Documents reveal Blair lied about WMD's in Iraq. Anybody surprised? No?

In the testimony revealed today Mr Ross, 40, who helped negotiate several UN security resolutions on Iraq, makes it clear that Mr Blair must have known Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons of mass destruction. He said that during his posting to the UN, "at no time did HMG [Her Majesty's Government] assess that Iraq's WMD (or any other capability) posed a threat to the UK or its interests."

Mr Ross revealed it was a commonly held view among British officials dealing with Iraq that any threat by Saddam Hussein had been "effectively contained".

He also reveals that British officials warned US diplomats that bringing down the Iraqi dictator would lead to the chaos the world has since witnessed. "I remember on several occasions the UK team stating this view in terms during our discussions with the US (who agreed)," he said.

"At the same time, we would frequently argue when the US raised the subject, that 'regime change' was inadvisable, primarily on the grounds that Iraq would collapse into chaos."

So of course if Blair knew then Bush also knew.

You know I have never doubted that before, but reading about the evidence pisses me off all over again.

I really do not think that we have a choice but to impeach Bush and his Vice President, and indict any of his cabinet members and staff who had a hand in this debacle. I mean if our values are based on justice then we just cannot allow this to happen without the people responsible being punished. We just cannot!