Saturday, January 04, 2014

With millions of Americans now signing up for health care plans through the Affordable Care Act, the anti-Obamacare minions change tactics.

Courtesy of Reuters:  

Conservative activists opposed to President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul started a new assault on the Affordable Care Act as more than 2 million people began new health coverage under the law on Thursday. 

One group, which is backed by the libertarian billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, launched a $2.5 million television ad campaign that targets three Democratic senators who support the law and could face stiff challenges from Republicans in November elections. 

The group, Americans for Prosperity, or AFP, spent more than $36 million on the 2012 elections, largely for ads that bashed the law known as Obamacare and Democrats who supported it. 

The ads by AFP are aimed at North Carolina's Kay Hagan, Louisiana's Mary Landrieu and New Hampshire's Jeanne Shaheen. Their bids for re-election will be crucial to Democrats' efforts to keep control of the U.S. Senate, where Democrats control 55 of the 100 seats. 

The 30-second videos represent something of a turn in strategy for conservatives, who have spent much of the past year focused on calling for the repeal of the healthcare law, the most sweeping social program since the 1960s. 

Now, with more than 2 million people having signed up for Obamacare and more enrolling for coverage every day, AFP and other critics are signaling that in advance of the elections, they will try to cast Democrats as liars who misled Americans about the law. 

The new ads try to link the senators to Obama and his discredited pledge that all Americans who liked their healthcare plans before Obamacare went into effect could keep those plans.

That of course relies on belief in the GOP talking point that says 5 million people will lose their current health care plans under Obamacare. 

However if California Democratic Senator Henry Waxman has his way that talking point is about to crash head on into a giant factual wall.

This courtesy of Rachel Maddow: 

To that end, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Dems on the House Energy and Commerce Committee published a report (pdf) this week intended to bring the debate into sharper focus. As George Zornick reported, Waxman found that even if we use the Republicans’ figure as a dubious baseline, the specific outcomes leave the GOP argument in tatters. 

* According to the report, half of the 4.7 million will have the option to renew their 2013 plans, thanks to an administrative fix this year. 

* Of the remaining 2.35 million individuals, 1.4 million should be eligible for tax credits through the marketplaces or Medicaid, according to the report. 

* Of the remaining 950,000 individuals, fewer than 10,000 people in 18 counties will lack access to an affordable catastrophic plan. 

In other words, even giving Republicans the benefit of the doubt, we’re looking at 10,000 Americans on the individual market who (a) can’t keep their existing plan; (b) can’t enroll in Medicaid; (c) can’t get subsidized coverage through an exchange; and (d) can’t get catastrophic coverage. 

Or put another way, when Republicans talk about the 5 million people left behind by the ACA, they’re exaggerating by a factor of 500.

Now much like the GOP response to the New York Times article blowing the Benghazi conspiracy out of the water, you can expect a whole lot of cognitive dissonance and misrepresentation of the facts. But that should only energize those of us on the Left to make it our duty to make sure that the truth gets out their far and wide to help undermine efforts to defeat progressives using this mischaracterization of the facts.

14 comments:

  1. Caroll Thompson2:55 AM

    In October, 2013, my husband had a medical emergency which caused him to spend 10 days in the intensive care unit. He did not have health insurance. Luckily he survived, but was diagnosed with congestive heart failure and has a blood clot in his heart.

    Yes, he got very good care in the hospital, but good luck to the husband getting any care without insurance. I signed my husband up for 'Obamacare'. We paid the premium just before the new year and my husband is looking forward to seeing a doctor. He can also get the medication he needs without having to choice between medication to stay alive, heat or food (those things are also needed to sustain life).

    Without the Affordable Care Act, my husband could not get insurance at any price. Now he has a plan and that plan will help him stay alive. Without the Affordable Care Act, my husband would be a dead man walking.

    President Obama and the Democrats who supported the ACA are for life. The Republican's health plan was summed up very nicely by Congressman Alan Grayson, "If you get sick, die quickly".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Randall4:18 AM

    And when explaining the facts to any rabid anti-Obamacare fanatic, whether its your own crazy uncle or a Republican Congress-critter on television, the one pointing out the facts should speak slowly and condescendingly - like you would to a very slow-minded child.

    Be kind, but be firm: they're either lying or they're really that stupid and need you to speak clearly and concisely.

    ReplyDelete
  3. anjaak5:53 AM

    I signed up! I am so excited as I haven't been covered for many years. Luckily I am in pretty good health but who knows, I am getting up there in years. Nice to have a safety net.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:24 AM

    And if you were wondering, if this writer is on target, our president is about to take on the next BIG thing (that the right wing will lose their shit over):

    Obama’s Second Term Is All About Climate Change



    When President Obama leaves office three years from now, the major policy story of his second term — barring some kind of unforeseen invasion — is likely to be climate change. I made this argument at feature length last year, and the evidence continues to mount. Coral Davenport reports today about Secretary of State John Kerry’s “systematic, top-down push to create an agencywide focus on global warming.”

    Kerry is a longtime climate obsessive. (Ten years ago, I attended an off-the-record discussion with Kerry alongside several journalists, and our main takeaway was that he understood and cared about climate change more than any other issue.) His appointment to run the State Department is one of several Obama second-term moves that signal the high priority he assigns the issue. This is true not only of the figures Obama has appointed to posts that inherently concern climate change, like the his green appointees to run the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy, but also to general political advisers, like Denis McDonough and John Podesta, both committed environmentalists who will drive Obama’s climate focus.

    The EPA’s new climate regulations are due to come out this June. They will face a certain legal challenge from conservatives. The main driving goal of Senate Democrats’ rule changes last year was to allow Obama to appoint judges to the D.C. Circuit, which will rule on those regulations.

    Meanwhile, the State Department today released its Climate Action Report, which reconfirms the administration’s commitment to issue new regulations of existing power plants, and further argues that such a plan could bring the United States into compliance with its international greenhouse gas reductions. Kerry has already negotiated an agreement with China to phase out hydrofluorocarbons. After the EPA’s regulations come out, the next step is for Kerry to negotiate the next international climate accord in 2015. As Brad Plumer correctly notes, with characteristic pessimism, a climate treaty is merely a necessary but insufficient step toward averting catastrophic climate change, with more reductions necessary. But that necessary first step is exactly what Obama is doing everything in his power to take with his remaining time.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/01/obamas-second-term-is-all-about-climate-change.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:59 AM

    10K is still way too high. It should be 0. Healthcare should NOT be for profit. It is shameful and disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:57 AM

      Healthcare should not be for profit? Are you fucking serious? Do you think that insurance companies are in this from the goodness of their hearts? What a stupid statement, you fool. Go after them, not the people who are trying to get people healthcare.

      Considering there are 300 million people in this country, 10,000 in a drop in the bucket.

      Go after the GOP governors who are BLOCKING millions from getting the relief of healthcare. Go after the GOP legislators who are trying to sabotage Obamacare every step of the way.

      You're just so full of bullshit outrage and you don't have a leg to stand on!

      5 Reasons The GOP’s Obamacare Sabotage Will Have To Get Even More Desperate

      http://www.nationalmemo.com/5-reasons-the-gops-obamacare-sabotage-will-have-to-get-even-more-desperate

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:18 AM

      Apparently you have poor comprehension, they can still have access to full coverage plans.

      Delete
    3. That's right. Healthcare should not be for profit.

      But you know WHY those 10,000 aren't covered, right?

      OBSTRUCTION BY THE REPUBLICANS.

      Just thought I'd point that out. The reason he number isn't zero is because of the GOP, not the Democrats and certainly not Obama.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous2:25 PM

      Don't forget, the insurance companies are winners either way. It was built into the language of the nill that if they mill rate, or not enough people sign up, or whatever, that they will get a bailout.

      Delete
    5. Anita Winecooler7:36 PM

      Until you get hit with something catastrophic, it puts things in a totally new perspective, Been There, Got the Tee Shirt.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous1:21 PM

      Mlaiuppa (2:24)

      I have heard this, but haven't had the time or ability to research what you said. I would love to have more info on what you said about Obstruction by Repubs. What was it they did? I have family that supports both sides, and this would be great ammo.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous11:05 AM

    5 Reasons The GOP’s Obamacare Sabotage Will Have To Get Even More Desperate

    Here are five reasons that you should expect increasingly desperate stunts from Republicans as they continue doing their best to sabotage Obamacare.

    http://www.nationalmemo.com/5-reasons-the-gops-obamacare-sabotage-will-have-to-get-even-more-desperate/?author_name=jason-sattler

    ReplyDelete
  7. Exaggerating by a factor of 500.

    That's about par for the GOP. When it isn't an out and out lie.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anita Winecooler7:39 PM

    IS it just me, or after awhile, anything the GOP says or does re:The Affordable Care Act" starts to sound like white noise or elevator music? As if THEY care about the plight of the average citizen, ever.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.