Thursday, June 28, 2012

The Truth about Fast and Furious. Update!



 Courtesy of Fortune:

Quite simply, there's a fundamental misconception at the heart of the Fast and Furious scandal. Nobody disputes that suspected straw purchasers under surveillance by the ATF repeatedly bought guns that eventually fell into criminal hands. Issa and others charge that the ATF intentionally allowed guns to walk as an operational tactic. But five law-enforcement agents directly involved in Fast and Furious tell Fortune that the ATF had no such tactic. They insist they never purposefully allowed guns to be illegally trafficked. Just the opposite: They say they seized weapons whenever they could but were hamstrung by prosecutors and weak laws, which stymied them at every turn. 

Indeed, a six-month Fortune investigation reveals that the public case alleging that Voth and his colleagues walked guns is replete with distortions, errors, partial truths, and even some outright lies. Fortune reviewed more than 2,000 pages of confidential ATF documents and interviewed 39 people, including seven law-enforcement agents with direct knowledge of the case. Several, including Voth, are speaking out for the first time. 

How Fast and Furious reached the headlines is a strange and unsettling saga, one that reveals a lot about politics and media today. It's a story that starts with a grudge, specifically Dodson's anger at Voth. After the terrible murder of agent Terry, Dodson made complaints that were then amplified, first by right-wing bloggers, then by CBS. Rep. Issa and other politicians then seized those elements to score points against the Obama administration, which, for its part, has capitulated in an apparent effort to avoid a rhetorical battle over gun control in the run-up to the presidential election. (A Justice Department spokesperson denies this and asserts that the department is not drawing conclusions until the inspector general's report is submitted.) 

"Republican senators are whipping up the country into a psychotic frenzy with these reports that are patently false," says Linda Wallace, a special agent with the Internal Revenue Service's criminal investigation unit who was assigned to the Fast and Furious team (and recently retired from the IRS). A self-described gun-rights supporter, Wallace has not been criticized by Issa's committee. 

The ATF's accusers seem untroubled by evidence that the policy they have pilloried didn't actually exist. "It gets back to something basic for me," says Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa). "Terry was murdered, and guns from this operation were found at his murder site." A spokesman for Issa denies that politics has played a role in the congressman's actions and says "multiple individuals across the Justice Department's component agencies share responsibility for the failure that occurred in Operation Fast and Furious." Issa's spokesman asserts that even if ATF agents followed prosecutors' directives, "the practice is nonetheless gun walking." Attorneys for Dodson declined to comment on the record. 

For its part, the ATF would not answer specific questions, citing ongoing investigations. But a spokesperson for the agency provided a written statement noting that the "ATF did not exercise proper oversight, planning or judgment in executing this case. We at ATF have accepted responsibility and have taken appropriate and decisive action to insure that these errors in oversight and judgment never occur again." The statement asserted that the "ATF has clarified its firearms transfer policy to focus on interdiction or early intervention to prevent the criminal acquisition, trafficking and misuse of firearms," and it cited changes in coordination and oversight at the ATF. 

Irony abounds when it comes to the Fast and Furious scandal. But the ultimate irony is this: Republicans who support the National Rifle Association and its attempts to weaken gun laws are lambasting ATF agents for not seizing enough weapons—ones that, in this case, prosecutors deemed to be legal.

 As has been mentioned numerous times before, by news agencies that are NOT Fox New, this is nothing more than a witch hunt, and yet another attempt by the rabid Right Wing to create a conspiracy out of virtual thin air in as they desperately try hang a scandal around the neck of President Obama, because in their black little hearts they just "know" that one must exist.

By the way I encourage you to read the entire article as it does an incredible job of revealing to what depths these Republican assholes will go to in order to smear this President.

Update: As usual Rachel Maddow has done an exemplary job of explaining this case in very simple  language.  If you want to understand this issue better then click here for further clarification.

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:14 AM

    Why does anyone take Issa seriously -- he said before the 2010 election that his goal is to embarrass Obama. That's what he's doing...also? He's an arsonist and an insurance fraud.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He is embarrassing himself, not the President.

      Today the President has to cope with the SCOTUS and healthcare - plus the antics of Issa who acts entirely like a spoiled child.

      Imagine if Mrs Palin had to handle these issues - guess she would resign because everyone was "picking" on her.

      It's nice having an adult in the white house.

      Delete
  2. I apologize to Hillary Clinton for laughing out loud in 1998 when she said there was "a vast right-wing conspiracy".

    Hillary was right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I started reading the article yesterday then dropped to the comments. Gun running has been a big business for the GOP for YEARS! And there is a hedge fund "Cerberus" that had bought up ammo makers and gun manufacturers. Let's face it...money talks and profits rule no matter what.

    Now under Bushco when this all began, does anyone doubt that this was legit on the surface but very muddy underneath?

    I keep wondering to myself why Pres. Obama didn't clean house more. Having just moved from TX to Missouri maybe I have a different perspective on Mexico and how tight Bushco was with them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sharon5:57 AM

    Its almost 7am here in Las Vegas...waiting on the 10am EST decision on Obamacare. Rachel Maddow debunked this horrid story last week in finite detail. If this doesn't crucify this treasonous congress...nothing will. Issa is a supreme asshole and always has been. Those Democrats scared of the NRA...I hope they get voted out too. You just know why Bohner made the vote today, another scumbag.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:19 AM

    My take on this is that US gun manufacturers and the NRA are responsible for the drug cartels having so much fire power. This is a case of the typical right wing action plan: project your criminal and unethical acts on the opposition to draw attention away from you. With all the attention on the drug cartels and their inevitable movement north, it is only a matter if time before people wise up to the 2nd amendment bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous8:53 AM

    Great post, Gryphen! Love that cartoon!

    Here's a video of Al Sharpton interviewing Rep. John Mica of FL about Fast and Furious, which was excellent.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755884/#47987468


    And here's the video of his interview with the author of that article:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45755884/#47987389

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anita Winecooler5:43 PM

    Thanks, Gryphen, and the links left in this thread. Much Ado about nothing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the NRA seems to stick it's nose everywhere spreading fear that someone's going to take away their guns, and Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats fall in line to kiss their asses. What's wrong with this picture?

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.