John Edwards takes on Rupert Murdoch's attempt to form a conserative media monopoly and chides Hillary for accepting his dirty money.

"The time has come for Democrats to stop pretending to be friends with the very people who demonize the Democratic Party," Edwards said in a statement.

He challenged his rivals to refuse contributions from executives of News Corp., and return any they had already received. The Edwards campaign said it would return less than $1,000 in donations from three Fox employees _ a worker at a local Fox station in Florida and two staffers from Fox Cable Networks _ even though they are not executives.

It makes perfect sense to me.

And where is Hillary on this?

Most of Murdoch's donations go to Republicans, but he gave $4,200 to Clinton's Senate campaign in 2006 and held a fundraiser for her at News Corp.'s midtown headquarters. He also donated $2,300 to her presidential campaign, according to online campaign donation database Political MoneyLine.

A Political MoneyLine search of donors employed by News Corp. finds $20,900 in donations to Clinton's presidential bid from nine company attorneys and executives, including Murdoch's No. 2, Peter Chernin, who gave the maximum $4,600 allowed.

Well she seems to have no problem taking this money. But why would anybody at FOX News give so much money to Hillary's campaign?

Well if you have visited this page before then you know that I believe that the Republicans are helping Hillary, since they know they are never going to get a Republican elected in 2008. And the reason that they have chosen Hillary to back is because she has agreed not pursue legal action against Bush when he hands the Presidency over to her. And no I don't have any proof. But I have rarely been this sure of anything.

Trust me the fix is in.

If we want Bush to be held accountable for the damage that he has done to our country, our reputation, our infrastructure, and the loss of so many American lives, then we do not want Hillary as our candidate in 2008.