Saturday, November 17, 2012

How to tell that the Republicans are really hitting rock bottom. Update!

"Hah! I knew eventually you'd come crawling back!"
Courtesy of Charlotte Allen as posted in the LA Times:  

The Republican Party has been doing a lot of hand-wringing and finger-pointing since the presidential election. Half the conservative columnists and bloggers say the GOP lost because it overemphasized social issues such as abortion and gay marriage. The other half says the party didn't emphasize them enough. And everyone denounces Project ORCA, the campaign's attempt to turn out voters via technology. 

But I've got a suggestion for cutting short the GOP angst: Sarah Palin for president in 2016. 

You think I'm joking? Think again.

No as it turns out Ms. Allen is NOT joking.

Crazy? Definitely. Joking? Not so much.

She continues on:

Palin can more than keep up with the Democrats in appealing to voters' emotions. Hardly anyone could be more blue collar than Palin, out on the fishing boat with her hunky blue-collar husband, Todd. Palin is "View"-ready, she's "Ellen"-ready, she's Kelly-and-Michael-ready. A Palin "war against women"? Hah! Not only is she a woman, she's got a single-mom daughter, Bristol, to help with the swelling single-mom demographic. On social issues, Palin, unlike Romney, has been absolutely consistent. And let's remember that most Americans, whatever their view of choice, disapprove of most abortions. 

Gay marriage? Palin opposes it. But she is also a strong advocate of states' rights, and I'm betting she'd be fine with letting states and their voters grapple with the issue on their own. Remember that all of America didn't swing toward approval of gay marriage on Nov. 6. Three reliably blue states and their voters did. If she were smart, Palin would recruit a member of her impressive gay fanboy base — yes, she has one — to help run her campaign. I nominate Kevin DuJan of the widely read gay conservative blog HillBuzz, a Palin stalwart since 2008. 

Palin's son Track is an Iraq war veteran, so she can be proudly patriotic without being labeled another George W. Bush, looking to do aggressive nation-building. She seems aware there is only one nation in need of building right now: America. 

Furthermore, looks count in politics, and Palin at age 48, has it all over her possible competition, including Hillary Rodham Clinton, who will be 69 by election day 2016 and who let someone talk her into adopting the flowing blond locks of a college student, making her look like Brunnhilde in a small-town Wagner production. Men love Sarah Palin, and she loves men.

Oh yeah, she's a beauty all right.

I'm sorry I think I just threw up in my mouth a little.

Has this woman ever even WATCHED Sarah Palin give an interview? Or seen her lately? Or REALLY given this argument any thought whatsoever?

Literally EVERYTHING she says to describe Palin is complete mooseshit. In fact the very mooseshit that the Grizzled Mama failed to sell to the American people in 2008.

You know when they rejected her, and that old fossil she was running with.  Since then she has been relegated to nothing more than the punchline for late night comedians and a oft repeated cautionary tale for budding politicians for wannabe vice presidential nominees.

But wait, it gets better. Look how the author ended her lunatic argument.

Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan: charming and affable and unwilling to back down if she's right. I can't see what's wrong with that.

 I was actually almost convinced that this MUST be a parody, but nope, the idiot is dead serious.

As literally insane as it appears to be, the Republican party is so beyond damaged, that there are some within its ranks that would actually consider resurrecting the Wasilla Banshee from the ashes and trotting her out as the 2016 Republican nominee.

And to that all I have to say is, "Oh please, please, please do that!" Just the IDEA of Sarah Palin facing off against Hillary Clinton makes my little blogging nipples hard.

And THIS time I will make damn sure that reporters get all of the information they need to prove that this nutjob faked that last pregnancy if I have to kidnap the witnesses and MAKE them confess all they know to the under threat of serious bodily injury. Though to be honest, I am pretty sure that IF the GOP ever really got this desperate I would not have to even reach out to the people in the know. In fact THEY would be breaking down MY door.

P.S. By the way, if you are of a mind to do so, you can e-mail Ms. Allen here and tell her EXACTLY how painfully incorrect she is about the Lunatic from Lake Lucille. Or if you would rather, encourage her in this endeavor until it blows up in her face. Your choice.

Update: As you might expect the Sea O'Pee is ALL OVER this.

132 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:11 PM

    They never learn.
    If the American people didn't buy her when she was in her young 40's, they sure ain't gonna want her in her young 50's.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sally in MI3:17 PM

    Nice spin when she says Palin is 48, and "Hillary will be 69." Hey dummy, Palin will be a post-menopausal 52 in four years. And at the rate she is losing weight (to look like her college-age daughters?) she will be a stick figure with a big head by then. As far as Hillary's hair, my guess is she does NOT travel with a stylist like Palin does. The woman works. She does not have time for $100 haircuts and obviously styles her own hair, not a series of ugly wigs.
    And she woman does realize that Palin will not debate anyone, let alone a crowded field of GOP nuts. I imagine Santorum will be back, and Perry, and Jindahl, and Christie and maybe even a few women. Oh yeah, Bachmann too. And Sarah will never be named from the floor without doing the work. So give it up, dearie. Sarah is lazy. Live with it. Find another savior. (Oh, and good luck with that in your party of hate and exclusion.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:02 PM

      will be a stick figure with a big head by then?

      Too late.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:16 PM

      Turn her upside down...stick a pole up you know where and mop the floor with her...that wig will work as well as any Swifter...that's about all she's good for.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:58 PM

      4:02pm:

      She probably won't even be around by 2016. She is in a poor physical state as of now and might not even make another year. It's rather a moot point anyone arguing over her 2016 prospects. At most her supporters dollars might go to end of life care for her, death panels, if you will :-)

      Delete
    4. Balzafiar4:59 PM

      You should also mention that Hillary, under her not-perfectly-coiffed hair, has a lot of what it takes: brains, and she really knows how to use them.

      She already has my vote for 2016; all she has to do is run.

      Delete
    5. Christie would do to Palin what the Hulk did to Loki, verbally, but she's too cowardly to take these people on.
      M from MD

      Delete
    6. Sally in MI1:46 AM

      OMG..Christie and Palin on the same stage? That would be one debate I would watch. Can Rachel moderate?

      Delete
    7. Sally in MI1:46 AM

      Did you catch the sign behind her? "CLOSED."

      Delete
  3. Anonymous3:24 PM

    Since Charlotte is such an expert on all things Palin, I think I will ask her to encourage Ms Fitness to tell us how she kept her abs so thigh with the 2008 pregnancy. I want to be so trim when 7-8 months pregnant. When Palin opens up more and discusses how she did it women will really love her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:29 PM

    She charged rape victims for their exams. She's a winner alright!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:30 PM

    Sarah Palin would clean Hillary's clock..:)

    Hillary has the blood of four brave Americans on her hands. Why do you think she left the County so fast? She must be in a drunken stupor by now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:45 PM

      I think that your comment about Hillary Clinton is entirely inappropriate.

      And I do not think that Sarah Palin will run in 2016. She could never handle the pressure.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
    2. Blood on her hands? Let's see...how many people died when Gabby was shot? Don't spout that bullshit, pal.

      Delete
    3. 330 pm hehe hahaha. Jealousy from the loon and her butt ugly offspring. You never fail to amuse us.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous3:54 PM

      3:30 PM And you like the idea of 1st PIMP DADDY? Sarah Palin had better be concerned about the MATMAID DAIRY Scandal, and the Alaskan Sex Trafficking Investigation. She is TOAST. As for cleaning Hillary's Clock, Sarah wouldn't last 20 seconds. Stop your Delusional PEEBOT THINKING.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous3:58 PM

      You're as deluded as Palin. The "special bus" is over there, "Krusty."

      Delete
    6. Anonymous4:00 PM

      You switched the people's names around.

      Blood Libel.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous4:01 PM

      If you mean by cleaning an actual clock at the Secretary of State's office in Washington, D.C., then, Sarah would lick it and shine it if it meant any kind of attention these days.

      Delete
    8. First....what form of blackmail does the Hillbillies have on poor Ms Allen?

      Second...didn't we just HAVE an election that the bald headed retard could have run in?

      Third...what you really meant to say 3:30PM is...

      Hillary Clinton would clean Baldy's clock...:)

      Baldy has the blood of six brave Americans on her hands. Why do you think she left Alaska so fast? She must be in a drunken stupor by now.

      There ya go troll...I fixed it for ya'! LOL!!!

      Delete
    9. lostinmn4:47 PM

      You must be thinking about the blood on Sara's hands from her target over Gabby's district. Go away Sara. You are one of the vilest humans who ever lived. You brought out the racist hatred that has increasingly consumed this country the last five years. And this writer - love to see the SaraPAC accounts - wanna bet some serious cash changed hands? This woman should be ashamed for aiding and abetting yet another influx of money to SaraPAC where it will be laundered for Sara's personal use. That gravy train will end soon enough unless writers like this woman get paid commission for stirring the pot and getting the money flowing again.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous4:51 PM

      You're a fucking idiot. All you Benghazi nuts need to go fuck yourself. Where were you hypocritical asswipes when Iraq was bombed to hell and no WMD were found? Fuck off!

      Delete
    11. Anonymous5:09 PM

      yeah, it is so obvious how badly the gop want to keep her around. that is why she figured so prominently in the republican convention. that is why she is being touted as the shining example of womanhood who can mix it up perfectly with politics. yes, this is why she is asked her opinion on world affairs and has been asked by all gop candidates to rally for them.

      oops-my mistake. none of the above is true is it?
      she is only being touted as A GLARING EXAMPLE OF MCCAIN'S LACK OF JUDGEMENT. this is being said by the right and left anonymous.

      btw-you can be anonymous all you want but it surely doesn't stop you from being an idiot too.

      Delete
    12. Anonymous5:11 PM

      I love the idea that these Palin toe lickers (in their dreams, they literally lick her misshapen toes) think Sarah is even in the same league as Hillary Clinton. Oh please, let's have match up between Palin and Clinton. That would be delicious!

      Delete
    13. Anita Winecooler8:12 PM

      I wouldn't trust Sarah to clean anyone's anything, certainly not mine and most certainly not Hillary Clinton. Have you seen those bony things she calls hands?

      Delete
    14. Anonymous9:19 PM

      Hey, asshat @3:39 - $carah Palin has the blood of, what was it nine including a child on her hands from Tucson.

      Delete
    15. Sally in MI1:44 AM

      4 Americans? Bush has the blood of 3400 on 9-11 and another 5000 of our soldiers who died to fught HIS war. Then there are the hundreds of thousands who are maimed and cannot ever work again. You know, those brave soldiers that your Congress refuses to support? And that Jill and Michelle are always behind? What has Sarah done for anyone ever? Nada. She screeches and never supports one charity or throws one fundraiser. She is a fraud. Always has been.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous3:35 PM

    Yes, please run Sarah Palin. Who doesn't love a train wreck?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous3:36 PM

    Oh c'mon. This is Sarah's PR machine planting positive articles, like she's ALWAYS done. It's SO transparent for me. It's so fawning and uses too many of the buzzwords that are rampant in Sarahland. This is a plant. Guaranteed. But why the LA Times? California is pretty firmly Democratic, so why a writer for the LA Times? It's completely suspect to me and has Sarah's gnarled, nasty mitts all over it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:17 PM

      Agreed. This is clearly a plant. She's desperate for a new tv/book/anything deal for herself, Todd, or offspring and LA is her preferred market. Her agent is also too perhaps trying to look busy.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:17 PM

      "It's completely suspect to me and has Sarah's gnarled, nasty mitts all over it."

      Or Chucklesjr. He has been showing up regularly on c4p trying to round up the survivors there to read his blog, buy his book and encourage donations to sarahpac. He has been hinting about another run, I'm sure just to keep stringing them along.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:44 PM

      Let's all go check the comments at the LA Times, never friendly to $creech in the past. I bet they are scathing!

      How can the writer ignore the fact that Palin can't speak in complete sentences, nor has she ever appeared on any program besides FOX w/preapproved questions? Unfrappin-believable .... But it likely allow for the Grifter to scam more $ from her few remaining 'bots.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous3:46 PM

    Two words from the President apply here.. "Please proceed." Let the nuts get all wee-wee-ed up while the smart people organize like Obama4America did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally in MI1:40 AM

      I loved that. And Mitt was too dumb to realize he was setting up his own trap. Just like Sarah.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous3:53 PM

    She quit her elected position as our Governor. That disqualifies her for any other political office in my opinion. Plus, she's dumb, really dumb and she can't fix the dumb because she seems unable to learn and retain any information. Not POTUS material. Hell, she wasn't even Mayoral Material; she had to hire a person to do that job for her too! I guess she has gotten by on her looks but she hit her ceiling as Gov of our small population state and she can't win on looks even for House or Sentate in AK, much less highest office in the land.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:26 AM

      Yes, she may be dumb,

      but she is Crafty and Vicious as a shit house rat.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous3:55 PM

    wonder if the $kank'll be allowed to have campaign signs put up in front of the hoosegow ? ... which is hopefully where $he'll be getting her mail come 2016

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous3:55 PM

    Really! What a stroke of good timing for this article to appear just as McCain's choice of Palin is being repeatedly, mercilessly mocked. Palin, apparently unable to use her Fox News soapbox, must have called in a favor or parted with some cash to get Ms. Allen to write such an inane analysis (not her first).

    I'm less frustrated with the Allen piece and LATimes willingness to publish it than I am disappointed by Gryphen's glee that the media and Democrats will assist Palin's self-promotion and help keep her around as a plaything for the next 4 years. I'll bypass the two suggested options and choose to ignore Allen.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous3:57 PM

    I would LOOOOOOOOOOVE to see Hillary pulverize Palin's sanctimonious ass a debate.

    Hey Sarah, you media whore, you gonna "man up,' "grow a pair,' and run this time?



    That's what I thought, you clueless piece of shit.

    ReplyDelete
  13. sewnup3:59 PM

    It'd be really, really good for the Democrats.

    I'm still laughing uncontrollably at "Ellen-ready".....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:21 PM

      Right??

      And, *obviously* Mittens lost because he was not *View-ready*...

      BWAHAHAHAHA!!

      Delete
  14. Anonymous4:00 PM

    That made me vomit a lot in my mouth.

    That was as pathetic and listless and endorsement as Peggy Noonan's for Romney a few days before the election. Worse than Alaska's own Lynne Curry (ADN) lackluster endorsement of Palin days before the 2008 election. Gee, it's on par with Sarah's own endorsement of Mitt two days before Obama stomped his ass.

    DELUSIONAL LOOOOOOOOOOOOOSERS!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous4:02 PM

    Maybe if she got a brain transplant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WakeUpAmerica4:56 PM

      AND personality transplant with an injection (make that two) of compassion.

      Delete
  16. Anonymous4:22 PM

    LOL Hey Charlotte Allen send that bitch Sarah Paylin your best donation. That will bring out the SarahPAC Convince Sarah Paylin To Run For President Scam again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:34 AM

      Yeah, really.

      Keep your psychosis between you and your therapist, crazy bitch.

      Write it in your diary, leave the rest of us out of it.

      Delete
    2. AKRNC6:44 PM

      SarahPAC is her little personal slush fund, but it wasn't so little when she was pulling in millions. For every million given to SarahPAC, Palin gave a whopping $1700 to a candidate. Let's see, what do you all think happened to the other $998,300? Hey, those botox injections, ugly pedicures and plastic surgery have to get paid for somehow and it's not going to come out of Sarah's personal bank accounts when she has a slush fund she can use. She even used it to pay for a family vacation and bragged about it. If she had actually run, that would have come up repeatedly during the primaries, along with the tens of thousands she spends monthly for consultants with NOTHING to show for it, except the occasional op-ed that she pretends she wrote. I remember when Judge Napolitano tried to question her on "her op-ed about quantitative easing" she rambled on and was unable to repeat even one of the points she allegedly made in her op-ed. When she said that the fed was "just printing money" four or five times in answer to each of his questions, he actually rolled his eyes and gave up. Sarah, in all her glorious ignorance, that she looked as if she knew what she was talking about. This is the same woman who didn't know what the "fed" was in her campaign until Schmidt & Wallace educated her yet her stupid supporters think she's grown a brain and is able to discuss economics in detail a year later? LOL, they are so freakin' gullible.

      Palin will NEVER run, there's too much in her past and despite all the nonsense about her having been vetted, it's yet to actually happen in detail. Wait until it does and she'll end her campaign, IF SHE HAS ONE, so fast her head will spin off her bony shoulders. Fake pregnancies, lending state money to friends who previously defaulted on multi-million dollar loans to the state, a husband who ran a prostitution ring, including procuring women for the Secret Service agents who were assigned to Palin in her '08 run w/McCain...these are just a few of the things that would come up IF she were to run. They make the Obama/Romney campaigns sound downright friendly towards each other!

      Delete
  17. Anonymous4:38 PM

    Iraq war vet?? I don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:05 PM

      Gay fans? Does Marcus Bachmann know about this? Have you seen Todd? Two-tone ptm. If half-term Sarah had any gay admirers they wouldn't let her dress the way she does. Don't get me started on those wigs. The interior decor of their house is blah and unfriendly

      Delete
    2. Sally in MI1:38 AM

      I thought our little war hero was in Afghanistan. Isn't that what Brissy and Sarah both said? And why does Track never spend time with his wife and newborn? Why does Sarah nevr mention her 'grnadkids?' Most mothers are thrilled to be grandmas. But Sarah can't be bothered to spend any time in Alaska now. The state that gave her money for her TV shows and supported her
      aspirations to go to DC is now off limits. Wonder if she'll do a Todd and ignore a Mat-Su supoena. Now that would be funny if Sheriff Joe has to send out the deputies and arres her bony behind.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:35 AM

      Only self-hating gays would like Sarah.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous4:40 PM

    Definitely put in by Palin's booking agent to keep her name in the news and test the reaction. . Perhaps there are people like Sarah out there to test us about sheer evil.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charlotte Allen is a partisan hack at Bill Kristol's The Weekly Standard. I'd imagine Kristol managed a few chuckles while reading this "throwaway" opinion piece in the LATimes, just as we all did.

      The neocons might use Sarah in her crazy clown act to throw grenades at Obama for 4 years, and then perhaps at Hillary later on if she runs, but they would NEVER put Sarah on the ticket again. They will be running Jeb Bush in 2016, probably with the fake-Cuban-exile Mario Whatshisname from FL as a stalking horse and possibly VP ticket-mate.

      The smart money in the neocons got off the Romney band-wagon when they realized he was going to be pummeled, although they kept their "game faces" on for the most part to keep up appearances of being good GOP people.

      The article by Allen actually sounds like it was written as a snarky "inside joke" to make fun of those who actually still worship the baggy-assed former half-term Quitter. Next, you'll hear something similar from analyst-extraordinaire Dick Morris, who I believe is on a book tour right now. I wouldn't buy his book at the dollar bin at Wal-Mart, but I'd pay $20 to see the look on his face if he ever put Sarah Palin's toes in his mouth. Of course, it's not likely he'd survive to collect from me.

      Hey, maybe it will be a Sarah Palin/Dick Morris ticket for the GOP IN 2016...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:45 AM

      "Hey, maybe it will be a Sarah Palin/Dick Morris ticket for the GOP IN 2016..."

      Quitters and Toe-suckers Unite!

      Delete
  19. Anonymous4:53 PM

    Sarah doesn't love anyone but herself; not women or men.

    Fill in the blank ______ it's perverts and sexual predator/men who LOVE SARAH; not normal men. IMO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:40 AM

      Remember that kidnapping victim who lived in her predator's backyard in a tent?

      The male predator was married; his "wife" went along with him to kidnap this little girl at her busstop in the morning; this woman allowed this little girl to be raped daily and live in a tent in her backyard-- with the children, the result of the numerous rapes.

      Women. can. be. equally. predatory.

      They NEED approval/acceptance/power, etc.

      They do not care who they hurt; even if they are children. (Perhaps b/c they suffered as children and think, Fuck It. I suffered - you can suffer, too. Life sucks.)

      Sarah Palin has shown us this, repeatedly.

      Delete
  20. Anonymous4:53 PM

    How much does Sarah pay these people to say this stuff. Any smart person with a brain would write nothing. Or maybe Bristol or Sarah wrote this stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous4:55 PM

    Sarah loves this. Now she can hint she may run and start filling her Pac bag for another 4 years with millions then say she decided not to run....

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous5:01 PM

    Oh please please please let palin run.I'd love to see her get her bony ass kicked again.It would ensure that we keep the presidency for at least until 2020.The very thought warms the cockles of my heart.The only downside I can think of is having to listen to her screeching again but the comedy will be endless.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous5:03 PM

    charlotte allen is a right wing conservative and regular contributor to the weekly standard. she has been lambasted for her pieces that seem to be written purely for causing controversy........sound familiar?
    she wrote a piece for the wash. post 4 years ago and trotted out every idiotic stereotype about women being the weaker sex that has ever been used. she was roundly criticized and to such a degree that the wash post tried to back pedal and say the piece was humor!! ha!! i wonder if the la times will have to do the same.
    though ms allen has graduated from highly acredited schools, while sp hasn't-the differences stop there. rape-woman's fault. men-boys will be boys/can't fight their urges. religion-my belief and no others.

    google her and you will see the source of her piece in the times......she is a sp wannabe-which is hysterical in itself. the fact that she mentions her "looks" which are gone, and her "loving men and them loving her" shows what a ridiculous sexist piece she is.

    ms. allen is not someone who the gop would listen to about sp.

    to feel better, answer the question about sp running in 2016 and beat the sea o pee at their own game of rigging the vote.

    namaste

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:42 AM

      Men love Sarah.

      Bull. shit.

      Men do NOT want to fuck Sarah Palin,

      and

      Women do NOT want to BE Sarah Palin.


      FAIL.

      Delete
  24. Anonymous5:06 PM

    I think the first comment I read on the LA Times version about sums this batch of crazy up:

    "This op-ed was mistakenly printed by the Times. Charlotte Allen wrote this for 'The Onion.'"

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well, sure, yeah. What a plan. One little hitch. Palin is lazy and a moron and ignorant and unteachable and thoroughly dishonest and unethical. Okay, more than one hitch. A lot of big hitches.

    Also too, wherever did the writer get the idea that Palin loves men? Palin has made it very obvious that she despises men with all of her unsavory and lascivious comments on their sexual prowess or equipment or lack thereof. She is one seriously sexually perverted person.

    And the aging trashy biker's old lady look that she is flaunting these days is not exactly presidential. She really needs to stop watching Sons of Anarchy as fashion inspiration.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous5:10 PM

    I vote to encourage her so we can have another landslide in 4 yrs for either Hillary or Eliz Warren.

    I LOVE Hillary's new hair approach, unconventional though it is. She has never looked (and been) more serious and able, and that is VERY attractive. More attractive to me than a worn out wig hat plus no education + Palingates galore.

    Maybe the milk scandal will settle this.

    OR, please please please Mr G let's get the baby hoax uncovered so dirty tricks are just that much less appealing to the GOP VIPs.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous5:11 PM

    Screech will serve a term alright ... in prison.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous5:13 PM

    I think she's picking a vaginal wedgie in that picture!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous5:14 PM

    judging from the outdoor socal pic, $kank's crotch crickets must be on the bite, relative to the claws on her left paw diggin' at her crotch

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:57 PM

      that or her herpes are flarin' up

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:33 PM

      Sarah is adjusting her over sized clitoris. That would be known as a penis to people outside her family.

      Delete
  30. Anonymous6:18 PM

    If she were put up against Hillary Clinton - she'd be the laughing stock of the country! Hillary is so, so much smarter and more experienced.

    Give me a fucking break!!! She'd continue bringing down the Republican party which is just fine w/me!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous6:35 PM

    Oh my is Sarah reinserting her mini vibrator that fell out?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Some of Palin's supporters are so delusional that you can't help but wonder if they've gone off their meds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:31 PM

      They were never on them.

      Delete
  33. Anonymous6:40 PM

    Charlotte Allen has written some really stupid things before and managed to get them printed.

    In the LA Times 2009: "Atheists: No God, no reason, just whining

    Superstar atheists are motivated by anger -- and boohoo victimhood.

    I can't stand atheists -- but it's not because they don't believe in God. It's because they're crashing bores.

    Other people, most recently the British cultural critic Terry Eagleton in his new book, "Faith, Reason, and Revolution," take to task such superstar nonbelievers as Oxford biologist Richard Dawkins ("The God Delusion") and political journalist Christopher Hitchens ("God Is Not Great") for indulging in a philosophically primitive opposition of faith and reason that assumes that if science can't prove something, it doesn't exist."

    And so on and so forth. Then she gets to some guy named P.Z. Meyers. (google for his response)

    "Then there's P.Z. Myers, biology professor at the University of Minnesota's Morris campus, whose blog, Pharyngula, is supposedly about Myers' field, evolutionary biology, but is actually about his fanatical propensity to label religious believers as "idiots," "morons," "loony" or "imbecilic" in nearly every post. The university deactivated its link to Myers' blog in July after he posted a photo of a consecrated host from a Mass that he had pierced with a rusty nail and thrown into the garbage ("I hope Jesus' tetanus shots are up to date") in an effort to prove that Catholicism is bunk -- or something.

    Myers' blog exemplifies atheists' frenzied fascination with Christianity and the Bible. Atheist website after atheist website insists that Jesus either didn't exist or "was a jerk" (in the words of one blogger) because he didn't eliminate smallpox or world poverty."

    But there is so much more stupidity at the rest of the article.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2009/may/17/opinion/oe-allen17

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anonymous6:41 PM

    Sarah must have bad old woman's arthritis. look at her knobby left knee. Man it is really sticking out.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous6:42 PM

    Sarah sure can't put her blackberry down. Who's going to call her.... President Obama?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous6:44 PM

    More offensive yet (and more hilarious when thinking about a Sarah Palin 2016 run) is Charlotte Allen's October 2011 (pre Akin, Mourdoch 'legitimate rape' and so on) advice to women on appropriate dress. LA Times again.

    "When women dress as Halloween candy

    A faux-ho dressed (or mostly undressed) for Halloween might want to be careful where she turns tricks or treats."

    Rilly you say? She said WHAT?! Yes she did!

    "What do "SlutWalks," the anti-rape demonstrations that have been held in nearly every major city, and Halloween parties have in common? A lot. Both feature phalanxes of females flaunting scanty clothing that typically involves lingerie.

    As everyone knows, the perennial favorite among Halloween costumes for women is "ho," followed by "sexy witch," "sexy nurse" and "Lady Gaga." So it's hard to spot the difference between the young woman marching down the street clad only in a lace corset and high heels for a SlutWalk and the young woman clad only in a lace corset and high heels for an evening of Oct. 31 club-hopping. "

    But wait there's even more! Next thing you know she'll be talking about GILFS!

    "Then this past spring a police constable in Toronto teaching a personal-safety class at York University said that "women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized."

    The admonition, if crudely put, was practical, rather like advising someone walking through a dangerous neighborhood at night not to flash expensive jewelry or leave a wallet hanging out. Sure, it's not your fault if you get mugged while flaunting your wealth, but you could have taken steps to reduce the risk."

    Whoops no GILF yet' but that's helpful...if you believe that's what causes the problem of rape...burka's help too right?

    Does anyone think the summary might apply to you know who...

    "the fact that rapists tend to target young women rather than grandmotherly types suggests that in the real rape culture (in contrast to the imaginary rape culture of some feminist ideology), the faux-hos of Halloween and their SlutWalker counterparts marching in their underwear — like a man walking at night with a bulging wallet — should be careful about where they flash their treasure."

    http://articles.latimes.com/2011/oct/30/opinion/la-oe-allen-halloween-sluts-20111030

    Sarah Palin: SHAKE IT IN 2016!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:47 AM

      An eighty year old woman was just brutally raped **in her hospital bed**

      by her caretaker, who shoved a "device" inside the old woman, telling her it would "feel good".

      The old woman is on tape screaming for the woman to stop.


      Was the old woman being too fucking SEXY??????

      Delete
  37. WakeUpAmerica6:47 PM

    Looks like she forgot the Belmont girls. I wonder if her head is on backwards. Hard to tell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally in MI1:30 AM

      I doubt even the uniflated Belmonts fit ehr any more. She is anorexic and ugly now.

      Delete
  38. Anonymous6:48 PM

    Send Sarah Palin your best...... again.

    Sarah needs to buy clothes that fit her. What you see in the picture where she is scratching her crotch is clothes that are too loose for her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WakeUpAmerica11:02 PM

      While I would love to make fun of her, I actually think she is pulling the gray shirt down. It looks like she is pulling on the hem of it.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:48 AM

      WakeUp -

      Why would she pulling it down? it already hangs on her hips - AND, she's wearing a long, black tank top to cover her belly.

      Her crotchie scaps are itching, face it!

      Delete
  39. Anonymous6:49 PM

    Oops Sarah's condom fell off again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:49 AM

      That bitch hasn't been close to a penis in a loooooong, loooong time.

      Delete
  40. Anonymous6:56 PM

    Ewwww look at Sarah Palin's grey fingernails. What's wrong with her?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anita Winecooler8:17 PM

      No Toilet Paper and too much lip licking.

      Delete
  41. Anonymous6:58 PM

    Sarah Sarah Sarah you making me sick just looking at you.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous7:24 PM

    OK, [dumb] men may love sarah palin, but women don't. And we outnumber men voters. Add in the smart men and no way.

    Besides, she'll never make it through the primaries with her Quitter Legacy. They'll eat her alive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:06 PM

      Sarah Paylin may have Todd's balls in her purse but Sarah doesn't have any cajones of her own to run. She would play her ignorant followers like last time and milk them like she milked Dairygate.

      Delete
    2. Sally in MI1:29 AM

      Dairygate is about to spill all over dear Sarah. Hope she has some real boots isntead of those teenage shoes.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:50 AM

      Dumb people, men and women (Nancy French, this bitch, Kristen Cole, Krusty, etc.) like Sarah Palin.

      So. fucking. what?

      Delete
  43. someone at C4P thinks these are a few of her best attributes.

    "Her greatness is best manifested by her enemies. It took Margaret Thatcher ten years to gather as many enemies as Sarah Palin got in two days. That is true greatness."

    That's what we need - more enemies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally in MI1:28 AM

      So now we are supposed to be judged worthy by the number of enemies we have? In that case, President Obama must be the greatest man ever on the face of the Earth! These morons have been his enemy since 2008...millions of them. I don't consider Palin an 'enemy.' I consider her to be a very bad joke. So cross one enemy off her list. That leaves a couple hundred at best.
      Serioiusly, See o'Pee, Sarah will never run for office. That would require work. And brains. And far more cash than even you people will find in your checking accounts. Charlotte Allen is a dunce.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:54 AM

      Interesting about the "enemies".

      I quickly befriended a woman at work. Things happened and our friendship soured. It got to the point where there was actual unspoken animosity toward each other.

      I had done nothing wrong, but i realized that I couldn't go in to work and face the animosity any longer.

      I sent her a simple text that congratulated her on a recent work accomplishment, and said she was an inspiration.

      She quickly replied thank you and offered to take me to lunch.

      I will keep her at arm's distance, but I have "fixed" the situation.

      Adults don't have "Enemies", Sarah.

      Delete
  44. Anonymous8:04 PM

    That shallow article has to be a friend of Sarah's. It's probably someone linked to that Burnett guy. Who are these people?

    Sarah's looks, and her fake man's man husband Todd, and her strong daughter, their fishing/4-wheel/mud-covered Ram truck/kind of people, traipsing the hinterlands, mountains, fields, streams, shores, bays of Alaska fake persona is enough to make one puke.

    Enough with this schtick. Who doesn't get tired of hearing the same old/same old of the no-fear/superhuman/Palin tribe. Don't they even get sick of perpetuating this again and again? People are sick of it. Do they ever get the hint?


    Real strong heroes are the ones who live through hard times and keep their heads above water. They live within their means, and don't have escape homes to run to. They have to sacrifice. Real heroes don't BRAG continuously about their outdoorsy performances and exploits. Who cares if they run, pan for gold, change diapers, snowmachine ride, ski, 4-wheel vehicle-run, run to Nascar races, etc. The real heroes are the men and women who are volunteering to help disaster victims. But, these people have humility. They don't have their dads, brothers, friends write books about them at how generous and wonderful they are. They don't SHOVE their deeds down other's throats. The Palins act like they are the center of the universe. Ooooohhhh, look at US, see how competitive we are, how fit we are, how outdoorsy we are, how WONDERFUL we are, how much more earthy we are than others. They really think only they do this stuff.

    People like this do not get it. They don't realize that the world moves on and the sun shines and it has NOTHING to do with Sarah.




    ReplyDelete
  45. Anita Winecooler8:15 PM

    HA HA! I'm voting for "encourage", gryph, your nipples can thank me later, and besides, you've got the ammo to take her down if she's stupid enough to even try.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Anonymous8:47 PM

    Obligatory Post Where We Say Charlotte Allen Sucks
    You've no doubt already read this impossibly horrible column penned by conservative freelance journalist Charlotte Allen that ran in the Washington Post on Sunday, but just in case you haven't gotten the outrage out of your system, consider this comment thread the place to do just that.

    We hardly know how to begin to wrap our brains around this series of events: Allen, the same woman who wrote the Weekly Standard story dismissing the Jena Six incidents as having been made up, apparently pitched a column to Outlook section editors at the Washington Post about how women are dumber than men. These same editors reviewed the idea, decided they liked it, asked to see a draft, read the actual column, still liked it, and then published it. All along the way, several editors and copy editors were no doubt involved in the editorial process that went into this piece of total garbage, and at no point did anyone stop to say, hey, maybe we shouldn't publish this ignorant pack of lies. Consider our minds officially boggled.

    The outraged and, really, dumbfounded response since the column ran couldn't have been more predictable. Gee, you know, it's almost like the Washington Post thought they'd run something this stupid on purpose just so everyone would link to it, comment on it and write in angry emails about it.

    http://dcist.com/2008/03/03/obligatory_post.php

    Charlotte Allen writes "christian" romance novels and very bad articles. Just google her. Certified nut.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Charlotte Allen is with Bill Kristol's neocon rag, the Weekly Standard. By no means is this a serious piece or even meant to be a trial balloon to test reaction. It's more of an inside joke for the GOP right now, kind of gallows humor because they just got the shit kicked out of themselves. It's a way to get over the experience without having to say nice things about Mitt Romney, who they will do all they can to forget ASAP.

    Sarah will probably send Allen a gift card for Christmas from her PAC as a thank-you for doing a little shit-stirring for some contributions from the C4P idiots. On second thought, since it's Sarah Palin, she will probably send Allen a 2013 Sarah-Calendar. Sarah won't give up her own "hard-earned money" that she works so hard to grift from the 'tards on her own sucker-lists.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous9:05 PM

    Why do newspapers keep publishing Charlotte Allen?

    Photo via DCist
    The op-ed pages of our nation’s largest newspapers can hardly claim to only run insightful, poignant commentary 100 percent of the time. Sometimes the writing is simply bad. Sometimes the arguments are faulty. And sometimes they get facts just plain wrong. But I’ll posit that, for the most part, when I read the New York Times, Washington Post or Los Angeles Times op-ed pages, they’re going to be full of accomplished people who have legitimate points to be made.

    Except, that is, when those papers decide to publish Charlotte Allen. Allen is virtually the only person – male or female – I can think of who consistently appears in major newspapers despite the flimsiest of resumes and despite arguing outlandishly bigoted, substance-free positions for no other reason than to bash people, belief systems, or even entire genders she happens to dislike.

    Lately Allen’s go-to outlet has been the Los Angeles Times. Most recently, she’s lashed out at two journalists – Joe McGinnis and Janet Malcolm – for setting up camp next to Sarah Palin’s house, and for expressing doubt about a convicted killer’s guilt, respectively.

    On McGinnis, Allen defends Sarah Palin for responding to the situation in a “good-humoredly” and “neighborly” way – this, despite Palin’s having insinuated that McGinnis was some sort of child-molester looking to peep in on her young daughter through her bedroom window.

    Allen – with no apparent sense of irony – takes to newspaper pages and exercises her own First Amendment rights in order to insist that other people shouldn’t do the same. In doing so, she makes it clear that the real journalists deserving of shame aren’t the ones she eviscerates, but the ones who continue to provide her with a platform.

    Embarrassingly, Allen’s most recent piece for the Times isn’t even close to the most indefensible thing she’s written – back in May 2009, she took to the op-ed page to declare “I can’t stand atheists” – an inexplicably hateful rant against a group of people’s way of looking at the world that was backed by such nuanced observations as “they’re crashing bores.” A similar piece lashing out at Judaism or Christianity, or written by anyone else, is unimaginable for a major publication – but for some reason, Allen keeps getting away with it. Hemant Mehta, who runs the blog Friendly Atheist, appropriately expressed outrage at Allen’s piece, writing:

    Those are ignorant, bigoted, hateful remarks. They’re also wildly stereotypical and extremely inaccurate.

    When Charlotte Allen says the exact same things about atheists, however, she gets published in the Los Angeles Times.

    The pinnacle of Allen’s absurd, inflammatory writing, however, was an op-ed in the Washington Post pointing out “what dumb fucks women are,” as Feministing so wonderfully described it. You might have thought that arguments about women being relegated to second-class chattel would be an idea that wouldn’t find a loudspeaker in the 21st century, but there is Allen – and the Post – acting every bit the eager-to-please-the-powerful-men-in-her-tribe submissive, and playing dumb to a comical degree:

    I am perfectly willing to admit that I myself am a classic case of female mental deficiencies. I can’t add 2 and 2 (well, I can, but then what?). I don’t even know how many pairs of shoes I own.

    So, let’s recap. First Amendment: overrated. Women: Dumb bitches. Atheists: Boring as shit. These are the stances being given a platform over substantive, nuanced ideas by the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. That’s indefensible.

    http://trueslant.com/saralibby/2010/06/08/why-do-newspapers-keep-publishing-charlotte-allen/

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous9:07 PM

    Weekly Standard Writer (Charlotte Allen): The Real Victims Of “Hookup Culture” Are Guys

    http://jezebel.com/5466830/weekly-standard-writer-the-real-victims-of-hookup-culture-are-guys

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous9:08 PM

    WTF? "And let's remember that most Americans, whatever their view of choice, disapprove of most abortions. "

    Again? WTF, what does Crazy Charlotte think pro0choice means? so, no. we don't disapprove of most abortions, any more than we "disapprove" of car accidents. Birth control is best, sometimes it fails through chemical or human error. And in that case it is the woman's CHOICE, Charlote, you ignorant, stoopid bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anonymous9:10 PM

    Oh, & Charlotte Allen HATES atheists and women who "swoon" over Barack Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anonymous9:39 PM

    Nothing quite as laughable as someone almost 50 dressing like they did in the 1980's.

    And thinkin' they're still sooo hot. hahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  53. Anonymous11:31 PM

    Dear Sarah,

    You'd make a bigger contribution to humanity chugging cock in amateur porn that whatever it is you are doing now.

    Love,
    The Thu inking World

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anonymous12:52 AM

    Gryph, have you seen this ?

    "Martin Short Compares Palins To Honey Boo Boo on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live!' (VIDEO)":

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/martin-short-compares-palins-to-honey-boo-boo-kimmel_n_2139418.html

    ReplyDelete
  55. BabyRaptor2:00 AM

    First off, she's lying through her teeth about most Americans being anti-choice. Second, who gives a flying Fuck even if they were? Rights are rights, no matter what the rest of the country thinks.

    This person is a pitch-perfect example of why the Right lost. No sense of respect for other people, no sense of respect for the truth and no connections to reality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:38 AM

      Thanks for catching that. Right's are right's, just like the right to have guns or viagra.

      Delete
  56. Anonymous2:53 AM

    Anyone else notice the irony in that picture of Sarah? The "Hot List Winner" sign on the window behind her and the "Closed" sign right next to it.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Anonymous5:31 AM

    I would like a photo of Kattie Courick's. face when she interviewed. The X GOVERNOR, that said it all.
    If the Republican Party backs her again, they should give up.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I'm kind of appalled at the people who know about her pregnancy faking and haven't, at this late date, said a word. Whomever is out there that has kept that secret for her is one of her enablers.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Anonymous6:55 AM

    Looks like she's scratching an itch..and those shoes look hilarious!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:05 PM

      Sarah always has some kind of crotch rot going on with her lady parts. You betcha. Some say that's why she smells so funky all the time.

      Delete
  60. Anonymous7:42 AM

    Hi Gryphen,

    This is the first time in a long time you have mentioned Babygate.
    Please get these people to come forward now, if they are indeed witnesses to the scam.

    We have all waited so long for this to be clearly and publicly exposed.
    If they know and they are anxious enough to "break the doors down" voluntarily, then why haven't they come forth?

    Please- beg them! There is nothing that would give us closure on this sanctimonious fake's tenure in the public eye than to have her exposed as a values fraud.

    Please, please, please!!

    ReplyDelete
  61. Anonymous7:57 AM

    Looks like Ms. Allen got confused about reality! That article is just pants on head retarded; and yes, I said retarded!

    Vero Guy

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous8:09 AM

    Yeah, she fires up the 'base' with idiotic, rabble rousing insults, lies, distortions and full-on vitriol.
    She's toast in the political world. How anyone can reasonably think this shallow-minded woman will run for president is beyond me. And even scarier is these nincompoops think she'd be a 'great' president. Unreal. Based on what?? Cause she's a hockey mom with 5 kids??
    Yeah, take a look at that photo of her with her shirt hanging off her shoulder reading the National Enquirer in K-mart for Christ's sake, and tell me she's presidential material! Or walking down the sidewalk with K-mart bags and 5-inch sandals on. Or in her Superman T-shirt and black come-fuck-me boots on...The list is endless.
    There's too many videos of her spouting off stupid and inane comments. She'll never outlive any of them.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Not What You Want to Hear9:05 AM

    Charlotte Allen is a rightwing PR hack, not a journalist. This was a guest editorial, not a piece by anyone who works for the LA Times.

    I am fairly certain she was probably paid by SarahPAC to write this. It's a business transaction, pure and simple. Pay someone to keep up the hopes that Palin will run, and the money will continue to flow into SarahPAC.

    This is going to go on indefinitely, by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I saw that the other day, thought for sure it had to be parody. Hope she was well paid for soiling whatever reputation she had.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anonymous11:12 AM

    It is eternally amusing to watch you flail about knowing you will never be taken serious because you cling to this silly conspiracy theory.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anonymous12:15 PM

    Is the Conspiracy Theory as silly as the Sex Trafficking and Prostitution Ring allegations? The latter is avoided by you Palinbots like the PLAGUE, WHY?

    ReplyDelete
  67. Anonymous11:12 AM

    It is eternally amusing to watch Baldy flail about knowing that she will never be taken serious because she clings to her delusions of relevancy.


    There...fixed it for ya'! LOL!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:46 PM

      Baldy has a small group of followers left and that's it. Nothing she says anymore is relevant. Sarah is just another reality show circus clown like Bristol and Todd.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous1:09 PM

      Thank you, GinaM, your astute observations are always appreciated!

      Delete
  68. Anonymous1:08 PM

    "Men love Sarah Palin, and she loves men." My god, what a stupid statement. Yeah, men would (and did) vote for her 2008 because they can picture themselves boinking her...? Seriously? And that makes her a viable candidate?
    In the minds of the rethug cons, yes it does!

    ReplyDelete
  69. Anonymous1:29 PM

    1. She quit because she couldn't handle being gov.
    2. Candidates loose when she personally endorses them.
    3. All of her and Todd's businesses failed or went into bankruptcy.
    4. Don't believe she actually graduated from college.
    5. She has been billed medically for at least one abortion. (NO MEDICAL OFFICE WOULD SEND A BILL FOR A MISCARRIAGE)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:12 PM

      5. She has been billed medically for at least one abortion.


      Link please

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:48 PM

      I wouldn't be surprised if when McCain's staff went through Sarah's medical records they found records/billings for an abortion. Of course, just in case it ever came up, Sarah had a whole sad "story" that she revealed in her book:

      "Todd flew home to be with me when I had the D&C. When the doctor's bill arrived in our mailbox, it came with a typo. In the box describing the procedure, someone had typed, "Abortion." Instead of starting off with a fresh form, they painted it over with a thin layer of Wite-Out and retyped, "Miscarriage." For some reason it just felt like salt in the wound."

      Delete
    3. Anonymous5:12 PM

      It's on page 56 of "Going Dumb"...uh...I mean "Going Rogue"...here's the link to Amazon...I just put in keyword..."miscarriage" and lo and behold...it came right up!

      Link....http://www.amazon.com/Going-Rogue-American-Sarah-Palin/dp/0061939897/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1353295343&sr=1-1&keywords=going+rogue+sarah+palin

      Delete
  70. Anonymous3:24 PM

    Todd's Sex Trafficking Ring did not go into Bankruptcy, however they won't claim that. How's that Allen West Endorsement Thingy 'Treatin' ya, Sarah? Are you and Toad still supporting Newt Gingrich, and 'WOMENS' RIGHTS ADVOCATE Richard Mourdock? How many of your last minute Endorsements LOST? You sure can pick WINNERS,........ NOT.

    ReplyDelete
  71. ibwilliamsi3:31 PM

    Ms. Allen's grammar is atrocious.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Anonymous5:33 PM

    O/T If we all just vote for the opponents of any Palin Endorsee, we are winners. Right, Allen West, Richard Mourdock, Steelman, Romney, Gingrich, etc. BWHAHAHAHA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:29 PM

      Don't forget Bristol the Loser Pistol on DWTS. We got rid of her lame nondancing ass.

      Delete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.