Saturday, April 05, 2014

Is the internet responsible for the dramatic drop in religious affiliations in the United States? In a word, yes.

Courtesy of MIT Technology Review:

Back in 1990, about 8 percent of the U.S. population had no religious preference. By 2010, this percentage had more than doubled to 18 percent. That’s a difference of about 25 million people, all of whom have somehow lost their religion. 

That raises an obvious question: how come? Why are Americans losing their faith? 

Today, we get a possible answer thanks to the work of Allen Downey, a computer scientist at the Olin College of Engineering in Massachusetts, who has analyzed the data in detail. He says that the demise is the result of several factors but the most controversial of these is the rise of the Internet. He concludes that the increase in Internet use in the last two decades has caused a significant drop in religious affiliation.

Of course there are other factors in the study as well, including fewer parents introducing religion to their children, and a slight increase in college enrollments.

However the correlation between increased internet access and decreased religious affiliation is dramatic and compelling.

When I first started The Immoral Minority it was to provide a space to talk openly about politics and religion, the two things my former wife used to tell me "should not be discussed in polite society."

At the time there only seemed to be a handful of places where religion was discussed with any regularity, but in the almost ten years of this blog's existence that has dramatically increased.

Today you can get into a spirited debate, and access reams of information about religion, mythologies, and the history of various beliefs, on numerous sites, such as the Huffington Post, Reddit, Salon, Daily Beast, you name it.

This allows people, even small towns and isolated areas of the country, to have their eyes opened to things that their parents or the leaders in their communities simply do not want them to know.

Of course I see this as wonderful and it gives me great hope for the future. It is safe to say that others do not see it this way.

In places like Saudi Arabia and Iran they dramatically limit access to the internet in hopes of controlling access to information that would undermine religious faith and promote ideas about equality and human rights.

I would not be at all surprised to see similar attempts to control information in this country, since access to information threatens those who thrive on the ignorance of their parishioners, constituents, or party members.

Personally I would be pleased to think that IM had any impact on a visitor's religious outlook and inspired them to do their own research and question the foundation of their faith.

In my opinion knowing more, thinking more, and discussing more can only lead to greater understanding and a better country.

12 comments:

  1. Caroll Thompson12:46 PM

    When I was growing up, I was told not to talk about politics, religion or money. I always thought that these subjects are the most interesting things to talk about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. More information, fact, and education makes one more liberal, democratic, and less religious. That's why republicans and religious fundamentalists are against those things.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous1:01 PM

    May be, but remember "correlation does not imply causation!" This is my favorite example
    http://gizmodo.com/5977989/internet-explorer-vs-murder-rate-will-be-your-favorite-chart-today/all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But lack of correlation proves no causation.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous1:24 PM

    We have a very long way to go because those who are indoctrinated as children often can't shed superstition despite native intelligence.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:46 PM

    "Personally I would be pleased to think that IM had any impact on a visitor's religious outlook and inspired them to do their own research and question the foundation of their faith."

    Actually, you have. In my case. I believe I have matured my definition of "faith" and "God" by reading your comments, Gryph and, especially everyone else's and all the good links.

    Sometimes people here are anti-religion, but most often I find that people present their views and experiences, provide links for more info and research and allow us to make our own decisions.

    I just don't get why we were lied to as kids, and continued to be lied to. Why not state: Really we don't know all that much about what happened 2,000 years ago, but here is what we can learn from what we know.

    If God is so great then doesn't it make sense that he/she can instill into us what we need to know?

    And, really, what kind of a kind and good God would punish people 6,000 years into the future because some ancestor disobeyed him?

    And, while I'm on a roll, what kind of Great Creator would brag about Humans being the best that he/she can create?

    Oh, better take out those he/shes because the people who believe that way only believe in a male deity and would be offended that I even mentioned the she possibility.

    If I'm going to rot in hell for questioning the male centric view of a deity, then any God that would be so shallow and vindictive likely has already condemned to hell already so there's no harm in asking these questions at this point in life.

    So see, I just proved my someone's point: Religion sets us FREE since, by their "rules," we are already probably condemned anyway, we are free to question, to think and to find answers that don't fit the "churchy" mode.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:58 AM

      Everything you wrote about "God" punishing people is ludicrous.

      You guys can't have it both ways.

      God isn't a "puppet master": We were supposedly given FREE WILL , which allows you to do as you wish!

      You don't have to love God or believe in God - that's the beauty.

      So, while many here want to place all of the murder and mayhem of human existence on religion, it's simply not the case.

      People are responsible for their own actions, not God.
      Them using God as an excuse to hate and murder is as bad as you guys equating their own hatred with that of a completely independent God.

      Even if Jesus were not real, the IDEA of living as Jesus did is the IDEAL!

      it's not easy because guess what? We are human and we falter. But try and wrap your mind around this: when we fail or fall, we try and recognize that WE failed (God didn't cuss that person out, I did),
      Then WE take responsibility for it.
      We try and make reparations if we can, but mainly we move forward, more humbly than before, and try our best from that moment on.

      Do we fail again?

      Sure. But it is okay.

      All this raging God crap is why the New Testament was written. People weren't supposed to fear God - God loved them.

      Jesus was sent to show people what the love of God looked like in practice.

      And Jesus was murdered by people, not God.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous3:12 PM

    You don't see a plethora of regularly commenting Evangelicals trying to "save" people on Atheist sites. Many try but soon scurry away with their tails between their legs. They learn quickly just how shaky is their own faith. Rattled and scared, they run back to the echo chamber for comfort and safety.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maple3:38 PM

      I think the Evangelical movement, led by Falwell's moral majority, has done more to dissuade people (especially the young) about religion. The crap that has come out about hypocrites like Jim Bakker and others has, as they say, added insult to injury.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous3:25 PM

    Actually, the two charts don't track together. First, they are drawn on different scales, creating a false sense of similarity. Second, from 1995 to 2005, unaffilation rose from about 9% to 14%, while internet usage rose from about 10% to almost 70%. Third, you can find a massive number of graphs that show a rise over the same period. Number of autism diagnoses, ownership of a cell phone, college tuition, biotech patents, etc. All of the foregoing increased more in line with the internet graph than the unaffiliation graph.

    That doesn't mean that the internet hasn't played a role in the modestly increasing number of people who declare themselves to be unaffilitated (7% 1975, 18% 2010). However, note that the change levels off 1998 - 2005 while internet usage continues its dramatic surge. Any correlation is weak, as is causation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:59 AM

      But. . It's on the internet! !!! It has to be true! !!

      Delete
  8. Randall7:56 AM

    Of all the "Christians" I know, only two have actually read their Bible from cover-to-cover. The rest have gotten the entirety of their "Biblical knowledge" from sermons at church and through the sparse selections allowed them to read by their pastors and priests.

    On the other hand, they are always surprised to find that I - an atheist - HAVE read their Bible.
    King James.
    Douay-Rheims
    many, many books of the Apocrypha (i.e. Enoch, The Gospel of Mary Magdalene)
    The Book of Mormon (and Doctrine and Covenants)
    The Koran

    10 ignorance
    20 equals
    30 religion
    40 equals
    50 goto 10

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.