From Consortium News:
While the gospels about Jesus are filled with the stories that he told and others about what he did, the Sermon on the Mount is different. The Sermon on the Mount is a collection of his aphorisms or short sayings.
Under the critical analysis of our best Bible scholars, the Sermon on the Mount stands as authentic Jesus material. I have concluded that if people want to follow Jesus, they need to read and digest the Sermon on the Mount.
Near the end of Chapter 5, the great challenge of Jesus is laid down.
“You have heard the saying ‘an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth;’ but I say to you do not resist one who is evil. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other side. And if someone sues you and takes your coat, let him have your cloak as well. You have also heard it said ‘love your neighbor and hate your enemy;’ but I say to you love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”
Nothing was more basic to the society in which Jesus lived and taught than the declaration “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” The saying is a clear expression of the understanding of sin as a debt to be paid. …
This concept was commonly applied to God. Break one of God’s rules and God will repay insult for insult. In the prevailing understanding of Judaism in Jesus’s day, sin was a debt that must be paid.
Jews traveled long distances to Jerusalem to make blood sacrifices to pay God the price of their sin.
Jesus argued against the prevailing system. Jesus did not believe that punishment cured the problem of sin. He rejected the concept of sin as a debt that must be paid. In this opinion, he joined a minority of Old Testament prophets who believed that the antidotes for sin were love and acts of kindness.
It is my observation that in the 21st century the vast majority of Christians have embraced “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.” Not only have Christians embraced what Jesus denied, the western world has adopted the standard of “a debt must be paid.”
Penalties are supposed to fit the crime and an offender must pay his debt to society. Christians have become what Jesus despised and rejected.
How did this happen? Look no further than Paul, the author of about half of the material that we have in our New Testaments.
Paul had a mysterious experience that he believed was with Jesus. It happened a few years after the death of the man from Galilee as Paul traveled on the road to Damascus.
Paul’s experience with Jesus took place decades before any of the parables, aphorisms and stories about Jesus were put in written form. They existed only as oral traditions. In the many letters that Paul wrote there is no hint that he was aware of what we now call the Sermon on the Mount.
Paul was Jewish by birth, training and conviction. He was steeped in the tradition of sin as being debt. Paul wrote a theology for the early church. The book of Romans is the center piece of his theology.
Paul embraced the idea that the debt of sin must be paid. Jesus’s death on the cross was the payment.
All of Paul’s letters were written and were being circulated decades before any of the four gospels were put in written form. Paul’s theology won the day over the teachings of Jesus.
In the history of Christian churches, there have been many ardent followers who have advocated a return to the teachings of Jesus, but Paul’s concept of Jesus’s crucifixion as the payment of the debt of mankind’s sin became imbedded in the central ceremony of Christians, in the Roman Catholic Mass and the Protestant Communion.
Paul’s theology still has a stranglehold on the Christian churches and on Christians.
Human beings have a long history of behaving badly. They lie; they cheat; they steal; and when pressed, they kill one another with abandon. They actually believe they can fight with honor.
There is no evidence that the practice of “eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” ever produced an honorable result, made people more whole with lives that are more satisfying, or produced a society that is good for all.
The good news is that Jesus is still looking for followers, who want to go on a different kind of a journey.
As many of you may remember Reverend Bess was the author of 1995 book, "Pastor, I Am Gay," that, then mayor, Sarah Palin asked about having removed from the Wasilla library.
He is also the man whose version of Christianity I find the most palatable.
Gryphen, this is an excellent post and I agree about your theory of Apostle Paul. It is very interesting to me personally, as my ex husband, who was a much better Biblical Scholar than my father, took the position you have shared here. And as is typical of staunch, right wing Christians, my father (as well as the entire Baptist church I grew up in) preferred to cherry pick whatever suited them from the scriptures and disregard the rest. It is my hope that true Christians will wake up and take that different journey than the hate that is being spewed forth today.
ReplyDeleteThanks again for posting this.
Religion. Jesus. God. YUCK. Move on...
ReplyDeleteI know I would not be adverse to Christianity as it is widely practiced in the United States if the churches and congregants actually followed the percepts of Jesus as expressed in the Sermon on the Mount.
ReplyDeleteMind you, I still do not believe that these words are actually His words, not am I a Christian in the church sense.
I believe in and try to follow the kindness concept expressed in all religions, particularly Buddhism. I cannot deny the existence of a higher power, but I do not worship any man or half-man/half-deity. I much prefer a more philosophical approach to living my life.
Still, I am grateful for this posting - I believe I saw it or something similar over at God's Own Party which is a fantastic blog about the threat of Dominionism (the kind of church belief Palin follows).
Thank you for sharing this wise counsel. May all Christians return to the heart and soul of the religion, not listen to the dark voices of hate and division being preached in too many churches today.
What happened to Oz Mudflats? Clicked it to read "Sarah Palin's Head Explodes...." and got this message:
ReplyDeleteThis blog has been archived or suspended for a violation of our Terms of Service.
You can create your own free blog on WordPress.com.
Oops. Sorry. Oz Mudflats is back.
ReplyDelete"Yuck" - ?
ReplyDeleteGranted, it doesn't seem to be for everyone, but just because you see no value in it, that doesn't mean it has no meaning for anyone. What is amazing is the total lack of regard by the "so-called Christians" for the words of the "original Christian" - Jesus himself.
Gryph, thank you for stating so clearly what really should be obvious to so-called followers of Chrisitanity.
On a forum I'm on, a handful of people were tea partying it up very vehemently. One person tried to inject a note of reason into the conversation, and the "rightest" of them came back with "Yeah, well, read the Bible first - and then tell me what Jesus would say!"
So I did...from the Sermon on the Mount. With chapter and verse cited.
I never saw a thread deserted so fast in my life. ha.
Eventually, they came back and were talking just as they had before - and not one of 'em responded to my post. Go figure.
The claim by many to be born again Christians appears to be Orwellian disinformation.
ReplyDelete"We are such only because we say we are...not because there is any substance to what we say or that we have any idea what it means other then making us some how above criticism. "
Mudflats has disappeared...What happened?
ReplyDeleteGryphen, can you tell us what was so wrong with what they posted?