Sunday, May 31, 2009

Sarah Palin you get to pick a new Supreme Court Justice! Come on down!

This will be Palin's third appointment to the state's high court, which means she will have named a majority of the five-member court in her less than three years in office. But she won't get to pick whomever she wants from the full list of 25 applicants. In an effort to take politics out of judicial appointments, the state Constitution decrees that the Alaska Judicial Council first narrow down the field and then present at least two finalists as the "most qualified" for Palin to choose from.

Palin has been keenly anticipating the decision, sending a message last week via the Internet social media Twitter (which limits messages to 140 characters) saying "Look forward to today's staff discussion re: my 3rd justice appt to highest court in 3 yrs. Supreme Court truly effects AK's future..."

Did anybody else feel that chill run up their spine?

Okay Grypehn don't panic. Remember last time out she actually picked a pro-choice advocate and moderate for this position. She might do the same again.

Or not.

Also on the list is Anchorage attorney Kevin Clarkson, who represented five state lawmakers who unsuccessfully sued to stop the Legislature's "Troopergate" investigation of Palin last fall when she was the Republican nominee for vice president. They argued the investigation was unfair but the courts declined to put a stop to the inquiry.

Uh oh.

Governor Palin has a history of putting her friends and high school classmates into positions of power. Would she consider giving Clarkson this position by way of thanks for interfering with justice during the Troopergate investigation? Damn skippy!


The judicial council must now evaluate the applicants. That process will include background investigations, a survey of members of the Alaska Bar Association, solicitation of public comment, and interviews with the applicants.

Council members will then vote in a public meeting on which names to give Palin.

Well that should keep Palin from making this a purely political gift to one of her friends. Boy those writers of the Alaskan Constitution were a smart bunch weren't they?

The judicial council has seven members. Three are public members appointed by the governor, three are attorneys, and the other is the current chief justice of the Alaska Supreme Court, Dana Fabe.

So we have potentially three votes in Sarah's pocket, three unknown votes, and Chief Justice Dana Fabe, who was appointed by then Governor Tony Knowles. Sounds pretty close to fair to me.

Besides October is a long way out there. No telling WHAT could happen between now and then.

7 comments:

  1. crystalwolf aka caligrl8:15 AM

    Yeah! ANYTHING could happen between now and then!

    ReplyDelete
  2. crystalwolf aka caligrl9:09 AM

    OT:Dr. George Tiller, who worked at a Woman's clinic in Wichita,KA..was shot to death on his way to church this morning.
    Now these are the Pro-life people,GINO's base that did this! The "Uterine police" as Shannyn calls them!
    RIP Dr. Tiller.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When I read GINO's suggestion to Mr. Biscuitbarrel, who is a lawyer, he shook his head. Mr. B thinks that asking for suggestions for appointments to the state judiciary via Twitter is, and I quote, "evidence of brain rot."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:07 PM

    I think she should have said..."truly affects AK's future..." rather than "effects." Typical GINO's lack of grasp of the English language. Using her journalism degree indeed. LOL!

    Oh, and great post MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous5:04 PM

    "...my 3rd justice appt to highest court in 3 yrs. Supreme Court truly effects AK's future..."

    Sarah dear, it truly is all about you, isn't it?

    Apparently, the Effects of your stunted early childhood development negatively Affects your present ability to interact with others in a meaningful, substantive way.

    Ah well, you truly seem to be having so much fun twittering twixt your two-fisted blackberries toys;however,your Affectation with this obsessive-compulsive behavior will only limit your Effectiveness in being taken as a serious, responsible and intelligent adult.

    Oh, that's right, I forgot you are not that kind of person.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:03 PM

    Onejrkitty here. Still having trouble selecting other profiles:

    Re:"Kevin Clarkson"

    Ok, for those who may not have noticed yet, the ADN has a new blog forum featuring a number of writers who the ADN advertises as "intelligent and informed."

    I been camping for couple of days and have not checked since Thur but all the the "bloggers" have a "comments section." NOT SO MR. CLARKSON.

    I had some back and forth emails with Mr. Dougherty (Senior Editor) and I was tersely informed that "bloggers blog and commentators comment" and THAT was why Clarkson had no comments section available.

    I advised Mr. Dougherty that was the worse ( or best?) NON answer anyone had ever given me and asked if he could do better. I tried to explain that a "blogger" with NO comments section was really just an editorial and asked WHY WAS THE ADN SUPPLYING CLARKSON WITH A PLATFORM UPON WHICH NO ONE COULD CONFRONT HIM OR ASK HIM ANY QUESTIONS? ( Kinda like Sarah right? No way to ask her questions either.)

    Mr. Dougherty did not respons.

    Since I gave my REAL NAME I decided not to press Mr. Dougherty further. No sense asking for trouble since he knows where to find me anyhow LOL

    NOW I see -- perhaps---WHY the ADN gives Mr. Clarkson his free, no confrontations guaranteed, platform.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous1:25 AM

    From: http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/scarce/sarah-palin-dodges-question-anti-abortion-t

    Who does this sound like below?


    The Department of Homeland Security issued an internal report last month which Director Janet Napolitano received criticism from conservative groups for saying just that, defining rightwing extremism as:

    A movement of rightwing groups or individuals who can be broadly divided into those who are primarily hate-oriented, and those who are mainly antigovernment and reject federal authority in favor of state or local authority. This term also may refer to rightwing extremist movements that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration. (also known as far right, extreme right

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.