Monday, February 28, 2011

Frank Bailey's manuscript and how it helps to prove that Sarah Palin did NOT give birth to her fifth child.



See? I was too pregnant!
  As all of you are aware I have bitten my tongue and refused to write about what is revealed on the leaked pages of Frank Bailey's hopefully "soon to be published manuscript."

However as I have played by the rules, and respected the authors right to control their intellectual property, others have not demonstrated such restraint.  Which has led to some unfortunate assertions having been made without an appropriate challenge.

There are a few to choose from but the one that I want to focus on with this post is the assertion that Bailey's book "Quashes gossip about Trig Palin's birth,"

Shushannah Walshe writer for the Daily Beast, and occasional Palin kool-aid drinker, wrote the following:

Although most of the tell-all is incredibly scathing, Bailey—who was not only an administrative staffer but also booked personal travel for the Palin family and worked around the clock to please his boss—aims to put the gossip about Bristol Palin giving birth to Sarah's fifth child, Trig, to an end. He writes that he visited Sarah Palin at the hospital just hours after Trig was born and spotted Bristol sitting in the waiting room. There is absolutely no way Bristol had just given birth, he says.

While factually accurate, the statement fails to mention how conflicted Bailey was by what Sarah Palin was saying officially, and what his own eyes were telling him.

Now I am not going to cut and paste to make my point, or quote directly from the manuscript, but since this assertion is out there let me give you a little more information about what IS in the manuscript, and what is NOT in the manuscript.

When Bailey learns of this "pregnancy," it is only ONE DAY before Palin announces it to the world.  And as we have heard numerous times before, from numerous sources, according to Bailey NOBODY knew she was with child. Nobody.

Even the closest members of her inner circle express absolute shock at the news, and gossip to each other that she is not showing AT ALL. Now once again this is not news to those of us who have followed this story closely but it does reaffirm the impossibility of this pregnancy. (In fact there is a conversation that Bailey had with Sarah back in 2006 which should give pause to anybody who believes that Sarah gave birth to Trig.)


Sarah Palin on March 14, 2008
 Frank goes on to talk about seeing Sarah Palin during her pregnancy , and even describes visiting their infamous cabin on Safari Lake in March, and seeing how carefully Todd treated her as proof she must be pregnant.  Bailey also talks about his multiple sightings of a "skinny" Bristol as proof that Sarah must be Trig's mom. (Remember back in those days the only two choices ever discussed were that ether Bristol or Sarah MUST be the child's mother. So in Bailey's eyes if Bristol is clearly too skinny to be pregnant, then ipso facto Sarah MUST be the mother!  Tah Dah!)

Now let's talk about what is NOT in Bailey's manuscript.

Nowhere does Bailey talk about Sarah suffering with morning sickness, a constant need to pee, or any of the discomfort that ANYBODY who has been pregnant, or worked with pregnant women (like I have), know all to well is a constant part of the "beauty of childbirth."

Also missing is any reference to any of the staff "feeling the baby kick," or talk about a pregnant Sarah struggling to get into a car, or out of an airplane, or into a chair.  Now perhaps Frank is a little dull on these points, though he does have children of his own, but these little descriptions would do much to support his personal belief that Palin gave birth to her fifth child.  Yet they are not there, why?

Well in my opinion they are not there because Frank never saw any of that. None.

Now let's address some of the other leaks from the book and how they support the seemingly absurd idea that the sitting Governor of Alaska would fake a pregnancy. 

And once again let me apologize to the authors, but this information is now out in the blogosphere and really must be taken into consideration to truly understand this topic.

As revealed, once again by Shushannah Walshe, Sarah Palin had her staff write glowing letters about her job performance and policy decisions, and then convince supporters to let them sign their names to them.

Now roll that around in your mind a little.  When Palin, and her staff, did this they knew full well that the people whose names appeared on the letters could easily reveal the truth about them, yet they did not seem to be worried in the least that it would backfire on them. And up until now it hasn't.

Okay you say, that is kind of unethical and deceptive, but it does not rise to the level of actually faking a pregnancy while holding public office.  And to that I say you are absolutely right.

Take a moment to ask yourself this, "What is the most defining Sarah Palin trademark?"  In other words what do you immediately visualize when you think of this famous icon?  Did you say her glasses?  I bet you did.

From Wonkette:

One of the “friends” on the dearly departed “Lou Sarah” Facebook account, Kermit Ketchum, is mentioned multiple times in former Palin advisor Frank Bailey’s leaked book. Who is Kermit Ketchum? According to Bailey, he’s an elderly man and longtime friend of the family. Bailey’s manuscript describes Ketchum as the one who saw a (presumably doctored) pornographic photo of Palin sent by email to the campaign. Later, Ketchum allegedly repeats gossip from Sarah’s mother saying that Sarah had Lasik surgery and just wears glasses for show. They’re not a prescription — they’re there to make her look smart.

Okay now, did that send you reeling?

Just think about what kind of a person wears glasses, virtually all of the time, JUST to appear more intelligent even though she does not need them. In other words, she wears them for the sole purpose of creating an illusion.

Does THAT seem like a person who might consider faking a pregnancy, JUST to create an illusion?

Remember she only had to wear that fake stomach for a couple of weeks, but she has worn those damn glasses for much of her life. (At least in public.)

Now at this point you have to be asking "How?" As in "how" does anybody mange to keep all of this quiet. "How" does anybody sleep at night knowing that somebody might spill the beans at any minute?  "How" does a person become such a chronic liar that all of these deceptions seem reasonable to them?

You know there was a time when Audrey, from Palin's Deceptions, and I would have long talks in an attempt to understand what would have compelled Palin to fake her own pregnancy.  And every once in a while Audrey would stop and say "But Jesse, that is just crazy!  Nobody would ever do something like that!"

And I would respond with, "We are not talking about a regular person.  We are talking about Sarah Palin.  And considering what we KNOW for sure about her, is there really ANYTHING that we could disregard as being too crazy?"

And after learning this new information from the Bailey manuscript, do any of YOU believe there is anything too crazy when it comes to Sarah "fake glasses, fake letters to the editor, fake baby bump" Palin?

So are you all caught up to where I am now?

Good, because we are about to take a trip a little further into the Palin rabbit hole.

Now you all know that I hear rumors. (Lord how I hear rumors!) And sometimes those rumors pan out, sometimes they don't, and sometimes they are just too crazy to even consider.

At least at first. 

Now about a year or so ago, I heard a rumor that fit into that last category. It was a doozy, but I realized that even if true, there was just NO way I would ever be able to prove it. No way! (I even had a person who swore that it was true in an e-mail, but back then I considered it a waste of time to pursue it.)

However, just recently this rumor has reemerged.  And with the information that has leaked out about Bailey's book, I am much less apt to consider that this particular rumor is false, because it fits in well with the established pattern of Sarah Palin's bizarre behaviors.

Some of you have already read the back and forth discussion in the comments section. But for the rest of you here it is in its unedited form.

FYI -- I read this 'comment' a couple days ago:

"Whoever gave birth to Trig, it couldn't be Sarah. Remember, she had said that she 'not only had her tubes just tied, she had them cut, and the ends burned - or some such measure to make SURE she wasn't going to be having more babies.

"Didn't she have it done during the delivery of piper??

"All of us who have kids that went to school with Sarah's kids know to be absolute factual gospel truth: Sarah Palin had a tubal ligation after her last baby (Piper) was born.

"She then took several days off work- more than she took when she "had" Trig. She bitched at Todd afterward saying HE should have gotten the snip since it was so much easier for men."

"Trig may actually have BEEN born at 7.5 months....but he wasn't born in April '08, and he sure as HELL did not issue forth from the tied, cut, and burned fallopian tubes of Sarah Louise Heath Palin."

10:17 PM

10:17PM is right on the money.

My two were in the same school as two of Sarah's at the same time. She volunteered for revolving carpool and bailed every single time. She called one morning saying she'd be unable to drive her planned day the next morning because she'd had "a tubal". I remember her saying it in that whiny fake accent she used to elicit sympathy: "Well, I've had a two-bull". I just rolled my eyes and got someone to fill in.

Two weeks after that when her next shift came up, she called again and this time it had gone from "a two-bull" to "my surgery". "I'm sorry, I can't make it 'cause yaknow I had surgery recently..."
I remember some of the other moms and I joked that when her NEXT shift came up, she would be calling saying "I can't drive due to the recent double AMPUTATION of my tubes..."

As for why I won't go on the record...and I think the other people in my position feel the same way: basically, it's fear.

We have all seen someone become unemployable and/or pariah in their community because they "crossed" one of the Palins. Most of us still have one or more kids still in school or college, and we all know Sarah goes for the jugular...which for most of us, is our kids. I know it seems unlikely that Palin would still have power given that she quit, but trust me when I say the "long arm of Palin" is still reaching very far in Wasilla these days.

I do hope Sarah's insane fake pregnancy will be revealed in national media soon. But I have a hard time believing that my going on the record about her tubal will make a difference. She would instantly brand me a "wee wee'd up" librul who just wanted to spread an ugly rumor. She would play the victim and claim I was "attacking her special needs baby". (do you notice how she keeps calling three year old Trig a "baby"? It's to foster the "young mother with sweet babe in arms" image. She did the same thing with Piper, saying "my baby is sick" or "I have to go, my baby needs me" when Piper was four years old. She even let Piper have bottles and sippies well past the appropriate age, in pursuit of this "image")

Anyway, she would say I was lying just to try and make her look bad. She would sanctimoniously sneer "prove it! Put up or shut up!" knowing that only her medical records would prove what I was saying.

Most of us in the valley are scared for CBJ, as she knows EVERYTHING...and Sarah doesn't like loose ends. But if CBJ ever DID decide to pitch her license to the wind and tell the truth about Sarah, Trig, etc...Sarah will be done. Even the most hardcore, ironclad, koolaid-dipped bot will abandon her.

8:08 AM

I am the person who posted about Sarah talking her "tubal" to death. There's one other detail I'd like to add: Sarah talked about breastfeeding and pumping ALL the time, but I don't think she nursed any of her kids for long, if at all. She bought giant tubs of Enfamil and I remember Piper smelling of that foul stinky formula (nutrammigan? I'm sure I spelled that wrong)

Anyway, my point is that Sarah has been trying to foster a certain image long before she hot the national stage. I really do think she has a mental disorder. I cannot adequately describe the way she used to go on and on and on about how breastfeeding was so rewarding, it was the most amazing job a woman could do, my nipples are sooo sore but it's worth it because I'm providing my child with the best...blah blah, etc etc. And she'd have a tub of formula RIGHT there in the diaper bag!

Not only that, she had the nerve to chastise other moms who formula fed. THAT is the Sarah we all know- "let me tell you what a bad mother you are for formula feeding while I sit here and give my baby a bottle of formula".

I remember once with Piper she actually said something like "I hope Pipe takes the bottle I pumped...she's been my pickiest about wanting her milk straight from the tap!"

Meanwhile, as she takes the bottle out, Piper goes after that thing like a grizzly after a gimpy salmon...LOL. She could hold it herself and everything.

Just another example of how it is vs. how Sarah SAYS it is. And the two shall never meet on common ground.

4:05 PM

I am the person who posted about Sarah's tubal. (Gryph, you were saying you wanted ME to email you, or the person who quoted my post..?)

Ok I'd like to address a couple of points. For the person who asks how I sleep at night: how DARE you presume to know what it's like to be in this position. You have NO CLUE how far Sarah still reaches in the valley. Look how many of us are from Wasilla (based on Gryphen's logger counter thing) yet so few speak up about living here because everyone suddenly thinks we "hold the key" to finishing Sarah Palin.

But hear this, friends...and Gryph can back me on this..MANY of us HAVE reached out to journalists or authors about things we know...and they are not, repeat NOT interested.

Instead of questioning US on our ethics or devotion to America...try to think of the view from here: we've seen Gryphen's "two babies" post...and we all thought....WHEW. It'll be over now. The media simply can't ignore THAT..

And we see others who have tried to speak up about Sarah suddenly seem to have a LOT of "bad luck".

Gryphon knows for a fact that Sarah Palin is infertile via her own choosing- a tubal legation and burn. And that she has been that way for far longer than Trig has been a gleam in anyone's eye.

If GRYPHEN knows it and hasn't been able to get this bombshell news picked up by the right people...then why would I- a stay at home mom with NO media connections- risk my family's well being?

I'm just saying...think about us before judging us so harshly.

8:58 PM

For those of you unaware of what the term "tubal ligation" means it is usually referred to as "getting your tubes tied" and it is a MUCH more reliable form of contraception than being 45 year old woman whose husband consistently sleeps on the downstairs sofa.

Now a couple of things t consider about these comments.  They COULD all be from one person.  They COULD all be a bunch of BS.  They could even be a red herring thrown out there by a Palin-bot trying to get me off of the sent of a real scandal.

However read them again, and ask yourself if they seem legit. Because they kind of do to me.

So here we are at a potentially defining moment.  After all of these years the true Sarah Palin is being revealed to a skeptical public by at least three major books, her supporters are fleeing like flaming rats from a sinking ship, and she is being openly mocked on network television.

She has never been this vulnerable, so the time for the proverbial fork is now.

Let me once again appeal to the women from Wasilla who spoke out so passionately in the comments section. Please contact me via my e-mail at gryphen2009@yahoo.com.  As hard as I have worked this has never been a one man operation in the strictest sense.  I have always relied on input form you, my visitors, and right now I am asking you to take the plunge and possibly someday be able to tell your children that you helped to remove a poisonous blot from the landscape of American politics.

Believe me your identities and locations will be protected. All I need is about two or three of you to tell your story.  I will edit out anything which might reveal your identity to the Palin family, or supporters, and I will make sure that your information gets picked up by the national media.  (Currently there is a lot of interest in finding out new bits of scandalous information concerning Sarah Palin, so there are a lot of perked up ears in the media.)

And while you are thinking it through, consider this;  The whole country blames Alaskans for helping to unleash Sarah Palin on the world, and not doing anything to stop her while she bullies the American media into submission.  How great would it feel if we Alaskans finally stood up and defeated this Frankenstein monster that we helped to create?

Like I said, I can't do it alone.  But with your help we might be closer than ever to putting all of this in our rearview miror. Come on Wasilla!  The world is counting on you!

294 comments:

  1. Barbara8:23 PM

    Are any birth mothers or fathers out there able to comment on the way "Trig" looked in the photo of him with Grandma and Grandpa Heath just after his birth? Didn't he look too "developed" and chubby to be a new born? And then didn't he look sickly a few days later in Mercede's arms?

    It's not the same baby, is it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. FEDUP!!!8:23 PM

    Anon @ 6:46 PM (and others also, too):

    Hospital staff is NOT ALLOWED to look at ANY medical records except on a 'need-to-know' basis!
    I work in a hospital pharmacy, and we are NOT allowed to look up ANY records - NOT EVEN OUR OWN! If we got caught doing that, we could/would be fired on the spot! If we wanted to look up our own records, we have to go to medical records dept and ask formally for it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. FEDUP!!!8:30 PM

    One more thing: Our hospital is a pretty big one in our area here, and so we have some 'celebrities' once in a while.
    Believe me, the nurses and doctors involved go to great lengths to protect their anonymity! They get fake names (that are only accessible in their official files), and they get closed-door treatment with private nurses/sitters in front of their doors.

    We are not allowed to comment on friends/family/neighbors admitted to the hospital. There have been lawsuits for someone talking to their neighbors and expressing concern that one of their family members were admitted to a hospital - and those neighbors then sued, because they either did not know the family member was in the hospital, or they did not want anyone else to know about it for whatever reason.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8:33 PM

    Anonymous asks, how much would you be willing to pay for the proof that Bristol is the mother of Trig, Sarah was not pregnant, and the date of Trig's birth as well as the date of Tripp's birth?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:17 PM

    Fed Up @8:23

    People have NO understanding of how online (computerized) records work. EVERY access to EVERY record is logged EVERY time.

    That record once created would not likely be deleted.

    The only possible way to bypass this is if there is some record in a paper form in the room.

    If for some reason the patient wanted exceptional privacy- this would not succeed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. FEDUP!!!9:23 PM

    8:33: You would have to come up with a bit more than just the questions. You would have to be able to prove at least ONE of the points you make. For the rest, we all could put up a collection here at Gryphen's site, and then Gryphen could tell you exactly how much we could come up with. (IF he agrees to that, of course!)
    Or... You could ask for an amount, and Gryphen could post it and give a daily total of the contributions (which should be kept in some kind of escrow account, so people would not be schemed out of their hard earned $$s like they are with Palin...)

    ReplyDelete
  7. I knew about the glasses being fake shortly after "meeting" her online after her VP nod.

    I noticed the lenses in her glasses have no curvature, which would be there if they are there to assist in seeing.

    I got my first pair of glasses when I was seven, was never able to adjust to contact lenses, and finally got Lasik myself at age 49.

    It's possible that she now does have some prescription lenses: I have become a bit farsighted after my surgery, which is why I use cheap reading glasses.

    Seeing the curve of the lenses is easy, once you know what to look for.

    As far as Bailey and Tri-g, I think that story is so far out and weird that people refuse to believe it. What crazy-ass bitch would invent something like that?

    ans: Sarah.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh. And I'm backing up FEDUP!!! @ 8:23 pm. In our hospital too. NOBODY looks at records unless it's needed.

    In fact, my current job is getting people ready for surgery. I routinely look up medical records online for my patients, and print out any old anesthesia records for the anesthesia provider when s/he comes around. If I have time, I look up a number of people at the same time. I've had nurses say they would never do that, because there would be a computer record of them looking up 5 or 6 different people in a matter of minutes and they aren't sure they could explain it satisfactorily.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous9:55 PM

    What daughter would let her father watch her vagina, even if it is a birth? Has anyone ever heard of such a thing? The husband, yes. Maybe a mom or sister...maybe. But the mother's dad? Something sick going on if that's even true.

    ReplyDelete
  10. she's a fraud, folks9:56 PM

    Here's the thing. Not a single person who has ever lived can prove that Sarah Palin actually gave birth to Trig Palin.

    That's because it never happened.

    Every mom has a box full of documents, hospital and doctor paperwork and pictures that can prove unequivocally that she had a child.

    Most moms also have family and friends who were there during the pregnancy and have many wonderful stories and photos - and hands they placed on a kicking tummy - to vouch for any pregnancy.

    Many family members and friends would happily sign an affidavit or show baby pics to acknowledge a joyous childbirth if crazy people were saying that such a blessed event never happened at all. How dare they, after all!

    Yet Sarah Palin - and no one else alive today anywhere in the world - has anything to prove that Sarah Palin gave birth to Trig Palin on April 18, 2008.

    There is NOTHING because it is impossible to prove something that never happened - and Sarah Palin did NOT give birth to Trig Palin.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous10:18 PM

    anonymous says, well I was thinking proof such as a nurse who was there and assisted in the birth of Bristol's child. I don't think you could raise enough money so I'll have to wait and hope for Sarah to become a presidential candidate and then there will be more people willing to raise enough money. You know, this can't be just hearsay, it has to be a sworn affidavit by a nurse who attended. How else are you ever going to prove it?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pursang10:18 PM

    Palin never did release her medical records when she was the VP candidate. Could it be she couldn't because they would have proved she didn't give birth to Trig?

    I mean even the MSM could put 2+2 together if they read she had a tubal ligation way before she was supposed to give birth to Trig.

    Interesting....

    ReplyDelete
  13. onething10:37 PM

    People are saying:
    "Ok, do we gwt the gist of this game boys and girls? Keep assigning ridiculous advise to someone who doesn't even have the condition. If you were the physician, wouldn't you CLEAR YOUR NAME????"

    The problem is, what did CBJ know and do and help with? Sure, if she had nothing to do with the whole production of Trig she could say that she never gave Sarah advice to fly, or never gave her advice as a pregnant woman at all. So I suspect the situation is more complicated than that. I'd like to know what CBJ's religious persuasion is. Is she a member of one of the main Wasilla churches? Could she have been pulled into all this due to some religious conviction?

    I've got some big reservations about CBJ, just like Bailey, although sometimes good people get pulled in over their heads. It sounds like Sarah Palin and her equally sociopathic husband have had a long and corrupting influence in their geographic area. Toxic personalities can do that.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:48 PM

    We need an Orly Tates type of crazy ass lawyer to go after CBJ and $arah for that matter for endangering an unborn premature, special needs child. Kind of like a class action lawsuit and give any proceeds to Special Olympics. If what Sarah says is true about the wild ride then they should both be held accountable for endangering Trig's wellbeing.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous11:14 PM

    Why not ask Mercedes? If any mother was whining the way $arah does, the kids would have been bitching about it at school. I know first-hand mine was a hypochondriac. Who do you think I aired my frustration to?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous11:26 PM

    The Menard woman in the Alaska Legislature is interesting. She introduces ridiculous Bills that money and time are wasted on.

    She is not attractive and doesn't dress well - which doesn't fit her position, but is typical of Wasilla/Palmer long-time residents.
    Plus, wasn't she involved w/the Miss Alaska thingy? You'd never know it by her appearance!

    The fact she supports Sarah Palin should tell Alaskan's something. Get rid of her in the next election Valley people!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I remember seeing a handful of comments up until Bailey's manuscript was revealed that all referred to Palin's tubal ligation. The latest comments just are another window into $arah's lack of ethics, morality and mothering ability. I don't doubt these women who are posting for one minute.

    When $arah hit the national stage there were many women all over the country who knew within moments they were seeing the "mean girl from high school who never grew up". No, it does NOT mean we are jealous, it means we are able to see right through $arah to her insecurities, her constant need to be the center of attention and the ridiculous need to attack others. However, let anyone retaliate and then it's "poor $arah" with her "how could they do this to me and my family?". For those who doubt the truth, ask any woman who has a Down Syndrome child and a pregnant teen if they would subject them to the national media in order to further their own ambitions. I'd bet that 99% of them would say they'd never do that. $arah is in the 1% whose needs and wants come before all others. Sure, she's fooled a lot of people. However, the truth is out there and easy to find. Read all about her before she even became Governor. There are many websites that will spell out a lot of the details about $arah's lack of ethics and how she ran from anything that prove she wasn't doing her job as Governor.

    Can anyone really picture a woman who was elected Governor and spent half of her time shopping and out of the office as President? It's not a 9 to 5 job and it takes knowledge that $arah clearly does not have. That is why it is so important to reveal what lengths she has gone to in the past to cover up her indiscretions, not to mention a fake pregnancy! There's not a doubt in my mind that she's not Trig's birth mother. All you have to do is watch her walk, go up and down steps-she actually runs up and down them in boots @ an alleged 7 mos. Real pregnant women, especially in their mid-forties are waddling and uncomfortable. Trig was not a 3 lb. premie but was presented as a baby just under 7 lbs. Where was she hiding him? Seriously? Open your eyes and forget the fact that you like her or admire her and look at the scenario surrounding Trig's alleged birth and all the inconsistencies about her pregnancy. Why would she have to come up with a way to prove she was pregnant, according to her emails? It's so easy to do yet she's never done a thing to prove she delivered that baby because she simply can't.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous11:51 PM

    It's good to know the strongest republican candidate may be part of an alaska mob so to speak and it's also good to know the current dem leader is part of a longtime Chicago thug group. Welcome to America

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous12:46 AM

    Hi Jesse - it's one of the Wasilla "moms" that you appeal to in this blog. I want to say a couple things. First, even though I am a conservative - both on social and fiscal matters - this blog has been a weird "safe" place over the past two and a half years. Probably 90% of those who post here wouldn't share my political beliefs - but guess what? We're on the same page when it comes to making sure those who would be our political leaders are honest and ethical. Sadly, Sarah has a faulty track record on both these fronts.

    Second, -- and this I can guarantee you -- the vast, vast, VAST majority of the people living out here in "the Valley" ARE NOT PAYING ATTENTION. If you polled most of the moms at say, Target - at the corner of Palmer-Wasilla Hwy and the Parks, or Pandemonium, or ATT Sports Center - at least 90%, if not more like 99% of the folks simply are not paying attention to the ongoing Palin saga.

    People here are over her. They have no idea that a blog like Immoral Minority even exists. Haven't all of you wondered how person after person after person - when they hear that there are thousands of folks around the nation and the world who don't believe Sarah gave birth to Trig - haven't you noticed how they can't believe it - and how they had no idea that anyone didn't think she birthed him? See - they simply don't pay much attention. It's how Sarah got into office in the first place - people not paying close attention.

    Third, I talk to very, very few folks out here about her. Otherwise I would appear obsessed - and I know her for crying out loud. It's one of the many, many bizarre ironies about the past 30 months. The very people who know her the best, know the least about how she really operates and who she really is.

    Fourth, for those very few of us who have followed her closely and do know the truth (and I don't mean the truth about whether she gave birth to Trig. Honestly, I don't know what I believe. I know what all the opposition says. I've seen all the pics, watched the videos - of the Israeli, etc. - I know CBJ. I know she would positively not have authorized Sarah to fly had she been told Sarah was leaking fluid. But I also know people who say they saw her pregnant. I know she was very upset that she got pregnant (or that's what she said). If she was pregnant - she did a historic job of making sure she gained virtually no weight - she told no one - I think only Todd, CBJ, and the lab tech were the only ones who knew. I don't know what to think.)

    Fifth, the reason no one around here (the 1% to 10% of us that pay attention) want to say anything is that it will probably mean we have to leave the Valley. Our homes our here. While I don't think Sarah would do anything rash to anyone, the long time friends of her and Todd's families (who are people we all know and are all friends with) would be very upset. I don't think anyone who knows Sarah at this point thinks she'd be a good president - but they also remain weirdly protective - mostly for the kids sake.

    Whoever does speak out, would need to get their Samsonite packed.

    So, while I understand the incredulity of those of you sitting across the country, please know that for the very, very few of us who care enough to pay attention to these things, the price is high. We would not be understood by most of our friends. We'd likely have to move. Small towns can be brutal when it comes to shunning and shaming those who take a stand.

    Thanks for listening.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous1:03 AM

    "Simply confirming that a certain patient either is, or is not, your patient when you are involved with their care may violate the privacy rights of the patient."

    No. A person who is NOT treating a patient is under no obligation to pretend that he or she is treating that person. An answer of "no" does not violate HIPAA.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous1:51 AM

    Gryphen - when I hear how the good people of the Valley are so cowed by and afraid of SP, I am reminded of something sent to me by a friend. It is a bit long, but it is a good reminder of why we must stand up to tyrants like SP, Todd and the Palinbots. (BTW, I just finished Frank Bailey's book, and when the indictments come down on SP, I'm sure they will go after him too and I want to help in some small way to pay for his defense. He is, in his heart, a really GOOD man.) ((looks like my post is too long - I will try it in two posts.))

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous2:12 AM

    second part of post:

    "A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.'"

    It is the fanatics that change the course of history. Think for a minute what we know now about SP, especially after Frank Bailey's book has been leaked, and then consider the unthinkable consequences of her being vice president - one 72 year-old heartbeat from having her thumb on the nuclear button. No, her political career must be over. over. over.)

    And there is someone up there - several someones - who know the truth about Trig's birth. If you will step forward, you can stop this vulgar, petty, vindictive person from ever holding public office again - and you might get the delight of watching her and Todd on television news, perp-walking in handcuffs with coats over their heads and be able to say to your children, "I did that."

    ReplyDelete
  23. Isaac2:24 AM

    It's very weird the way some people (I use the term lightly) are so obsessed with Sarah Palin's childbirths. You're just as nutty as the Obama Birthers. This shit is the left wing's "show us your birth certificate". Sheesh.

    Also, plenty of women get pregnant after having their tubes tied. Even if she HAD done that, it proves nothing. I suggest psychiatric evaluation of anybody who harp on this bullshit, or think the President was born in Kenya.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous3:04 AM

    Anonymous said...
    CBJ is sitting pretty. There's been no challenge to her medical license(s). But if CBJ "spoke out", her life would become quite complicated.

    CBJ has plenty of reasons for keeping her mouth shut.

    5:27 PM

    LOL That's gonna change very soon!!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. FloridaDem3:07 AM

    Gryph thanks for the reply regarding Mat-Su Regional, and others. It's always been confusing to me why an investigation didn't start there, and soon afterwards before the trail got cold. Even if it cost a bit of money for a private investigator. Think about all the time and money expended by all the bloggers thus far with nothing to show for it.

    I'm also not sure if it makes it easier or harder to fake a birth in a small hospital. Because on the one hand, a small hospital with friends on the board can be controlled somewhat, but with fewer patients I would think more attention would be give to them by the staff. Especially with SP, I can imagine the staff willing to suck up to her, constantly peak in the room, or whatever. And if it was the case as is speculated by some, that an entire "wing" was segregated off for her and records segregated, then there's at the very least staff that would have known that to be the case. It's not a violation of HIPAA for staff to say no, I wasn't assigned to attend to SP because a private duty nurse was there instead. But we don't know what happened, not one thing.

    Also, she wasn't there for an hour and left. She was there over a period of time where more than one shift would be in attendance. And yes, you do have to have staff, there's no such thing really as "skeleton" crew because a hospital could be sued if a patient went into distress and there was no RN on staff because she went home. Not only do you have to hide a non-pregnant Sarah, but hide a non-delivery, and a non-baby in the ward. There were only 3 babies born that day, it's not like they would have lost count.

    I'm not saying it's not possible, but for this to happen more than 1 individual needed to be paid off, imo. Also, there needs to be more evidence than photos of her looking not pregnant and other circumstantial evidence. We have no records, no testimony. The most damaging thing I heard so far is that Shailey said SP told her she's not pregnant. Hopefully that's written down somewhere. But that is just a start. If Sarah Palin did not give birth then there is evidence, somewhere of that.

    ReplyDelete
  26. AKRNC3:53 AM

    To Anonymous @ 11:17 a.m. You've hit the nail on the head with your comment about $arah never being afraid of anything or anyone, unless we count her pregnancy with Trig. I can understand not wanting to announce it immediately when it comes to a woman who finds out she is pregnant with a special needs child as they need time to adjust, especially if they already have children. They need to prepare themselves as a family. However, a mother waiting so long to let her kids know that their new "brother" was going to be born with D.S. makes no sense, especially with someone like $arah. She's not that conscientious when it comes to her kids, no matter what lies she has spun in the past. She lied about them voting on the V.P. nomination when in reality they were told about it by a McCain campaign staffer. $arah knew how Bristol would react if she was the one who told her so she let someone else do her dirty work.

    Palin has always claimed that she took on the good old boys from the oil companies and from the Alaskan political parties. We know this is bullshit. If a woman actually did that she wouldn't be the least bit worried about announcing a pregnancy. Besides, it was a done deal, they couldn't impeach her because she was pregnant. She just uses this as another excuse and again, it's another excuse that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

    Of course, all of the above would be assuming $arah was actually pregnant which I don't believe for a minute. It is the way $arah is trying to pretend she would have handled things if she actually became pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous4:29 AM

    @ 6:02

    Very informative post and an excellent summary. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous4:40 AM

    In regard to Chuck being in the delivery room. Just because he was in the delivery room doesn't mean he saw her give birth. I was once allowed in the delivery room after a family member gave birth. About 1-2 hours after the birth and once everything had been cleaned up and they were waiting for a room to transfer to. So it doesn't mean anything unless he said the he was in the delivery room while she was delivering.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Jeanabella4:43 AM

    Thanks for your faithful and true commitment Gryphen!
    I wanted to comment on the baby shown at the hospital with Chuck and Sally. One of my children was 9 weeks early and weighed 31/2 lbs when born and lost 1/2 lb quickly. He had to stay at the hospital until he weighed 5 lbs. He was in the incubator for a while and then special care for almost 2 months.
    There is no way the baby shown was premature by 5 or 6 or more weeks, and certainly wouldn't be around people after just being born. The whole hospital scene was staged.
    Preemies don't go home right after being born.
    When we look at the massive amount of bull this woman wants everyone to believe, Beck looks like her twin!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous4:45 AM

    @9:55, I know a woman who let her father watch her give birth - the whole shebang. Everyone who knows her, including her own husband, thought it was WEIRD. She didn't tell her husband that the dad would be there until right before the birth. She comes from a weird (but I'm not suggesting incestual at all) family. The girl's mom had C-sections and so the dad had never seen a vaginal birth. STILL very weird, I know.

    Anyway, I guess it happens. Not in Chuck's case, though, I'd bet big money. Just another example of him being creative. After all, I don't know if the Wild Ride story would even exist if big mouth Chuck didn't decide to announce that SP's water broke. Read the transcript - the reporter who first asked SP about the water breaking said that he/she was only asking because Chuck mentioned it. That was ALL Chuck and I bet he's been paying for that little invention ever since!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous4:47 AM

    Anon @6:54 and 7:31: Those are really good points, but why do those people remain so loyal to Palin when she is not Governor anymore and seems to have forgotten about Alaska as soon as she got the VP nod? The Palins appear to act like punks in their dealings so you'd think they'd attract equally shifty, self-interested characters in their schemes: i.e. people who aren't always so slavishly loyal and who would sell the Palins out or who would not appreciate the Palins holding favors over their heads for the rest of their careers/lives. Do you see what I mean? You'd think someone would call the Palins on their bluffs and say no to getting in deeper in the corruption. I just can't wrap my head around an entire state controlled by an ex-governor and her appointees whose power reaches all the way to anyone who shared a carpool with Palin's kids.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous4:57 AM

    BTW: IF she told everyone her tubal included "burning the ends" called cauterization, then there is no fail. There is no way to get pg after that.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous5:01 AM

    If someone does have proof, the tabloids would pay millions for it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anonymous5:24 AM

    I'm beginning to think that the fake pregnancy has a connection to why Track is smiling beautifully in all the family pix before Trig and forced, or not at all, in pix after. Track doesn't seem to ever be included in the family. Of course, he had to be included in Sarah's UNreality show because it would be hard not to to and not have people wondering why, but other than that, I don't see warmth and hugs and genuine smiles and happiness including Track and his family. I'm wondering if letting the kids be independent was to help them or Sarah. I'm not convinced it was a good parenting strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous5:45 AM

    Isaac said...
    "This shit is the left wing's "show us your birth certificate"."

    Yep. I believe that the whole "Obama birthers" idea may have been contrived just so people WOULD say that. So here's the deal, people have finally sorted out that President Obama is the real thing and Sarah Palin is not. Your tactic isn't working any more.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous6:21 AM

    @10:37, CBJ is a Christian, I believe she belongs to Sarah Palin's church. In any event, she is an evangelical Christian.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Anonymous6:53 AM

    Florida Dem - There would be no medical records if there was no medical procedure so nothing to keep from anyone. She goes into the private room. Baby is brought in by a family member. SP presents the baby as her own. She stays for a couple of hours and leaves. The end. Corrupt board makes it known that no info about the governor's visit is to get out or else, wink wink. People value their job so they keep their mouths shut. You really need to read more about $P to understand how this is all possible. She lies at the drop of a hat about anything and she is a master manipulator. You are looking at the situation from a rational point of view, but $P is not rational. So things that seem ridiculous to the average sane person, aren't ridiculous in SP's world. Up is down, left is right etc.

    I forgot she kept the whole thing a secret form her kids too. Either she never saw them or her kids never hug her. I have boys, and even they would have noticed if I was pregnant. They're always climbing on me and hugging me. Sad for her kids, but makes sense that they look for affection elsewhere which may help explain Bristol's pregnancies.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Catherine6:55 AM

    It may not be just Track who's connected to Curtis Menard, Jr.

    http://thoughtsfromveracity.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&updated-max=2010-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=8

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous7:07 AM

    So, one thought is that there were 2 levels of being "in-the-know", one with one idea of who the cover-up was for and those who really knew who the cover-up was for. I'm thinking that Levi was in the latter group (and not who the cover-up was for, but maybe who the first group thought it was for). One thing everyone knows, something happened on the day of the "wild ride" that made Sarah need to get to that particular hospital immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anonymous7:24 AM

    7:07 said: "One thing everyone knows, something happened on the day of the "wild ride" that made Sarah need to get to that particular hospital immediately."

    It is odd that she would hightail it back to AK from Texas, or have even gone to TX if she knew that she'd be "giving birth" when she says she did. You're right, there must have been a reason...

    ReplyDelete
  41. emrysa7:33 AM

    anon@ 5:24 am sez:

    "I'm beginning to think that the fake pregnancy has a connection to why Track is smiling beautifully in all the family pix before Trig and forced, or not at all, in pix after."

    could be. if sarah really had a tubal track would have been old enough to remember that. that + figuring out you've been lied to about your father for your entire life... was it the book game change that pointed out one of sarah's kids on the campaign trail asked her "why are you trying to be something that you're not?" my guess is that was track, and the reason he doesn't look happy in later pics is because he knows the whole show is a farce. track could make a lot of money if he ever decided to blow the lid on sarah.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Anonymous8:05 AM

    The daughter of former Alaska governor Sarah Palin has signed with William Morrow to publish "Not Afraid of Life," to come out this summer.

    Wonder if we will see any truth-telling from Bristol or will this just be another Palin work of fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  43. "7:07 AM
    One thing everyone knows, something happened on the day of the "wild ride" that made Sarah need to get to that particular hospital immediately."

    I don't know that. It could have been a pre-arranged hand-off. She wanted to reach the end of the legislative session, to give the speech in TX, and then be at her local hospital in the middle of the night when no one would notice her. Todd said he changed their tickets to an earlier return flight from Dallas; that was never verified. Even the time of "birth" was 6:30 am: shift change, when staff is distracted.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous8:16 AM

    10:32 AM has a point about the missing OB appointments. Aren't the governor's calendars a public record? I saw the OB twice a month with two normal deliveries. A 45 year old woman with a DS child would have to be seen regularly to be seen as a fit and caring mother.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Anonymous9:19 AM

    GREAT POST!! -E

    ReplyDelete
  46. Anonymous9:22 AM

    Creepy Chuck said he was in the delivery room when the baby came out but he didn't say what the baby came out of. A duffel bag maybe? A duffel bag that he brought to the hospital?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous9:54 AM

    8:16 AM:

    10:32 AM has a point about the missing OB appointments. Aren't the governor's calendars a public record? I saw the OB twice a month with two normal deliveries. A 45 year old woman with a DS child would have to be seen regularly to be seen as a fit and caring mother.

    Yes and no. Sarah didn't spend nearly the normal hours on State business. She was 'missing' a lot during normal business hours. I doubt that these absences are on the calendar. There is probably nothing on the calendar at these times.

    I've examined some of these calendars.
    I can say that on at least one occasion a significant activity is not listed on her calendar. Sloppy? Not recorded on the schedule by someone's instruction? Forgotten at the time the calendar was made? When was the calendar made?

    The last question is a serious question.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous10:01 AM

    Let's set the record strate on a few things: Sarah didn't have a wild ride while she was leaking.

    Sarah's father wasn't in the room when Sarah gave birth.

    Sarah's father wasn't in the room when Bristol gave birth.

    Levi is not Bristol's baby daddy for baby #1. That wouldn't furnish a reason to cover up.

    It's pretty obvous that you people are never going to trust your instincts and arrive at a common sense explanation and that's why the blogs can go on and on. There are just too many 'possible' theeries which you people are willing to hook into because you have nothing better to do. You're all on the wrong Track. And besides that, there's no proof going to be furnished that will put an end to it until photografhic proof puts an end to it. Don't dispair, when women have babys they take pitchers of themselfes and their babies while lying in the maturnity bed.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous10:24 AM

    10:01
    Let's set the record strate on a few things: Sarah didn't have a wild ride while she was leaking.

    Sarah's father wasn't in the room when Sarah gave birth.

    Sarah's father wasn't in the room when Bristol gave birth.

    Levi is not Bristol's baby daddy for baby #1. That wouldn't furnish a reason to cover up. It's pretty obvous that you people are never going to trust your instincts and arrive at a common sense explanation and that's why the blogs can go on and on. There are just too many 'possible' theeries which you people are willing to hook into because you have nothing better to do. You're all on the wrong Track. And besides that, there's no proof going to be furnished that will put an end to it until photografhic proof puts an end to it. Don't dispair, when women have babys they take pitchers of themselfes and their babies while lying in the maturnity bed.



    1. straight
    2. obvious
    3. theories
    4. Is your capitalization of Track a hint, a pretend hint or just ignorance?
    5. photographic
    6. despair
    7. babies
    8. themselves
    9. maternity

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous11:41 AM

    Anon @ 4:40am: But he DID say he 'saw him pop out'!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anonymous11:47 AM

    Pop out of what?

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anonymous11:47 AM

    10:24:


    Its' caled fonetic speling 4 a reson. It kindo stinks out. LOL

    10:01:

    It's pretty obvous that you people are never going to trust your instincts and arrive at a common sense explanation and that's why the blogs can go on and on.

    Where did you cut and paste common sense explanation from?

    The common sense explanation for this-

    And besides that, there's no proof going to be furnished that will put an end to it until photografhic proof puts an end to it. Don't dispair, when women have babys they take pitchers of themselfes and their babies while lying in the maturnity bed.

    Is that it was not Sarah's child.

    I don't look at pitchers, I dronk pitchers.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Anonymous12:29 PM

    "You're all on the wrong Track."

    There have been some hints in the comments that may be leading to the right TRACK. And they seem to be zeroing in on a path that is "DARK".

    ReplyDelete
  54. Anonymous12:31 PM

    @10:01 a.m., I think there are a few too many spelling "mistakes" in your comment to pass the smell test. You had me going there for awhile but it's a little too much. If I'm wrong, though, my apologies. And please go back to school.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anonymous1:03 PM

    anonymous says, well I was thinking proof such as a nurse who was there and assisted in the birth of Bristol's child. I don't think you could raise enough money so I'll have to wait and hope for Sarah to become a presidential candidate and then there will be more people willing to raise enough money. You know, this can't be just hearsay, it has to be a sworn affidavit by a nurse who attended. How else are you ever going to prove it?

    10:18 PM

    If Sarah runs for office, ths nurse should get a lawyer, go to the authorities questioning the mental stability of a candidate and tell whst she knows. HIPAA is overridable in cases of a national security threat. Having a batshit crazy VP candidate is a nationaal security threat. If this nurse can prove Sarah did not birth Tri-G and Sarah petending that she did shows Sarah is a nutscase. This nurse would be a hero to the world.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Anonymous1:10 PM

    Fifth, the reason no one around here (the 1% to 10% of us that pay attention) want to say anything is that it will probably mean we have to leave the Valley. Our homes our here. While I don't think Sarah would do anything rash to anyone, the long time friends of her and Todd's families (who are people we all know and are all friends with) would be very upset. I don't think anyone who knows Sarah at this point thinks she'd be a good president - but they also remain weirdly protective - mostly for the kids sake.

    Anon Wasilla mom 12:49.
    With all due respect, you are confusing the hell out of me. Firt you say no one cares about SArah Palin, less than 1% care. So, then if no one cares, why can't you all spill the beans? How many people are there in 1% of Wasilla? And of them ,how many do you know and of them how many are like you and have the dirt?
    I mean on one side we hear of the mafia tactics and on the other side you say no one cares about the Palins. Thats pretty conflicting. Apathy will do us no good. People who know, start talking. There is strength in numbers. You have a window of opportunity. oncde it breaks, the money chances decrease by the minute.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Anonymous1:10 PM

    Anon 10:01:...."trust your instincts and arrive at a common sense explanation"

    The common sense explanation may be something too difficult to think about. Do you know more about these pictures you talk about? Do they include the dad as well? You may want to try emailing G about these using the address in his "About Me" section.

    Sarah flew too close to the sun, Ivy? I think G posted an invitation for you.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Anonymous1:14 PM

    Let's set the record strate on a few things: Sarah didn't have a wild ride while she was leaking.

    Sarah's father wasn't in the room when Sarah gave birth.

    Sarah's father wasn't in the room when Bristol gave birth.

    Levi is not Bristol's baby daddy for baby #1. That wouldn't furnish a reason to cover up.

    It's pretty obvous that you people are never going to trust your instincts and arrive at a common sense explanation and that's why the blogs can go on and on. There are just too many 'possible' theeries which you people are willing to hook into because you have nothing better to do. You're all on the wrong Track. And besides that, there's no proof going to be furnished that will put an end to it until photografhic proof puts an end to it. Don't dispair, when women have babys they take pitchers of themselfes and their babies while lying in the maturnity bed.

    10:01 AM

    All very intriguing.
    So ,somewhere out there is a picture of a mom post partum (freshly) holding Tri-G? Doubtful, if he was really reall premie he'd be whisked away for medical attention. There may be some photos but not right after birth.
    But keep talking and we'll listen. Would loce to see those pictures.
    And what Track should this train take??

    ReplyDelete
  59. Anonymous1:17 PM

    Also, plenty of women get pregnant after having their tubes tied. Even if she HAD done that, it proves nothing. I suggest psychiatric evaluation of anybody who harp on this bullshit, or think the President was born in Kenya.

    2:24 Am
    Sure Isaac, they sure do...but they don't go from a flat belly to a big belly to a flat belly to a square belly to a huge belly to a belly that is apparently pregnant. THEY JUST DON'T. Use your head man!!

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anonymous1:27 PM

    Well ya all fell fer that didn'tcha. The spelling mistakes are a sure sign of a conserative aren't they!

    So well I'm at it, here's spelling lesson that's been bothering me for a long time. It doesn't matter how edgecatered a murican is, he/she can't get the word 'led' right.

    No, it's not like 'lead' as in the metal. It just sounds the same. And it's not like 'lead' as in lead and I will follow. Really it's just too easy and it's a three letter word muricans. Let's work on if fer a wile and maybe we culd git oursefs mor edgecated ya think?

    ReplyDelete
  61. Anonymous3:18 PM

    OMG!!!! I was wondering when someone would mention "the twobull"!!! I have gone back & forth a hundred times about mentioning it myself! But I didn't want to be put in Palin's infamous cross hairs....
    Plus, I don't have details only general knowledge. I recall talking with one of my daughter's teachers and I mentioned the gossip about Palin acting like she had just gone thru brain surgery or something when in reality it she went home the very next day. My kid's teacher said we should break open a bottle of bubbly over the playground junglegym in celebration of there being no more Palins. Because Track & Bristol were already horrible entitled bullies by then..seems like Toad was at school several times a month having to smooth ruffled feathers over stuff the kids did. And they were still pretty young at this time.

    Gryphon do you also know that Sarah was REALLY really loving & tender with piper but not at all with any of the others? She also sold all her big baby items when piper was still tiny, like less than 6 months old. Someone (I don't want to say her name but I will ask her to come here & see if she will tell the whole story) told a family member of mine that she had told Sarah where she could donate the items to native women in need .. she said Sarah looked at her like she had lost her everloving mind. And she did not "need" the money. She was just greedy.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous4:15 PM

    Anon @ 12:31, Yeah, I thought I overdid it a bit with the spelling mistakes too. But then I thought better and decided that it would fly with most of you.

    How'dja like the Track thingy? That wasn't meant to mislead ya know.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Anonymous4:28 PM

    Wasilla Mom @12:46: Thanks for your thoughts. Unfortunately, I am more confused now about the situation there: People are not paying attention and are over Sarah Palin but would shun you and make your life so miserable that you would have to move if you speak the truth about her?

    ReplyDelete
  64. Anonymous5:48 PM

    Anon 10:01/1:27 PM...
    Secrets can where on a person.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anonymous6:46 PM

    Wasilla Mom, I'm not sure what corner of 'Silla YOU are hiding in...but in MY Wasilla, people talk about Sarah Palin all the time. All. The. Time. Everywhere. Walmart? You betcha. Grabbing pizza on parks hwy? Oh yes. Shopping for cute-eries at little britches? Every other mom will fund occasion to mention Sarah.

    It's been that way since veep-a-pa-looza started. And it only picks up speed with Sarah's manic, merciless, well deserved downfall.

    And can I just day that I love hearing people talk about her tubal ligation/cauterization?!! Ain't no way to find yourself up the pole when the ends of the tubes are BURNED! And that is exactly what Sarah did...when asked why she was taking the extra step of cauterization.....she said and I quote: "cause I'm making sure this shop is CLOSED".

    ReplyDelete
  66. OK-- I'm just poking around in the dark here-- but I was intrigued by the comment by anon @3:18 about SP giving away big baby things when Piper was little. It sounded like she might have been getting rid of these things prematurely, as Piper was about 6 months old. We've heard this before.

    Yes, it does suggest that SP didn't want or expect more children. Yes, it is consistent with the information about the tubal ligation.

    But it is also interesting --- when did Curtis Menard Jr. die? Wasn't that around the SAME TIME???? Hmmmm...... was getting rid of these things a form of grieving? ... and did the death of CM Jr. mean that SP knew she'd never have any other children??
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    If I understand Gryphen's request to the Wasilla moms who know about the tubal ligation, he is not asking you to make any public statements, only to share information with him. Let's face it, no one can force SP to prove whether or not she had this procedure. Thus, there is no percentage in anyone risking their home life in Wasilla to make a public statement.

    But if you share this information privately, it may be helpful to the overall effort to expose this dreadful fraud once and for all.

    It also seems important for the folks who know about this information to stick together and support each other however they can.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Anonymous6:18 PM

    Folks, don't waste any more time answering "FloridaDem" -- he/she is being deliberately obtuse -- it's a Palinbot.

    I don't know anything about Dr. CBJ, but her picture makes her look like a compassionate, decent person. I can easily imagine how Palin could have bullied her into the first lie, about the wild ride -- and after that, what option was open to her but to keep silent about the whole thing?

    My heart goes out to her. She has been used and abused by Palin. She must feel wretched.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Anonymous6:40 PM

    So what kind of man is Chuck Heath? I'm guessing he too suffers from narcissistic personality disorder, and the he views Sarah as an extension of his own grandiose self -- if she attains the presidency, well, that's confirmation of his own greatness. Which helps explain his own perfidious behavior.

    That family is amazingly dysfunctional, and yet there is still a chance she could end up in the White House. She is so scary.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Anonymous1:16 PM

    Maybe Trig is Todd's love child. That would have definitely ended her career, so she and Todd "adopted" the special needs baby, paid off the real mom, and made media hay with their pro-life values. I hate to say this but they made lemonade out of Baby Trig.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Anonymous5:04 PM

    When they were in Alaska, Sarah and Todd caused people to lose jobs and tried unsuccessfully to make others lose their jobs. They smeared the names of critics and employees who refused to follow marching orders. It started as soon as she was elected to her first office in Wasilla and worsened after she became governor.

    Now the fear for people in Wasilla is probably more about the pain people and their families might suffer from being ostracized from important people in their community. Wasilla is a small pull-off on the road basically. Blink as you pass and you will miss it. There are people in Wasilla loyal to the Palins because they gave them their jobs or they were high school friends, and even more so, because they belong to the same goofball church that believes she was anointed by God Almighty himself to rise to high places and force us into a Christian nation, their version of Christian to boot. A person living in a small town doesn't want to risk loss of income or ostracization because narrow-minded, vengeful neighbors hold their going public against them. Who can blame them?

    Something else to remember is this: S.P. was one of the chosen ones of Rev. Franklin Graham and his toady Rev. Jerry Prevo. Prevo is powerful in Alaska and he is without shame in his organized attacks on any groups or persons he sees fit when he wants to stop or start something. Sadly for the country, the Rev. Franklin Graham is not like his father, and he is also a mostly-behind-the-scenes (but not always) powerhouse in Alaska.

    Franklin's "ministry" empire colludes with similar fundamentalist Christian empires out of Colorado and Texas to influence our elections and laws all over the country, even our military branches (most effectively, in the Air Force). They've been at it for many years now, successfully, and absolutely nothing of consequence has been done by our federal or state governments, or we the citizens, to rein in their growing power over our secular lives. They were responsible for Sarah's rise in the state of Alaska, despite her lack of skill and qualifications. So anyone in Wasilla who takes on Sarah openly, may also be taking on those background forces supporting her. Our criminal justice system isn't above targeting people unethically, even illegally, and families cannot do squat about it because everyone in authority belongs to the same club or is dependent on it.

    Now, most likely she's proved something of a disappointment to her benefactors because she isn't going to be president, or even vice president, but she still does help them raise money, the Palinistas still send in money to "ministries" and causes because she supports them, and her influence will get their candidates votes in some places, so she isn't useless to them yet. And Palinistas are still in the highest offices of Alaska. She left them there when she quit. It isn't a large population so it isn't that hard to become a target.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Anonymous5:06 PM

    Will you help and support them, anonymously?

    ReplyDelete
  72. Anonymous5:38 PM

    Because McCain lied to the country when he said his campaign vetted her.

    His campaign was fizzling due it being a big a big yawn up against the more youthful, exciting Obama and he was desperate to give it a kick in the pants. Someone foolishly suggested this attractive, highly popular Republican governor in the pretty much unknown to most citizens state of Alaska and they thought they could save the campaign with her image. it did excite his campaign briefly, but too bad for them, they forgot to talk to any Alaskans before they announced her!

    No Alaskan Republican legislators were talked to, no past governors, no law enforcement, no journalists, no private citizens, no one; except for one lone guy who got a call asking what he thought of her, and a very short conversation later the call was over and he didn't know what it was about. It was a big, arrogant slap in the face by the McCain campaign and national party that the Alaska Republican leaders found out their governor was chosen when everyone else found out. Because no one from the campaign or national party bothered to vet her, they didn't even know she was being considered.

    The McCain campaign found out what a controversial snake they had after the fact. Their bad! Because if they'd vetted her properly, they would have discovered the Republicans in the state legislature liked her less than did the Democrats, and all of them were weirded out by Todd. They would have discovered her popularity was already waning in Alaska because Alaskans were learning more and more about her unethical accounting practices ripping off the state, and of her and Todd targeting people, including highly respected people. They would have learned the ethics investigation against her had been approved unanimously by the committee that had far more Republicans on it than Democrats. They would have learned she had, in fact, campaigned for governor supporting "the bridge to nowhere" and that she had thrown previous supporters who helped her get to where she was, like the much beloved Senator Stevens, under the bus before she threw "the bridge to nowhere" developers and supporters under the bus. And they would have learned of some of her fiascos as governor that cost Alaskans money because she didn't know how to be a grown-up professional, like the Matanuska Dairy fiasco (which still makes for a "isn't she hilariously stupid!" story.

    You can thank McCain. You can also thank him for his willingness to endanger the entire country because of his personal desperation to be president. Palin and McCain deserved each other.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Anonymous5:44 PM

    Exactly! Thanks for the post.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Anonymous5:54 PM

    They are "propped up" by a large, wealthy, powerful Christian fundamentalist network. The only way to stop this sort of undemocratic control is for citizens in the entire country to rise up and demand of our government that it stop allowing these organizations special rights beyond what the founders intended, which was no taxation of a community church and no government interference in the private religious life of the individual.

    As it is now, they are mega-wealthy, international industries operating and growing under the guise of "ministries," networking, and using their tax-free status to gain more wealth and then using that wealth to corrupt our entire system of government and personal freedoms.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Anonymous5:58 PM

    You are correct, and I'm not comfortable with the attempt to obtain illegally someone's medical records anyway. It is possible to sink too low, even for a good cause.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Anonymous6:02 PM

    (<:

    ReplyDelete
  77. Anonymous6:03 PM

    Dare we say, they are Palins?

    ReplyDelete
  78. Anonymous6:04 PM

    How do you get into twitter accounts like that? Are they not password protected/

    ReplyDelete
  79. Anonymous6:05 PM

    More likely, Sarah used her as a prop and didn't care about Piper's school year or social life.

    ReplyDelete
  80. But our society rewards sociopaths. They become rich and famous because they are not limited by the restraints of conscience and ethics. When they become rich and famous, we admire them and protect them.

    ReplyDelete
  81. I agree. He helped her commit her ethical sins against the people of this state, and against individuals. He covered up for her. Although I'm glad he is now more forthcoming, He's not a Sarah's circle insider anymore and he can't work for her anymore. Writing the book is for income from the book and tour circuit. I would do the same in his place and she doesn't deserve his protection. but he is still the man who lacked ethics and morality, contributing to what she heaped on Alaskans, and he does not deserve praise for exposing her for financial gain because he can't work for her anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  82. I think you mean sociopath. Psychopaths are different from sociopaths.

    Psychopaths do not distinguish between what is real and what is imagined or hallucinated (a psychotic break). Sociopaths do not recognize right from wrong and do not feel empathy but, they do distinguish what is real from what isn't and they also know what the rest of society considers right or wrong.

    Sarah's behaviors are at minimum those of someone suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. She may be sociopathic, but she's not shown any sign of being psychotic, at least not publicly!

    ReplyDelete
  83. Just like little Bush for eight years, and as governor of Texas before that.

    ReplyDelete
  84. The split in Alaska is a religious one. The fundamentalists Christians running the state, with a few gullibles who don't bother to read anything but headlines thrown in, divided against the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Not in a teeny-weeny town in an isolated state, especially if you are a local power, like the governor for instance. I don't know if any of these theories are true, and I have doubts, but that is how one could get a room in the hospital, and staff members are not allowed, by law, to discuss patients.

    ReplyDelete
  86. " then a whole lot of people from the police force and state and local governments must also be that criminally corrupt to let them get away with it. "

    Welcome to the state of things in Alaska, whether or not the theories regarding this birth are true.

    ReplyDelete
  87. The rest of the nation's opinions are irrelevant to the people in Wasilla. They live far far away from the rest of the nation, isolated with just other Alaskans and the politicos in power. Thus, the rest of the nation are not going to feed and house their families, nor protect them and their children from shunning.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Anonymous7:23 PM

    I don't think she even told her doctor. I think she surprised her in Alaska with the news, and then, because the community leaders were Palinistas, and maybe the doctor was too, went along without disputing SP' public statements that she called her doc and got the go ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Anonymous7:25 PM

    It is sadly amazing how many people will not retract an erroneous public statement, even when they know they should. Something about pride and/or fear makes people dig in their heels and stick with their story no matter what.

    ReplyDelete
  90. What Bailey did not say in his book is evidence of nothing. Furthermore, if I were writing such a book, I wouldn't include anecdotes about nausea, OB appts., or peeing because I would consider them inconsequential.

    SP may or may not wear fake glasses. Professional photographers remove glare and distortions. Also, people can read from podiums wearing their glasses if the glasses are reading glasses. Even if she does, though, wearing glasses frames for image is a far cry from faking a pregnancy and birth, so that piece of gossip proves nothing.

    I'm all for "moms of Wasilla" contacting Gryphen to tell what they know, but until what they share is verified it is only unsubstantiated gossip. I say that despite having no sympathy for SP. She deserves whatever she gets, but I hope blog owners will remember ethics so that the same tactics aren't later justified against someone underserving of them. Anonymous smear campaigns in the comments sections of blogs happen to innocent people too. I'm not saying what is written isn't true, but allowing the posting of unverfied accusations is questionable. As soon as Gryphen verifies the real scoop or merely some pieces of reliable, credible evidence, I will be as interested as the next person. Until then, though, the list of suspicions and interpretations prove nothing and look more like an online witch hunt, even if it isn't. In my opinion, it isn't kosher as is.

    What is indisputable are the statements SP made herself about her child's birth. 1. She was pregnant at an age that made the birth higher risk. 2. She knew the child she carried was going to have a high-risk birth because of his own physical problems. 3. Her water broke in the morning, far away in the state of Texas. As soon as her water broke and as the hours went by, there was an increasing chance of infection. 3. She withheld from the airlines her condition. They never would have let her board if they knew she was in labor. 4. Normally, women who birth multiple children have faster labors and deliveries with each subsequent birth. Yet SP managed to go something like 18 hours without giving birth? 5. After flying from TX to Seattle to Anchorage, SP did not rush straight to the largest hospital in the state, Providence, or any hospital in the city, but drove another hour (if the roads and weather were good) to Palmer to deliver this high-risk child at a small regional hospital not equipped as well as the hospital in Anchorage. 6. After SP made the statement, her doctor allowed it to stand that she gave SP the go-ahead to climb on a plane and start that long trip despite the fact that almost everyone and their dog knows that no responsible physician would give that advice or medical go-ahead. And the physician would know that the airlines would not have allowed her to board if they'd known. 7. What reason would a woman have to intentionally endanger her child? Who in their right mind would believe her desire that he be born in Alaska was a valid, sufficient reason to risk his life?

    Regardless of whether SP birthed the child, what she has admitted to (foolishly) indicates she did not want her "special needs baby" but did not want to be held responsible for not having him. That is enough right there to shatter one of her crafted images.

    ReplyDelete
  91. If she did not have the child, then I hope we find out because the public deserves to know. SP made herself a public figure and she's banked on a certain image, so if it is a false image, she does not have a right to privacy in that regard. Additionally, if anyone at the hospital contributed to a coverup, the community deserves to know it. I hope eventually to see substantiated evidence.

    Until then, as the hunt for credible evidence continues, perhaps people are barking up the wrong tree. Most of the conjecture focuses on her daughters as the true mother. It isn't impossible, of course, but I don't think it is likely. And Downs-Syndrome increases in the children of women past 30-years-old, increasing as they get older. Has anyone considered that it may be another woman's child by Tdd P?

    If I were in SP's position at that time and I discovered another woman was going to have a child by my husband, I would be humiliated by the public knowing it. Perhaps she decided to pass the child off as hers in order to avoid scandal and public humiliation.

    She isn't often seen with the child and never has been. During the Republican convention, Bristol was on screen and in photos holding him more than either of her parents were, which could have killed two birds with one stone-SP didn't have to take care of him, Tdd is a macho guy who doesn't have to, and since the country knew Brstl was pregnant, she looked maternal and madonna-like holding the child on camera, while Levi flapped in the wind nearby. Perhaps he was an accident of Tdd's neither one wanted and SP pragmatically decided to go with her as the birth mother rather than telling the world from the governor's office that our shadow governor had been a bad boy and betrayed her.

    It is something to consider as the hunt continues, but my observations of the convention, photos, and SP's lack of interest in the child are evidence of nothing without something more substantial to add to them. On their own, they mean nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Anonymous4:13 PM

    i thought this blog was about having morals, i see a lot here have none

    ReplyDelete
  93. Anonymous1:02 PM

    People might think this is a stretch, but watch some of the videos on You Tube of Jodi Arias and how she so easily lies and tries to manipulate people. She is also to narcissistic to be embarrassed by anything she says. Jodi also started wearing glasses during her trial. Again, I know it's a stretch, but check out. I think they both have the same personality disorder only manifested in different ways, fortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Anonymous1:36 PM

    Ever wonder why we've NEVER seen a picture of a pregnant Michelle Obama? Those girls look nothing like her or Barack.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.