I have chosen to post the portions of this article that really jumped out at me, but I invite you to read it for yourself by clicking the title and visiting the Esquire magazine site. Undoubtedly you will notice things that I missed and I invite you to discuss them in the comments section.
"Trigby! Crazy boy!"
A girl's voice. His oldest daughter, Bristol. Age eighteen. Todd puts the screwdriver down on a coffee table in front of the couch, looks over his shoulder, and smiles at Bristol as she comes down the stairs from the second floor. She's wearing jeans and a baggy sweatshirt. Baggy or not, you can still see her belly underneath. Official due date is a week away, but everyone knows due dates are just educated guesses. She's got her baby brother with her, eight-month-old Trig, and he's a case in point: showed up almost a month premature. He's dressed just like his big sister: jeans and a sweatshirt. Most days, she and Todd are his main caregivers.
Bristol hands Trig over to Todd, who balances his son on his knees and juts his chin forward and makes snorting noises at him. Trig grunts happily back, reaches out and grabs ahold of his dad's lower lip. Todd pulls his head slowly away till his lip snaps back into place, then looks over at Bristol again, who's searching for shoes in the heap by the front door. She's getting ready to drive into town.
"Where's that car seat?" Todd asks. "In the Jetta?"
"No, the car seat's in Mom's."
"Just the base," Todd corrects her. "Are you taking the Jetta or the truck?"
"The truck. Do you want us to get Willow?"
"I'm gonna get Willow," Todd says. "But just call me."
Interesting passage for a few reasons.
One it is interesting that it is reported that Bristol and Todd are Trig's main caregivers. It seems to me that adding Todd as one of the caregivers is a stretch since it appears that before Bristol gave birth she was his primary caregiver, with the other family members pitching in only when it was absolutely necessary. And I believe that after Tripp came along things did not change much.
(For instance at this big Indiana pro-life fundraising dinner the other day Trig was left home. Who do you think was caring for him then?)
And the following is a good example of what I mean.
Bristol comes around the corner into the living room, holding Trig. His middle daughter, Willow, follows behind, her eyes down, one thumb tapping on her cell phone. She's fourteen. Once, when they were out somewhere together, Willow asked Todd to stop texting on his own phone, not because she wanted his undivided attention but because she was embarrassed by how slow and clumsy he was at it.
Bristol had a doctor's appointment this morning and Todd hasn't seen her since.
"How you doing?" he asks her, nodding at her belly.
She smiles.
"One centimeter dilated!" she says.
Willow, still looking at her phone, walks up behind her dad's chair and tousles his hair.
"Hi, Dad," she says. "My friend Cassidy's coming over."
Todd puts his soupspoon down and stretches his arms out toward Bristol. She gives him Trig, who's still sleeping. Todd takes him to his chest, and Trig rouses enough to nuzzle his cheek into Todd's shoulder.
"What'd they say? At the hospital?" Todd says to Bristol.
She shrugs.
"We'll see," she says. "Grandma says tonight!"
Okay if both Todd and Bristol share the responsibilities of little Trig, than why did she take him to her OBGYN appointment? Why would anybody ask a teenage girl, about to give birth any minute (supposedly), the responsibility of caring for her infant brother?
Hell even accepting that Trig is her child, why wouldn't anybody take him during this appointment? I guess it is feasible that Willow was with her and helping, but that really does not make it that much more acceptable.
Bristol comes into the kitchen with Levi Johnston, her fiancé. He's a good-looking kid, very Abercrombie & Fitch. He says hi all around but doesn't say much more. When he's over here, it's usually just him and Todd and Trig in a house full of women, and the women dominate the conversation. He nods at Todd and Todd nods back.
"Levi got his wedding ring stuck on his thumb," Molly says.
"Levi!" Sarah says. "That's par for the course. That means you're stuck. That's symbolic or something." She pulls a roast out of the refrigerator and calls Levi over and starts showing him how to marinate it. "Now, Levi, look, I'm gonna put this stuff in here..."
This has already received a lot of attention on the internet, but nobody seems to know exactly what it means that Levi has a "wedding ring" on his finger. If they were married why would the Palins keep that a secret? It would have made the whole "unwed teenage mom scandal simply disappear.
I think Esquire magazine should be asked to explain that sentence.
Todd comes back in a few minutes later dressed in a suit and tie.
"See you," he says. "I'm gonna go."
"Have fun, Todd," Sarah says. "Tell them I said hi. And if they ask you to get up to speak, say — " She zips her lips and shakes her head.
He gives her a look.
"I tried to get Sarah here," he says. "Her flight to Hooper Bay got canceled."
Sarah's eyes widen behind her glasses.
"Don't tell them that!" she says.
Todd walks out smiling.
Okay I included this exchange because it demonstrated just how tightly Todd is controlled by his wife. She tells him not to talk if asked to, which leads me to believe she is afraid he will reveal something she does not want revealed, and than he seems to playfully tease her by almost revealing something that she is trying to keep secret.
Just how many secrets is this family juggling at any given time?
This last portion picks up the story a month later (January?), and completely skips the delivery of little Tripp and seems to have been relegated to a garage in Soldotna. Which makes me wonder what is going on in the Palin home that these reporters were not supposed to witness?
Normally Todd uses Google alerts to monitor the media's coverage of his wife. He gets an e-mail sent to his BlackBerry whenever a news story containing the words "Sarah Palin" appears. During the campaign he'd disabled this function, since there were too many stories to keep up with. Now, though, the flow has ebbed, become manageable, and his in-box only floods with alerts every now and then. Three weeks ago, for example, he received a bunch of links carrying the news that state troopers had arrested Levi's mom for allegedly selling OxyContin. All Todd could say at the time was that he hoped there was a bright side: Living in the public eye can sometimes be better than rehab at forcing you to get your life together. There was another spurt of stories a week later, carrying the news that Bristol had given birth to a healthy baby boy, Tripp. And two months after that, Todd's BlackBerry will declare, in a chorus of news briefs, that Bristol and Levi have broken up.
And just like that, after a few useless bits of information about snowmachine racing, the story comes to an abrupt end.
Why did the reporters lose access for almost a month? What was the original agreement for the time of the interview. Why would they leave when such an auspicious event as the birth of the Governor's grandchild was supposed to happen any minute?
Like almost every single story concerning the Palin's this seems to raise more questions than it answers. I continue to believe that if anybody submitted this story as a work of fiction it would be rejected as being too unbelievable.
Bristol is Trig's primary caregiver because Bristol is Trig's mother.
ReplyDeleteI hope the folks over at PD are going over this story to further clarify the events around the Palin mystery babies.
ReplyDeleteI continue to believe Triggy-bear is basically a prop baby, that GINO borrows from Bristol to give herself the appearance of being a warm, maternal figure.
Ecchh. I could pick this article apart with a scalpel, at great length--this Luke Dittrich is NO Ron Suskind, meaning he's an accumulative rather than an investigative reporter. I'll toss out just a few items that particularly caught my eye: Regarding Bristol's pregnancy with Tripp, he jauntily notes, "Everybody knows that due dates are just educated guesses." Quite so, as in this case, due dates depend on who's doing the "educating." As with Trig, no doctor's name or prediction is ever cited in a way that can be verified.
ReplyDeleteChuck Heath insists that his son-in-law Todd is "half-Native." Say what? Isn't Todd one-eighth Yup'ik, not one-half?
As a way of "proving" that Trig is his biological grandson rather than his great-grand, Chuck Heath asserts that he "was there when Trig came out." But he doesn't say out of whom Trig "came out," or where the blessed event took place.
My guess is that this writer is just dazzled by big-sky Alaska and Palin detail, logging in all of the macho column-inches about snow machines and dead animals. He almost off-handedly mentions Todd's calling Sarah "the boss." Apparently, even though the First Dud clearly has his balls in escrow, he's otherwise proved his machismo by all these boytoys: the plane, the weapons, the machinery and multiple cars. I also can't imagine that this article hit print without serious scrutiny by someone in Team Palin, which used to be strictly verboten in the MSM.
And what's that photo of the Palin family shoe collection supposed to indicate? My family of five has amassed that many shoes.
I'm relying on your account, Gryphen, since I haven't read the article, but I would think that the grand finale happy ending to the story style of almost any other family oriented magazine piece would be- drum roll, please- the happy mother and new father warmly embracing the new borne child (Tripp), proud grandparents hovering in the background. If the date really was Dec.27 or 28, we'd catch flickering lights of the Christmas tree in the background when they brought baby home, his little present under the tree-- a few days late but still a loving welcome. Don't most magazine articles end like that? In fact, no one has ever seen photos like that at all!
ReplyDeleteGryphen,
ReplyDeleteI read the article. Did you not find the part about them going out to the van and playing around with the door and their comments ridiculous. It really goes to show they do have it out for Wooten, that it is truly a personal thing. I can't believe that the Palin's let all the Wooten info get printed. It makes them look stupid.
You're good Gryphen, I recognize a real ability you have to read between the lines and behind the scenes. Look, if this is important to you, and I think it is very important, all we need to do is bring the fact that Sarah is not Trig's mother to the public in a way which they can accept. There is no longer any doubt that she lied of course but the world needs to know. I'm saying this because I did recognize an ability to get the message accross in what you said and how you analyzed the Palin exchanges. Keep up the good work.
ReplyDelete"Todd had managed to keep secret from everybody else in the family, and the family managed to keep secret from everybody else."
ReplyDeleteHmmmmm
"After a minute or so, the screen cuts away from Todd's wife to a shot of the reporter, standing alone, saying something about what Todd's wife just said.
ReplyDelete"That guy's a real jerk," Todd says. He's sometimes tempted to phone editors or producers if a story about his wife rubs him the wrong way. But he knows that would be counterproductive. It's just like, you're a player, and the referee makes a call you don't like, and you bitch: The headline's already there, and accosting the ref only makes you look worse."
You would have thought SP would have learned that when she was playing basketball.
I think I have some big news!!
ReplyDeleteI found some interesting dates in the article. The interview starts before Dec. 24.
The interview continues ONE MONTH later, which is also 10 days BEFORE the Iron Dog race and Todd and his partner are finetuning their snowmachines in preparation for the race.
This is on page 6 of the article at
http://tinyurl.com/dkb63o
The race began Feb. 8, so 10 days earlier would be around Jan. 28-29 (which also fits with the "one month later" from a day after Dec. 24).
The article states then that Bristol gives birth to Tripp "a week later." This wold be early February--before the Iron Dog Race. This is consistent with the picture from your website http://tinyurl.com/d5pww2
showing Bristol postpartum.
Toward the end of the article, it mentions something that occurs on Dec. 24, and that this happened AFTER the first interview day. So that is another confirmation that the first interview day was BEFORE Dec. 24. Bristol was dilated 1 cm on that day. (so the article leads the reader to believe that birth will be that day or the next) However, mothers who have given birth know that you can be dilated 1cm or even more for several weeks before birth.
Then Bristol gave birth one week after the "one month later" interview of Todd while working on his snow machine!!!!!
Do you read the dates like this????
To: MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for giving us the location of Todd's testicles!
So far, my biggest laugh of the day!
Ginger
And how about that little conversation about the fancy new-fangled babyseat for TRIG that so amazes old Chuck Heath? Todd says Bristol "doesn't mess around"......So, the 18 year-old pregnant "sister" is the one who "doesn't mess around" providing expensive goods for Todd & Sarah's kid? Please.
ReplyDeleteThe Esquire article is a pathetic piece of writing. There is no point, no central theme, no conclusion: just a streaming commentary. The only reason anyone would read it is to learn more about the Palin family saga. And even there, the article reveals very little of interest.
ReplyDelete@LisanTx.....I was working on the dates, too.
ReplyDeleteThe reference to Tripp's birth "one week later" is given relative to Sherry Johnston's arrest.
On page 6, the author says, “Three weeks ago...state troopers had arrested Levi's mom for allegedly selling OxyContin” and “a week later... Bristol had given birth to... Tripp”. A week later that three weeks ago would be two weeks ago.
The author is saying Tripp was born two weeks prior to the interview which was 10 days before the Iron Dog start....which would be around Jan 13. He's also saying SJ's arrest was three weeks prior to the interview or around Jan. 6. We know the arrest was Dec. 19. The dates are sloppy and there is nothing in the article to rely on.
It’s crazy that the author doesn’t seem to know the difference between one month and three weeks.
Sorry to dampen your excitement.
This adds a little information and some insights. I'm not surprised that the Palins exhibit one of my pet peeves, flying a "weathered US flag." Why wear a flag on your lapel to show your respect for your son in Iraq when you can't be bothered to take down the flag in bad weather?
ReplyDeleteHi. I also, too, think that since Bristol's pregnant self and her upcoming due date was written about in the first part of the interview, it's odd that there is no first hand mention of the girl's or the new baby's presence in that house during the second interview. But, LisanTX, I don't think we can read anything into the fact that the writer say the birth was a week later than some other event, because he in fact doesn't say that; he says that the reports of the baby's birth occur a week later, and we know that those reports came out around December 27th-ish, and so the fact of the reports doesn't prove anything, time-wise.
ReplyDeleteThis article (and I did read it in its entirety) does nothing to dissuade me from thinking Bristol is the real mother, and I might add, actually adds to that believe since Bristol is so clearly to this reporter, his main caregiver, along with Todd, the house-husband.
And also, I think I was 1 cm dilated for the last month, so that doesn't prove anything either.
Willow's whining about taking care of Trig is interesting, as is Bristol's complaint that Willow never watches him. Whether or not Sarah is Trig's legal mother.....it sure seems like Bristol is his real Mommy. Perhaps that impression that so many people have is also why this story will not die--------Sarah just does not SEEM or ACT like Trig's Mommy--Bristol does. SO, in the event we are all wrong and Sarah is, after all, actually Trig's birth mother, is it any wonder that we were all skeptical?
I still don't believe Sarah, though. It's hard to believe someone about anything when you KNOW that they have lied about other things. Repeatedly.
Gryphen,
ReplyDeleteThey have the Dec. and Jan. interviews, one at the house and the other at the Davis garage. Then they have a Feb. 1 (Superbowl Sunday) photo of Todd & Piper and Sarah & Tripp. So they eventually let Esquire back in the home. Was there a baby?
LisanTX:
ReplyDeleteIf the date of this second interview truly was 10 days prior to the Iron Dog start that would make it Tuesday, January 27.
Todd is relating to his Google alerts regarding things that have happened in the recent past beginning w/Sherry J being arrested for Oxy., although they get the Johnston Oxy arrest date wrong based on a 1/27 interview date. Her arrest would have been 5 weeks in the past, not 3 as she was arrested Dec 18. When they then go on to discuss Bristol giving birth, they call that the "next week", the one after the SJ arrest, which would have been close to the 12/27 Tripp birth date. The next item is the Bristol/Levi breakup that was reported 2 months following the birth.
It looks like the reporter got his number of weeks wrong from 1/27 to 12/18. Should have been 5 wks, not 3 wks, but I still think that dates refer to a string of events happening beginning 12/18(arrest), then 12/27 (or 12/28)[Tripp birth], then late Feb (breakup).
LisanTx,
ReplyDeleteThe article states Bristol gave birth about a week after Sherry's arrest, which was around 12/18/08, not a week after the garage interview with Todd.
the whole Palin family is just pathetic. i cant even laugh at them - thoses kids would be better away from both of them, no wonder the older son is outta the house
ReplyDeleteWhat a stupid article. These people just can't let go of the past! The entire family (aunts, unlces, and grandparents, included!) goes on and on about the same stuff, over and and over again! This is weird! Who cares about his injuries, and that he almost got killed? Who cares about how "tough" he is? Who cares about how often he does the laundrey? They even managed to squeeze in "Babygate!" They always have to bring up when Trig Palin was born, and how pregant Bristol Palin was, or whatever. These people are crazy! How pathetic that Toad Palin monitors the news stories about Sarah Palin. That is so lame. And of course, near the end, they were trying to say again how "unfair" the media is in their coverage of the Palin clan.
ReplyDeleteWHY would a serious politican WANT the news to talk about how she took her 7 or 8 year old daughter to the police station???? I could be wrong, but I don't even remember the national news media mentioning ANYTHING about this Mike Wooten arm-slammed-in a-van-door-drama! "The media didn't even talk about the charges being dropped!" Were they talking about the local media, or the national media? Why would the national media, say anything about charges being dropped, if they didn't even mention the first story? As for the eldest son coming home safely from Iraq for Christmas, and the media not mentioning it: Toad Palin is the one who kept it secret from everyone, including the family. So they say. But what's interesting is how the Palin's will keep their son coming home from Iraq a secret, yet they wished the media had talked about Sarah Palin taking their 7 or 8 year old daughter to the police station! What's also funny is how Sarah Palin made sure the national media took notice of her fighting with a 19 year old kid! (Levi Johnston) They are always looking for sympathy.
The way the media deals with Palin, is her own fault. She never should have made her family, an issue during the campaign. SHE is the one who decided to tell the world her teenaged daughter was pregant, and that her daughter and her boyfriend wer getting married. She didn't have to tell the media all that stuff. The media would found out, anyway. And the reason she told everyone her daughter was pregnant is because of "Babygate." It's also Palin's fault for shooting her mouth off during the campaign. Every time she opens her mouth, she proves that she is a dim, lying, divisive, hypocritcal, crazy woman!
These people whine about the media talking about their family, while at the same time, they go and do interviews with magazines, and Greta Van Susteren, and talk about their family's business! What serious politician puts her children out front in the national media like that? Most serious politicans are protective of their children, and don't like to talk about family drama involving their children. These people just won't go away.
Sarah Palin is clueless. The Palin clan seems to believe it was the way the mean "liberal media" portrayed their family, that was the cause of Sarah Palin's downfall. Because after all, most of the country was more worried about the image of the Palin family, than the crumbling economy! The woman is a dumb-bell! She's not evn qualified for the job she has! Palin is to blame for her failures, no one else.
LisaninTX-new blog up by PalinDeceptions-I'm sure they would be interested in your info.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.palindeception.com/blog/2009/04/myspace-part-three.html
Sarah, Sarah,.........She took Piper(8yrs old) to the police station to...do...What?
ReplyDeleteOf course the case was thrown out and that, along with the arrest of Levy's mother, is what the Palins wanted the world to know. Ridiculously Vicious to their own detriment.
Forever.
What a thoroughly vapid storyline. No one cares aside from the interesting tidbit that Bristol just may have given birth the end of January instead of December.
ReplyDeleteThis is a novel approach to the diary of trailer trash - boring, uninteresting, possibly incestuous low class family popping kids out of females and no one knowing who is the mother or the father.
You couldn't peddle this uninteresting drivel to a Teen Magazine. Dumb and Dumber don't make good reading.
Pathetic, but then so are the subjects of the article. This is brazenly stupid.
Ginger--
ReplyDeleteWhy, thank you, dear! (Mrs. B curtsies.)
Interesting comment under the photo on page 3:
ReplyDeleteIn response to the rumor that Trig was actually Bristol's baby, Sarah's father, Chuck Heath, says, "How can you prove that? Goddammit! I was there when he popped out!"
"How can you prove that?" Huh? Grandpa Heath's comment does not give a good impression. You know how it goes....someone lies, you confront them and they say, "you can't prove it".
If Palin stays in politics, I hope, at some point, her supporters will demand sufficient medical records to settle this issue once and for all.
Just read Audrey's latest blog over at PD. A word jumped out at me and I left a post there and had to come over and tell you what I said.
ReplyDeleteThe word was "shower" and I remembered they had one for Sarah when she had Trig. But nowhere could I remember anyone having a shower for Bristol when she had Tripp(?)!
Isn't this interesting, Gryphen! Bristol's "first" baby and nobody in that great big family gives her shower? Or, did I miss something?
FIRE EXTINGUISHER: Esquire doesn't say Bristol gave birth at the end of January. It says she gave birth about a week after Sherry's arrest, which is consistent with TriPP born 12/27/08.
ReplyDelete