People: Is there anything to the buzz about Monica Lewinsky being considered as a View co-host?
Wallace: I've heard her name and I've talked about her. I watched her TED talk three times. So I would love to have her on. No idea if she's on anyone's radar as a host.
People: What about Palin, who was once pretty open about wanting the job?
Wallace: (Laughs.) I think I'm all the Republican they can handle right now. I've never heard Sarah Palin's name, but I would not be surprised to see her there one morning. This process is sort of like a Republican White House – it's shrouded in secrecy and there are no leaks.
Yeah the day that Nicolle Wallace shows up and sees Sarah Palin seated on the couch is the day she runs screaming from the studio.
Besides as we know Palin does not want to actually work for her money, so the idea of her taking the job is a non-starter.
As for Lewinsky, I could see her wanting a gig like this.
I think either one of these choices would be nothing more than a casting gimmick, but I imagine that once Lewinsky got past all of the questions about Bill, and stained dresses, she might have something to contribute.
And let's face it if this were to take place during the 2016 election cycle, with Hillary running for President, it would certainly attract viewers just waiting to hear what Monica had to say about Hil.
Seriously, was there ever a time when Sarah was an attractive woman?
ReplyDeleteShe wears so much freaking makeup, how can anyone even tell? But from what we've seen when she removes the five inches of crap on her face, it's not pretty.
DeleteI think for a brief time in her 20s Palin might have been a head turner. But the ugly on the inside has fully manifested itself on the outside. Plus, she's always looked trashy; this woman has no sense of style, which is very common amongst conservative women. Conservative women are either frumpy-Phyllis Schlafly, Michelle Duggar, Virginia Fox, or they are skanky looking, Sarah Palin, Chicks on the Right, various Fox News fembots.
DeleteJennifer K
She is short, clumpy, and ugly on the inside. And outside
DeleteCheese and. Rice.
ReplyDeletePalin is not interested in a J. O. B.
She never was.
For her role in helping Sarah Palin rise to D-list celebrity status, Nicolle Wallace should be banned from the public for the rest of her life. She helped create the monster and now she's been profiting from it.
ReplyDeleteBeaglemom
Is she even D-list anymore?
DeleteAnd she won't go all the way and tell what she knows. It hardly daring or controversial to say that Sarah Palin is a nightmare and a moron. All or nothing, Nicole.
DeleteWe could all write Wallace at "The View" and ask her to disclose what she knows about Palin. I know it's been done to her before, but should again.
DeleteAnd, we could also tell her that we know Sarah Palin will never be a member of "The View"!
Wallace is blowing smoke for her own promotion and that of her book!
X2!
DeleteEven by Monica Lewinsky standards, poor Sarah is just a wannabe. And this, even in the eyes of that Nicolle Wallace of 'Country First' failed McCain fame.
ReplyDelete*ugh*
dowl
The gop would LOVE to have Monica Lewinsky appear daily on TV, reminding everyone of the scandal. She should stay out of the public eye, get a job and get on with her life. It takes TWO , she was no shrinking violet in that affair. He was wrong, but he did not take advantage of a pure little flower. If PayMe gets on, Whoopie will tear her a new one.
ReplyDeleteAs you say, it takes two to tango.
DeleteIf Bill is allowed to bask in money and prestige and public adoration after his wrongdoing, then so is Monica.
I'm kind of disgusted at the idea of Bill returning to the White House as first horndog, but I know I'm in a minority.
According to all accounts, Monica has never been able to find a job due to her notoriety. If The View wants to hire her and she wants to do it, I say she should go for it.
Slick willy loves to eat monkey
DeleteHmm,well that would give me two more reasons not to watch it.
ReplyDeleteRepub Pols and Analysts are good looking. that is where it stops of course.
ReplyDeleteExplain Carly Fiorina and Ann Coulter? Both closely resemble horses. Have you seen PayMe lately? All the photos she allows to be posted are several years old. Too much Botox and plastic surgery. Jeamine Pirro on Fox is cross eyed, and stupid, like PayMe. Elizabeth Haselbeck is wearing her skirts shorter and her tops lower, since she is "long in the tooth" for Fox. Also, too, he black roots are showing!
DeletePlus, if you get a side shot of Palin's face, she has a hooked nose at the end. That is why she is normally photographed face on. And, as she has aged, she's lost her attractiveness. The evil inside her seeps out through her pores and has transfigured her considerably over the past ten years.
DeleteYou mean the portrait Palin has stashed in the attic isn't working?
DeleteIt would be good for the country for the View to have Sarah Palin as a co-host because the more she talks, the less people like her.
ReplyDeleteAs I've said before: Sarah Palin is a one-trick pony. She consumes conservative bumper-sticker slogans and regurgitates them on command with no thought towards cohesiveness or narrative.
Her knowledge of politics and world affairs is as shallow as piss on a plate and every bit as palatable and for her to elaborate on any topic - as she would have to do when questioned by the other ladies - would obviate her ignorance.
She likes to think she's tough - but a day or two with Whoopie would reduce her to the quivering mass she became when little Katie Couric asked her what she reads.
Sarah Palin thought "what do you read" was a 'gotcha' question!
You will no more see Sarah Palin on The View than you will ever see her running for any national office: it will never happen.
Sarah Palin is a joke - and she knows it.
I should think after working with (FOR) Sarah Palin the last thing Nicole Wallace would like is to have to work along side her again.
DeleteNicole knows just what to say to trigger an on camera meltdown by the former half term quitter. I really doubt Sarah would ever allow herself to be in the same space as Wallace.
DeleteBut it does make me lol at the possibility anyway!
mlaiuppa - don't forger that Wallace stated after the '08 election that she did not have the heart to pull the lever for McCain in the voting booth! Perhaps when the "songbird" is pushing daisies, the REAL truth will emerge!
DeleteYes, she's a joke but I don't believe she knows it.
DeleteToo bad the "Where's the Beef" lady is dead. She could have been the next host on The View. Maybe Gabrielle Carteris, BH90210s Andrea Zuckerman, is available.
ReplyDeleteVictoria Jackson is available!!
Delete"According to Nicolle Wallace she would not be surprised to see either Monica Lewinsky or Sarah Palin showing up as hosts for The View."
ReplyDelete----------------------------------------------
This headline is rather misleading. It would be easy to infer that there was an underlying reason for not being surprised.
"Wallace: (Laughs.) I think I'm all the Republican they can handle right now. I've never heard Sarah Palin's name, but I would not be surprised to see her there one morning. This process is sort of like a Republican White House – it's shrouded in secrecy and there are no leaks."
In other words, there is no hint at all that Palin was or is under any consideration at all.
As for no leaks? Every time a spot opens up on The View, the leaks are out there, along with pure speculation. And no leaks from republican White Houses?! Right.
Plus, Wallace is pumping her new book and "The View"! Sarah Palin will never be invited to be on the show. The black lady already there cannot abide Palin and she's made that known throughout the years.
DeleteIf Lewinsky wants to rebrand herself, she would be stupid to talk about or speculate about anything Clinton.
ReplyDeleteO/T Here's more info about the SarahPAC lawsuit. Some of the details in this article were new to me.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202724118813/Palin-Settlement-Over-911-Photo-Stalled?slreturn=20150405094225
Coleman explained that getting Palin to sign the agreement took time because she is “a prominent public figure with whom we deal through Alaska counsel.”
Palin moved on April 10 to enforce the settlement. Coleman said in that filing that confidentiality of the settlement was important because Palin and SarahPAC believe “an important and influential percentage of their donors would prefer [that] defendants resist plaintiff’s claims on the merits, and to incur the costs of doing so, rather than pay what these donors would regard as an exorbitant amount to settle what those donors would consider frivolous or even politically motivated claims.”
Coleman went on to say in the filing that those were not his views, but “in the contemporary, polemical environment of political fundraising, defendants have represented to me that they consider this perception to be one they had to take pains to avoid.”
Anything they don't like is now labeled "frivolous" or "politically motivated."
DeleteThe fact that copyright law has been around for centuries does not deter them from believing that it doesn't apply to them.
SarahPAC was sloppy and ill-informed in using the photo without getting approval. Publication of a photo or article doesn't mean it's in the public domain. Any first-year law student could have told them that.
Typical Palin bullshit for the idiot rubes that follow her.
Delete"...confidentiality of the settlement was important because Palin and SarahPAC believe “an important and influential percentage of their donors would prefer [that] defendants resist plaintiff’s claims on the merits, and to incur the costs of doing so..."
Of course. In other words, Palin and SarahPAC are going to cave (because they have no choice), but don't want their followers to know. They want to be able to bullshit about being such badasses and mama grizzlies and gun-toting jabberwockies who never take any shit from those liberal wusses.
They can't let their followers know that a) they are chickenshit cowards who wouldn't dare fight this in court because they have no merits on which to fight it, and b) the only thing SarahPAC is going to spend its money on is the personal enrichment of Palin and her hangers on, not legal battles that are going nowhere.
They want to have their cake and eat it also too. They want to be able to tell their drooling cultists that they fought off the evil liberals and by the way, it cost a shit ton of money to do so, and to please send their donations now.
I hope the copyright owners laugh in their faces.
Frivolous amount of the settlement? $10,000 compared to a possible $75,000? Sounds like a bargain any "fiscal conservative" would smile over.
DeleteHow much you wanna bet she uses this case as an excuse for why so few contributions to SarahPAC?
It's all the fault of that liberal NJ newspaper attacking her. Send money. Send money.
Personally, I'm loving the fact that the paper outed her--LONG after she put them off again and again.
It's her own fault.
Also, too, I'm loving seeing the manipulations of the Sarah and her attorney. They probably do this stuff to everyone every time.
Watch out Dakota! Pay attention. We don't make this stuff up.
Ridiclous. Lawsuit settlements are handled largely through email exchanges these days - doesn't matter where she is or her attorneys are - and as we have seen she has a crackberry and an Iphone glued to her hand, She's more connected than an erector set.
DeleteMark my word, gryph. That news group isn't thru with mrs. palin by any stretch of the imagination. Fireworks are forthcoming. ;o)
DeleteHELLOOOOO, THESE TWO MADE THEIR NOTORIETY SUCKING DICK OR SUCKING ON ONES DICK. ugh. this is why they remain infamous,having never achieved Fame.
ReplyDeleteUgly when visualizing that god awful deed it! Cannot imagine 'anyone' (except Palin perhaps!) doing that to Dick Cheney. I wouldn't be able to get past his sneer - or, what he calls a smile!
Deleteamazing what a person will do to get noticed. Sarah is a sick one all by her own doing. Monica was just as guilty as bill when it comes to her doings and the Blue dress. she was an adult and knew better. so much for being a victim..she's an adulteress. she,like screech, needs to sit down a stf up.
DeleteIM captions are getting as bad as the HuffPo - misleading and sensationalized.
ReplyDeleteWell dipshit, at least the headlines on the posts here are always entertaining. Hey wait, what's wrong with the caption? You do know the difference between a headline and a caption?
DeleteYes, I do know the difference. Now, fuck off.
DeleteNo one cares what you think
DeleteThat Nicolle Wallace is one hot tamale.
ReplyDeleteOld fugly washed up Sarah Palin will not sit at the table with that beautiful young lady.
-Todd
It was treason to make Sarah Palin a candidate for vice-president alongside an old, sick John McCain. Nicole Wallace was active in that treason. Wallace is constantly laying down a smoke screen to keep away from rational questions like "why do you continue to protect Sarah Palin from the exposure of her lies about the birth of Trig?"
ReplyDeleteJohn McCain is the father
DeletePalin would never make it on the show. Whoopy Goldberg cannot stand her and she is the leader of "The View". Wallace knows it too!
ReplyDeleteRemember everything is about SEX. Nicolle is one of the smartest RINOs i've seen. Or maybe not? Listening to her speak on the View is almost sureal. She supports almost everything Democratic and actually seems like a nice person. She has the scoop on the Cheney/Bush white house and is/was on the inside of many a S&M dens of Kinky Repigs.
ReplyDeleteShe tones her wingnuttery waaaaaay down on the View. She always bashes Democrats when she's on political talk shows.
DeleteHUH?
ReplyDeleteAnon 6:13 shared an internet post they read that said Sarah Palin is “a prominent public figure"?
Is Sarah Palin a prominent figure or a effing con artist?
How can Sarah Palin justify taking her parents, her children, Todd and miscellaneous relatives and friends across the lower 48 touring all the memorials in Washington DC, Statue of Liberty and all the other sites they visited for the Sarah Palin - Palin / Heath Family - SarahPac Sponsored Summer Vacation?
That includes paying for all attendees :
Airfare - roundtrip
Ground transportation
Rooms
3 meals a day
Laundry / dry cleaning service
Fees at attractions
Souvenirs
That includes:
Paying SarahPac employees for logistical support,
Making last minute changes and making arrangements for trip attendees to go home after being tired of being part of Sarah Palin's photo op.
Paying travel agencies.
Keep in mind airfare is more expensive if you didn't purchase tickets ahead of time. So when Sarah Palin's entourage was tired and bored from this trip they just got up and left which means higher airfare tickets
This wasn't no spur of the moment vacation, they had to have SarahPac employees planning this big event way in advance because Sarah Palin wasn't going to plan it (especially after being mayor and effed up the hockey rink planning ).
Did Trig go on this boondoggle? If yes then most likely a nanny was part of Sarah Palin's entourage.
If Trig didn't go then SarahPac paid someone to attend to Trig's needs, feeding him, bathing him room and board, etc.
Did SarahPac pay for new clothes for the Palin and Heath families? Can't imagine the Wasilla Hillbillies going out on a high profile vacation wearing old clothes.
Not many people can do what Sarah Palin does which is to find new ways to get uninformed ignoramuses to faithfully give their hard earned money to SarahPac.
Only God, Sarah Palin and Tim Crawford knows whose palms has been greased and whose pockets has been filled.
Palin will never be a cohost on The View. Not even a guest target, no matter how much Goldberg or O'Donnell may salivate.
ReplyDeletePalin can't string a coherent sentence together, even though English is her native language. She may be stupid but she's not stupid enough to allow herself to be the butt of jokes she doesn't even understand for an hour.
Well, she was stupid enough that she thought she could be VP. Lack of self awareness will do that to you.
DeleteHa! She was stupid enough to go on Saturday Night Live's anniversary show and think that they invited her because she's "in show business". She was the butt of the joke that night for certain.
DeleteO'Donnell what? She is not on the show. That is the spot that is up for grabs. I like Raven..
Deleteot American Sniper, back in the crosshairs of controversy
ReplyDeleteThough the filmmakers have claimed that the film isn’t political, American Sniper has become a Rorschach test for ideological loyalties —
http://americablog.com/2015/05/american-sniper-back-in-the-crosshairs-of-controversy.html
This is O/T (kinda sorta) ...
ReplyDeleteRemember Rep. Aaron Schock, the closet queen who resigned at the speed of light after being exposed for shady spending -- like decorating his "Downton Abbey" office at taxpayer expense?
Since resigning, he's kept such a low profile that his brow and chin must by now touch -- perhaps a valuable disguise since there are multiple investigations into his potential wrongdoing(s) -- including one that caught my eye:
"A one-time donor has filed a lawsuit that accuses the Illinois Republican of fraud and racketeering. Howard Foster, who contributed $500 to Schock in 2012, has had trouble tracking down Schock to serve him a subpoena."
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/aaron-schock-low-profile-before-grand-jury-117633.html#ixzz3ZHwEqpU8
Helpfully, Howard Foster has posted "Why I am suing Aaron Schock" which includes:
"Why can’t we treat a politician the same way we treat General Motors or a lawyer or the Catholic Church? All of them have been sued for making false statements about their products or abilities or in the case of the Church, inducing donations while harboring pedophile priests."
(snip)
"Not every politician that breaks a campaign promise should be sued under RICO. But one who misleads donors over a period of years to believe he was a breath of fresh air while acting in precisely the opposite way should not be above anti-fraud laws. "
http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2015/04/foster-why-i-am-suing-aaron-schock.html
YES, and, also too, that goes for any serial liar who keeps pretending SHE's rilly rilly thinkin' -- and with all seriousity, just waitin' for God to say the "Go!" word -- about running for, y'know, the presidancy?
And yet an investigation into her PAC's finances would reveal just how much of the donations have been misused.
Oh I think the US laws will be reviewed now...people are tired of being screwed over...and they are standing up...in force...together... Makes crooks nervous...
DeleteWho watches this crap anyway?
ReplyDeleteI do
DeleteYou do
Delete10:19 PM Doo Doo.
DeleteIt will never happen. Palin doesn't have the ability to think on her feet (or at any time really). She parrots crapola. Plus, she is a diva in her own mind and doesn't play well with others. If she was sitting there, she would think it was 'Sarah Palin's View' and she would be a spigot from which RW excreta would spew.
ReplyDeleteHater
Delete1:14 do you think you're earnin' your money for that?
DeleteYou're as lazy as your boss.
must be a slow day for our troll. she needs to get a real gig.
DeleteKorn - Hater. Perfect song for Palins! They are the Haters...for sure!
Delete1:14 PM Yes, we hate stupid juvenile comments from you, Troll.
DeleteOh stfu nicole. I know you want a show where you sarah monica can talk, but you had your chance to tell all the facts of tundra turd. I dont watch this show since you started, arse hole.
ReplyDeleteI just checked.... nope, there's still not enough gold in Fort Knox to make me watch any of those old attention whores.
ReplyDeleteIt's time there was Channel IM.
O/T but involves Nicole...Flash back to the 2008 RNC and here is a conversation I envisioned between Nicole and Steve Schmidt:
ReplyDeleteSteve: Nicole, we just got word from Johnny. The dipshit wants Sarah Palin on the ticket.
Nicole: Oh no, the legislature is trying her for "abuse of Power" and, the file of garbage against her is overwhelming.
Steve: I know. I know. In my findings, I see Todd belonged to the AIP and ran a prostitution ring. Minor issues. We can cover most of this up.
Nicole: Gasp! Steve, she "faked a pregnancy!" Rumor is all over Alaska, especially in Juneau, the Capitol! We are hearing it was Bristol, not Sarah, that gave birth to Trig.
Steve: No problem. Call the Duggars. They'll have Bristol five-months pregnant in no time. That will stop the rumors.
I was expecting Monica to rear her head when Hillary said she was running, and voila'! The second most persecuted slut shamed woman in the world does a Ted talk on bullies. Isn't she a breath of fresh air? Where's her pal, Linda Tripp, who tutored her to keep the stained dress? I'm a woman who had to explain to my kids that oral sex is sex, and I wasn't thrilled about it, but it was a learning experience. We spent how many millions on the Starr report? Not excusing Bill, but the blame goes fifty fifty, they were both above the age of consent and should have known better. But she came out to put the screws to Hillary, again. I wonder who paid her and how much? DO go on "The View", Goldberg knows how to pose these questions, and poor poor Monica will be a victim again.
ReplyDeletePalin, on the View???? ain't gonna happen. She hates Wallace with a vengeance and blames her for making Palin the laughing stock of the nation.
Hell yeah, she knew better. It's not like it was her first time with an older, married man. Has everyone forgotten about her baby sitting gigs, in her hometown, before leaving for DC?
DeleteTime for The View to retire. It has not been good since Barbara left.
ReplyDelete