invaded is allowing the Iraqi people to see America at its worst.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki condemned a U.S. raid Saturday in Baghdad's Shiite Sadr City slum _ a politically sensitive district for him _ in which American troops searching for Iranian-linked militants sparked a firefight the U.S. said left 26 Iraqis dead.

The U.S. military said all those killed in the fighting were gunmen, some of them firing from behind civilian cars. But an Iraqi official put the death toll lower, at eight, and said they were civilians. Residents also said eight civilians were killed in their homes, angrily accusing American troops of firing wildly during the pre-dawn assault.

It is so past time to leave that country it is almost unbelievable that we are still there. If we stay much longer we will have turned the Middle East against us for the next twenty years.

Or perhaps we already have.

Saturday is for comics.











CBS poll says that 77% of Americans realize things are going badly in Iraq and 75% think the country is going in the wrong direction.

A CBS News poll shows Americans are increasingly dissatisfied with the Iraq war, President Bush and the Congress, as well as the overall direction of the country.

More Americans than ever before, 77 percent, say the war is going badly, up from 66 percent just two months ago. Nearly half, 47 percent, say it's going very badly.

While the springtime surge in U.S. troops to Iraq is now complete, more Americans than ever are calling for U.S. forces to withdraw. Sixty-six percent say the number of U.S. troops in Iraq should be decreased, including 40 percent who want all U.S. troops removed. That's a 7-point increase since April.

Our country, which seemed to be populated by simpletons after the last Presidential election, is definitely getting much, much smarter.

And now these same enlightened people need to call their Senators and Congressmen and demand the impeachment of George W. Bush.

Friday, June 29, 2007

This is sure to irritate the hell out of the Christians as man moves ever closer to the territory of God.

Scientists in the US say they have taken a major step towards producing life from scratch in the laboratory.

Dr Craig Venter says in the Science journal that his team successfully transplanted an entire genome from one bacterium cell to another.

He says he hopes eventually to use the technique to create designer microbes, which could produce artificial fuel or help clean up toxic waste.

It is astonishing how fast we are coming to understand and even control biology.

How much longer before we can do away with disease and prolong life indefinitely? And then what?

Obama not a fan of impeachment.

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama laid out list of political shortcomings he sees in the Bush administration but said he opposes impeachment for either President George W. Bush or Vice President Dick Cheney.

Obama said he would not back such a move, although he has been distressed by the "loose ethical standards, the secrecy and incompetence" of a "variety of characters" in the administration.

"There's a way to bring an end to those practices, you know: vote the bums out," the presidential candidate said, without naming Bush or Cheney. "That's how our system is designed."

I am just not sure there will be an America left for Barack Obama to be President of if we leave these guys in power until 2009.

I mean they are the most destructive force I have ever seen in this country.

In my opinion we should probably move some of the money and manpower away from worrying about homeland security and focus instead on what is the real imminent danger to our freedom, George Bush and Dick Cheney.

Letter reveals that US Attorney scandal leads right to the White House. Raise your hand if you are surprised. Nobody? Damn you people are smart!

This guy Solicitor General Paul Clement, in response to the subpoenas to get information about the US Attorney firings, reveals that the documents do indeed reveal that the White House was involved at every level.

Clement reviewed the documents that the Congress subpoenaed. In his letter, Clement reveals what investigators have suspected from the very beginning — that the White House was intimately involved in the attorney scandal. Upon examination of the White House documents, Clement writes:

Among other things, these communications discuss the wisdom of such a proposal, specific U.S. Attorneys who could be removed, potential replacement candidates, and possible responses to congressional and media inquiries about the dismissals.

The White House had “said that Mr. Bush’s aides approved the list of prosecutors only after it was compiled.” President Bush himself said that “the Justice Department made recommendations, which the White House accepted” regarding the removal of the attorneys.

So I am sure that somewhere there is a loyal Republican who reads this and thinks, "I had no idea, that this government would lie to us about this incident!", and then he will crawl back into his hole and refuse to listen to anymore news until Jesus comes back and releases him from his pain.

But for the brilliant people who visit this site (and watch the Daily Show, Colbert Report, and Countdown), we already know that "when the White House says it we know it is bullshit!"

And really if we just keep the above rule in mind we will never again find ourselves fooled.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Viewers of the Daily Show know more about current events then viewers of Fox News. Visitors to this site know everything!

I love that the Daily Show and The Colbert Report come in second, just behind major newspapers and web sites, while at the very, very bottom is Fox News.

Oh please be true, please be true, please be true!

Keith Olbermann announced on Wednesday's Countdown that the White House is refusing on grounds of executive privilege to honor Senate subpoenas and release documents relating to its warrantless wiretapping. In addition, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, David Addington, has sent a letter to Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) saying Cheney's office will not comply with oversight by the National Archives because it is not "an agency."

Olbermann then turned to law professor Joanathan Turley, who agreed tentatively that the administration might move slowly enough to "run out the clock" on its time in office. "But there is one thing that might concern them about the court," Turley said, "and that is, you know, for many years, since we first found out about this program, some of us have said that this was a clearly criminal act that the president called for. ... If we're right, not only did he order that crime, but it would be, in fact, an impeachable offense."

"Both sides, both Democrats and Republicans, have avoided this sort of pig in the parlor," Turley continued. "They don't want to recognize that this president may have ordered criminal offenses. But they may now be on the road to do that, because the way Congress can get around the executive privilege in court is to say, we're investigating a potential crime."

I think I just had a liberalgasm! (This is my new word, I made it up, if you use it then you owe me a dime.)

But you know I have been teased like this before. I am not going to get too excited until I hear somebody in Congress or the Senate use the term impeachment. Then I am going to get absolutely crazy with joy!

"You black kids need to stay in your black schools, while the white kids will stay in their much nicer white schools." So says the Supreme Court.

In a decision of sweeping importance to educators, parents and schoolchildren across the country, the Supreme Court today sharply limited the ability of school districts to manage the racial makeup of the student bodies in their schools.

And just like that the Supreme Court bitchslaps 40 years of progress to the back of the bus.

And if the people who voted for George Bush did not have enough reason to regret ever entering a voting booth, you can add that your vote helped to undo decades of positive social change by electing a President who structured the court to send our country hightailing it back to the dark ages.

You can hear the pain in the dissenting judges voices as they respond to what to them seems an almost impossible verdict.

Today’s ruling threatens the promise laid out in the 1954 Brown decision, Justice Breyer lamented. “This is a decision that the court and the nation will come to regret,” he wrote.

Today’s ruling breaks faith with the 1954 ruling, Justice Stevens asserted. “It is my firm conviction that no member of the court that I joined in 1975 would have agreed with today’s decision,” he wrote.

Everybody hates us! Whose fault is that you ask? Really? Could there actually be a chance that you don't know?

Global distrust of President Bush is mutating into an almost worldwide sentiment of antiAmericanism, according to the world’s most comprehensive poll of international opinion, published yesterday.

The Pew Institute’s survey of 45,239 people in 47 nations shows support for the US has dropped sharply among traditional allies in the West, including Britain, as well as substantial declines elsewhere in Latin America, Eastern Europe, China and the Middle East.

It found “a broad and deepening dislike of American values and a global backlash against the spread of American ideas” – although US technology and popular culture is still held in high regard.

So in other words they hate us, they really hate our moronic President, but damn they just love our IPod.

You know I personally am not very happy with us either, I do indeed hate our moronic President, and I simply love my IPod. See how much we have in common, now can't we all be friends?

Bush fights subpoenas, claims "Executive Privilege". Cheney looks on jealously.

President Bush, moving toward a constitutional showdown with Congress, asserted executive privilege Thursday and rejected lawmakers’ demands for documents that could shed light on the firings of federal prosecutors.

Bush’s attorney told Congress the White House would not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor.

In reaction, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy accused the administration of shifting “into Nixonian stonewalling” and revealing “disdain for our system of checks and balances.”

I bet that Dick Cheney wishes he had not claimed that he was not part of the executive branch now. Then he would not have had to cave like a little bitch when Rahm Emanuel called his bluff!

I wonder if the White House has any plans to build a moat to stave off the assault by the Democrats. I am loving the Democrats right now!

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Rahm Emanuel makes Cheney admit that he is indeed part of the executive branch. Hah, made you blink!

Dick Cheney's office is abandoning a justification for keeping the vice president's secret papers out of the hands of the National Archives, while asserting a new argument for withholding them.

Officials working for Cheney had tried to claim he is separate from the executive branch, but they will no longer pursue that defense, senior administration officials tell The Politico.

The decision follows a threat by Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), the No. 3 House Democrat, to try to cut off the office's $4.8 million in executive-branch funding, and a letter from Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) asking for the reasoning behind the argument.

Cheney's not so tough. He is so used to everybody kissing his ass that he is not ready for people to call him on his bullshit. He is just the typical schoolyard bully who needs to get punched in the nose to learn to stop being such a dick.

Oh, well I guess he will always be a Dick won't he.

It is a Dick-a-polooza this week as Jon Stewart weighs in on the Cheney conundrum.



Yeah what does he put in those man-sized safes?

Is that where they put him in case of a terrorist attack?

Are they extra husky man-sized safes?

This is possibly the coolest very bad idea ever!

Palaeontologists are piecing together the complete genome species of long-dead species such as the woolly mammoth and the Neanderthals in an effort to bring them back to life, much like billionaire John Hammond resurrected the extinct dinosaurs in Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park.

This is the kind of thing they may cause me to become schizophrenic.

On the one hand I don't think that it is a good idea to bring back extinct species, but on the other I totally want to see a freaking woolly mammoth! I mean how cool is that?

I think that we can all assume that if scientists can resurrect extinct species, including dinosaurs, then they will definitely do it. Scientists are really just big kids with a much cooler sandbox to play in.

Cheney and other White House officials subpoenaed over warrrantless wiretapping.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has served Vice President Dick Cheney and other officials in the White House and Justice Department with subpoenas over President George W. Bush's warrantless wiretapping programs.

Man this is going to be a hot summer!

I am having so much trouble keeping up with all of this news which keeps breaking at such an incredible pace.

I am doing yard work much of the day and it is time consuming and not a lot of fun for me. I would much rather be posting negative things about Bush, Cheney, the Iraq war, and the Republicans, but what is a guy to do when his yard looks like a South American jungle?

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Elizabeth Edwards confronts the horrible Ann Coulter on Hardball.

Wow, Elizabeth Edwards just earned a whole boatload of respect from me.

I have no idea why anybody, with the exception of the those tools on FOX, would have this shrew on their show.

But damn wouldn't you pay per view to see Ann Coulter on the "Colbert Report"? Stephen would outmaneuver Ann so bad she would not be able to string a sentence together for several days.

Nancy Grace is a hypocritical whore who is going to give birth to twin demonspawn.

Have I ever mentioned that I think Nancy Grace is the absolute worst thing on television?

She is a bottom dwelling, garbage devouring parasite who makes a living bringing us the most unnecessary crap that ever slimed our televisions.

I dislike her even more then Bill O'Reilly or Tucker Carlson, and I hate both of them!

The fallacy of the soul.

For many scientists, the evidence that moral reasoning is a result of physical traits that evolve along with everything else is just more evidence against the existence of the soul, or of a God to imbue humans with souls. For many believers, particularly in the United States, the findings show the error, even wickedness, of viewing the world in strictly material terms. And they provide for theologians a growing impetus to reconcile the existence of the soul with the growing evidence that humans are not, physically or even mentally, in a class by themselves.

The idea that human minds are the product of evolution is “unassailable fact,” the journal Nature said this month in an editorial on new findings on the physical basis of moral thought. A headline on the editorial drove the point home: “With all deference to the sensibilities of religious people, the idea that man was created in the image of God can surely be put aside.”

Or as V. S. Ramachandran, a brain scientist at the University of California, San Diego, put it in an interview, there may be soul in the sense of “the universal spirit of the cosmos,” but the soul as it is usually spoken of, “an immaterial spirit that occupies individual brains and that only evolved in humans — all that is complete nonsense.” Belief in that kind of soul “is basically superstition,” he said.

This article is of particular interest to me right now because I have been pondering of late that the idea of a monotheistic God with followers created in his image may be the most poisonous belief system ever created by man.

Now I know that the previous sentence probably made a number of visitors simply click to the next page and refuse to read any further, but if you did stay allow me to elaborate.

You see evolution explains more then just how all living things arrived at the stage we see them in today, it also explains how religions came to be as well. It is a false assumption to believe that Judaism was given to the Jewish people by Yahweh, it actually evolved over time from a more "primitive" belief system.

Ancient people, including those who would one day become Jews, were puzzled by the world around them and in an attempt to understand it better began to give the things that they saw familiar human traits, which is called anthropomorphous, or humanizing non-humans. So trees were imbued with spirits, and animals were determined to be creatures who could speak to each other and occasionally to certain special humans. This then evolved from believing that there were unseen spirits in creatures and inanimate objects to believing that there were various gods in charge of different parts of our world, god of the feast, god of the harvest, goddess of beauty, etc., etc., etc..

Then came Zoroastrianism in the 5th century B.C., which was the first known religion to be monotheistic. It is also the religion which inspired Judaism, followed by Christianity, and then Islam.

And this is when things went south. The idea that there is a God that made this planet for the sole use of his children, the faithful, allowed these people to literally destroy the planet in their greed to use its natural resources for their benefit. Animals hunted to extinction, forests chopped down, oceans polluted, and the very air damaged beyond repair.

You see the people in other religious beliefs are far more connected to the world around them, they do not think of it as a incredibly generous gift from their sky father, they think of themselves as being part of an amazing organism and therefore not at all special or superior to it.

You can see this in how these other religions interact with the planet.

Buddhists are careful in only using what they need and never intentionally harming a creature, while carefully cultivating the land around them, often growing beautiful gardens in an homage to nature. Taoists are also as non-intrusive as they can be, and feel a kinship to everything that surrounds them. Native Americans lived and traveled with the animals that they hunted believing the animals sacrificed themselves to the hunters and were therefore a gift to be honored and whose flesh, skin and bones were never wasted. The same is true of the natives in my Alaskan home.

When the Christians came to the countries inhabited by people who had these simple belief systems they endeavored to obliterate them. Either by enslaving them, or taking their lands, or even hiding their agenda in educational opportunities.(That is how it was done to the native Alaskans. They were given Christian names and punished for speaking their native tongue in school. The result? Many native languages are almost completely extinct.)

But the sad fact is that if we had all remained "pagans", as the Christian or Muslim faith would label these other beliefs, the world would not have suffered the harm that it has suffered in the last 2,000 years. I know that some will think that I have oversimplified the situation, but you will have to agree that my logic is bulletproof.

So to sum up, Christianity is killing our planet. You should all be ashamed of yourselves!

I wonder if the Christian conservatives who helped to put George Bush in office are happy about this?

It's Monday night in a dingy club on the outskirts of the Syrian capital. Two dozen girls are moving half-heartedly on the dance floor, lit up by flashing disco lights.

They are dressed in tight jeans, low-cut tops and knee-high boots, but the girls' make-up can't disguise the fact that most are in their mid-teens. It's a strange sight in a conservative Muslim country, but this is the sex business, and it's booming as a result of the war in Iraq.

There are more than a million Iraqi refugees in Syria, many are women whose husbands or fathers have been killed. Banned from working legally, they have few options outside the sex trade. No one knows how many end up as prostitutes, but Hana Ibrahim, founder of the Iraqi women's group Women's Will, puts the figure at 50,000.

I guess since they are not Christian girls it does not matter so much that they are forced to degrade themselves to survive.

Brave High School students confront Bush about torture and he lies to them.

President Bush was presented with a letter Monday signed by 50 high school seniors in the Presidential Scholars program urging a halt to "violations of the human rights" of terror suspects held by the United States.

The White House said Bush had not expected the letter but took a moment to read it and talk with a young woman who handed it to him.

"The president enjoyed a visit with the students, accepted the letter and upon reading it let the student know that the United States does not torture and that we value human rights," deputy press secretary Dana Perino said.

The handwritten letter said the students "believe we have a responsibility to voice our convictions."

"We do not want America to represent torture. We urge you to do all in your power to stop violations of the human rights of detainees, to cease illegal renditions, and to apply the Geneva Convention to all detainees, including those designated enemy combatants," the letter said.

I hope that what these young people take away from this encounter is the deeply held desire to only vote for political candidates that are ethical and moral. I also hope that they, unlike their parents, will not allow themselves to be fooled by smoke and mirrors and will not be manipulated by catch phrases and fear mongering.

All in all I am very impressed by these kids. Reminds me of me at that age, except for the good grades of course.

Another prominent Republican turns his back on this President and his illegal war.

Republican support for President Bush's Iraq war policy suffered a significant crack Monday evening when Republican Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana urged the president to change course in Iraq "very soon."

The well-respected GOP voice on foreign affairs took to the Senate floor to urge Bush to avoid further damage to America's military readiness and long-term national security.

"Our course in Iraq has lost contact with our vital national security interests in the Middle East and beyond. Our continuing absorption with military activities in Iraq is limiting our diplomatic assertiveness there and elsewhere in the world," he said.

For those who bemoan the lack of progress being made by Democrats in stopping this war, this should help to lighten your heart.

Without substantial Republican support, ending this war will just not be possible.

Having Lugar breaking ranks with the Republican enablers signals a new challenge to Bush in waging this war. Even though the President seems to do what he wants without consideration of others, he really does need the Republican faithful to run interference for him. If they stop supporting him, they stop him.

Monday, June 25, 2007

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son, but it is a good way to stay out of Iraq.

Most of today’s youth are not eligible for military service because they are too fat, too weak, not smart enough and prone to drug-use and criminal behavior, according to a panel of senior military officers.

“We are all victims of our own past success. We all have a conscript mentality that there’s a never-ending supply of perfect high school graduates that are over the horizon coming at us to fill every job we have,” said Vice Adm. John Cotton, commander of the Navy Reserve. “I’ll tell you what, we’re about to be shocked, because they are not there.”

Seventy-two percent of American youth between 17 and 24 years of age are not eligible for military service for fitness, academic and law enforcement deficiencies, Cotton said, citing national statistics that some 30 percent of male youths drop out of high school.

And we thought all of that video game playing was going to hurt our children.

Is this how the war will finally end? No more able bodies to send into the meat grinder.

I have no idea how they managed to find this guy.

I mean especially in Utah which is just brimming over with blonde white males.

That must have been some impressive detective work on the part of the police.
(Damn! Those ear tattoos must have hurt!)

Gonzales fails to rule on Cheney's refusal to allow review of records. There was just no way to see this coming.

Cheney's position so frustrated J. William Leonard, the chief of the Archives' Information Security Oversight Office, which enforces the order, that he complained in January to Gonzales. In a letter, Leonard wrote that Cheney's position was inconsistent with the "plain text reading" of the executive order and asked the attorney general for an official ruling. But Gonzales never responded, thereby permitting Cheney to continue blocking Leonard from conducting even a routine inspection of how the veep's office was handling classified documents, according to correspondence released by House Government Reform Committee chair Rep. Henry Waxman.

My guess is that Gonzales is scared shitless of Cheney.

I mean the man lives off of the blood of babies, you just know he would rip Gonzales into little tiny Hispanic pieces if he tried to tell him what to do.

I actually think that it is laughable that this Leonard guy thought he would get any help from anybody in this administration in dealing with Dick Cheney. He must be new or something.

For those of you who really believed that we might be reducing troops in Iraq by next spring, let me introduce you to the Bush administration.

The top U.S. commander in Iraq yesterday backed off comments by his second-in-command that American troops could start pulling out of Iraq by next spring.

"I'm not making any predictions," Gen. David Petraeus said yesterday, as roadside bombings claimed the lives of seven more U.S. troops, including four killed by a single blast outside Baghdad.

Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno said Friday that Iraqi forces were progressing well and could take greater responsibility for the country's security by spring. "Potentially, we could have a decision to reduce our forces," he said.

Petraeus, visiting a farming town south of Baghdad, was more cautious. He said he and Odierno would consult on reduce troop levels closer to September, when Petraeus is due to report on the surge's effectiveness.

"It depends an awful lot on different factors out there - obviously how we're doing in the security sector, how the Iraqis are doing, how much has been accomplished in a variety of different areas, and that's what will determine what we take back," Petraeus said.

In other words we are NEVER leaving Iraq. Never!

If anybody believes that we are even considering bringing our soldiers home while George Bush is in office then you must not have read this, or this, or this.

After you have the read those articles you can be as deathly afraid of this administration as the rest of us are. There is no negotiation or conversation with George W. Bush, the only solution is for him to be removed from office.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

These are my people.

Today Holtzman is one of the leading voices in a small but energetic movement seeking to impeach not only President Bush but his vice president, Dick Cheney. In March, the Massachusetts Democratic Party joined 13 others, in states like California, Nevada, and New Hampshire, in passing a resolution in support of impeachment. The legislatures of nearly 80 towns and cities (most in Massachusetts, Vermont, and California) have passed similar resolutions, and state legislators in 11 states have introduced impeachment bills.

But given how controversial and deeply unpopular the administration has become, it is surprising how little mainstream political traction the movement has gained. Polls show the public does not think impeachment should be a priority. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has repeatedly declared impeachment to be "off the table," and even Congress's most liberal members oppose the idea. It is a sign, say many, that the nation's most vivid memories of impeachment are of the deeply divisive Clinton proceedings, not the Nixon drama that eventually allowed the country to heal.

The fact that we are not actively moving toward impeaching this President is almost unimaginable to me. He has broken every rule that his office is supposed to uphold, not to mention innumerable laws.

He lies, he spies, and he denies.

He, and his cabinet, act as if they are above the law, and so far they have been proven right. If the Democrats think they can stop him by simply arguing that he is wrong about things they have not been paying attention. He does not give a fuck what they think. He is going to do whatever he wants until somebody takes his power away. And so far it has been reduced but not removed.

I do not believe there is any President in history more deserving of impeachment then George W. Bush. (And yes that includes Nixon.)

Should we be teaching both Evolution and Creationism in science class, and how would that work in other scientific disciplines?


Here is a moment of jocularity for you my serious friends.


Just how much of our current difficulties with this Presidency are really problems with the Vice Presidency?

In his Park Avenue corner suite at Cerberus Global Investments, Dan Quayle recalled the moment he learned how much his old job had changed. Cheney had just taken the oath of office, and Quayle paid a visit to offer advice from one vice president to another.

"I said, 'Dick, you know, you're going to be doing a lot of this international traveling, you're going to be doing all this political fundraising . . . you'll be going to the funerals,' " Quayle said in an interview earlier this year. "I mean, this is what vice presidents do. I said, 'We've all done it.' "

Cheney "got that little smile," Quayle said, and replied, "I have a different understanding with the president."

Someday in the future history will finally sort out exactly what happened in this Presidency and how much was caused by the incompetence of George Bush and how much was the fault of the "Machiavellian" Dick Cheney. That is if Cheney has not destroyed all evidence that he ever existed at all by then.

I know I will anxiously await those disclosures.

If you can take it there is even more about Cheney's influence here.

According to this site my little website is not safe for the kiddies.

Online Dating

You know I live such a PG rated life for the most part it is a little gratifying to see that I may be a little to raunchy for some of our more delicate visitors.

"That's right! I'm bad!"

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Democrats to vote to cut Vice President's funding.

Following Vice President Dick Cheney's assertion that his office is not a part of the executive branch of the US government, Democratic Caucus Chairman Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL) plans to introduce an amendment to the the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill to cut funding for Cheney's office.

The amendment to the bill that sets the funding for the executive branch will be considered next week in the House of Representatives.

"The Vice President has a choice to make. If he believes his legal case, his office has no business being funded as part of the executive branch," said Emanuel in a statement released to RAW STORY. "However, if he demands executive branch funding he cannot ignore executive branch rules. At the very least, the Vice President should be consistent. This amendment will ensure that the Vice President's funding is consistent with his legal arguments."

God I am loving this!

It is about time that the Democrats decided to get down and dirty with the Republican hypocritical bastards.

Obama takes on the Religious Right. Jerry Falwell tries to turn in his grave but it is too tight of a fit.

Sen. Barack Obama told a church convention Saturday that some right- wing evangelical leaders have exploited and politicized religious beliefs in an effort to sow division.

"Somehow, somewhere along the way, faith stopped being used to bring us together and started being used to drive us apart. It got hijacked," the Democratic presidential candidate said in remarks prepared for delivery before the national meeting of the United Church of Christ.

"Part of it's because of the so-called leaders of the Christian Right, who've been all too eager to exploit what divides us," the Illinois senator said.

"At every opportunity, they've told evangelical Christians that Democrats disrespect their values and dislike their church, while suggesting to the rest of the country that religious Americans care only about issues like abortion and gay marriage, school prayer and intelligent design," according to an advance copy of his speech.

"There was even a time when the Christian Coalition determined that its number one legislative priority was tax cuts for the rich," Obama said. "I don't know what Bible they're reading, but it doesn't jibe with my version."

I think that this shows a great deal of chutzpah on Obama's behalf. We know that the religious right will never vote for a Democrat en mass like they will a Republican, but if Obama can make them start to doubt that their pastors are giving them good political advice then they might start to think for themselves.

And wouldn't that be just wonderful.

However he also runs the risk of getting the religious right to organize against him, and start attacking him. They might uncover some silly little fact that they can turn into a wedge to pry voters away form Obama.

And that would just suck!

Did anybody have any doubt about the outcome of this story?

Searchers recovered a body Saturday afternoon that they believe is that of Jessie Marie Davis, a pregnant woman who disappeared June 13, police said.

Bobby Cutts Jr., the father of Davis' 2-year-old son, was arrested and charged with two counts of murder, including that of Davis' unborn child, said Stark County Sheriff's Chief Deputy Rick Perez. Cutts is also believed to be the father of Davis' unborn child.

Cutts is an officer with the Canton Police Department.

Perez said the body was found in Summit County, not far from Davis' home in Stark County's Lake Township.

Heartbreaking story. And the fact that he not only killed her and his unborn child, he also left his other baby alone in the house to be discovered by her mom, makes this just about the most heinous crime in recent memory.

How could you not immediately flash back to the Lacey Peterson case when you became aware of this case.

I am a man and I cannot imagine the circumstances that would make me want to hurt the people that I love. Especially a child. Or the mother of my child. It just makes me sick.

Wal-Mart pulls support for gay causes after loving Christians threaten boycott. Gay people shop at Wal-Mart?

Wal-Mart, the world's largest retailer, has decided to curb its support of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) organizations after conservative Christian groups threatened a boycott, and after some of its own employees expressed disapproval.

You know the problem with this kind of thing is that I can understand both sides of the issue.

The gay community wants to be accepted for who they are (and apparently shop for cheap clothing at Wal-Mart), and the Christians truly believe that they are doing their God's will (though all truly intelligent people know that is a load of crap.)

No, the only real villain in this story is Wal-Mart. If you do not feel comfortable supporting a certain group or lifestyle, then don't. But if you do support something, do not allow yourself to be bullied into pulling that support. That is just chickenshit!

So a couple of uptight religious zealots won't buy your cheap clothing stitched together by starving Indonesian children, so what? Unless their God is going to rain free shirts and underwear down on their homes you know they will be back. We all know how Christians feel about nudity.

They are still pissed about getting thrown out of that garden.

The CIA has a history of breaking our laws.

Little-known documents now being made public detail illegal and scandalous activities by the CIA more than 30 years ago: wiretapping of journalists, kidnappings, warrantless searches and more.

Among them:

  • The "two-year physical confinement" in the mid-1960s of a Soviet defector.
    Assassination plots of foreign leaders, including Fidel Castro.
  • CIA wiretapping in 1963 of two columnists, Robert Allen and Paul Scott, following a newspaper column in which national security information was disclosed. The wiretapping revealed calls from 12 senators and six representatives but did not indicate the source of the leak.
  • The "personal surveillances" in 1972 of muckraking columnist Jack Anderson and staff members, including Les Whitten and Brit Hume. The surveillance involved watching the targets but no wiretapping. The memo said it followed a series of "tilt toward Pakistan" stories by Anderson.
  • The personal surveillance of Washington Post reporter Mike Getler over three months beginning in late 1971. No specific stories are mentioned in the memo.
  • CIA screening programs, beginning in the early 1950s and lasting until 1973, in which mail coming into the United States was reviewed and "in some cases opened" from the Soviet Union and China.

I guess those of us who have never really trusted our government are not so paranoid now are we?

This is why our government needs much more oversight in the future. No more "the ends justifies the means" mentality anymore.

If we are going to serve as an inspiration to other countries, which I truly believe most Americans believe we are, we must be above reproach in our methods. If we get down in the mud with the pigs we cannot suddenly stand up and declare them disgusting. That my friends is hypocrisy.

Friday, June 22, 2007

Rolling Stone uncovers Bush's secret campaign to deny Global Warming.

Bush's do-nothing policy on global warming began almost as soon as he took office. By pursuing a carefully orchestrated policy of delay, the White House has blocked even the most modest reforms and replaced them with token investments in futuristic solutions like hydrogen cars. "It's a charade," says Jeremy Symons, who represented the EPA on Cheney's energy task force, the industry-studded group that met in secret to craft the administration's energy policy. "They have a single-minded determination to do nothing - while making it look like they are doing something."

I am so numbed by the blatant disregard for science and critical thinking of this administration that I am almost beyond the point of being surprised by anything that I learn about them.

But this is so evil that I am almost shaken from my lethargy enough to be astounded.

Women want sex as much as men do. Sluts!

Bachelors might have sex on their minds more than their single female counterparts, but once in a committed relationship, men and women have similar attitudes toward the act, a new study finds.

If this study is trying to say that women are more sexually open after marriage then before, I just don't think they have been going to the same bars that I have, or been in the same marriages that I have either.

Actually they may have a point that married women are more open sexually then their single peers, just not towards their own husbands. But with other men they are naughty, naughty, naughty.

After Cheney claims exemption form oversight, Bush says me too!

The White House said Friday that, like Vice President Dick Cheney's office, President Bush's office is exempt from a presidential order requiring government agencies that handle classified national security information to submit to oversight by an independent federal watchdog.

The executive order that Bush issued in March 2003 covers all government agencies that are part of the executive branch and, although it doesn't specifically say so, was not meant to apply to the vice president's office or the president's office, a White House spokesman said.

So Bush issues an order to make sure that there is oversight to insure that our information is secure, without realizing that he would also have to comply with the new rules. Don't you hate it when that happens?

But I fail to see why they would not want to make sure that their information is just as safe as the information being handled by a Congressman or Senator. I mean all that it means is that somebody outside of your office will check your information to make sure that there are no security risks or discrepancies......ooohh! Okay now I get it.

Australian naval boarding party repel Iranian attackers with salty language. Now why didn't those British soldiers think of that?

The Australian Defence Force says up to five Iranian gunboats tried to capture Australian sailors in the Persian Gulf in December 2004.

A defence spokesman told reporters the four-hour confrontation occurred after Australian navy personnel boarded a grounded cargo ship in the gulf.

The boarding party commander ordered the Australians to reboard the cargo ship.

"He got his boarding party back on to the ship and established a very credible and appropriate defensive position,'' Commodore Gilmore told reporters in Canberra.

The BBC reported earlier today that Iranian naval forces tried to capture the boarding team, but were repelled in the face of machine guns and "highly colourful language".

Now let me get this straight. We are supposed to be afraid of a country whose military members can be defeated by curse words?

I mean fuck, I can probably beat that whole military my own Allah damn self.

Alaska is on fire!

Wildfires ravaged thousands of acres in Southcentral Alaska while numerous lightning strikes threatened to open new fronts Thursday, and state fire managers issued a national call for help.

There is so much smoke outside that it has completely blocked out the sky.

It arrived in town pretty suddenly and I can only hope that it does not last very long.

Thursday, June 21, 2007

Dick Cheney not only refuses to cooperate with the Information Security Oversight Office, he also decides it needs to be abolished.

House Democrats on Thursday denounced Vice President Dick Cheney's idea of abolishing a government office charged with safeguarding national security information — and criticized him for refusing to cooperate with the agency.

Cheney's office — over the objections of the National Archives — has exempted itself from a presidential executive order that seeks to protect national security information generated by the government, according to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Under the order, executive branch offices are required to give the Information Security Oversight Office at the archives data on how much material it has classified and declassified.

The Information Security Oversight Office has asked Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to resolve the legal dispute over whether the order applies to Cheney's office. So far, the Justice Department has not ruled on the issue.

Waxman said J. William Leonard, director of the Information Security Oversight Office, told the panel that after he sought advice from the Justice Department, Cheney's office recommended that the executive order be amended to abolish the ISOO. "I question both the legality and wisdom of your actions," Waxman said.

That will teach you to ask Dick Cheney, the dark lord, to comply with some wimpy oversight office.

Okay who has bigger balls then Cheney? Nobody, that's who!

The Bush agenda infects all levels of this government.

Karen Stevens, Tovah Calderon and Teresa Kwong had a lot in common. They had good performance ratings as career lawyers in the Justice Department's civil rights division. And they were minority women transferred out of their jobs two years ago -- over the objections of their immediate supervisors -- by Bradley Schlozman, then the acting assistant attorney general for civil rights.

Schlozman ordered supervisors to tell the women that they had performance problems or that the office was overstaffed. But one lawyer, Conor Dugan, told colleagues that the recent Bush appointee had confided that his real motive was to "make room for some good Americans" in that high-impact office, according to four lawyers who said they heard the account from Dugan.

In another politically tinged conversation recounted by former colleagues, Schlozman asked a supervisor if a career lawyer who had voted for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), a onetime political rival of President Bush, could still be trusted.

Schlozman has acknowledged in sworn congressional testimony that he had boasted of hiring Republicans and conservatives, but he denied taking improper actions against the division's career officials. That account was challenged by six officials in the division who said in interviews that they either overhead him making brazen political remarks about career employees or witnessed him making personnel decisions with apparent political motivation.

I cannot get over the irony that this tool was in charge of Justice Departments "civil rights" division. That just blows my mind! It is as if they do not even understand what they are supposed to be protecting!

And these assholes are so damn cocky! I can hardly wait until the Democrats start really getting to the bottom of the corruption in Washington, and watch these bastards start to wilt under public scrutiny. We will see how cocky they are then.

This will only fuel the Right Wings belief that the MSM is liberally biased. Maybe they are just informed enough to make the smart decision.

MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 17 gave to Republicans. Two gave to both parties.

This is an interesting story in time where reporters are far less careful about hiding their opinions about world affairs and politicians. And this is the fault of FOX News who opened the floodgates of commentary during newscasts. FOX not only encouraged their reporters to give their personal opinions on the stories they covered, they also made sure that the overwhelming slant was to favor the right wing and Republicans.

So what choice did the other news outlets have, especially after having FOX trounce them in the ratings, but to follow suit?

So now we know who gave money and to what organization they gave it to. Oh yeah this is going to be all over the right wing blogs and cable shows today. Especially this part right here:

"Probably there should be a rule against it," said New Yorker writer Mark Singer, who wrote the magazine's profile of Howard Dean during the 2004 campaign, then gave $250 to America Coming Together and its get-out-the-vote campaign to defeat President Bush. "But there's a rule against murder. If someone had murdered Hitler — a journalist interviewing him had murdered him — the world would be a better place. I only feel good, as a citizen, about getting rid of George Bush, who has been the most destructive president in my lifetime. I certainly don't regret it."

Amen to that brother! You know I think that the policies of George Bush have inspired a lot of people to feel they must do something to stop him. That is why you are reading these words on this very website. George Bush got me off of the fence and into the fight.

Stopping George Bush may be the most important decision of our lives.

I wake up early on the summer solstice to see our Governor Sarah Palin on CNN.

They are asking the same tired old questions about how hard it must be to sleep with all of the sunshine we are experiencing right now.

Governor Palin did a great job of explaining that Alaskans are superior people who just do not need as much sleep as the mere mortals in the lower forty-eight.

Of course I paraphrase.

I don't like that John Roberts guy. He seems like kind of a dick. And he asked the dumbest questions.

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Making your children go outside because they are driving you crazy does not make you a bad parent, it makes you the best parent ever!

Advocates and researchers have been aware of the downturn in outdoor activity for a long time, and it has been documented by experts such as Sandra Hofferth, a family studies professor at the University of Maryland. From 1997 to 2003, Hofferth found, there was a decline of 50 percent, from 16 to 8 percent, in the proportion of children 9 to 12 who spent time in such outside activities as hiking, walking, fishing, beach play and gardening. Organized sports were not included as an outdoor activity in the study, which was based on detailed time diaries.

Hofferth's study also showed an increase in computer play time for all children and in time spent on television and video games for those ages 9 to 12. And it found increases in sleep time, study time and reading time.

The increased activism has been partly inspired by a best-selling book, "Last Child in the Woods," and its author, Richard Louv.

Coining the term "nature deficit disorder," Louv has argued that indoor kids are more prone to a range of childhood problems, including obesity, depression and attention disorders. He contends that they miss out on the spiritual, emotional and psychological benefits of exposure to the wonders of nature, including reduced stress and improved cognitive development, creativity and cooperative play.

This is why I am so well adjusted. I was never allowed into the house unless it was mealtime, or bedtime, or it was at least 20 below zero. I used to think they hated me but now I know they loved me!

And I bet those daily beatings were good for me in some way as well. Thicker skin?

Hillary is slowly realizing that she cannot win this nomination without the anti-war Democrats. I am not sure we are listening to her anymore.

Trying to win over her party's liberal activists, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday accused President Bush of disregarding the Constitution and promised to bring a new progressive vision to the White House.

Bush's government has "a stunning record of secrecy and corruption, of cronyism run amok," she said in one of the more partisan speeches of her campaign. "It is everything our founders were afraid of, everything our Constitution was designed to prevent."

Clinton returned to the Take Back America conference where she was booed last year for opposing a set date for pulling U.S. troops from Iraq. This time, she said she is working to deauthorize the war.

Her comments on Iraq at the end of her 30-minute speech drew heckles, but she also won applause for promising to get out of Iraq and for embracing liberal positions on domestic issues such as health care, worker rights, education and stem cell research.

Hillary is late to understand just how angry we are at her support of the Iraq war, and her inability to admit that she made a mistake.

We have a President who could not admit his mistakes and we certainly do not want another one.

By the way did you see this part of the article?

One audience member yelled, "Impeach him!"

We need to keep demanding this until we see this criminal brought to justice!

Jon Stewart weighs in on the "Whack-a-mole" strategy in Iraq.



I think that this is an inside joke for Stewart, since I am fairly sure that the first time I heard the term "whack-a-mole" it came from Jon Stewart.

I wish I could remember the interview where he first used it.

I also think that it is very interesting that the White House thinks that keeping a promise requires "magic". That is certainly very telling.

P.S. By the way the gayest member of the Village People is clearly that motorcycle dude.

Democrats are finally investigating the voter fraud charges from the 2004 election.

Senate Democrats urged the Justice Department on Monday to investigate whether one of its former prosecutors led attempts to suppress Florida voter turnout during the 2004 presidential election.

One of the fired prosecutors, Bud Cummins in Little Rock, Ark., was replaced on an interim basis by Tim Griffin - a protege of presidential political adviser Karl Rove who worked at the Republican National Committee in 2004. The two senators Monday pointed to two e-mails to Griffin - titled “caging” and dated August 2004 - listing nearly 2,000 potential voters in Jacksonville, Fla.

“Caging” refers to efforts to disqualify voters who fail to sign for registered campaign mail sent to their houses. In theory, the practice identifies homes where voters no longer live. But the Democrats said in a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales that “there are many reasons why registered mail might be ‘returned to sender’ that have nothing to do with a voter’s eligibility.”

The caging lists targeted predominantly African-American neighborhoods in Jacksonville, the senators said in their letter.

This is another reason why Republicans should not be an alternate choice if the Democrats do not perform as well as their constituents would like. The Democrats may not be as effective as we would like, but at least they did not have to cheat their way into office.

All Republicans are tainted by this scandal and it just goes to show that those who wave the flag or morality are more then likely showing you a false face.

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

George Bush was right, there are terrorists in Iraq, nnoowww!

Iraq has overtaken Afghanistan as an ideal training ground for Jihadists to export their battle across and beyond the Middle East, experts say.

The new generation of Islamist militants in Iraq are more battle-hardened than their veteran anti-Soviet counterparts from Afghanistan, and the export of their Muslim "holy war" to calmer Arab countries has become a phenomenon.

The presence of Saudi, Jordanian and Yemeni volunteers in the besieged Palestinian refugee camp of Nahr al-Bared in north Lebanon, as well as arrests in Jordan and Saudi Arabia of Jihadists coming from Iraq illustrate this.

The next time you have a conversation with the few remaining neo-cons who are willing to show their face in public maybe you could ask them to explain again how removing Saddam Hussein from power made us all safer.

You know, just for laughs.

Justice Antonin Scalia does not realize that Jack Bauer of the FOX television show "24" is make believe.

The conservative jurist stuck up for Agent Bauer, arguing that fictional or not, federal agents require latitude in times of great crisis. "Jack Bauer saved Los Angeles. ... He saved hundreds of thousands of lives," Judge Scalia said. Then, recalling Season 2, where the agent's rough interrogation tactics saved California from a terrorist nuke, the Supreme Court judge etched a line in the sand.

"Are you going to convict Jack Bauer?" Judge Scalia challenged his fellow judges. "Say that criminal law is against him? 'You have the right to a jury trial?' Is any jury going to convict Jack Bauer? I don't think so.

I firmly believe that the show "24" was developed by FOX to get Americans comfortable with the idea of torture by creating these horrible circumstances and then having the heroic Agent Bauer use extreme measures to save the day.

And the simpletons in the Republican party are buying it hook, line, and sinker. I wonder if the voters are that easily fooled as well.

The Democrats seem surprised that Americans are angry that they have not ended the war yet.

The new Democratic-led Congress is drawing the ire of voters upset with its failure to quickly deliver on a promise to end the Iraq war.

This is reflected in polls that show Congress -- plagued by partisan bickering mostly about the war -- at one of its lowest approval ratings in a decade. Surveys find only about one in four Americans approves of it.

"I understand their disappointment," said Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada. "We raised the bar too high."

I feel the same frustration but I also know that the Dems cannot just go in and end this conflict and this is why:

Democrats told voters they would move swiftly to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq.

But they now say voters must understand they need help from Republicans to clear procedural hurdles, override presidential vetoes and force Bush to change course.

But if the Republicans stand by their President and make it impossible they cannot really believe that this will mean that they will retain their offices in the 2008 elections. Or do they?

"If Democrats fail to reverse course, the dynamics in the 2008 elections may shift significantly, allowing Republicans to run as the party of change ... only two years after Democrats successfully campaigned on that same theme," Senate Republican leaders told their ranks in a letter last week.

This is simply bullshit. We know that our only hope of ever getting our troops out of Iraq rests with the Democrats, and we are certainly are not stupid enough to fall back on the sycophantic Republicans to accomplish that goal.

So for those liberal websites who are suggesting that we withhold money from the Democrats if they do not end the war, I just have to say how does it feel to be playing right into Karl Roves hands?

Monday, June 18, 2007

Buddhism revives the dead! Take that Jesus!

An 87-year-old man in Taiwan Province who was thought to be dead awoke while relatives recited Buddhist prayers for hours at his mourning hall.

I may have to do a little more studying on Buddhism in the future. I spent that last six months devouring books on Taoism. I feel very peaceful most of the time. Except when I talk about the war, or George Bush, or the Republicans.

But what do you expect? I am only human after all.

If it is written in an illegal account, and then illegally deleted, then chances are the e-mail is illegal.

Almost 90 White House officials have maintained private e-mail accounts on the server of the Republican National Committee, including top advisers such as Karl Rove and former White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card, according to a House committee report released today.

The disclosure means the practice is much more common than Bush administration officials have previously acknowledged, the report noted.

The RNC has preserved more than 140,000 e-mails sent or received by Rove, but only 130 were written before President Bush won re-election in 2004, according to the report. The committee has preserved another 100,000 e-mails from two of Rove's top lieutenants, former White House political director Sara M. Taylor and deputy political director W. Scott Jennings, according to the House Oversight Committee.

But the RNC has no e-mail records for 51 of 88 White House officials -- such as Ken Mehlman, the White House political director from 2001 through early 2003 -- who used their servers in addition to government e-mail accounts, according to a summary of the panel's report.

There is literally so much criminal activity happening in this White House that it is almost mind numbing!

I think that this can finally put to rest the idea that very religious people, or those who profess to be very religious, are more moral or somehow better then those who do not make such statements.

When did Dana Carvey start to work for the White House?

I had the hardest time watching this guy hem and haw his way through his defense of the surge and his blaming of the Iraqi government for the lack of progress in the area.

Such colossal bullshit!

The country is in flames, not because of the Iraqi government, but because we keep fanning the fucking flames!

Will there be a civil war after we leave? Yes, just like the civil war that is happening now.

Will there be thousands of Iraqis killed once we pull out? Yes, just like there are thousands of Iraqis being killed now.

Will it be worse? Probably, but it will come to an end once the Iraqis determine that they are going to have to somehow make things work to survive. Then they either allow a dictator to come to power or they will finally try that new "democracy" thing.

But whatever happens they are not going to want to allow America to touch their oil. And that is why this White House is not interested in giving the Iraqis their country back. Ever!

As the country awaits the report from General Petraeus to see when the troops can start coming home, FOX News watchers already know.

US forces could be needed in Iraq for a decade to battle insurgents, the top coalition commander said Sunday while vowing a "forthright" review in September on whether a troop surge is working.

Speaking on Fox News, General David Petraeus said there was broad recognition in Washington that Iraq's daunting challenges would not be resolved "in a year or even two years."

"In fact, typically, I think historically, counter-insurgency operations have gone at least nine or 10 years," he said.

Everybody in the media acts as if there is this magic report coming about the surge in Iraq, that will finally reveal that we have failed and then our troops will start to come home. But those "journalists" are not paying attention, or they are White House propagandists who are just trying to keep the American people from discovering the truth about our plans until September when they will have a whole new line of bullshit to feed them.

We are not leaving as long as George Bush is in office. Period!

As long as there is oil in the ground of Iraq, our soldiers are going to remain there to help those private contractors get their hands on it. Essentially Bush has turned our military into indentured servants to the oil companies.

And let's not forget that Bush still believes that he is in charge of the Rapture. He has to soften the area for the return of Jesus.

Impeachment is how America gets its soldiers and integrity back, and that is the only way.

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Even more shit is headed for the global fan.

Israel’s new defence minister Ehud Barak is planning an attack on Gaza within weeks to crush the Hamas militants who have seized power there.

According to senior Israeli military sources, the plan calls for 20,000 troops to destroy much of Hamas’s military capability in days.

The world is in flames.

George Bush has destroyed all of the hard work that every President before him had done on solving the problems in the Middle East. I know that liberals get a lot of shit for always saying that the bad things that happen in the world are George Bush's fault, but in this case that shoe definitely fits.

He is the worst thing to happen to the world since Hitler.

Obama the "Renegade".

Sen. Barack Obama has a new tag: "Renegade".

That's what Secret Service agents are calling the Illinois Democrat, in the time-honored tradition of giving "secret" code names to presidential candidates and other protected dignitaries. As is custom, the Obama moniker reflects something of the man himself (though he might prefer "progressive" or "independent").

That is so cool!!!

Man he lucked out! He could have had a really stupid nickname (I would probably have called him "Bam-Bam", isn't he lucky I am not in charge of Secret Service nicknames.)

And it is way better then "Eagle" for Bill Clinton, or "Evergreen" for Hillary, or "Minuteman" for Kerry (I wonder if his wife came up with that one), or "Tumbler" for George W. Bush, or "Deacon" for Jimmy Carter, or "Sawhorse" for Al Gore, however Reagan's nickname of "Rawhide" is pretty damn cool as well. And George H.W. Bush's nickname of "Timberwolf" isn't bad either. (Really? "Timberwolf"?)

I bet some of those others would not have minded being called "Bam-Bam"!

The Gay is coming and the GOP can't do anything about it.

On no issue is history moving faster than on "gay rights"--an already antiquated term for full and equal participation and acceptance of gay men and women in American life. The work is not finished, of course, but what took black Americans more than a century, gays have accomplished in two or three decades (thanks in no small part to blacks, who designed the template for this kind of social revolution). We still argue about it, but the whole spectrum of debate has moved left. A right-wing thug like Tom DeLay or Newt Gingrich probably has more advanced views about homosexuals than dainty liberals of the past century like Adlai Stevenson or Hubert Humphrey. And whatever the actual views, public expressions of overt homophobia are now unacceptable from any national politician.

The debate of 14 years ago about gays in the military seems almost quaint. Kids grow up today with gay friends, gay parents, gay parents of friends and gay friends of parents. If only blacks and whites were as thoroughly mixed together in society as gays and straights are. Kids are also exposed constantly to an entertainment culture in which gays are not merely accepted but in some ways dominant. You rarely see a reality show without a gay cast member, while Rosie O'Donnell is a coveted free agent and Ellen DeGeneres is America's sweetheart. The notion that gays must be segregated out of the military for the sake of our national security must strike Americans younger than, say, 40 as simply weird, just as we of the previous generation find the rules of racial segregation weird. (O.K., run that by me again: they needed separate drinking fountains because ... why?)

The article goes on to say that the Republicans are essentially trying to stop a flood by putting their finger in the dyke. (Sorry I just could not resist)

But there is much less fear of homosexuality now then since its supposed "heyday" in ancient Greece. We have openly gay singers, gay talk show hosts, gay athletes, gay actors, gay politicians, and even gay preachers. (Of course these guys have to go to the church based "gay away" program to get the gay out. But we all know that they still love the dudes.)

Anyhow it is ridiculous to continue to vilify people who have a different sexual preference then you do. Hell we all have differing sexual preferences, we just don't talk about it. (I like smart, attractive women. See what a pervert I am?)

If the Republicans keep trying to scare people by using the gay card they are going to find themselves being laughed out of many debates. So I guess I would encourage them to keep using the gay card. I don't want those simply bastards running my country anyhow. They don't even understand evolution!

60% of Baghdad is still out of control.

Security forces in Baghdad have full control in only 40 percent of the city five months into the pacification campaign, a top American general said Saturday as U.S. troops began an offensive against two al-Qaida strongholds on the capital's southern outskirts.

Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno said American troops launched the offensive in Baghdad's Arab Jabour and Salman Pac neighborhoods Friday night. It was the first time in three years that U.S. soldiers entered those areas, where al-Qaida militants build car bombs and launch Katyusha rockets at American bases and Shiite Muslim neighborhoods.

Odierno said there was a long way to go in retaking the city from Shiite Muslim militias, Sunni Arab insurgents and al-Qaida terrorists. He said only about "40 percent is really very safe on a routine basis" — with about 30 percent lacking control and a further 30 percent suffering "a high level of violence."

This is just one city. We cannot get control of just this one city.

I know that there are a lot of complicating factors that make this such a complex situation, but at the end of the day the most powerful military in the world cannot ensure the safety of the population in one city in Iraq. That is a pretty good indication of our ability to ever gain control of Iraq as a whole. We can't!

And it makes absolutely no difference how many brave young men and women we send into that charnel house, it will never do any good. We are essentially sending them to die. They may not die on the first tour so they will continue to be sent back until they do.

This is not a war this is a suicide mission, for our troops and for our country. As long as we are there we will remain unprepared for all of the deadly things that are happening in so many other parts of the world.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

If you visit this link you can see how America voted from 1960 to 2004.

I had to watch it several times and I and what I have determined is that American voters are fickle and change their votes based on what is going on in the country or the attractiveness of a candidate, not on party affiliation.

This bodes well for the Democrats in 2008.

This nice atheist couple visited the Creationists museum so that you don't have to.

"Look ma, the people in the bible rode dinosaurs just like a pony!'

I am sure gratified to see that they stuck to good sound science to help make their argument.

I know for a fact that they are constantly finding bits of saddle leather intertwined with the Triceratops fossils.

I think that the stress of trying to find more cannon fodder to send to Iraq is driving military recruiters to booze and porn.

Jorge Arevalo was sleeping upstairs in the house in Hackettstown, NJ, when he heard what he thought was his housemate coming home at around midnight. He wondered why his housemate was walking around and making noise so much.

The answer to this came at around 1a.m., when his housemate actually returned. Arevalo reported hearing a string of expletives as his housemate discovered a naked man sitting at the computer.

On the computer were several windows open on porn sites. The man was dressed only in shoes and socks, and was covered in cuts and bruises. Bloodstains were found in several rooms in the house.

The man was identified as Jerry B. Mahaffey, a recruiter for the U.S. Army. Police later found his abandoned clothes behind The Laughing Lion, a local bar.

You know I don't want to pass judgement here. God knows I have consumed alcohol and surfed porn before, of course I usually stay in my own house to do that, it just seems a little less icky that way. However this guy might want to drink just a wee bit less the next time he is celebrating sending some young person to die for Bush's lie.

And as for the naked part, well he still had his socks on so he wasn't technically "naked" now was he? "Socks on" = "not naked"!

I think these people may have overreacted a little.

US Attorney scandal takes out another official.

A senior Justice Department official who helped carry out the dismissals of federal prosecutors said Friday he is resigning.

Mike Elston, chief of staff to Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, is the fifth Justice official to leave after being linked to the dismissals of the prosecutors.

Elston was accused of threatening at least four of the eight fired U.S. attorneys to keep quiet about their ousters. In a statement Friday, the Justice Department said Elston was leaving voluntarily to take a job with an unnamed Washington-area law firm.

I still cannot quite believe how little notice I gave this story when it first arrived on the scene. But it just continues to give, and give, and give to us liberals.

It is like a media version of Santa Claus.

Great article that lays out all the information about Iraq and Bush's war that we will ever need to know.

Much of this information may not be new to many of us, but when it is laid out like this it just makes me angry all over again at this administration.

They ignored history, lied, destroyed an entire country for selfish reasons, and have put all of us at risk.

Here are just a few of the excerpts that really got to me.

  • Saddam Hussein started his career as a political thug, on the payroll of the CIA during the 1950s and 1960s, torturing and murdering Iraqi leftists whose names were provided by American intelligence, and participating in an armed coup against the Iraqi government.
  • Right after 9/11, according to Clarke, “The president dragged me into a room with a couple of other people, shut the door, and said, ‘I want you to find whether Iraq did this.’ Now he never said, ‘Make it up.’ But the entire conversation left me in absolutely no doubt that George Bush wanted me to come back with a report that said Iraq did this. I said, ‘Mr. President. We’ve done this before. We have been looking at this. We looked at it with an open mind. There’s no connection.’ He came back at me and said, ‘Iraq! Saddam! Find out if there’s a connection’. And in a very intimidating way. I mean that we should come back with that answer. We wrote a report. It was a serious look. We got together all the FBI experts, all the CIA experts. We wrote the report. We sent the report out to CIA and found FBI and said, ‘Will you sign this report?’ They all cleared the report. And we sent it up to the president and it got bounced by the National Security Advisor or Deputy. It got bounced and sent back saying, ‘Wrong answer. … Do it again’.”
  • To this day Bush says in his speeches that Saddam did not comply with the UN, that Saddam kicked the inspectors out of Iraq, and that Bush had Security Council authorization to invade. None of those statements are true.
  • As a result of this war, over 3,500 Americans are dead, and perhaps 20,000 or so are gravely wounded. Americans have not been allowed to see the caskets returning to Dover Air Force Base.
  • The best, most scientific, and least politicized estimate of Iraqi dead suggests that probably close to one million have now perished in the country’s post-war chaos, out of a population of 25 million.

Now if this is new information to you then I am glad you finally turned off FOX News and decided to learn the truth. Welcome to you.

But more likely you have already read all, or most, of this information. However I think it is important that we continue to revisit these facts and remind ourselves just how incredibly incompetent and deceitful this administration has proven itself to be.

And to always remember that they are never going to be a source of truth on any subject about this war or anything that shows them in a bad light.

If you are lovers of the truth then you are going to have to skip much of the mainstream media which still acts like a mouthpiece for the White House. (Anybody notice the misinformation about Iran that CNN has been promoting?)

But you can find that truth here and on many of the sites listed on my blogroll. We may not be trained journalists, but we also cannot be bought off or pressured by our advertisers to tell falsehoods. We are an eclectic bunch but we are passionate about getting to the truth.

(By the way if you would rather watch the truth on television rather then search for it on the Internet, then allow me to direct you to "Countdown" with Keith Olbermann and "The Daily Show" with Jon Stewart. They are both very entertaining and will give you the real story that you may not get from many other news outlets.)

Friday, June 15, 2007

It looks like I might be part of the majority. How in the hell did that happen?

It should come as no surprise that conservative media figures repeat the myth that most Americans share their views. Even when Democrats win, conservatives claim that their ideology is still dominant. On election night 2006, Fox News Washington managing editor Brit Hume acknowledged that Democrats were winning, but stressed that "from what we could see from all the polling and everything else, it remains a conservative country." He did not say what "polling and everything else" he was referring to. Glenn Beck of CNN Headline News agreed, stating the following day that despite the Democratic victory, "the majority of Americans seem in favor of classically Republican points of view."

But it was not just conservatives; in fact, they were simply repeating what they had heard mainstream journalists say for some time. "This is basically not a liberal country," said John Harris, then of The Washington Post and now of The Politico, in May 2005. "It's a conservative country." Previewing the Democrats' prospects for victory three weeks before the 2006 election, CNN senior political correspondent Candy Crowley asserted that Democrats have been "on the losing side of the values debate, the defense debate and, oh yes, the guns debate." (Crowley presented no evidence that Democrats had been "on the losing side" of any of these debates.)

We do hear that all of the time, and I have often felt very disappointed by that. If most of America really was that conservative then we would continue to elect these warmongering, CEO hugging, oil company butt boys.

But it appears that I have been the victim of poor information.

The idea of an American public moving to the left -- or residing there in the first place -- seems to be outside the imagination of much of the press. But the data demonstrate that the American public is in fact progressive, far more so than conventional wisdom imagines them to be.

Further, the movement of public opinion, particularly on social issues, seems to be in one direction: to the left. Opinion on issues such as homosexuality and the role of women has grown steadily more progressive for the last few decades, while it is difficult to find an issue on which the public is more conservative now than it was 20 years ago.

Hah! Well that just makes my whole damn weekend!

This is a must see clip from Michael Moore's old television series. In it he takes on homophobes including the Reverend Phelps and Trent Lott.



This is priceless.

It is really worth watching just to see the reaction of that hateful, gay bashing, funeral desecrating, Fred Phelps of Westboro Baptist Church alone.

Telling the grieving parents of a dead child that their son is going to hell is possibly the ugliest thing ever uttered by a so-called human being.

Michael Moore is a brave man who certainly deserves our admiration.

I love the Daily Show so much that literally the only thing that could make it better would be if they had Angelina Jolie on. What? She is? Oh my!



She is a goddes. I do not know how Jon can even form a coherent sentence.

Oh, well I guess he really can't can he?

The seeds of chaos that we planted in Iraq are spreading throughout the Middle East.

A beleaguered Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas declared a state of emergency and disbanded the Hamas-led unity government after the Islamic militant group vanquished its Fatah rivals and effectively took control of the Gaza Strip on Thursday.

Fearful that Hamas' momentum could spread to the West Bank, Fatah went on the offensive there, rounding up three dozen Hamas fighters. Angry militants threw office furniture out a third-story window of the Palestinian parliament building in Ramallah, then set fire to the office of three Hamas lawmakers. A Hamas activist was shot and killed in Nablus, the first person to be killed in the West Bank after days of violence in Gaza; the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, a violent Fatah offshoot, claimed responsibility.

If this causes the hair on the back of your neck to stand up, then you are an intelligent person who realizes the ramifications of this turn of events. But if you think the Bush administration shares your fears, then you are mistaken.

You see this is exactly the kind of event that is predicted in those "Left Behind" books, which George Bush has read and believes to be as prophetic as the Bible.

Bush is expecting the Rapture to occur in his lifetime and he believes he has been chosen to help facilitate it. So you will see very little response other then the press release that will express his disappointment, but he will take no further action.

Of course the Rapture is not coming, since it is just superstitious nonsense, but what is going to happen is that the situation in Palestine may endanger Israel and that may draw America into yet another conflict. And can we really afford any more war at this point?

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Jon Stewart is having trouble figuring out who our enemy is in Iraq. I have been having the same problem myself.

This may be my favorite story of the day. Angelina Jolie bans FOX News from red carpet of her movie premiere.

Jolie is touting press freedom these days, playing the widow of murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in a new movie called "A Mighty Heart."

But Jolie turns out to be a mighty hypocrite when it comes to her own freedom of the press. Her lawyer required all journalists to sign a contract before talking to her, and Jolie instructed publicists at first to ban FOX News from the red carpet of her premiere.

The above excerpt is from the Fox News website which goes to prove Ms. Jolie's point.

I mean they try to call her a hypocrite for identifying their hypocrisy and trying to keep it from damaging the media coverage of her very important film. She is not a stupid woman, she knows that this is an organization with an agenda that is in direct opposition to her beliefs.

Besides she believes in freedom of the PRESS, not freedom of the REPUBLICAN MOUTHPIECE. And no matter how hard FOX tries to blur the line between the two, there is definitely a line and Angelina Jolie is smart enough to see it. And good for her for being brave enough to call them on their partisan bullshit!

Meet "Obama Girl" Barack Obama's most ...uh....interesting supporter.



I have no idea if this was put out by a supporter or somebody trying to make fun of Obama, but you have to admit it is compelling viewing.

I can hardly wait to see Hillary's response with a male hard body dancing and singing his "I just can't get my fill of Hill" song.

This is going to be the most colorful Presidential campaign in history.

Cavemen were swingers.

Timothy Taylor, reader in archeology at Bradford University, reviewed evidence from dozens of archeological finds and scientific studies for his research.

“The widespread lay belief that sex in the past was predominantly heterosexual and reproductive can be challenged,” said Taylor.

He argues that monogamy only became established as hunter-gatherer societies took up agriculture and settled in houses, allowing the social roles of men and women to become more fixed.

Petra Boynton, a relationship counselor and health lecturer at University College, London, found the study “refreshing.”

“So much evolutionary theory promotes the idea that humans, particularly women, are preprogrammed for monogamy, but that is often simply overlaying science on a pre-existing view of society,” she said.

All of the fun of sex is drained by making all of these rules and labels.

If sex is not naughty then it is almost not worth doing. I love kids, but in my opinion they are just a side effect of a healthy sex life.

Pentagon weighs in to say the surge is a failure. Nobody can really be surprised by this.

Three months into the new U.S. military strategy that has sent tens of thousands of additional troops into Iraq, overall levels of violence in the country have not decreased, as attacks have shifted away from Baghdad and Anbar, where American forces are concentrated, only to rise in most other provinces, according to a Pentagon report released yesterday.

The report -- the first comprehensive statistical overview of the new U.S. military strategy in Iraq -- coincided with renewed fears of sectarian violence after the bombing yesterday of the same Shiite shrine north of Baghdad that was attacked in February 2006, unleashing a spiral of retaliatory bloodshed. Iraq's government imposed an immediate curfew in Baghdad yesterday to prevent an outbreak of revenge killings.

Yesterday's attack adds to tensions faced by U.S. troops, who are paying a mounting price in casualties as they push into Iraqi neighborhoods, seeking to quell violence that the report said remains fundamentally driven by sectarianism.

I have heard that General Petraeus is ready to report that the surge is working and ask for an extension. So the question is will the Republicans side with the President on this or with the Pentagon?

With the uptick in violence against Iraqis having moved to the suburbs outside of Baghdad, and with the increase in American deaths since the surge began, Petraeus is going to have to be a magician to convince anybody that this is all going according to plan.

Surely even the Republicans are not this easily duped.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Are most Republicans too stupid to be allowed to vote? Yep.


The majority of Republicans in the United States do not believe the theory of evolution is true and do not believe that humans evolved over millions of years from less advanced forms of life. This suggests that when three Republican presidential candidates at a May debate stated they did not believe in evolution, they were generally in sync with the bulk of the rank-and-file Republicans whose nomination they are seeking to obtain.

Independents and Democrats are more likely than Republicans to believe in the theory of evolution. But even among non-Republicans there appears to be a significant minority who doubt that evolution adequately explains where humans came from.

You know this poll does not exactly fill me with confidence concerning Democrats and Independents either. How can you not know about evolution?

It is just more proof that religion is a force of intellectual destruction, forcing believers to deny science in order to be accepted in their faith.

Americans who say they do not believe in the theory of evolution are highly likely to justify this belief by reference to religion, Jesus Christ, or the Bible. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between high levels of personal religiosity and doubts about evolution.

According to the FBI there are over 500,000 terrorists in America!

A terrorist watch list compiled by the FBI has apparently swelled to include more than half a million names.

Privacy and civil liberties advocates say the list is growing uncontrollably, threatening its usefulness in the war on terror.

The bureau says the number of names on its terrorist watch list is classified.

A portion of the FBI's unclassified 2008 budget request posted to the Department of Justice Web site, however, refers to "the entire watch list of 509,000 names," which is utilized by its Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force.

Holy shit! We need to get the fuck out of here!

I mean the only way this is not the most frightening thing I have ever heard is if the FBI is completely full of shit! So unless we have the worst Homeland Security Department in history it means that the FBI are indeed full of shit.

These guys are complete tools who have wasted million, and millions of taxpayer dollars and have turned out national security into a joke.

Like I have said before, every thing this administration touches turns to shit.

Congress is looking for the weak link in the US Attorney scandal. Is Harriet Miers it?

Two congressional committees are issuing subpoenas for testimony from former White House counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor on their roles in the firings of eight federal prosecutors, according to two officials familiar with the investigation.

Democrats probing whether the White House improperly dictated which prosecutors the Justice Department should fire also are subpoenaing the White House for all relevant documents, said the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the move had not yet been formally made public.

The Democrats have been almost laughingly impotent at making any progress on this case. Or for that matter any other investigation into White House wrongdoing.

But I am not laughing. These are very serious concerns and we really do need to get to the bottom of the corruption that seems to permeate this Bush administration and everything they touch.

If Harriet Miers can be the straw that snaps this stubborn camels back then I hope they verbally slap that bitch into next week. All we need is one insider to start spilling their guts and this house of cards will start to crumble.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

I have never posted about Paris Hilton because I think that she is a useless human being and a waste of my time. Both Jon Stewart and CNN agree.

Cheney gets called on his lies about Iran supporting al-Qaeda in Iraq.

A media campaign portraying Iran as supplying arms to the Taliban guerrillas fighting U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, orchestrated by advocates of a more confrontational stance toward Iran in the George W. Bush administration, appears to have backfired last week when Defence Secretary Robert Gates and the commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Dan McNeil, issued unusually strong denials.

The allegation that Iran has reversed a decade-long policy and is now supporting the Taliban, conveyed in a series of press articles quoting “senior officials” in recent weeks, is related to a broader effort by officials aligned with Vice President Dick Cheney to portray Iran as supporting Sunni insurgents, including al Qaeda, to defeat the United States in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

An article in the Guardian published May 22 quoted an anonymous U.S. official as predicting an “Iranian-orchestrated summer offensive in Iraq, linking al Qaeda and Sunni insurgents to Tehran’s Shia militia allies” and as referring to the alleged “Iran-al Qaeda linkup” as “very sinister”.

That article and subsequent reports on CNN May 30, in the Washington Post Jun. 3 and on ABC news Jun. 6 all included an assertion by an unnamed U.S. official or a “senior coalition official” that Iran is following a deliberate policy of supplying the Taliban’s campaign against U.S., British and other NATO forces.

In the most dramatic version of the story, ABC reported “NATO officials” as saying they had “caught Iran red-handed, shipping heavy arms, C4 explosives and advanced roadside bombs to the Taliban for use against NATO forces.”

Far from showing that Iran had been “caught red-handed”, however, the report quoted from an analysis which cited only the interception in Afghanistan of a total of four vehicles coming from Iran with arms and munitions of Iranian origin. The report failed to refer to any evidence of Iranian government involvement.

You simply cannot believe a single thing that this administration says. If they say they know something is true, it isn't! If they say they have proof they don't! If they say we can trust them, we can't!

It is literally like having a Bizarro version of the Presidency.

Good is bad. Up is down. The enemy is our friend. And the friend is our enemy.

Albanians just love our President Bush! They love him so much they stole his watch right off his wrist!



Here is the video of the event. He walks toward the crowd clearly wearing a watch on his left wrist. But at about 55 seconds into the video you can see somebody grab his wrist with two hands and then, presto, the watch is simply gone. There is really no doubt that it was stolen.

And that Albanian has the biggest balls on the planet!

P.S. The NBC Nightly News just showed video that they claim shows Bush putting his watch in his pocket. It does show a hand with a watch on it, but I am not completely convinced.

Monday, June 11, 2007

I don't usually cotton to new rules or laws but I might be able to get behind this one.

The words "natural family," "marriage" and "union of a man and a woman" can be punished as "hate speech" in government workplaces, according to a lawsuit that is being appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

I have no idea why marriage is not a four letter word.

I would love to end an argument at work by saying "Hey, marry this!"

It would be classic.

Poll shows Hillary well ahead after CNN debate.

In early April, New Hampshire Democrats were all over the place. The front-runners -- Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-New York; Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois; and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina -- were closely matched. Clinton was at 27 percent, Edwards was at 21 percent and Obama was at 20 percent. It was essentially a jump ball.

Who jumped highest after the debate? Clinton. According to a new CNN/WMUR poll of New Hampshire Democratic primary voters released Monday, the New York senator has surged into the lead, with 36 percent support. Obama has held fairly steady at 22 percent, while Edwards has lost support. He's now at 12 percent.

The reason why this dramatic change in polls happened is simple. Hillary refused to engage in any in fighting or verbal wrestling matches with the other candidates. She constantly reminded the audience that the enemy was George Bush. And she is right.

And the person who handed this victory to her was none other then my pick to be President, John Edwards. Edwards decided that he needed to demonstrate his greater then thou integrity by calling both Obama and Clinton on their delay in voting against the Iraq budget.

John made an ignorant mistake. He is campaigning the way that candidates campaigned in the old days. But these are not the old days. The American people are beyond tired of mud slinging, attack ads, and character assassinations. John was too aggressive. Hillary was talking like a peacemaker. It is as simple as that.

John may have truly screwed himself. And if he uses those same tactics in the future I can guarantee that he can kiss this candidacy goodbye.