Thursday, May 23, 2013

Evidence discovered which just might prove the existence of multiple universes. "All that I know, is that I know nothing."

Courtesy of the Mail Online: 

Laura Mersini-Houghton, theoretical physicist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Richard Holman, professor at Carnegie Mellon University, predicted that anomalies in radiation existed and were caused by the pull from other universes in 2005. 

Now that she has studied the Planck data, Dr Mersini-Houghton believes her hypothesis has been proven. 

Her findings imply there could be an infinite number of universes outside of our own. 

She said: 'These anomalies were caused by other universes pulling on our universe as it formed during the Big Bang. 

'They are the first hard evidence for the existence of other universes that we have seen.' 

Although some scientists remain sceptical about the theory of other universes, these findings may be a step towards changing views on physics. 

The European Space Agency, which runs the £515million Planck telescope, said: 'Because precision of Planck’s map is so high, it made it possible to reveal some peculiar unexplained features that may well require new physics to be understood.' 

Cambridge professor of theoretical physics Malcolm Perry told the Sunday Times that the findings could be real evidence of the existence of other universes. 

While George Efstathiou, professor of astrophysics at the university, told the newspaper: 'Such ideas may sound wacky now, just like the Big Bang theory did three generations ago. But then we got evidence and now it has changed the whole way we think about the universe.' 

Multiple universes. Just imagine how amazing it would be to learn that we are all just a vibration away from entire universes lurking just outside our ability to perceive, and waiting to destroy our concept of reality and our place in the cosmos.

I cannot help but wonder if after such a discovery were to be universally accepted it would signal the final death throes of religion, or if the need to cling to a faith would force a chameleon like metamorphosis that would allow religion to survive and adapt to the new information?

It would seem impossible for the Abrahamic religions to evolve past the outrageously egotistical idea that the planet, the stars, and the sun itself had been created by a God for the human creatures crawling across this tiny orb to encompass the idea of multiple universes. But then again I walked away at seven years of age, so what do I know?

For myself all I can say is that I hope that we learn more about this as soon as possible, because I would hate leave this life with so little understanding of the reality in which I once existed.

17 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:10 AM

    Thank you, Gryhenfor another great post. I ereally enjoyed the one about Rep. Juan Mendez of Arizona as well.

    I hope people begin to broaden theipperspectives.

    However, judging from what George Stephanooplis said on GMA this mmorning, I have my doubts as how quickly change will occur. He was intorducing coverage of the Moore OK tornado bys syaing "how one teacher reacted to approaching evil" (the tornado). Evil?? Really?

    Goodness, how can we move forward when arer intent upon acsribing "evil" to natural phenomena? Is sunshinealways "good" when it sears ccroplands or produce severe burns on human skin? Or is it evil as well? People need to get a grip on reality.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:49 AM

    Can we buy a ticket to send Sarah to another universe?

    I will chip in to help get her there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:42 AM

      We don't have to. I take comfort in the fact that there are an infinite number of universes 'out there' where the only difference between them and the universe we inhabit is that Sarah Palin does not exist.

      To push this to a comic extreme, there are universes out there where Sarah Palin is a Democratic President with Hillary as VP, or where Sarah is actually married to Barack Obama, creator of Facebook.

      The possibilities are endless.

      Delete
    2. It is now time for MY head to explode! -:)

      Delete
  3. Belief in a creative intelligent energy in the universe makes some sense, but religionis comforting. I have learned to live in uncertaintly but most days i wish there a Judgement Day and some justice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Read Carl Sagan's book "Contact" for an interesting take on this possibilities. it's an oldie but goodie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "We once thought our world was the only world."--philhellenes

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdRCPjXn1DY

    ReplyDelete
  6. Unfortunately you can never out logic faith.
    That's why it is called faith.
    There is always a bible verse to explain what ever it is. And then there is the classic fingers in the ears and la la la la response.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Otto Katz6:47 AM

    Just as religion doesn't belong in science, science doesn't belong in religion. They don't have anything to do with one another.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:22 AM

      Agreed. However, I don't see any move by science to teach science in church, but there seems to be a lot of moves by religion to teach religion in school.

      Let schools teach science and churches teach religion, and let the people exposed to both choose whether to believe in science, religion, or both.

      Science thrives on scrutiny. Religion is terrified of it.

      Delete
    2. Leland12:48 PM

      Great description how things SHOULD work, 8:22.

      I hope to live long enough to see it finally settled and returned to how it used to be, without the disgusting rancor of those with big mouths so excruciatingly painful to the rest of us.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous6:59 AM

    Tea Party groups eager, GOP unsure on possible Sarah Palin Senate bid

    Tea Party activists from around the country are eager to see Sarah Palin run for the Senate, but Republican senators themselves aren’t rushing to recruit her.

    A recent poll shows Palin would lead the Republican field if she ran for Senate in Alaska. And while Tea Party activists are running a “Draft Sarah” campaign, Republican leaders in Washington appear decidedly less interested in the prospect.

    A Harper Polling survey conducted on May 6 and 7 showed Palin leading the second-place Republican candidate, Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, 32 percent to 30 percent.

    Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who has feuded with Palin in the past, said the former Alaska governor has become detached from the state.

    “I think there are a lot of outside interests that would like to see Sarah Palin in some form of elected office. Most in Alaska recognize our former governor is really not involved in or engaged in the state anymore, that she’s moved to other interests,” Murkowski said. “In order for you to represent the state of Alaska, you’ve got to be in the state.”

    During the 2008 presidential race, Palin privately said, “I just don’t want to go back to Alaska,” according to the book, Sarah from Alaska. A similar line was used in the HBO movie, “Game Change.”

    Some Republicans in Washington don’t think Palin, who resigned as governor with 18 months left in her term, would be the best candidate to challenge Democratic Sen. Mark Begich (Alaska).

    A Harper poll from earlier in the year showed Begich leading Palin 47 percent to 40.

    Palin might not even get an endorsement from Murkowski in a race aga

    ...Tea Party activists are eager for Palin to get back into elected office. The Tea Party Leadership Fund, which commissioned the recent Harper poll showing her leading the GOP field, has amassed more than 60,000 signatures on a petition calling for her to run.

    “The Tea Party Leadership Fund has a broad audience of grassroots conservative activists, and they feel very strongly that she’s a champion of their values and would love to see her run, and we’re doing everything we can to see her run,” said Dan Backer, the fund’s treasurer.

    Backer said the Senate Republican conference needs more members in the mold of Tea Party favorites, such as Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

    Backer says Palin has yet to comment on the campaign to draft her for the 2014 Senate race.

    Brock McCleary, the Harper pollster, said Palin’s fundraising network and high name identification gives her the luxury of waiting to get into the race.

    “My suspicion is that she would utilize that luxury and wait as long as possible to see if dynamics of a primary between Treadwell and Miller would provide her an opening to run,” he said.

    Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who put Palin on the national stage when he picked her as his vice presidential running mate in 2008, said she would be “great” addition to the Senate.

    “I think she’d be fantastic,” he said. “She has a great national following, and I think she would have an immediate impact.”

    There was speculation that Palin was eyeing a Senate run in Arizona after she bought a house in north Scottsdale in 2011. She later denied that she was interested in replacing then-Sen. Jon Kyl (R).

    In 2010, Palin signed on with the Fox News Channel as a paid contributor. Earlier this year, Palin and the cable news network parted ways.

    A spokesperson for Palin’s political action committee didn’t comment for this article.

    http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/301461-tea-party-eager-gop-unsure-on-possible-palin-senate-bid

    ReplyDelete
  10. Heck, having never seen one, I am skeptical about the platypus.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous9:08 AM

    I have wondered if, in another universe at another time, or perhaps now, there isn't another planet like earth with trees and mountains and rivers and farms and people and domesticated and wild animals or maybe another planet poised to become like earth once we finish with our time here. Maybe that's how it works - a planet like earth comes and then goes and another, similar but different, takes its place. I hope that the people who get to go through something akin to our planet's life cycle will be nicer to one another, to the animals and to the planet itself.
    Beaglemom

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous9:23 AM

    I thought that the multiverse concept was that there are one or more additional universes occupying the same space and that matter is constantly switching from one to the other. This sounds as if they are suggesting that these are completely separate universes operating outside and adjacent to our universe.

    That would suggest that, while space my be infinite, the space occupied by our universe very well may NOT be infinite. If we are an ever-expanding universe then there is the probability that we will collide with another universe at some point. Perhaps that was what our Big Bang was - a collision with another universe.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous12:03 PM

    There has also been discussion regarding "Tachyon Universes", those which could coexist within our own universe, except that all activity happens at a speed faster than light speed, thus we are not able to detect it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

    (there's a crazy website called Tachyonuniverse.com that is a weird new age place selling something called "tachyon sand", that's why I linked the wiki instead)

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.