Thursday, July 05, 2012

Just what is Mitt Romney hiding from Uncle Sam in his offshore accounts? Good question.

"Look it's not my fault the tax laws allow me to get away with this kind of thing."
Courtesy of Vanity Fair:

The assertion that he broke no laws is widely accepted. But it is worth asking if it is actually true. The answer, in fact, isn’t straightforward. Romney, like the superhero who whirls and backflips unscathed through a web of laser beams while everyone else gets zapped, is certainly a remarkable financial acrobat. But careful analysis of his financial and business affairs also reveals a man who, like some other Wall Street titans, seems comfortable striding into some fuzzy gray zones.

"Gray areas?" Somehow I think that the Republicans would allow President Obama no such "gray areas." But should they be of concern to the American voters?

To give but one example, there is a Bermuda-based entity called Sankaty High Yield Asset Investors Ltd., which has been described in securities filings as “a Bermuda corporation wholly owned by W. Mitt Romney.” It could be that Sankaty is an old vehicle with little importance, but Romney appears to have treated it rather carefully. He set it up in 1997, then transferred it to his wife’s newly created blind trust on January 1, 2003, the day before he was inaugurated as Massachusetts’s governor. The director and president of this entity is R. Bradford Malt, the trustee of the blind trust and Romney’s personal lawyer. Romney failed to list this entity on several financial disclosures, even though such a closely held entity would not qualify as an “excepted investment fund” that would not need to be on his disclosure forms. He finally included it on his 2010 tax return. Even after examining that return, we have no idea what is in this company, but it could be valuable, meaning that it is possible Romney’s wealth is even greater than previous estimates. While the Romneys’ spokespeople insist that the couple has paid all the taxes required by law, investments in tax havens such as Bermuda raise many questions, because they are in “jurisdictions where there is virtually no tax and virtually no compliance,” as one Miami-based offshore lawyer put it. 

That’s not the only money Romney has in tax havens. Because of his retirement deal with Bain Capital, his finances are still deeply entangled with the private-equity firm that he founded and spun off from Bain and Co. in 1984. Though he left the firm in 1999, Romney has continued to receive large payments from it—in early June he revealed more than $2 million in new Bain income. The firm today has at least 138 funds organized in the Cayman Islands, and Romney himself has personal interests in at least 12, worth as much as $30 million, hidden behind controversial confidentiality disclaimers. Again, the Romney campaign insists he saves no tax by using them, but there is no way to check this.

The media soon noticed Romney’s familiarity with foreign tax havens. A $3 million Swiss bank account appeared in the 2010 returns, then winked out of existence in 2011 after the trustee closed it, as if to remind us of George Romney’s warning that one or two tax returns can provide a misleading picture. Ed Kleinbard, a professor of tax law at the University of Southern California, says the Swiss account “has political but not tax-policy resonance,” since it—like many other Romney investments—constituted a bet against the U.S. dollar, an odd thing for a presidential candidate to do. The Obama campaign provided a helpful world map pointing to the tax havens Bermuda, Luxembourg, and the Cayman Islands, where Romney and his family have assets, each with the tagline “Value: not disclosed in tax returns.” 

Simply put Mitt Romney is a man running for President, who appears at least, to keep as much money out of the hands of his own government as humanly possible.

Money, by the way, that he made right here in the good old USA. And money that he now hides in tax havens in other countries.

Should voters be irritated by that? Yeah, since they are expected to pay their share while wealthy tax cheats like Romney squirrel their money away in offshore accounts, I certainly think they should be.

Take a moment to read the entire Vanity Fair article if you have the time, it is really quite eye opening.

50 comments:

  1. Anonymous3:07 AM

    Yeah we should be annoyed! The argument for lower taxes for the rich is that they create jobs.,,what jobs do you create when you squirrel your money away in tax shelters? And he only pays 25 percent!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:21 AM

      He pays 13 or 14 percent

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:46 AM

      Romney only paid 13% taxes in 2011, and I bet some years he paid zero taxes. This is probably why he will not show his tax returns prior to 2011.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:57 AM

      He pays 13 or 14 percent on the money he claims.

      However, there is so much secrecy to his fortune and the way it's stashed all over the world, hidden in mysterious investments, that there could very well be money he pays NO taxes on and doesn't even claim.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:27 AM

      My estimate is that Mitt pays an effective rate of between 6 and 7% IF all his income was reported like you and I have to do. If you unwind all the compound interest earned on his previous scams, reinvested in new tax free scams, and roll in all in the family participation in the tax sheltering and tax dodging I believe you might calculate an effective rate of less than 4%.

      Still waiting for Trig's birth certificate and Mitt's tax returns fro the last 15 years.

      Leona Helmsley said it best (on her way to jail): "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes..."

      Delete
  2. This is a perfect example of why the Bush Tax Cuts do nothing toward helping our economy. Decreasing taxes for those who are merely accumulating additional wealth actually extracts wealth from the economy, because the recipients are highly unlikely to use the additional income for consumption. Hence, there is no trickle-down effect whatsoever, because those funds are "socked away", not spent on consumables that provide a multiplier effect in growing the economy as the money "turns over" within a community. Until there is demand in our economy, this capital will merely seek it's highest rate of return, often in offshore accounts in tax havens with sparse regulation. In too many cases, these offshore meccas exist for the primary purpose of laundering, thus legitimizing, wealth from the world drug trade. A recent case of this is the Allen Stanford case, who was recently sentenced to 110 years for convictions of Ponzi and Fraud.

    And yes, if you're unaware already, the Romneys have multiple financial links to the Stanford Financial organization that have yet to be completely vetted. I don't think this is the only blip that's gonna pop up on the radar, but it's easily understood why Romney will have the support of other big moneyed interests to maintain its surreptitiousness of those types of investments which enjoy lax regulation and often non-existent oversight.

    This is nowhere even close to being the tip of the iceberg. It's a big iceberg, bigger than we will begin to discover during this election, if it is ever revealed. Some links to recent articles on the subject.

    http://www.politicolnews.com/romney-son-investigated-for-8-billion-ponzi-scheme/

    http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/ponzi_scheme/

    http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/11/01/316040/romney-solamere-ponzi/?mobile=nc

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/14/1100163/-Did-Tagg-Romney-Launder-Money-with-R-Allen-Stanford

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hadn't read the comments but headed to google to find these links about Solamere. Good for you. Here's one more link on a June 22nd post.

      http://www.politicolnews.com/romney-ties-to-allen-stanford-ponzi-scheme-as-partners/

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:06 AM

      Some of the highest rates of investment in the businesses in this country occurred when the corporate tax rates were also the highest. The wealthy had a choice of paying enormous amounts of taxes on their profits, which provided them with no benefit, OR they could invest their profits in expanding or creating more businesses in this country, thereby creating more jobs for Americans. If those investments were successful, their profits would then create more profits - a much more beneficial use of their money than just handing it over to the federal government.

      In all the years since Reagan started the worst of this economic trend,there has never been any proof that tax breaks for the wealthy result in business investment (at least in THIS country) or increased jobs for Americans.

      It's all a big hoax perpetrated by the 1% and promoted by the GOP to help themselves and their corporate supporters. And, most frustrating of all, the so-called 'liberal media' fails to expose the lies.

      Delete
    3. Anita Winecooler7:49 PM

      Thanks for all the links and information. Just watched a clip of Mitt and Ann in their 8 million dollar vacation home, Mitt sat back and sent his yapping attack dog, Ann to attack the Obama campaign. She kept using the royal "we" while being interviewed.

      Not only is Mitt a lying weasel,he sits back and lets Ann do the dirty work. Imagine FLOTUS saying something like "Their campaign's main objective is to kill Obama"

      Delete
    4. Dis Gusted6:19 AM

      which one? The FIVE houses Ann owns on Lake Winnipesaukee are valued at $10 MILLION EACH.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous3:31 AM

    Willard, the Mutt Torturer for President: Of The Cayman Islands!

    With apologies to the good people of the Cayman Islands!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:52 AM

    Why and how is it accepted for Romney to avoid paying taxes, yet we hear about many people getting charged with tax evasion every year because they did not report earned money to the IRS.
    We hear about celebrities, professional athletes, getting charged all the time. So why is it alright for Romney to do it?
    Why is it illegal for all, but Romney gets a pass?
    These are questions the American people want answered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:02 AM

      Just like what that Google guy did.

      Made a ridiculous amount of money here in America, then set up some account overseas that allowed him to AVOID paying TAXES in AMERICA...ya know, the "land of opportunity" where he MADE all that money.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:54 PM

      Isn't that what one of the founders of Facebook did? I think he renounced his citizenship, after having made his fortune here in the Land of Opportunity, and ran off to Singapore.
      M from Md

      Delete
  5. Anonymous4:46 AM

    There is something that is just not right about a person who wants to be president of the US putting his money in foreign accounts to avoid paying US taxes. It might be what all of Mittens' friends do but it is just unpatriotic to me!

    I'm amazed how unwilling Republicans are to pay taxes to run our government at any level. I've always thought that paying taxes was part of the requirements of living in a democracy. It is part of "we the people." Payment of taxes supports our police departments, our fire departments, our schools, our road systems. It provides protection from disease and pollution in our water, land and air. It provides our national security. How can we pay for all of these services if we all do not chip in our fair share?

    I can only conclude that Republicans do not want this country to succeed. For that reason, they are all traitors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:09 AM

      Haven't you been paying attention? Paying taxes is only for the 'little people', not the wealthy!

      WE are supposed to provide the money to support all those services that the 1% enjoy and take advantage of. It's our own fault, after all, because we were not born into the right families!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:55 PM

      (Applause)
      M from MD

      Delete
  6. Anonymous5:01 AM

    When an average person fails to report income of any form, they are regarded as tax cheats, but if a wealthy person such as Romney fails to report income of any form, he or she is regarded as a savvy business person.

    There is no fairness, no justice in that.

    It is not right that a man who wants to be President is fine with funneling money out of the country he wants to govern. He says he wants to help us, but then does everything the can to cheat us out of taxes that help us.

    Romney cannot have it both ways. Either he is for us or against us. I will not vote for him because I think he is only for himself, therefore against the rest of us.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Beldar Tiberius Conehead5:19 AM

    (CBS News) On a mission to shatter the image of her husband as rigid and unrelatable, Ann Romney told CBS News she worries that President Obama's entire campaign strategy is "kill Romney."

    "I feel like all he's doing is saying, 'Let's kill this guy," she said, seated next to her husband, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney, in an exclusive interview with CBS News. "And I feel like that's not really a very good campaign policy.

    ----------------------------------------
    Ok, personally, I have a deep, abiding respect for a man who hides behind the billowy old-fashioned skirts of his primary wife. (At least she didnt say she'll unzip him to prove he isnt rigid, as she threatened to do recently) But to almost everyone else, Mittens is proving to be an insufferable douchebag. The video of him nervously twisting a lace hankie while she speaks gives it away.

    But this is significant. She is using very carefully chosen language.

    First, Prime Directive #1 of conservative strategery is to always accuse your opponent of that which you are about to do yourself. Then, when you later commit the offense, large numbers of stoopid Amercians can be counted on to spit on their own shoes in disgust and say "Well, they ALL do it, don't they!"

    As right wing political pundint The Screechy Wretch(tm) would say, "This is also the harbinger of those future things that are yet to come but that so far haven't yet happened yet."

    They're going to have to "go big" in order to distract the voters from revelations that Mittens has undisclosed rMoney squirreled away in off-shore accounts.

    Second... damn, I forgot the second point I was going to make. Sorry.

    Third: according to a little known provision of the so-called Stand Your Ground law, if you declare in a public place, so that at least four (4) white men over the age of 21 hear you say "that guy over there is trying to kill me", you have the right to shoot "that guy" in the back from a distance of up to 1500 meters and preserve your claim to have shot in self defense. Sure, it doesn't seem fair to some, but it's probably based on sound biblical principles, so it's definitely what the Foundling Fathers would have wanted.

    (Hey, security dudes, put down the hooker and protect our president, will ya!)

    Somewhere, an anxious Mittens staffer sits at a computer, waiting for The Call, poised to upload campaign web-o-mercials prominently featuring the N-word. You know they're out there...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:56 PM

      I just saw that clip of Ann Romney saying 'kill'. That is inciting language meant to rouse hostilities of the worst sort. I despise her.
      M from MD

      Delete
    2. Anita Winecooler8:00 PM

      Yes, did you catch her use the royal "we" while being Meh's attack dog, while sitting in their 8 million dollar "summer home"?
      Did you see their "watercraft" (aka jet ski). The thing is HUGE, I'm sure it's written off as "MS Therapeutic Aqua Dressage Horse Ballet Device".

      Obviously, these two "don't get it". He's been running for POTUS, what, at least 8 years? They had no idea how tough politics can get? Obama hasn't gone negative, he's just pointing out the truth.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous5:19 AM

    Do you have an offshore bank account?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ktVR-_6B12w

    ReplyDelete
  9. Years ago, my husband came home from a business trip where he had spent a couple of days with a close friend who owned a mid-sized manufacturing plant and who was an "expert" on Swiss bank accounts. My hubby laid out an elaborate plan to open Swiss bank accounts and avoid taxes. He was ready to do it!

    I listened to what he said, then I said "Are we MOVING to Switzerland?" NOOO, of course not, he said. I replied, "so we're going to live in the US, drive up and down the roads, cross the bridges, enjoy the safety provided by the military but we're not going to pay our share of taxes?"

    He said "Oh shit!" That was the last I ever heard about Swiss bank accounts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beldar Cayman Conehead6:39 AM

      It's patriots like you and your husband who are going to screw up Mittens' carefully crafted business plan to take the control of the United States of Amercia to which he's so unquestionably entitled.

      Thanx!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:05 AM

      Just "obey", you guys.

      Shhh.

      Let the warmth overtake you, and just go to sleep.

      Obey. Obey. Obey.

      Delete
    3. Anita Winecooler8:13 PM

      Thanks, Sharon. I used to work for a wonderful couple who worked their fingers to the bone for 20 plus years. As tempting as the prospect was, they declined joining a group of investors who floated the same idea.
      She's a "one percenter" who "gets it", she always said "I never forgot what this country allowed me to achieve nor where I came from".

      Delete
  10. Anonymous6:59 AM

    Wow. The Romneys.

    Just. like. Me!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous7:16 AM

    good for you sharon, we all need to think like that

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:37 AM

    Romney has no soul, no heart, no convictions. He is a mega-rich dilettante of inherited privilege, who views accumulation of vast money and power as the definition of success.

    Romney is so bereft of honesty and humanity that he hungers to be president, not because he has the nation's best interests at heart, but because he has conquered the challenge of being super rich, and now looks at the other goal fueling his egotistical hunger: absolute personal power.

    That he made his fortune destroying others doesn't bother him. That he fired employees, slashed their health care, outsourced American jobs and cast them and their families to the bitter winds of the Reagan and Bush economies doesn't concern him.

    Have we become so cynical that we allow such a charlatan to masquerade as a legitimate presidential aspirant.

    Romney know betters, but he willingly dismisses scientific proof of climate change and global warming, opposes stem cell research that has made progress against Alzheimer's, publicly claimed on numerous occasions to be both pro-life and pro-choice, and would penalize innocent immigrant children brought to the U.S. and cast them back into countries foreign to them.

    My God, I don't know what's worse: the delusional descent of the Republican party; that it is so broken that it produces a candidate like Romney; or that our country is so divided that we could actually see a man of so little character and so much deviousness elected president.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:01 PM

      I've been posting this article all over the place as it sums up the mindset of people like Romney to a T.
      http://www.alternet.org/visions/156071/Conservative_Southern_Values_Revived%3A_How_a_Brutal_Strain_of_American_Aristocrats_Have_Come_to_Rule_America_/

      M from MD

      Delete
    2. Grey Lensman9:19 PM

      I know of one conviction he should have.

      Voter fraud for voting in MA, claiming his son's unfinished basement was his address, all while he was living in CA.

      Whatever happened to that, or is IOKIYAR?

      Delete
  13. ibwilliamsi7:41 AM

    "Though he left the firm in 1999, Romney has continued to receive large payments from it—in early June he revealed more than $2 million in new Bain income."

    Do you remember when we all stopped drinking Coca-Cola because of their involvement in Apartheid in South Africa? Now it has become apparent that Mittens has invested heavily in Stericycle, a medical waste firm that disposes of aborted fetuses. (I could give a rat's ass, but there are some who would disapprove.) Many Rethugs are claiming that Mittens left Bain in February of 1999, several months before this deal was begun. The truth is that Mittens was the "sole holder" of the funds until December 1999, well after the deal was struck.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/romney-bain-abortion-stericycle-sec

    Given the above quote, isn't it more accurate to say that Mittens benefits from ALL Bain Capital investments to this day?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous7:41 AM

    There's only one qualification for being 'Presidential material' - the ability to be elected President. Obama clearly has it and, as yet, Romney does not, and Mitt's not off to great start, either. Romney did manage to defeat his rag-tag GOP opposition, but this was a totally dysfunctional Keystone Cops collection of 'candidates', not one of whom could ever have won in the November election against any Dem, much less against Obama. Meanwhile, Mitt's level of likability is low even within the GOP - only about 60% - and he's sinking in the polls as we speak. There's just something about a near-billionaire running on a pile of other billionaires' money and not much else.....

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous7:41 AM

    Ann Romney came out and told us straight away why her husband should be president. "It is our turn", she said. Not meaning it is the larger GOP time, or the time for a change, but rather that it is Mitt's time.

    He has one more box to check off on his resume and President of the Untied States is it.

    The man has no shame, no program, no vision beyond the platitudinous, and worst of all, no sense of purpose beyond - the time for me, is now.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I read the article through to the bitter end yesterday. It gave me a stomach ache before I finished.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous8:00 AM

    VIDEO: In this interview by Chris Matthews, Newt Gingrich confirms most of what you think about him, Mitt Romney, and the political tactics of the GOP to get low-information voters to vote for the candidates of elite billionaires.

    http://buyingourfuture.com/newt-gingrich-tells-all-about-gop-and-romney-in-hardball-interview/

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous8:05 AM

    5 Shady Financial Tactics Employed By Mitt Romney

    http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/07/03/510246/romney-financial-tactics/

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous8:12 AM

    Romney attempts a double back flip with one leg behind his head: A federal insurance mandate is a tax because John Roberts says so, but a state insurance mandate is not.

    http://swampland.time.com/2012/07/05/romneys-latest-greatest-twist-on-the-individual-mandate/?iid=sl-article-latest

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous8:38 AM

    No, the Obama campaign’s quick response to the Vanity Fair article is more an indication of Team Obama 2.0′s strength, which is its omnipresence and omnipotence at data collection and exploitation. While the Romney effort is opening up a wide fundraising advantage, the Obama campaign’s unanswerable strength is that, like Savoir Faire, they are everywhere.

    http://www.mediaite.com/print/obama-campaign-pimped-romney-expose-to-reporters-before-vanity-fair-did/

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous9:25 AM

    Call for transparency: Romney’s ‘astronomical’ $101 million IRA

    http://current.com/shows/the-war-room/videos/call-for-transparency-romneys-astronomical-101-million-ira

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous10:31 AM

    Why would anyone vote for this guy? He scares the hell out of me. Think he is a liar, unethical and doesn't relate well to regular people.

    OBAMA/BIDEN 2012

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous10:32 AM

    For His Eyes Only: Mitt Romney’s Financial Shell Game

    http://www.politicususa.com/mitt-romneys-financial-shell-game.html

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous12:34 PM

    It should all be subject to taxation, and this sort of selfish, deviously greedy behaviour is another reason why we don't want Romney in the White House. He is quite good at looking after his own interests and indifferent to his responsibilities as an American citizen who made his fortune here and now wants to keep it all for himself, the Pseudo-Patriot.
    M from MD

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous3:47 PM

    But Mitt Romney looks like a President
    Obama looks like a tap dancer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. PalinsHoax4:52 PM

      Anon @ 3:47 pm "But Mitt Romney looks like a President".

      Yea, the president of the "Dogs-in-Crates-on-top-of-Cars" society.

      My toothless, wizened old Uncle Igor looks more like a president of the United States that R'money will ever look. And Uncle Igor has a heck of a lot more presidential qualifications and charisma than R'money.

      Delete
    2. Anita Winecooler8:25 PM

      Yeah, he looks like presidential material, especially when he doesn't know what to call a donut. Romney tap dances around where he stands on any particular issue. He's his funniest when Ann unzips him.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:00 AM

      Anonymous3:47 PP, You ignorant cretin.

      President Barack Obama IS the president, something Mitt Romney will NEVER be.

      Delete
    4. Beldar J Conehead11:56 AM

      Anon347
      "But Mitt Romney looks like a President" (WHITE)
      "Obama looks like a tap dancer" (BLACK)

      Thanks for the clever and insightful analysis.

      I heard The Washington Times is looking for a new severe conservative editorial columnist to replace Mongo, The Hairless Albino Monkey Boy, who was fired for hurling feces at fellow employees. Your writing styles appear similar and if you aren't an egregious feces hurler, it might be worth applying. Good luck.

      Delete
  26. Anita Winecooler8:29 PM

    The whole article is pretty disturbing, but it's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure he's got blind trusts in other corporate names, Corporations are people, my friends!

    He's fighting to keep his wealth and keep it secret, Obama's fighting for the middle class.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous9:00 PM

    Mittens is not running for president.
    He is running for CEO in order to Bain the
    US for the LDS.
    He seeks 50.45% of the vote to capture CEO.
    Its just business for Bain. Oh, and proselytizing
    the nation for the LDS (also at Bain).

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.