Army Sgt. Rebekah Havrilla. Proof positive that having access to guns will not prevent rape. |
Former Army Sgt. Rebekah Havrilla told the military personnel subcommittee she delayed filing formal charges for an alleged rape by a fellow soldier in Afghanistan because she did not trust the system, and that after she finally reported it nothing happened.
“The military criminal justice system is broken,” she said. “I feared retaliation before and after I reported, the investigative process severely re-traumatized me, many of the institutional systems set up to help failed me miserably, my perpetrator went unpunished despite admitting to a crime, and commanders were never held accountable for making the choice to do nothing,” Havrilla said.
Havrilla was an explosive ordnance technician deployed to Afghanistan as part of Taskforce Paladin when she allegedly was raped in 2007 by another service member about one week before the deployment ended.
“Initially, I chose not to do a report of any kind because I had no faith in my chain of command,” she said. Her reluctance was based, in part, on the fact that her first sergeant had been accused of sexual harassment “and the unit climate was extremely sexist and hostile in nature towards women.”
She filed an informal complaint before leaving active duty “but had no intentions of ever doing a formal investigation.” Havrilla said she saw her rapist again in 2009, about a year after she separated at Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., while on reserve duty. “He recognized me and told me that he was stationed on the same installation. I was so re-traumatized from the unexpectedness of seeing him that I removed myself from training.”
Havrilla said she sought help from an Army chaplain “who told me — among other things — that the rape was God’s will and that God was trying to get my attention so that I would go back to church.”
She did not name the chaplain but said his comments convinced her to still not report the alleged rape.
She finally reported it after a friend told her the accused rapist had posted photographs of her, taken during the rape, on the Internet. “I felt that my rape was always going to haunt me unless I did something about it,” she said, so she reported it to Army authorities.
"The rape was God’s will and that God was trying to get my attention so that I would go back to church." Apparently the God that this asshole worships is one that is willing to brutalize women in order to increase church attendance.
And people wonder why women, especially those in the military, are so hesitant to report their rapes to the authorities.
I am completely sickened by this.
fuk_tard talibanesque chaplain needs to get fragged along with the rapist - sooner rather than later
ReplyDeleteGryphen, I share your being sickened by this, it's reprehensible to have someone serve their country, only to be violated in such a horrific way and have little to no recourse to gain justice.
ReplyDeleteThat chaplain should be disbarred or dismissed or whatever you do to get rid of them from our military. I hope that this gets a big focus in the media, though I won't hold my breath.
It's 2013 and yet if feels like we're falling back into the dark ages in some ways. The regressive influence is unrelenting, making it all the more critical for the progressive influence to fight, fight, fight for true justice and FREEDOM. Not the faux patriotic freedom that Palin tweets about, but GENUINE freedom to feel SAFE when you are serving your country...doing your job...living your life.
O/T, but I felt sure you'd want to know this, G:
Scott Prouty, '47 Percent' Filmmaker, Reveals Identity On 'The Ed Show'
The man who changed the 2012 election is named Scott Prouty. The 38-year-old bartender at the Boca Raton, Fla., fundraiser that doomed Mitt Romney's presidential campaign came forward Wednesday in an interview with MSNBC's Ed Schultz.
Prouty, a Midwest native, took his Canon camera to the fundraiser, thinking Romney might pose for photos with the event staff. Instead, he captured Romney speaking about "the 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent on government, who believe that, that they are victims, who believe that government has the responsibility to care for them. Who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing."
The bartender said in a series of embargoed phone and in-person interviews with The Huffington Post that he decided to make the video public and posted clips online, hoping they would go viral.
...After deciding to release the video, Prouty made it his mission to get the film clips out there. "I decided I was going to make a 24-hour a day push to make sure it went as far and wide as it possibly, possibly could go," he explained. "It's been a long journey for sure. A lot of people think I just sent it to the news media on a disc or something and then forgot about it. I had been pounding it."
When Prouty talked about the film's rollout, he sounded like any indie film director looking for word-of-mouth magic. "I wanted to have a build up," he said. "I wanted to have it viral as much as I could possibly get it viral. And then I was hoping obviously a serious reporter could jump on it at the right time [and] make it pop. ... I wish I almost did it a little bit later because I think it would have been more crushing. But it all worked out obviously."
BuzzFeed offers a thorough rundown of where Prouty shopped his Romney reel and where he posted it. On May 31, under "Romney Exposed,"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/13/scott-prouty-47-percent_n_2870837.html
That interview with Ed was riveting. Scott Prouty is a very brave man knowing what the repub's could have done to him if they found out who he was. When he talked about how he had the video for a couple weeks and one day looked in the mirror and said he was a coward if he didn't release it. What a hero! I hope all my fellow IM'ers watch this one.
DeleteAh, just another dirt-bag fake reverend trying to stir up some...
ReplyDeleteThis poor woman! I am sick just thinking about how hopeless she felt. The chaplain should be removed from his post.
ReplyDeleteI agree, this is sickening. For this soldier first to be assaulted, for the chain of command to let the attacker carry on unpunished and then to be told that it is God's will? My brain stutters...
ReplyDeleteMaybe these men should be permanently separated from the weapon they are using. Because rape is an assault aggravated by a weapon that just happens to be attached to the attackers body.
If anyone is cringing at the statement above, I understand. But I cringe as well each time I read of ever more instances of violence and subsequent derelictions of duty by those within the chain of command, all in the so-called name of unit "morale and cohesion".
It is usually relatively easy to know the "enemy" outside the gates. The enemy within the compound is not known until he overwhelms you. To some extent the dual burden of the female soldier has ever been thus, but I wonder if it has become worse, or if women have finally found their voices as a group. They have my admiration.
With the increase in attention the media has been devoting to rape, especially during the last election cycle and most specifically in recent recent months, I can only hope that this represents the beginning of a new era of awareness with regard to sexual assault on women.
ReplyDeleteIn my generation the word was never spoken and it was always the woman's fault. The shame was unbearable. I truly hope that future generations of men will grow up in a society where they have been taught that they may not rape women. They may not force themselves on anyone. Ever. They do not have the right to violate a woman's body.
Right now we still live in a society where that poor woman receives death threats for suggesting that men be taught this common decency.
It is sick. And when a woman dares to suggest that men 'should be taught NOT to rape women,' she is demonized by the right. And these soldiers? Yeah, some patriots. They treat their fellow soldiers jsut as badly as they do the citizens of the countries we invade. The whole military needs a cleansing. And by the way, what kind of 'chaplain' even goes to war? How can someone claim to be Christian and support war? We loaned our parsonage to one of these guys for a few years. We are a peace church and he wanted to come preach. Evidently, he came in starting trying to justify war and his place in it. Needless to say, he was not invited back to preach. Oh, and this awesome Christian soldier and his wife lived rentfree in our parsonage for 7 years and paid not one cent in rent, nor did they ever make a contribution to our tiny church. Talk about takers.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you, Gryphen.
ReplyDeleteThere's a big story right there in Alaska, right under your nose
ReplyDeletehttp://youtu.be/6wuA-CWCWNg
I hear ya and agree Gryphen. This is a sad state of affairs for our country. Dam SAD and pathetic!
ReplyDeleteI certainly agree that it's a sickening act to tell a woman who had bee raped that it was "god's will"...or some such hokum. Most religiously based explaining away of things, does far more harm than good.
ReplyDeleteThe caption - "Proof positive that having access to guns will not prevent rape" doesn't rise to that level of offensiveness, but it definitely pegs the silly meter. I suppose when one has a gun control fetish, it statements like that seem to worm their way into any subject.
First you need to look up the term "fetish." I don't think it means what you think it means.
DeleteSecond clearly a woman in the military is both often armed and well trained in how to use her weapon. Still got raped.
I'm not the first to use the term here on your site. I know exactly what it means, and how it is often employed.
DeleteSecondly, a women assigned to CJTF Paladin is quite often not armed....and your caption presumed a factual basis that does not exist in the totality that you would claim.
According to the GOP - EVERY woman should be armed so why you are talking about a "fetish" on this blog is weird - the sad fact is that even in the armed services a woman is not safe from rape. She could have had a machine gun in the corner & she still would have been raped. Why - because MEN rape.
DeleteThere is as much female on male and male on male assault in the military as there is male on female. Spout your crap elsewhere.
Deletethis will be very unpopular with the pitchfork and torch crowd rape accusers here but, out of curiosity, and in line with the immoral minority blog being 'dedicated to find the truth' did anyone actually read the entire story as written at the army times site?
ReplyDeletei read it several times... there seems to be a lack of any hard evidence except for potential internet photos that apparently must not have indicated rape. the guy did admit to consensual sex (and adultery as he was married, but was not charged although though he could have been). i wont accuse her of lying, i also wouldn't accuse someone of rape simply because they were accused. this story seems odd in the very least, her explanations for not filing complaints or notifying her superiors immediately are odd too. in the very least, her stated distrust of the system doesn't make the accused 'more' guilty. also, as of yet the mystery 'gods will' chaplain, who she claims due to his comments convinced her not to report the rape is still un-named.
10:50 I appreciate your comments. But, having been in the military (I'm a woman.) I don't find it the least bit "odd" that she would be hesitant to report the rape to her superiors--or to anyone, even a best friend in the military.
DeleteLife in the military is NOT like life outside the military. Unless you've been in it, it's hard to comprehend the TOTAL CONTROL the system has on you. The system that is run by MEN. The system that more often than not is quite open about its disdain toward women.
But the GOP says a gun would have saved her - just imagine the court martial if she had shot him - women need a weapon to save themselves - thus NO-ONE in the services should ever fear rape
ReplyDeleteWhat a joke
The takeover of our military by evangelicals is truly frightening, and the influence they have is a danger to the security of our country.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 10:50 wrote: this story seems odd in the very least, her explanations for not filing complaints or notifying her superiors immediately are odd too.
ReplyDeletePerhaps they only seem odd because you have no experience as a woman in the military? Even back in 1975-78 when I was in active duty, women who were raped were quite cautious because of the resulting blowback. It is supposed to be better for women now than it was then - but from what I've been hearing and reading - I think it may be worse.
During my hitch, I knew of two women who were raped a second time in retaliation for reporting the first assault. I know of several women who upon reporting their rapes to a commanding officer (per regulations) were told rape "was a compliment" because it meant that men found them sexually attractive. It doesn't take many such instances before women learn that it isn't safe to report being attacked. I also know of several women who were 'punished' for reporting a rape while the known rapist was lauded and promoted.
Just because you haven't had the experience or can't imagine it doesn't mean it didn't occur. Unfortunately, this story sounds all too real to me.
Woman Veteran 1975-1978 US Army
Woman Vet. Thanks for your comment. I just posted a similar one above before seeing yours.
DeleteSign me "Also a Woman Vet".