Monday, December 11, 2017

Robert Mueller's focus on the Michael Flynn timeline suggests that he is building a case for obstruction. Update!

Courtesy of NBC News:

Special counsel Robert Mueller is trying to piece together what happened inside the White House over a critical 18-day period that began when senior officials were told that National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was susceptible to blackmail by Russia, according to multiple people familiar with the matter. 

The questions about what happened between Jan. 26 and Flynn's firing on Feb. 13 appear to relate to possible obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump, say two people familiar with Mueller's investigation into Russia's election meddling and potential collusion with the Trump campaign. 

Multiple sources say that during interviews, Mueller's investigators have asked witnesses, including White House Counsel Don McGahn and others who have worked in the West Wing, to go through each day that Flynn remained as national security adviser and describe in detail what they knew was happening inside the White House as it related to Flynn.

Some of those interviewed by Mueller's team believe the goal is in part to determine if there was a deliberate effort by President Trump or top officials in the West Wing to cover up the information about Flynn that Sally Yates, then the acting attorney general, conveyed to McGahn on Jan. 26. In addition to Flynn, McGahn is also expected to be critical to federal investigators trying to piece together a timeline of those 18 days.

Essentially Flynn lied to the FBI. two days later Sally Yates told Don McGahn that Flynn lied, McGahn told Trump, Trump fired Yates, and then only after the press started to report on some of this did Trump finally fire Flynn.

So it would appear that there is a solid case to be made for obstruction.

However I actually think that Mueller is coming at this from several different angles.

I think that he well might make a case for obstructionism, but that he is also looking to flip Manfort and then Kushner and make the case for conspiracy as well.

I think that is why Trump is starting to lose his shit and why there is increasing talk about firing Mueller, while the Right Wing propaganda outlets prepare the base to accept that decision.

Courtesy of New York Magazine: 

Trump is preparing to shut down Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian intervention in the 2016 election. 

The administration and its allied media organs, especially those owned by Rupert Murdoch, have spent months floating a series of rationales, of varying degrees of implausibility, for why a deeply respected Republican law-enforcement veteran is disqualified to lead the inquiry: He is friends with James Comey, who is biased because Trump fired him; Comey is biased because he pursued leads turned up in Christopher Steele’s investigation, which was financed by Democrats; Mueller has failed to investigate Hillary Clinton’s marginal-to-nonexistent role in a uranium sale. 

The newest pseudo-scandal fixates on the role of Peter Strzok, an FBI official who helped tweak the language Comey employed in his statement condemning Clinton’s email carelessness and has also worked for Mueller. His alleged crime is a series of text messages criticizing Trump. Mueller removed Strzok from his team, but that is not enough for Trump’s supporters, who are seizing on Strzok’s role as a pretext to discredit and remove Mueller, too. The notion that a law-enforcement official should be disqualified for privately expressing partisan views is a novel one, and certainly did not trouble Republicans last year, when Rudy Giuliani was boasting on television about his network of friendly agents. Yet in the conservative media, Mueller and Comey have assumed fiendish personae of almost Clintonian proportions.

As I have said before, if this happens it will blow this investigation wide open, and essentially prove the case for obstruction.

I would bet big money that Trump is itching to fire Mueller and that the only thing holding him back are his lawyers and advisers telling him that it would be political suicide.

The only question is, how long can they hold him at bay?

Update:  

Okay this tidbit from the NBC report was brought to my attention, take a look at this: Mueller is trying to determine why Flynn remained in his post for 18 days after Trump learned of Yates' warning, according to two people familiar with the probe. He appears to be interested in whether Trump directed him to lie to senior officials, including Pence, or the FBI, and if so why, the sources said.

Okay well that is a whole new dimension to all of this.

That is suggesting that Mueller may have evidence that Trump not only ignored evidence that Michael Flynn lied to the FBI, but that he himself may have instructed him to do so.

If that pans out, I do not think that even the Republican majorities in the Senate and House can protect him from impeachment.

27 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:38 PM

    https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/nuclear-plan-backer-denies-inauguration-day-text-with-top-trump-aide-mike-flynn/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:57 PM

    How much info did Flynn pass on to the Russians during those 18 days?

    Trump is guilty of failing to uphold the constitution, he knew Flynn was working with the enemy and did nothing,he should be impeached!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:32 PM

      He should be brought to trial, found guilty, impeached and possibly live in jail for the rest of his life or meet his fate in the electric chair.

      Trump has proven himself to be a fraud, liar and has committed treason. He is not supporting America or its people! He's owned by and working for Putin!


      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:09 PM

      I'd love to see trump fry ..

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:05 AM

      Yep, the turd took an Oath of Office for the Presidency.
      Failed.
      IMPEACH!

      Delete
  3. Dinty2:00 PM

    In this context, you really should use the word “obstruction” vs “obstructionism”.

    Obstructionism is a practice of continually obstructing, where obstruction is Either a single act or multiple acts employed to obstruct an investigation.

    People can be charged with multiple counts of obstructing justice when employing the practice of obstructionism with regard to an investigation, but they will never actually be charged with “obstructionism”, as the law covers single discrete acts of obstruction.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2:12 PM

    "• The outlets were relying on bad-faith sources who were intentionally trying to make the mainstream media look bad. (The Sept. 14 email in question is in the possession of the House Intelligence Committee; maybe some Trump loyalists on the committee pulled a James O’Keefe.)"<IM liken 3

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/12/medias-wikileaks-trump-jr-email-date-screwup-still-unexplained.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous2:54 PM

    Trump is clearly in the debt of others? He appears to be the one that will be (is) compromised.
    He is a terrible businessman.
    He has been bought , because he owes someone(s).
    He knew the presidency was his during the debates.
    He has been an obstruction ,and has been undermining any and everything that can and will implode the United States .He is clearly someone's butt boy trying to destroy our democracy. He must be taken down!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:16 PM

    INRE Update:
    OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE

    We may get Pence/Ryan, but you want to try that shit again, asswipes???

    Pee pond wailing that $arah's gone silent when she should be saying something. She'll be named veep? OMFG.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:53 PM

      Palin? Give yourself a break. She is the last thing any person would pick! She's the kiss of death and the country knows it!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:52 PM

      Shows how dumb the pond scum are. Since when does someone just assign someone outside the line of ascension to a position within the administration? They truly are a special kind of stupid.

      Delete
    3. Who’s going to offer her VP? President Orrin Hatch?
      Because if Trump, Pence and Ryan go down with the rest, the next in line is Orrin Hatch.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous8:39 AM

      Sarah is stalking others in a comotose state. She's busy...

      Delete
  7. Anonymous3:24 PM

    This train's not stopping.

    https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-will-have-a-hard-time-stopping-the-russia-investigation-even-if-he-fires-mueller/

    GeorgiaPeach

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous3:52 PM

    I'd be surprised if Trump is ever impeached. I'd far prefer the long arm of the law to nail him and put him away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m hoping for a quick death, then all of the facts revealed afterwards to totally blacken his “legacy.”

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:07 AM

      I'd go for ivanka meetoo moment and he goes straight to proson.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous5:04 PM

    Jailed Russian hacker: I hacked Democrats 'under the command' of Russian intelligence agents

    http://www.businessinsider.com/russian-hacker-democrats-dnc-intelligence-2017-12

    MUELLER PROBE CIRCLING ITS BIGGEST TARGET YET: FORMER CAMPAIGN CEO STEVE BANNON

    http://www.newsweek.com/mueller-bannon-witness-trump-target-744358

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:44 PM

      Finally!
      Up next denture Giuliani.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous5:11 PM

    Trump officials were warned about Mike Flynn at least 6 separate times before firing him

    http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-michael-flynn-warnings-mueller-russia-2017-12

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous5:17 PM

    Report Suggests Trump Told Flynn to Lie to the FBI

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/12/report-suggests-trump-told-michael-flynn-to-lie-to-the-fbi.html

    The Mueller Investigation Is in Mortal Danger

    ...It is almost a maxim of the Trump era that the bounds of the unthinkable continuously shrink. The capitulation to Moore was a dry run for the coming assault on the rule of law.

    http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/12/the-mueller-investigation-is-in-mortal-danger.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous6:00 PM

    Democrats turn the tables on GOP, demand probe of bias at FBI

    Two top Democrats on the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees are demanding documents from the Justice Department that they say could reveal evidence of “politically motivated misconduct” at the FBI meant to damage Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

    Jerry Nadler of New York and Elijah Cummings of Maryland, ranking members of the judiciary and oversight committees respectively, made the document request on Monday, in a move that turns the tables on Republicans, who have accused both the FBI and special counsel Robert Mueller’s office of being tainted by political bias against Donald Trump.

    “Our committees are now engaged in an investigation of allegations of politically-motivated misconduct at the FBI,” the Democrats wrote in a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. “The facts point to a coordinated effort by some in the FBI to change the course of the Clinton investigation by leaking sensitive information to the public, and by threatening to leak additional information after the investigation was closed.”

    The documents they are seeking include possible leaks to True Pundit, an anonymously written right-wing website, during the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s email server. In the letter, Nadler and Cummings asked for information that could show whether True Pundit’s reporting, which cited sources within the FBI, influenced the bureau’s decision to reopen the email investigation less than two weeks before the election.

    Now, Nadler and Cummings are demanding to know more about those sources, which they say could reveal an anti-Clinton bias within the FBI. Recently released emails show that True Pundit’s reporting was on the radar of senior FBI officials, including deputy director Andrew McCabe and then-Director James Comey, who discussed the potential source(s) of the leaks.

    more..

    https://shareblue.com/democrats-turn-the-tables-on-gop-demand-probe-of-bias-at-fbi/

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous6:48 PM

    " I do not think that even the Republican majorities in the Senate and House can protect him from impeachment."

    That doesn't make any sense as it IS the House and the Senate that need 2/3 majority votes to impeach the President. No one else has the power to impeach, thus if the GOP majority in House and Senate stand behind him and do not vote to impeach, there is NO WAY he can be impeached.

    ReplyDelete
  14. So, his obstruction could have started with firing Sally Yates and continued by firing James Comey.

    Now the question is what he covering or trying to protect Michael Flynn? I don’t thiink so. If anything, he was trying to protect his own ass. So with that in mind, what is it? That everything Michael Flynn did was at Trump’s direction. We all konw what a micromanager and control freak Trump is. Not only does he demand loyalty but he also demands obedience. Everything Flynn did he did at Trump’s direction. Certainly Trump’s knowledge.

    As for those assholes with the FBI. They basically hijacked our election and manipulated the vote so Trump could win. Trump had nothing to do with it. They did this on their own. But the results were the same. The FBI rigged the election.

    That means that Trump is NOT the legitimate president. Unfortunately our forefathers could never have foreseen this possibility and there is nothing in the Constitution to address this. It was basically a coup, not by the military but by a Federal Government department. Now, what did Comey know? He’s the one that released that damned letter that destroyed Hillary’s lead and gave the election to Trump.

    It is all just so very CORRUPT.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous9:53 AM

    So think about this. I always wondered why Mueller only brought one charge for Flynn to plead to. Lying to the FBI. Flynn has now pled guilty to that charge.
    So when Mueller hits Trump with obstruction of justice charges, Trump can't claim that he did nothing wrong because Flynn didn't lie.
    With Flynn's one, measly plea of guilt, Trump can no longer weasel out with that excuse because he said he was guilty. Trump is in a corner that he can't get out of and therefore goes down for, among other things, obstruction of justice.
    LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did Trump SAY it or did he TWEET it? Because now he has grounds to dismiss anything he tweeted as "I didn't do it, that was XXX."

      Delete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.