Sunday, March 20, 2016

Conservative logic vs science.


5 comments:

  1. Anonymous2:54 AM

    Off-topic: Why isn't Sarah in Arizona campaigning for Trump? After all, she still owns the Scottsdale house -- and doesn't Bristol own property in AZ? And wasn't she planning to run for the Senate in AZ once upon a time?

    Speaking of the Scottsdale house: Been on the market almost 90 days now; dropped the price once already.
    http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Scottsdale-AZ/8037192_zpid/54346_rid/5-_beds/2000000-2750000_price/7201-9901_mp/any_days/33.909175,-111.392785,33.428576,-112.285424_rect/10_zm/?3col=true

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:41 AM

      Just to clarify my comment: It was SARAH who was planning to run for Senate in AZ, not Bristol. Problem with my pronoun antecedent.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous11:47 AM

    This week in science: denial runs deep

    http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/3/19/1503203/-This-week-in-science-denial-runs-deep

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well at least the science deniers have accepted the first two. They're moving slowly beyond the 17th century. Progress, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anita Winecooler4:48 PM

    Why would an age old argument need a second edition? I haven't seen evidence of science deniers admitting they're wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.