Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Even though Sarah Palin no longer leads our state her legacy continues, as the Palin-bot she left in charge, Sean Parnell, sues Federal government over health care bill. Is there no end to the stupid?

From ADN:

Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell said Tuesday the state will join 20 others led mostly by Republican governors in suing to overturn the health care overhaul bill signed into law last month by President Barack Obama.

Calling it an "unprecedented exercise of congressional power," Parnell said Alaska would follow the other states in challenging the constitutionality of the mandate that people buy health care insurance or pay a fine.

"For the first time we now have a federal government dictating our economic activity," Parnell said. "Alaska will use the courts to fight this federal encroachment on our citizens."

Everybody in Alaska knows that Parnell is essentially a charisma deficient, slightly less masculine version of Sarah Palin. However until just recently he has been so insignificant that he can barely be seen with the naked eye.  However now with an election coming Parnell has decided that he needs to do something bold to gain some conservative credibility.  So being a disciple of the incredibly politically savvy Sarah Palin (Snark alert!) he has decided to do something truly stupid to make himself stand out.

"Look there is Governor Sean Parnell.  I can see him now!  Damn is he an idiot!"

Not only is this case probably going to cost my state many thousands of dollars (Parnell estimates $5,000, but other equally ignorant governors are wasting as much as $100,00 of their stat's money), it simply cannot win.

Many constitutional law experts say that the health insurance mandate falls within the constitutional purview of Congress. They say there are plenty of other cases that show Congress has just as much authority to regulate economic inactivity as it does activity, said Stanford University Law School professor David Freeman Engstrom. It will be difficult for the Supreme Court to step away from those precedents, Engstrom said.

"There's lots of case law where Congress has regulated economic inactivity," Engstrom said. "It seems really unlikely that the court is going to stick its neck out and strike down a signal piece of social legislation by doing what many would say is charting a new constitutional path."

Sadly our governor is not the ONLY Republican politician in the state blowing the Teabagger dog whistle.

The decision for Alaska to join the suit drew praise from Parnell's Republican counterparts, Rep. Don Young and Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Young already has signed onto a Republican-backed House bill that would repeal the law.

The faster Alaska can dump these Republican obstructionists and move into the 21st century the better off our whole state and it's people will be. We cannot have the 2010 elections soon enough in my book.

18 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:38 AM

    Now that Gryphen has you all riled up - and justifiably so - visit themudflats.net for AKM's presentation of historical facts that Parnell, Palin and their packs either don't know or refuse to acknowledge.

    The Immoral Minority and Mudflats are perfect complements to one another; the ying and yang of political commentary in Alaskan (and beyond).

    I cannot get through a day without visiting both because both bloggers make me think deeper, make me laugh more deeply and give me hope!

    BTW, wake up Alaska - poop on Parnell at the next election by voting for a Democrat for Governor - a good one, mind you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm looking at the picture there and I see $arah and Todd are not dressed up for the swearing in of Sean Parnell. Shows total lack of class.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous7:01 AM

    http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=12348087

    KNOXVILLE (WATE) - Sarah Palin's daughter, Bristol, is expected to testify Wednesday afternoon in the federal trial over her mother's Yahoo email account.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:59 AM

    Of course sarahs family has their government run healthcare so why should they care about anybody getting affordable healthcare?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ratfish8:10 AM

    As always, Palin-lite and his Law Department are lying when they imply that the lawsuit will cost $5,000.

    What they said in careful legalese is it cost $5,000 to file, or join, the lawsuit. This does not include what will be huge costs taking the case through the federal court system, even if the state has to pay 1/20th or whatever of the total.

    It also does not include the huge costs in preparing the 48 page political science thesis they called a brief.

    And finally, if it only cost $5,000 to join a lawsuit on such a momentous issue, why does it cost so much more when the same people are asked to produce some emails about Palin?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:11 AM

    Justice Breier has said he expects this case to end up in front of the Supreme Court.

    No one doubts that Congress can regulate commerce. The question will be whether the government can force some citizens to buy a commercial product from a private company.

    Note this applies to some citizens, not all and that if you fail to comply, you will be fined and eventually jailed.

    This is by no means as simple as it appears. If Congress can force you to buy health insurance from a private company then theoretically the government could mandate that everyone making $X has to buy a Chevy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:11 AM

    Who cares if bristol testifies?
    There is a pic of her or willow making a crossed eyed tongue sticking out retard face holding trig.
    Big fucking deal! If PayMe wasn't so retarded to be using a Yahoo account, password protected by info found on wikipedia...
    and if this kids father wasn't a dem...it wouldn't be a issue. Any one of her Ethics complaints are more serious than this!

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is my fervent hope that the good people of Alaska will take the election of 2010 very, very seriously. I would like to think that elected officials in any capacity should be elected to do their job of serving the people of Alaska, not based on their charismatic personalities.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8:50 AM

    Sen Begich says this lawsuit is doomed to fail. He must have picked up extensive legal training in his education at Stellar High School.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous9:04 AM

    you have to buy insurance to own a car, you have to buy homeowner's insurance to get a mortgage, and now you have to buy health insurance. I don't see what the problem is? Grow up people!
    -ayerishgrl

    ReplyDelete
  11. sallyngarland,tx9:06 AM

    There definitely is no end to stupid in Texas, either---Our AG joined in this and our gov Perry says we have " torpedoes ready in the water.". Lovely--torpedoes for Perry and crosshairs for Palin.!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Come on, Alaska! Wipe every trace of Sarah Palin out of your government. You owe it to yourself and to the rest of us (for facilitating her rise to power in the first place).

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anon 8:50:
    It IS going to fail.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:47 AM

    I think God tried to give her a big hint, by slamming the door in her face last time..she keeps putting the carrot out there..


    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/04/21/palin-on-2012-if-its-right-then-we-will-pursue-that/?fbid=jNHq-esHKBg#more-100619

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous11:07 AM

    Anon @ 8:11

    Okay, since nobody else has said it yet, I will. And since you appear to be attempting to be reasonable, I'll do the same.

    Nobody will be "eventually jailed" for failing to buy insurance. Nobody. That is simply not true.

    So unless I've misunderstood your meaning, please look into this further. Hopefully there are at least some folks who are willing to be reasonable enough to admit it when an outright falsehood is just that.

    http://www.factcheck.org/2010/04/more-malarkey-about-health-care/

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous11:13 AM

    you have to buy insurance to own a car

    ===========================

    A. Those are state laws, not federal.

    B. You are not required by law to own a car.

    C. If you are poor, the govt doesn't step in and buy your auto insurance for you.

    D. Alaska Natives/American Indians don't get free auto insurance.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous11:19 AM

    The anti-HC bill bull is lame theater, no one thinks it is going anywhere, Parnell is a puppet clown. I can't wait to hear from the Alaskans that went to Knoxville to witness Ivy Frye, Todd, Bristol and Sarah on the witness stand in a Federal trial. What an opportunity!

    ReplyDelete
  18. A bit of mandate history

    The Founding Fathers' "Individual Mandate", by Adam Winkler (Professor at UCLA School of Law)

    Excerpt:

    .... the individual mandate is not really so unprecedented. In fact the founding fathers adopted the first "individual mandate" back in 1792. It required individuals to outfit themselves with guns and ammunition, even if they had to buy those items from private sellers.

    The mandate was included in a series of laws known as the Militia Acts. Early Americans were were fearful of a standing army so they relied on ordinary citizens organized into state militias to fight off Natives and invading armies. States, however, couldn't always be counted on to send their militias to help out other states. Comity was an unreliable basis for national security. And ordinary citizens couldn't always be relied upon to have the equipment they would need to be an effective fighting force.

    Congress sought to rectify these problems by passing federal legislation. In the first Militia Act, Congress gave the President authority to call out the militias and imposed penalties on any militiaman who refused to obey orders. In the second Militia Act, Congress included an individual mandate: all free, able-bodied male citizens between the ages of 18 and 45 "shall, within six months... provide himself with a good musket or firelock" or "a good rifle." All men of age were also ordered to equip themselves with ammunition and "a knapsack" to carry supplies. Many citizens already had these items. Those who didn't had to go out and buy them, like it or not, presumably from a private seller. ....

    Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/the-founding-fathers-indi_b_523001.html

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.