I am going to destroy you. |
Well as it turns out it had this little nugget contained within it, that I missed entirely:TIME’s new cover: How Trump’s loyalty test is straining Washington https://t.co/4ZQG16wS8f pic.twitter.com/tnng9Wy6km— TIME (@TIME) May 18, 2017
In May 2016, a Russian military intelligence officer bragged to a colleague that his organization, known as the GRU, was getting ready to pay Clinton back for what President Vladimir Putin believed was an influence operation she had run against him five years earlier as Secretary of State. The GRU, he said, was going to cause chaos in the upcoming U.S. election.
What the officer didn’t know, senior intelligence officials tell TIME, was that U.S. spies were listening. They wrote up the conversation and sent it back to analysts at headquarters, who turned it from raw intelligence into an official report and circulated it. But if the officer’s boast seems like a red flag now, at the time U.S. officials didn’t know what to make of it. “We didn’t really understand the context of it until much later,” says the senior intelligence official. Investigators now realize that the officer’s boast was the first indication U.S. spies had from their sources that Russia wasn’t just hacking email accounts to collect intelligence but was also considering interfering in the vote. Like much of America, many in the U.S. government hadn’t imagined the kind of influence operation that Russia was preparing to unleash on the 2016 election. Fewer still realized it had been five years in the making.
Everything that happened during the 2016 primaries and general election was manipulated and rigged by the Russians, with the help of the US media of course.
In fact they are STILL trying to destroy Hillary.
Of course this has already been debunked, but the Russians are well aware that we have millions if uninformed morons living in the US.#WikiLeaks informer Seth Rich murdered in US but 🇬🇧 MSM was so busy accusing Russian hackers to take notice. pic.twitter.com/0XVezTyfHM— Russian Embassy, UK (@RussianEmbassy) May 19, 2017
Well it certainly appears that those who saw through the bullshit and voted for Hillary in the primaries and general were the ones putting "America First" and fighting to retain our independence from a foreign government trying to undermine our democracy.
I'm just saying.
May? Interesting. Will have to achieve notes. Finger wag @ Putin. Shame on you. Grow up.
ReplyDeleteYour daughter voted for Bernie Sanders in the primary because she "didn't trust" Hillary.
ReplyDeleteYep, like many Millennials she was targeted by the Russians on Facebook and fed propaganda in order to disenfranchise her.
DeleteHowever she came to her senses before the general.
Jesus Gryphen, you have turned complete fool. Honestly I come here just to laugh these days.
DeleteThat really is the weirdest statement I've heard in a long time.
DeleteThe Sanders movement was very organic and a lot of people really believed in his message, which was good and strong and solid in its foundation.
The tinfoil hat quotient in your statement that "Russians on Facebook and fed propaganda in order to disenfranchise her" is very strong and I do hope that you are indeed being humorous rather than serious with such an out-of-this-world statement, otherwise, perhaps you need some time off the internet.
Who cares who she voted for? And why are you pretending to be a long time reader, trump troll?
DeleteBernie has no respect for ir plans to improve the lives of women or people of color. It's really stupid that a lesbian thought he was a worthy candidate.
Delete6:39pm, that may be obvious now, but I don't think it was so obvious around the time of the primaries.
Deletewhoever helped to Keep Hillary out of the White House is to be congratulated and saved this country
ReplyDeleteWhatever you say comrade.
Delete2:24. Why do you come here and say such stupid shit. Go away. Oh I know, go to your homeland, Putin misses you. Idiot.
DeleteThat's funny 2:34. Your buddy Trump's impeachment hearings will be the bigliest crowd he ever draws. Count on it.
DeleteA month later dRump "decided" he was running?? GMAFB, it was in the cards way before that. All it took was Pootie calling to say all was in place.
ReplyDeleteYeah, didn't he say that he thought about a run in 2012? Of course he did, but knew President Obama would kick his fat, lily white ass but good.
DeleteTalked to a Trump fanboy today. He thinks Trump is doing a fine job, and doesn't believe any of the Russia stuff. Thinks it all the media's fault. Sigh.
ReplyDeleteIf this happened in May of 2016 as stated, that was almost a year after Trump declared he was running, not a month before. Here is Washington Post article saying he is going to declare, dated June 16, 2015.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/06/16/donald-trump-to-announce-his-presidential-plans-today/?utm_term=.afb8f1d95a4e
Is that article correct date-wise? Trump declared he was running in 2015, not 2016.
ReplyDeleteSorry I posted the wrong date.
DeleteI removed that portion so as not to confuse the point of the article.
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/05/21/hillary-clinton-traveled-401-days-sec-state-trump-2-days-president.html
ReplyDeleteHRC! HRC! HRC!
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/dude-america-has-been-exhausted-for-months-white-house-slammed-over-trump-exhaustion-excuse/
Delete"White House admits that Trump misspoke, but blamed the error on a lack of rest, saying that the president is “exhausted” after only two days of travel."a minor mistake, seemingly, but one which tars an entire religion with one brush"
"a minor mistake, seemingly, but one which tars an entire religion with one brush"
Deletethe White House admits that Trump misspoke, but blamed the error on a lack of rest, saying that the president is “exhausted” after only two days of travel."
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/dude-america-has-been-exhausted-for-months-white-house-slammed-over-trump-exhaustion-excuse/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-and-gulf-nations-agree-to-crack-down-on-terror-financing/2017/05/21/e1222b34-3dfd-11e7-9e48-c4f199710b69_story.html?utm_term=.c27827134591
OT CHEATER! -LYING PIG!"The school removed Clarke’s thesis from its website shortly after CNN’s story was published."Clarke said that “only someone with a political agenda would say this is plagiarism.”Clarke announced on Wednesday he would be joining the Department of Homeland Security. But the department has not confirmed the appointment."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/21/homeland_security_hopeful_david_clarke_plagiarized_portions_of_thesis_on.html
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/dhs-hopeful-clarke-denies-plagiarism-masters-thesis-47542296
DENY DENY DENY
The World Bank plans to announce Sunday at an event with Ivanka Trump, the U.S. president’s daughter and senior White House adviser, that Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates have pledged $100 million collectively toward a fund for women who own or want to start businesses, according to people familiar with the announcement.'
ReplyDeletehttp://m.dailykos.com/story/2017/5/21/1664578/-On-same-weekend-as-record-breaking-arms-deal-Saudis-announced-100-million-donation-to-Ivanka-fund
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/04/ivanka-trump-fund-women-entrepreneurs
"IVANKA TRUMP’S “MASSIVE” NEW FUND COULD BE AN ETHICAL MINEFIELD"
Is she releasing a statement on how this is different from Hillary's charitable funds?
ReplyDelete