The Lincoln Group, a Washington-based public relations company, was told early in 2005 by the Pentagon to identify religious leaders who could help produce messages that would persuade Sunnis in violence-ridden Anbar Province to participate in national elections and reject the insurgency, according to a former employee.
Since then, the company has retained three or four Sunni religious scholars to offer advice and write reports for military commanders on the content of propaganda campaigns, the former employee said. But documents and Lincoln executives say the company's ties to religious leaders and dozens of other prominent Iraqis is aimed also at enabling it to exercise influence in Iraqi communities on behalf of clients, including the military.
I am a little tired and not really interested on climbing up on my high horse over this revelation. Besides to be honest, I am not surprised that we are using every means at our disposal to gain support in Iraq. All wars use propaganda. And while this instance seems particularly amateuristic, it is not unexpected.
I do have to lament the fact that this administration seems so adament in throwing money at every problem that it encounters. This is clearly the party of the wealthy that believes that all problems are just a "suitcase full of cash" away from being solved. I would like to hope that if we did the right thing in Iraq that we would enjoy the support of the people without having to buy them off. But that is just me.
(Okay that was just a "medium size horse" I was on there.)
Considering the propaganda the other side is throwing over there, I would certainly hope we are trying to fight back.
ReplyDeleteBy the way, propaganda does not necessarily mean "lies" - it seems that most people equate the two. You can equally well propogate truths through propaganda.
Let me see if I've got this straight ...
ReplyDeleteWhen the Pentagon doesn't make an effort to 'speak the language' (be it cultural, religious, or linguistic), it's derided by the left as 'clumsy,' 'culturally insensitive,' 'heedlessly ignorant,' blah blah blah. When it does, it's derided for propaganda (which, as kathy k points out, is not synonymous with lies). And heaven forfend they should actually pay someone for providing relevant knowledge, expertise, or even (perish the thought!) a good word in the right ear -- then they're merely 'throwing money at the problem.'
Yep that about sums it up!
ReplyDeleteYou know, by itself maybe this would not be such a big deal. But you add it to the stories about american soldiers faking positive news stories and then having them published in local papers without identifying the source and you have some serious malfeasance gong on here.
If we are doing a good job over there then the press whould be willing to cover that without having to be paid off.
And how do you think the Iraqi's take the news that the Americans are paying for people to lie for them? You know what I would think? I would think that these Americans are not to be trusted.
"Propaganda does not mean lies".....
ReplyDelete(OMG.... LOL.... I am still laughing..this is a joke right?)
well, it sure as Sunday don't mean the Truth....