Courtesy of AZ Central:
Former state Sen. Russell Pearce, who has recently served as the Arizona Republican Party's first vice chair, resigned his post late Sunday over remarks he made about requiring women on public assistance to use contraception.
The Republican Party announced his resignation around 11 p.m. Sunday -- hours after GOP candidates expressed their displeasure with his remarks and a day after the Arizona Democratic Party Executive Director DJ Quinlan noted Pearce's comments in a news release and pressed his party's candidates to denounce them.
Quinlan's statement, issued Saturday, highlighted remarks Pearce made on his talk-radio program on KKNT 960 AM. According to the statement, Pearce talked about changes he would make to the state's public assistance programs and was quoted in the Democratic Party's news release as saying: "You put me in charge of Medicaid, the first thing I'd do is get Norplant, birth-control implants, or tubal ligations…Then we'll test recipients for drugs and alcohol, and if you want to [reproduce] or use drugs or alcohol, then get a job."
In his statement, Pearce wrote that during a recent radio show there "was a discussion about the abuses to our welfare system" and he "shared comments written by someone else and failed to attribute them to the author."
"This was a mistake," Pearce stated.
"This mistake has been taken by the media and the left and used to hurt our Republican candidates."
Yes how dare the media and Democrats use the actual words spoken by a Republican against them.
The audacity!
Of course this is nothing new, as conservatives have long attempted to suppress childbirth among minorities in this country.
This from Public Eye magazine:
Even a cursory examination of the right's policy agenda demonstrates that, when the focus is changed from abortion to broader reproductive freedom, the right applies race and class criteria that distinguish between the rights of white, middle-class women and low-income women of color. The right has viciously attacked welfare mothers for their "sexuality" and immigrant women for bearing "too many" children. In its worldview, "excessive" childbearing by low-income, single women causes poverty. To eliminate poverty, it is necessary to prevent that childbearing.
Right-wing activists reserve their most vicious attacks for these groups of women, promoting negative stereotypes of low-income women of all races as dependent, irresponsible, prone to addictions, and inadequate mothers. They use these stereotypes to inflame public opinion against all sexual behavior that lies outside the narrow parameters of right-wing ideology.
So all Russell Pearce was doing was openly expressing an idea that is discussed in the back rooms among conservatives, and he felt safe is saying it aloud because the audience for his radio show would all be nodding in agreement with him.
But you know I can't get over the idea that I have seen this guy before, but where?
Oh that's right! That is him right there in the middle between Joe Arpaio and some crazy lady from Wasilla.
Seriously. Does she have her pajamas on under that sweater?
ReplyDeleteLooks like a nightgown to me.
DeleteShe's trying to be sexy...ALWAYS "trying."
DeleteLooks like a camisole that is suppose to be worn under a blouse or sweater, Leave it to Ms. Fashionista to wear it as outerwear. The woman is an idiot.
Deletetubal ligations ?!?
ReplyDeletethe crosseyed skank knows tubal ligations - LMAO !!
Why don't they start by sterilizing Brisket and $carah! They REALLY live off the governemnet et al. PFT!
ReplyDeleteThe Immoral Minority continues to document the Palin curse!
ReplyDeleteGOP has been fucking the "poor" for years ... be easier to just cutoff their dicks or vote them all out of office.
ReplyDeleteAll these women getting pregnant via immaculate conception, too! Also.
ReplyDeleten his statement, Pearce wrote that during a recent radio show there "was a discussion about the abuses to our welfare system" and he "shared comments written by someone else and failed to attribute them to the author." "This was a mistake," Pearce stated.
ReplyDeleteI think this was actually plagiarism.
If it was done for Pearce's commercial benefit, it may have been copyright infringement too.
This sounds like he is saying:
ReplyDeleteWomen on welfare should be sterilized or prove they are have an implanted contraceptive device. Men on welfare have unrestricted reproductive rights (and all the Viagra they want).
Poor women, not yet on welfare, should get zilch help with family planning (including no morning-after pill when raped) to make sure they have the baby god intends them to have.
But it's not a war on women.
Eric Thompson, a guest at the infamous Palin Brawl party, lost his job shortly after giving an interview to ABC's Good Morning America.
ReplyDeleteA GoFundMe page has been set up to help Eric out through this month, given his prompt firing. Donations will be graciously accepted. However, Eric really just wants a job.
http://www.gofundme.com/ekkm9w
And we're supposed to believe there's no Republican "War on Women."
ReplyDeleteHe needs help.
ReplyDeleteLost job because of Sarah Palin
http://www.gofundme.com/ekkm9w
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6DuY3NCsO80/VBYK2cMO1RI/AAAAAAAAGIM/ss-euh4Xne4/s1600/Palin%2B-%2BDo%2Byou%2Bknow%2Bwho%2BI%2Bam.jpg
Why is there NEVER any talk about a mandatory tying off of a male's sperm shooter? Or jail time for all of those males young and old whacking off and wasting all of those precious sperm? Each one of those could be a baby you know.
ReplyDeleteThese nasty old freaks have no idea that it actually takes two to make a baby, do they? It's always the female's fault, always. Never a mention of the male role. Idiots! Does it hurt to be that stupid? It should!
Another one bites the dust! It's only a matter of time before these misogynistic RW bigots show their true colors. Thank goodness they're having to face consequence for their disgusting words and actions.
ReplyDeleteHe resigned......we can only hope it's a trend........OT......news item today about the ISIL folks banning the teaching of Evolution in Mosul schools......finally......common ground......
ReplyDeleteBoy really can't win with these guys, first they don't want to have to pay for birth control under ACA. Now they want women on Medicaid, sterilized or on birth control-Either way War on Women.
ReplyDeleteAs others have commented,nothing about vasectomies for the guys,much easy procedure, but lets not talk about men's "private parts".
End the War on Women -Vote out these morons in November !!!!!!
Hi Sarah! Read it and weep:
ReplyDelete'The View' premiere pulls best ratings in 8 years
ABC has happily announced that The View's Season 18 premiere on Monday, showcasing newcomers Rosie Perez and NICOLLE WALLACE with returning Rosie O'Donnell and veteran moderator Whoopi Goldberg, was the best premiere in eight years.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2014/09/16/the-view-premiere-best-ratings-in-8-years/15724463/
Palin Family CAUGHT In Drunken Birthday Party Brawl
ReplyDeleteAmanda Coyne tells her story to CNN. Video here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zjZ3sz7hV4
What does Russell think about Two Bulls?
ReplyDeleteI get so confused. Is the the GOP for or against paying for slut pills. Because he definitely sounds like he wants tax dollars to pay for slut pills.
ReplyDeleteactually it sounds like he doesn't trust women to stay on slut pills, he wants PROOF. And a tubal ligation is very hard to reverse... so the guy is looking for some permanent sterilizations... tough luck if a women actually manages to get off welfare... a woman should be SMART to not want a baby after leaving welfare.
Delete"the first thing I'd do is get Norplant, birth-control implants, or tubal ligations…"
I actually agree with the guy, to a point. However, I think that EVERYONE should be allowed no more than two kids, no matter your circumstances (though family planning and birth control should be free and available to all). Then after the second child, everyone needs to stop. Anyone who keeps having more, should be taxed, every year, until the child reaches 18. There should be exponentially higher taxes every time the number of children passes a particular milestone...........say double the tax for each kid past #4, triple for each child after #6, all the way up to Duggar status. And if you are a politician who opposes abortion, then you are required to adopt at least five children from the foster care system for every bill you try to pass restricting women's control of their own reproduction. These laws would be good for the planet, good for preventing women from being kept "barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen", and good for the tax coffers. The only bad part is that a bunch of undeserving foster kids would be raised by Republican prigs, but I have a feeling that once you live with kids who have experienced foster care, you couldn't help but become compassionate and non-judgmental. That's my perfect world!
ReplyDeleteWell, China has a version of your perfect world. They abort/kill female fetuses/children to the extent they have a massive imbalance in the male/female population ratio... a situation that often leads to violence on a local and international scale.
DeleteYou need to move to China. Democracy isn't working out for you.
DeleteAs a mom of three, I don't give a damn who you sort of agree with in a way kinda. Welfare and social services should be there for those that need a hand up when something happens, I'm married and have a career and don't mind my tax dollars going to social programs. Because I know anyone can be one illness, one paycheck, or one catastrophe away and can lose everything in the blink of an eye.
DeleteO/T But my refresh reflex has been to IM 100 times in the past couple of days. I think Gryphen needs one of those text alert systems like my college has so he can just beep us when something new is going on. :)
ReplyDeletelike
DeleteThe amount of money which is spent on these programs is marginal compared to the "corporate welfare". It is very easy to attack the marginal population and to stir the hate toward them. These phony Christians are appalling. We ARE our brother's keeper and the few that cheat the system hardly warrants punishing the rest. If the passion they have for this would be directed toward the cheats of Wall Street, Blackwater and Halliburton, the economy, middle and lower income families would fair much better. Also, WHY is it ALWAYS women who are targeted for such Draconian ideals? Scary times to be sans penis.
ReplyDeleteBy his reasoning, J.K. Rowling should have been sterilized.
ReplyDelete" ... the whole family is now degenerating into full-blown snowbilly farce " ?!?
ReplyDeletethe plain's/heath's have had that mastered for their entire miserable existence, nothing new there - in fact if they gave PHD's for that they'd have 'em hangin' high ...
Why is that Old Crazy Lady wearing a camisole as a top? At least button up your sweater for goodness sakes !!! What a peabrain she is.
ReplyDeleteAmen ! And where are the Belmonts ?
DeleteNot that sterilization of whole classes of people is a great idea, but for people like Russell Pearce, you'd think they might understand that sterilizing men--generally more fertile than women, monthly, and for life--would be more cost effective. It is money they're more worried about than human lives.
ReplyDeleteLike!
DeleteActually, I'd be all for offering these items to those seeking assistance. Being in the poverty level, I'd be damned grateful for it. A massive worry off my shoulders. I also wouldn't mind offering a small incentive to choose to do so.
ReplyDeleteBut, requiring it, though? A l̶i̶t̶t̶l̶e̶ lot too Clauberg-esque for me.
I may vote Liberal, but I see nothing wrong with requiring those who take public money to take measures to prevent pregnancy.
ReplyDeleteAhh the "welfare princess" gop fallacy, again. At least that woman (?) between he and Arpaio takes personal responsibility and got a twobull.
ReplyDeleteI love how people, mostly male, like to stick their noses in other people's reproductive decisions, and know automatically which form of birth control is best for their bodies. What do we need doctors for?