Nine days ago conservative blogger Andrew Sullivan called for the release of Sarah Palin's medical records.
Now as we all know Presidential candidates and Vice Presidential candidates are all required to release their medical records, so this is not demanding anything unreasonable.
Hell even Dick Cheney released his records, which made many of us wonder just what was keeping the evil one alive.
Sullivan has also asked to see Joe Biden's medical records, which is absolutely reasonable and appropriate. Especially since Biden has a history of brain aneurysms.
Well Biden is about to release his records, so it only seems fitting that Sarah Palin do the same.
That would finally put to rest all of those rumors about Sarah not giving birth to Trig Palin that keep being propagated by those scurrilous liberal bloggers. (Don't you just hate those guys?)
So today marks day one of:
The Immoral Minority's demand for the release of Sarah Palin's medical records!!
There. Is that subtle enough?
And by the way if the only doctor listed on the report is Dr. Cathy Baldwin-Johnson, then we will demand a second opinion. Because any doctor who admits to the news media that she allowed a 44 year old women about to give birth to a Down's Syndrome child to fly from Texas to Alaska while leaking amniotic fluid cannot be trusted to give a medical examination to ANYBODY!
I will bet anything there will be some excuse for her not releasing records...it will jsut go along with the same plan of her not speaking to press on the plane, no interviews, and no taking questions.
ReplyDeleteSadly, I doubt her true believer followers would even care at this point, they are so desperate.
ReplyDeleteYou don't "leak" amniotic fluid. When your water breaks....it breaks. And it gushes. And it's icky. Any movement, and she would have been wet from the thighs down. Find the passengers on the flight. See if any of them noticed her in pain, or looking unusual, or breathing funny. A woman in labor definitely shows signs of it, and since this was not her first child, this baby would have come faster. My sister was in labor for 2 days with her first. My first took 8 hours - because I ended up having a C-section. Had I not, I would have been in labor for quite some time seeing as how it took me 8 hours to dilate to 2 cm (the cervix needs to be at 10 cm before pushing). So, there is no way this woman could have possibly had a child while on a trip that would have taken that long.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous great point but I think we all concur that the baby is Bristol's so one wouldn't find any witnesses to Sarah's water breaking.
ReplyDeleteThat's the whole point - because then it wouldn't be seen as a "conspiracy theory" - it would be a fact that is no denying.
ReplyDelete