Tuesday, June 30, 2015

This Huffington Post article from a retired teacher about teacher evaluations is a must read.

Courtesy of HuffPo:

Ostensibly, the policy of evaluating teachers on their students' performance is designed to improve public schools by holding teachers accountable. However, by refusing to take into account several factors which impede student learning and over which teachers have no control, this policy is, in essence, a punitive measure, a political weapon, a pre-emptive strike against teachers, intended to demoralize and drive them out of the teaching profession. 

Moreover, when linked to merit pay, a divide-and-conquer strategy to pit teacher against teacher, this evaluation attempts to destabilize and weaken the National Education Association (NEA), the nation's largest labor union with its three million members, a development not unwelcome to corporate America. 

Why has this happened? Connect the dots: 

(1) Every year hundreds of billions in federal, state and local tax revenue support America's public schools and their teachers. 

(2) How divert those billions into the hands of privatizers, charter schools, and their corporate sponsors? 

(3) You've never taught a day in your life, yet you christen yourself an educational "reformer," who concocts an anti-public-school narrative of "school failure" that smears teachers in order to make the public lose confidence in them. 

(4) You then ask Bill Gates for seed money and promise him an exclusive multi-billion dollar contract -- with no competitive bidding -- for putting computers in every American classroom. 

(5) You then give Pearson Publishing Co. the contract for high-stakes standardized tests so flawed that up to 70% of students will fail them. 

(6) You and your fellow "reformers" then fan out across the country to enlist the services of willing governors and legislators by "campaign contributions" to "facilitate" legislation that will give charter schools a semblance of "legality." 

(7) You bring in Arne Duncan, President Obama's Education Secretary, for political muscle in imposing standardized testing on all public schools, even though government intrusion in the classroom is forbidden by law. You don't worry about breaking the law because the White House is also on board and calls this "reform." 

(8) You double-check with Pearson that the failure rate on these tests will be so high that it will "validate" your claim that public schools and their teachers aren't doing their jobs. 

(9) Enter teacher evaluations based on student performance on these rigged tests, and you begin to understand what standardized testing is really about -- providing the "legal" basis for evaluating teachers as the first stage in firing them. 

(10) Since 25% of all children in America are below the poverty line, they'll do poorly on these tests as will their schools, which you can then label as "failures," shut down, fire their teachers, break up their union, and re-open as charters. 

(11) You don't worry about the corporate media blowing the whistle about what you're doing since, with few exceptions, they're in on the scam. 

(12) Although you trumpet "reform," your real agenda is the destruction of public schools and the ultimate privatization of education. 

(13) Even now tens of billions in tax revenue are annually diverted to charter schools and private investors, who preside over what they hope will be the Golden Age of charters, the self-styled wave of the future, the Promised Land and long-awaited deliverer of American education as you undermine democracy. 

(14) Your mantra for charter schools is "freedom of choice" for parents to send their children to whatever schools they wish. The only problem is that charters are not public, but private schools, a fact you deny, for how else will you get taxpayers to unknowingly finance your scam? 

(15) It makes no sense whatsoever that public-school parents must pay for the private-school education of other parents' children! It's not fair, equitable, or even moral, but you don't let that stop you!

I have been making essentially this same argument for over ten years now, though admittedly not quite so eloquently. 

This is why I speak out so aggressively against private schools and religious home school programs.

They are not about educating children so much as they are about pushing an ideological agenda and making a profit.

Oh, and of course destroying the public school system in this country.

P.S. By the way this is only a portion of part three of a three part series written by this man, Frank Breslin, part one can be found here and part two is right here.

18 comments:

  1. Anonymous4:10 AM

    Teachers can bitch all they want but unless they are willing to vote in their best interests, they are screwed. In my town the teachers lament what the state has done to them but they vote them back in every time. EVERY TIME, mainly due to the abortion bull shit the GOP has dangled in front of their faces to lead them like sheep to the slaughter.
    I tell the ones I know but they still refuse to do anything but piss and moan about their situation. Until they can stand up and vote DEM they deserve everything they voted for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doesn't matter. Obama appointed Arne Duncan and we've suffered 7years (so far) if his privatize shit.

      I should buy stock in Holiday Inn for all the so-called experts out there. Everyone thinks they know everything about public schools just because they attended one. And even more if they went to a private school.

      No one trusts the experts to actually run the show. That would be the EDUCATORS. In every other profession you'd think a masters degree would be respected as some indication of expertise in your field. But not teachers. We still elect housewives and used car salesmen to sit on Boards of Education and tell teachers how to do their jobs.

      No wonder Finland is number one and we're not even in the top 30.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous4:18 AM

    The Heritage schools are repukkklican owned and it shows

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous4:33 AM

    As a 40 year veteran, now retired, this article is spot on! I also now live in NC where homeschooling is.such a big part of the culture because "you don't want your child going to schoole with those black folks". The former school superintendent, now mayor, started his own Charter school which leaves th school district in the exact position described above.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The article absolutely nails what you have been pointing out for years, Gryphen! Period.
    The comments on the series absolutely reinforce Breslin's advancements. Most are from educators.
    We need to look at the Scandinavian model which addresses so many issues that plague us. No room for corporate and on the dole legislators.
    Hopefully the fundies will lose traction as diversification demands change.

    Funny how when reading the article, I come up with a bad apple taste in my mouth.
    Heaths= Bad Apple Teachers
    Palins= Bad Apple Parents

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maple5:50 AM

    Up here in Canuck-land, we place a very high value on our public school system. Yes, we have excellent private schools too, and yes, some religious schools as well, but this whole idea of U.S. charter schools had me totally stymied when I first read about them. To us Canucks, education is a right, just as access to good healthcare is. I would have thought that most Americans would certainly agree at least with education! Charter schools, just like most of your prisons, have become money-making enterprises. I'd say that's carrying free enterprise and laissez-faire just too f'ing far!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous6:02 AM

    OT: Palin may have been spotted in Dayton, OH and could be headed to Michigan. Dayton is half way between the Kentucky ex-fiance and the Michigan first wife.

    I do not think Dakota was legally divorced. A lawyer is paid to defend his/her clients' interests. Telling the truth is optional. So, the shit hit the fan and pieces of Brissie's and Mater's past took a very unattractive dump.

    Yes, I just pulled this out of my very giddy asshole after I made my first fishing trip into the SEA of PEE where I caught them speculating about why Sarah was in Ohio. Was she going to announce? Naw, she is trying to make an honest woman out of Bristol. That is a heavy lifting job,

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous6:03 AM

    And yet there are still teachers, as many are featured on Ellen, that give EVERYTHING with no thought of recompense to give children hope for their future.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous6:12 AM

    Yep, former tracher, teacher educator, etc here. I'll add two more to the list. 1)Most of the "good or bad" decisions are based on small enough numbe to be statically invalid. It's brought to the attention of policy makers, but ignored from there. 2) there are many teacher and classes that aren't tested, some grades, and many subjects including electives. While that might just be ignored, often a completely subjective system is mandated, being just as unfair to those teachers, and in no way proven to be equivalent.

    Dave
    Texas

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:39 AM

      *teacher, not tracher. and *number. Just FYI, I didn't teach typing. :)

      Dave

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:06 AM

      It absolutely floors me that many states can justify evaluating teachers who teach subjects not covered by state testing by using the scores of core subjects. They refuse to admit that evaluating a PE or art teacher by the ELA scores of students they may not even teach is completely absurd!

      I work with a lot of special ed teachers and they are incensed by the new 'accountability' movement. If their students COULD pass these tests, they wouldn't need to be IN the special ed classes! Far too many of the states use the raw scores without taking into account the progress that students may have made that year. Yes, a student may be 3 years below grade level, but if they've made 2 years of progress in that single school year, the teacher is doing a phenomenal job!

      Delete
  9. Anonymous7:47 AM

    "This is why I speak out so aggressively against private schools and religious home school programs.

    They are not about educating children so much as they are about pushing an ideological agenda and making a profit.

    Oh, and of course destroying the public school system in this country."

    As the product of private school (preschool through college), I experienced this firsthand. Sadly, you are dead on. Scares the f**k out of me. This is why if I have kids, they will go to public schools.

    I received much more indoctrination than education, and what passed for education was so blatantly skewed and revisionist that even at the time I realized a lot of it was bullshit. But insidious bullshit. I am 40 and I still catch some of those old prejudices from time to time. "Oliver Wendell Holmes was the worst Supreme Court chief justice ever...wait, why do I think that? Where did that come from?"

    What saved me was that I had one or two teachers who did teach critical thinking (with the expectation that it would prepare us to see the flaws in "secular" reasoning, but in my case it backfired), and I read constantly, so I had exposure to other ideas and facts.

    That's just the education side. Psychologically, I was a mess. I cried myself to sleep. I had breakdowns at school and was told I needed to work on my self-control. I was threatened with corporal punishment when I was unable to stop crying. And I was sexually assaulted by another student.

    I teach at a large state university. Next year, our funding will be tied to how students perform -- we will get money for As, Bs, and Cs and lose money for Ds, Fs, and withdrawals. I am extremely lucky to have a department chair who is adamantly opposed to grade inflation and is constantly looking for early intervention strategies instead. But grade inflation is going to happen throughout the university system, which does no one any favors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maple9:39 AM

      Funding tied to performance and grades? That is just unbelievable. If that continues, state universities will soon be a thing of the past because no one will hire graduates when true grades can't be trusted. And those students will never ever make it into post-grad.

      Delete
    2. I couldn’t agree with you more as a Florida resident. Bush started to push vouchers for charter schools when he was governor and failed. Our education testing was in the bottom 5 states in test scores, and when it left it was still there. When the charter schools were started there was very little requirements to become a charter school and many charter schools failed because of it. The teachers they hired at lower pay then the public schools were not nearly qualified as public school teachers and they simply shut down. The only charter schools that remain open today are the ones who teach advanced studies.

      Let me warn you about vouchers. Of course the money comes out of the public school funding and although public schools may have somewhat less students they still have pay to maintain the school building and teachers pay. In addition, our Governor who like Bush seems to be following the same goal as the Koch brothers in trying to make all schools private. By doing so will make the parents with students pay for their own children’s education with little help from the state. Our state promised, like all states when they said in the beginning that all of the funds collected from the lotteries would go to the local school districts to without the state using that money as their share of funding for education. Eventually, like all states that lotteries, they break their promise and they start using the money as the states share of the money they used for funding local school districts. Similar to that example you can also look for them to reduce or not keep up with inflation on what they give to parents in vouchers. I also believe by doing this the states can slowly get out of funding the local schools districts making the parents who have children the ones who will have to pay for their children’s education. Of course, it will be the poor and the middle income families who will suffer the most.

      Bush has made comments recently on how much he help the schools to improve while he was governor which is a total fabrication from the actual facts. When Bush first became governor our schools was in the bottom 5 states according to student’s test scores. When he left after 8 years we were still in the bottom 5 and only improved by 1%. Of course with Governor Scott we are still there and he has continued to cut the state’s share of funding to the local school district putting pressure on the local districts who end up cutting cost in their districts because they can’t afford the cuts from the state.

      So I caution you, when they start talking about school vouchers think of what they can do down the road and take that as a means of moving public education private and making the parents who have children pay for their own child’s education. This is what the Koch brothers want and have tried in the past to load up local district school boards with their own people in their effort to move in that direction. Fortunately the local citizens saw what was going on and rebelled and voted out the school board members the Koch brothers not only supported, but helped pick to be on the board.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:59 PM

      m baker -

      The vouchers for charter schools actually, in effect, can do even more damage to the public schools because many of the charter schools do not admit students with special needs. These students remain in the public schools and usually require extra services to succeed. They use a greater percentage of the reduced resources left to the public schools, so there's ultimately less to go around for everyone. Many of the charter schools don't have to follow the same laws that public schools do, so if the special needs students are admitted, the charter schools can refuse to provide the extra services they need to learn successfully.

      As for the lottery, here in NY they made the same promises to provide lots of funding for education, which sounded like a great idea since we thought it would be EXTRA money. Most people still don't realize that the funding for our public schools stayed the same but part of it just comes from a different source - the lottery instead of the state budget.

      This headlong rush into privatization of education should scare the pants off anyone who cares about kids and the future of our country. I firmly believe that the Koch brothers are two of the most dangerous men in our country today!

      Delete
  10. It started with No Child Left Behind. The greedy capitalists saw all that money going to public schools and they wanted to get their hands on it. NCLB had the unrealistic goal of bringing EVERY student to average or above, knowing that's impossible. Then they would shut down the 'failing' schools and send the kids to private, for- profit schools. It worked for prisons and the military b

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anita Winecooler7:47 PM

    Thanks, Gryphen. This was an excellent read. We chose to send our kids to public school. We;re in the suburbs of Philly and we both struggled, as many other parents did and do, to get our kids the best Public School Education possible. Our former Governor, a Republican, pushed the charter school one size fits all con job. I'm not complaining nor bragging, but with a few exceptions, we had no problem whatsoever with our kid's educators nor the quality of their education. Two earned scholarships to public Universities and made the deans list. every year. Our son did well, but decided to take a break before going to college, but it's his choice, and we let him. Sometimes you just have to let them go, but I have a feeling he regrets that decision.
    Anyway, my sister resigned her profession as an educator in New Jersey for the reasons pointed out so eloquently in the huffpo piece. She lived and breathed for her "kids", but the pressure was just too much for the kids and the educators.

    ReplyDelete
  12. A few more points:

    16. Pearson not only provides the tests (for a fee) but also scores them (for a fee). For extra money they will provide tutorial and remediation programs to help those failing students pass. They also have a near monopoly on providing textbooks.

    17. Private schools and to some extent Charters don't have to take everyone. So if you have a child with any sort of special needs, they'll be going to that crappy public school that will have even less money because of the funds diverted to private/charter.

    18. Just because your kid gets into that private school or charter doesn't mean he'll stay. They'll take your money. Then if your kid is any sort of a behavior problem he's out. That includes if they suspect he will bring the test scores down. If your kid is dragging down the mean, they'll find an excuse to kick him out. Probably a behavior violation of that contract you signed. Then it's back to the public schools stretched to the limits with even less funding.

    19. Private schools and Charters aren't held to the same standards as public schools. That means they don't have to test, don't have to reveal scores, don't have to follow the same curriculum, etc.

    20. Because private schools and some charters aren't required to meet the same standards as public schools you don't know who your kid's teacher is. They don't have to have a teaching credential (which includes fingerprinting and bonding to make sure they are not criminals and is revoked should they commit a crime.) They don't even have to have a college degree. They don't have to teach within the same subject for which they are qualified. That means your kid's algebra teacher could have a degree in physical education. Oh, and your kid's teacher could be an ex-convict or a child molester. There is no guarantee of any vetting of teachers in private schools and some charters. They make their own policies and it is their own honor system that they set up and there is no legal oversight for them to follow.

    Maybe some of this was covered in the other two parts.

    The bottom line is there was no crisis in U.S. public schools. Ronald Reagan has his spin doctors create "A Nation At Risk" out of thin air to support his fairy tale that schools weren't working. The reason was to divert public tax dollars into private hands.

    That is the sole reason public education and social security have been under attack for privatization for the last three decades. They were the last two pots of public tax payer dollars Wall St. couldn't get their hands on.

    Now that they've done an end run through NCLB and RRTT to get the school money, look for a renewed push to privatize Social Security. With the destruction of unions pensions are on the out, so it won't be long now. After the 10 year anniversary of the Wall St. meltdown, they'll figure the public has forgotten and will renew their efforts to privatize social security.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.