President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia sauntered into American presidential politics on Thursday, praising President Obama as “a very honest man” and chastising the Republican nominee, Mitt Romney, for describing Russia as “without question our No. 1 geopolitical foe.”
Mr. Putin was asked about the presidential race during an interview with the state-controlled television network RT. The interview was recorded earlier this week but broadcast on Thursday to coincide with Mr. Putin’s arrival in Vladivostok for the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit conference, which is being held in Russia for the first time.
Mr. Putin said he believed that if Mr. Obama is re-elected in November, a compromise could be reached on the contentious issue of American plans for a missile defense system in Europe, which Russia has strongly opposed.
On the other hand, Mr. Putin said, if Mr. Romney becomes president, Moscow’s fears about the missile system — that it is, despite American assurances, actually directed against Russia — would almost certainly prove true.
“Is it possible to find a solution to the problem, if current President Obama is re-elected for a second term? Theoretically, yes,” Mr. Putin said, according to the official transcript posted on the Kremlin’s Web site. “But this isn’t just about President Obama.
“For all I know, his desire to work out a solution is quite sincere,” Mr. Putin continued. “I met him recently on the sidelines of the G-20 summit in Los Cabos, Mexico, where we had a chance to talk. And though we talked mostly about Syria, I could still take stock of my counterpart. My feeling is that he is a very honest man, and that he sincerely wants to make many good changes. But can he do it? Will they let him do it?”
Mr. Putin mentioned the American military establishment and the State Department as obstacles to a compromise, and he said he faced similar challenges working with Russia’s own generals and career diplomats.
With a reminder of Mr. Romney’s remark about Russia, Mr. Putin was asked if he could work with a Romney administration.
“Yes, we can,” he said. “We’ll work with whichever president gets elected by the American people. But our effort will only be as efficient as our partners will want it to be.”
He added a sharp rebuke, accusing Mr. Romney of using inflamed language for political gain.
You know perhaps if Mitt Romney didn't get all of his foreign affairs experiences from watching Rocky IV, Red Dawn, and Ice Station Zebra he wouldn't freak the rest of the world out at the very thought of his winning this election.
As it is I think Putin (Not somebody who I usually place a great deal of trust in) is right about the fact that diplomacy will be MUCH easier under an Obama administration as opposed to one that will be primarily funded by defense contractors and others that benefit from a country constantly in conflict with other nations.
I'm just saying.
Romney manages to insult every nation. How many have he insulted so far? I lost count. He is unlikable at home and abroad. He is undiplomatic. He is NOT presidential AT ALL.
ReplyDeleteBut Gryphen, we could have had this type of foreign policy instead of President Obama's! If only McCain hadn't suspended his campaign! *sob*
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/c359vn6
:-)
Bwhahahahhahahahaha!
Deletepol5:17 AM Haha, I like that pic, pol. Putin's head is almost as big as baldy's gourd.
Delete"Tahd, you need to raise that fence some more. Pootin is rearing his head again into Alaskan airspace, so he can see in Piper's window. Pootin musta read Joe McGinniss' book, the bastahd."
The last two Republican candidates for high office were ready to swing their dicks and start the Cold War all over again for no good reason whatsoever.
ReplyDeleteGrasping for some relevance, some credibility - Sarah brings in Putin rearin his head in Alaskan waters? She had no credentials, still doesn't four years later, and she's still doubling down on no foreign relations record for the simple reason that the State that she was once partially "Chief Executive" of, has a very narrow maritime border [with] Russia. She didn't engage in "trade missions back and forth" on behalf of the State. Bob Poe did, the Democrat that was about to run against her in 2010.
Sarah, Sarah sacrificed her one elected position of influence to 'progress' Alaska without a title, how's AGIA going? The one you told any of 'em, all of 'em about to get on the ticket in the first place?
--------------------------
I fought to bring about the largest private-sector infrastructure project in North American history.
And when that deal was struck, we began a nearly forty billion dollar natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence.
That pipeline, when the last section is laid and its valves are opened, will lead America one step farther away from dependence on dangerous foreign powers that do not have our interests at heart.
The stakes for our nation could not be higher.
--------
From the same RNC VP acceptance speech:
"With Russia wanting to control a vital pipeline in the Caucasus, and to divide and intimidate our European allies by using energy as a weapon, we cannot leave ourselves at the mercy of foreign suppliers."
No wonder she refused to meet with top Russian oil executives when they came to the State to meet with any interested parties in development.
October 15, 2008
Russian Gas Executives Visit Palin's Turf
By ANDREW E. KRAMER
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/15/world/europe/15alaska.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=Palin&st=cse&oref=slogin
MOSCOW — A high-level delegation from the Russian energy company Gazprom met in Anchorage with state officials on Monday to talk about investing in Alaskan energy projects. The meeting came nearly three weeks after Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska talked in a television interview about her expertise in energy matters and took a hard line with Russia.
Senior officials of Gazprom said at a shareholder meeting in Moscow in June that the company was seeking to take part in a consortium that is building a natural gas pipeline from Alaska to Canada. The company is also interested in investing in other energy initiatives in the state, according to a statement released by Gazprom on Tuesday about the meeting in Anchorage.
Mr. Irwin said in a telephone interview that the Gazprom executives never mentioned Ms. Palin during the meeting. Nor was the company's desire to join in the natural gas pipeline discussed, said Mr. Rutherford, the deputy commissioner.
-----
Keep being so influential and productive there Sarah, and Mitt also too.
President Obama’s campaign raised $114 million in August, edging Mitt Romney’s haul of $111.6 million and ending the Republican’s three month winning streak in the money race.
ReplyDelete“The key to fighting back against the special interests writing limitless checks to support Mitt Romney is growing our donor base, and we did that substantially in the month of August,” said Jim Messina, Obama’s campaign spokesman.
The $114 million in August is a big spike for Obama, who had raised only $75 million in July.
….. The new fundraising totals come right after the Republican and Democratic conventions, and at a time when Obama is taking a lead over Romney in daily tracking polls.
More here
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/09/obama-edges-romney-in-august-fundraising/1#.UE3afRjzd1Q
Step one of any authoritarian politician:
ReplyDeleteFeed the jingoistic beasts called Exceptionalism and Hyperpatriotism.
Add Fanaticism and voila, you have the Troika with which to override any and all Objectivism.
Look at history and correct me if I am wrong.
In his own words, here's some insight into the dick that is Mitt.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/channel/UChMTCCC6dzR-VkgTDWo7H_A/videos?view=0
We could have easily been in a shooting war over Syria with the Russians by now (and it may yet happen), which would be poignantly tragic beyond all because we actually want the same overall outcome there. Check your history: Russia and America wind up on the same side whenever push comes to shove in all the big wars, going back to 1863 (well, I am speaking as a Northerner and supporter of the Union).
ReplyDeleteThe Russians saw all along that the multi-tiered Strategic "Defense" Initiative ("Star Wars," if you will) wasn't so technologically unfeasible as detractors claimed... but that such a system could in no wise be all the time operational. It could however, be arranged to work at a chosen time. It would also be more effectively against a vastly reduced arsenal--say, like the one remaining after a preemptive first strike.
ReplyDeleteI read the puzza owner is being harassed using gay slurs, comments mocking You Did Not Build It, etc.
ReplyDeleteThe nuts want to hurt this Obama supporter and his business now.
Hmmm....I wonder if he delivers pizza via air freight! I'd almost pay the cost for that to support him. He is awesome and I am so tired of the haters in America.
ReplyDeleteHey, Gryphen, howzabout you lay off Mittens a little bit! Geez.... Kicking a guy while he's down (in the polls) is NOT cool!!
ReplyDeleteThe headline at cnn.com today says "Rmoney: GOP made a 'mistake'" Now, I have neither the time nor the interest to actually read anything he has to say but I'll bet you a brand new Tom Delay commemorative washing machine token that the 'mistake' Mittens refers to is the nomination of... Mittens to be presdient of Amercia in 2012. That's just sad...
So, if you insist on hammering someone in the political sphere today, how about hammering George W. Bush whose indictment for crimes against humanity was recently called for by Bishop Desmond Tutu and supported by Beldar J. Conehead.
On second thought, nevermind. Both of them deserve the Hammer of Gryphen.
Hammer away!
Just got my car washed and put two bumper stickers on the back (OBAMA*BIDEN and 2012). I'm stylin'!
ReplyDeleteRemember the Bush Doctrine of unilateral attack on a sovereign country that “might become” a threat at some point in the future? Remember the war-mongering, chicken-hawk neocons that comprised Shrub’s teams of advisers in foreign policy and defense at the State and Defense Departments?
ReplyDeleteWell, guess what--- those SOBs are back, all of 'em sporting Romney 2012 buttons, and this go-round the neocons all have Iran and Syria in their “surveying equipment” grid that barely resembles a sniper’s rifle scope lens, unless you’ve actually seen one before. In that case, it’s okay because “the Democrats probably did it first 20 yrs ago”. In any event, it’s clear that Iran and Syria are imminent targets if Mitt pulls the upset, although not necessarily in that particular order.
Right now, around 30 of Romney’s 40 Foreign Policy advisers worked for the Bush43 administration. In fact, at least 8 of Romney’s advisers signed letters drafted by the Neocon “Shining Fucking City on a Hill atop a Goldmine", aka Project for a New American Century(PNAC). PNAC, which was founded in the 1990s, outlined in detail the blueprint for the Iraq invasion in their “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” report. How convenient to have a plan on the shelf for the exact mission. Clairvoyant, even.
These same PNAC goat-fuckers tried unsuccessfully to twist the thumb screws on Bill Clinton to motivate him into executing the attack on Saddam Hussein. Once they realized Clinton knew he could get BJs anywhere and wouldn’t be goaded into attacking Iraq, these war hustlers turned on Clinton with a vengeance: whisper-campaigns and conspiracy theories one and all about multiple murders ordered by Bill and Hillary were repeated in the far-right pubs and the respectable MSM pulled off the gloves and gave them a beat down as well.
Most of the neocons have dual citizenships (US-Israel), which is certainly just a coincidence, so the “respectable" media needn't mention that little factoid because of the career-killing knee-jerk charges of “anti-Semitism” and “Jew-haters” that are automatically hung around a reporter’s neck via AIPAC and ADL or other Zionist attack-dogs.
With Bush, the man who couldn’t say no anything to his boss, VP Dick Cheney “suggested”, the neocons were in control of the ill-fated FP and defense decisions that we will struggle to pay off over the next two generations.
See, you don’t actually need to have to have a clue how to govern to start a war or two. Bush sure as hell didn’t. You don’t even need to hint about a plan to pay for the wars, as Bush also proved. Bush's only plan given to him by Cheney was to read an illustrated story book about some fucking goat to an elementary class one morning. Shrub stayed up late, reviewing the book and preparing his talking points the night before. That was it as far as plans go. Beyond that, maybe take a few vanity photos with some of the teachers who might be hot but be careful groping them bc of cameras and shit, Dick reminded Georgie.
According to the Earth-killing, global-warming deniers, neocons included, capitalism works better if you remove all the regulations. But that’s nothing compared to the coin your rich suck-buddies can extract from the US Treasury when you eliminate competition in selling death and human misery via their exclusive, no-bid contracts for bombs and bullets and gas masks and body armor and toilet seats and even Apache Attack Heelio-copters. You’ll never see a happier bunch of old pasty-white CEOs jerking one another off in a money orgy pile while lighting their $50 dollar cigars with $100 bills! That’s GOOD capitalism bc it rewards these hard-working patriots, the titans of business and industry with $100M bonuses and shit. Thanks, Dick. Tell your boy, Shrub, "Hi". Oh, by the way, have that goofy-fuck Willard or Milt what's his name to give us a call. We have some more errands.
ShesToast 9:27...
DeleteCompliments!
That is One Fine Rant!
I could not approve more.
If we do not voice our opinions, we become part of the problem.
Not happenin'...
I'd expect a Mr. Putin to be a man who cares about his countrymen; he says he has his own challenges with Russia's own generals and career diplomats. Why do the Palins(Putin rears his head thingy) and Romneys create conflicts when there are no conflicts with their stupid words. Why would Romney, before even being elected, create waves and undo the diplomatic friendships that this administration has worked so hard on and call them the #1 geopolitical foe. It's outright stupidity and arrogance.
ReplyDeleteAnd they accuse President Obama of weakening the nation's reputation as a force to be reckoned with. Why don't they leave the delicate relationships up to the professional diplomats and shut up!
What burns me up, is how these "pro life" people can be "pro war". We already fought an unjustified war, do we really need to start more?
ReplyDeleteA lot is at stake in this next election, as much as I loathe Putin, he's right- a Romney (not gonna happen) presidency would be the beginning of World War 3.