Friday, October 16, 2015

So here is perhaps the most disturbing advertisement about gun laws that you really need to see today.

 Courtesy of Vox: 

The Second Amendment is more than 220 years old. When it was written, the world did not have machine guns, assault rifles, or tanks, instead relying on clunky muskets that were a pain to reload. 

Yet as a video from States United to Prevent Gun Violence points out, America's lax gun laws are often based on a reading of the Second Amendment that makes it hard to pass restrictive gun laws, even as our weapons get much, much deadlier.

Powerful message don't you think?

Just imagine how few gun deaths we would have each year if our guns were still as primitive as they were when the 2nd Amendment was created.

There is also a petition you might consider signing located right here.

12 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:50 PM

    Powerful ad. But it's been around for a couple of years.

    A least several mass shootings ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Several mass shootings ago."

      That may be the most depressing way to mark the passing of time that I have ever read.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:13 PM

      That's why I wrote it.

      When does it stop?

      The Anonymous Person Above

      Delete
  2. Anonymous2:50 PM

    This is disturbing. But gun rights/paranoid 2nd Amendment freaks will respond they have availed themselves to the same weaponry available to local governments through time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:32 PM

    Take a look on Twitter at Dana Loesch & the right wing trolls going after Gavin Newsom for his new bill to charge $ for ammo, hopefully on the CA ballot in 2016. They are disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:35 PM

    And the bible? How old? Yet folks still believe 'cause most of us aren't curious enough to think.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:38 PM

    Sorry - correction. Newsom's bill is not charging for ammo but does this:

    "Bottom line: The initiative would outlaw large capacity magazines with 11 or more rounds, require background checks for domestic violence, felony records and mental health for ammunition sales; would require reporting of lost and stolen guns; would mandate felons relinquish weapons; and would significantly strengthen California’s firearms database.

    'The paradigm of [the National Rifle Association] has been to fight a legislative fight, and the NRA has been extraordinarily effective at stifling the legislative process,' even in solidly blue California, Newsom told POLITICO. 'We’re now going to fight a different fight — that is, direct democracy. We’re going directly to voters.'"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm optimistic this bill will pass in California. I'll keep my fingers crossed.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous5:19 PM

    Black lives matter:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marian-wright-edelman/teaching-the-truth-about_b_8317292.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yah, there have been a lot of school killings using machine guns and tanks. Talk about the right wing using fear and the boogie man to control the masses. Sheesh.

    But actually, this statement; "The Second Amendment is more than 220 years old. When it was written, the world did not have machine guns, assault rifles, or tanks, instead relying on clunky muskets that were a pain to reload.; advocates for common citizen's to own them. Because the government didn't have these weapons to use against citizens either and the Second Amendment was designed to give citizens the power to take down the government if it got out of hand.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Frosty9:15 PM

    Petition signed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous12:28 AM

    Okay! I've solved the conundrum. We uphold the 2nd amendment by allowing only guns that were available when it was written.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.