Don't you worry, I got this. |
David Rothschild:If you want a quick and meaningful rubric for understanding the likelihood of an election, one way to think about it is take every state and the District of Columbia -- the 51 Electoral College districts -- and rank them from the most likely for Romney to the most likely for Obama. Rank them all, number them 1 to 51. You have a bunch of states that are bunched up near 100 [percent likelihood] for Obama and a bunch of states bunched up near 100 [percent likelihood] for Romney. Then you have this whole middle ground from leaners [to the Democrat ticket], to tossups, to leaners [toward the Republican ticket]. And what happens is that, barring a major event, any given state is just going to start drifting, over time, towards the candidate they're most likely [to vote] for. So every day that goes by on which that state does not flip [to the other party], it's going to slowly drift in the direction of the candidate that it favors in terms of probabilities. And that's what we're seeing happen.
Paul Solman: So a state like Ohio has simply become more and more Obama friendly?
DR: No. What I would say is that a state like Ohio has maintained its Obama friendliness but as it gets closer and closer to Election Day, it becomes more and more likely that it will actually vote for Obama come Election Day. So it's not a shifting of opinion as much as it's saying, "Romney is running out of time to shift that opinion." And as that happens, you see very few states cross each other, in essence, and so that ranking holds. We've had one state that's really cut across and that's North Carolina. Though it went for Obama in 2008, it was a heavy leaner towards Romney in the beginning of the cycle and drifted to the point where it was slightly in Obama's category and is now slightly in Romney's category. But for the most part this order has maintained.
So take that order, start adding up electoral votes until you hit 270. You're going to find a pivot state: a state that if Obama holds he wins and that if Romney can reach he wins, and that state has been Ohio for virtually the entire election cycle. It means that if Romney can get all the states up to that point, he can win this election. But that includes Florida and Virginia on top of Ohio and those are three big hurdles and that means on the flip [side] that all Obama has had to do is hold one of those states. Just one of those main three states, and that's what's been giving him that edge this entire time.
The ranking method is not 100 percent. It is possible that Obama could win the state of Ohio and that Romney could capture everything and then somehow lightning strikes and there's a massive economic issue, or something that somehow flips another state past Ohio that gives him the election.
PS: What's the likelihood that that could happen?
DR: It's extremely low at this point because there just aren't that many states in play. ... There aren't that many swing states left.
Good news right? And let's not forget that Nate Silver STILL has the President pretty far out in the lead:
President Obama halted an 8-day winning streak for Mitt Romney in the FiveThirtyEight forecast on Saturday, with his chances of winning the Electoral College ticking up to 62.9 percent from 61.1 percent on Friday.
And a poll taken late last night has Obama up 51 to 46 in Ohio.
Now there is NO reason for any democrat to get complacent, and after Romney's latest surge I think that is much less likely to happen, but it IS nice to get a little perspective on things with so many Right Wing assholes trying to harsh our mellow.
Turn out is still the name of the game, and just because people poll one way, it does not mean they will follow that up by heading out to pull that lever for the candidate they claim to support. None of it means a thing until the night of November 6th, when the numbers can finally be counted.
They keep trying to say that Democrats are not excited this time around, but speaking for myself I have eight days to go before early voting starts in Alaska, and you can bet your ass I will be there on day one ready to cast my vote. (And yes I realize that Alaska always goes Red, but that does not deter my enthusiasm to have my voice heard one little bit.)
Update: It appears that Obama is also WAY out ahead with early voters:
Obama leads Romney by 59 percent to 31 percent among early voters, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling data compiled in recent weeks.
And the good news this Sunday just keeps rolling in.
I received my Absentee Ballot and it was so neat to vote for President Obama and VP Joe Biden again!
ReplyDeleteSaw national media coverage a week or so ago that showed an Alaska map beginning to turn blue! Yea! I lived here when we actually were a Democratic state and so, so want to see as many as possible Republicans voted out of office this election cycle.
Got mine on Friday! Can't wait to pop it onto the mail plane!
DeletePresident Obama leading with early voters in Ohio.
ReplyDeleteOBAMA/BIDEN...LET'S MAKE IT HAPPEN!!!
Where people put their money where their vote is:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.predictwise.com/politics/2012presidentindividual
Never been wrong in 12 years!
http://www.7-eleven.com/7-Election/NationalResults.aspx
For the popular vote:
https://mmicdata.rand.org/alp/?page=election#election-forecast
http://pollyvote.forecastingprinciples.com/index.php/pollyvote-2012/models.html
http://iemweb.biz.uiowa.edu/quotes/Pres12_Quotes.html
And this guy keeps REALLY close track of all the polls:
http://twitter.com/JeffersonObama
Early Voting Favors Obama +28
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/14/1144368/-Early-Voting-Favor-Obama-28
The Latino population is growing rapidly in numerous states. Obama is now competitive in Arizona because of Latinos. Carmona is pulling Latinos with him.
ReplyDeleteLatinos will be there for Obama. Republicans will be so sorry for all the hate and bad policies they embraced.
Obama leads 80-20 among Latinos in Arizona.
In Florida, Obama leads 61-31 in a recent poll.
Obama has his voters and he is likeable. As long as they all turnout, we will be OKAY.
Obama campaign surpasses 4 million donors, highest ever for a presidential campaign
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/13/obama-2012-campaign-says-_n_1964284.html
Today's morning news is so uplifting!
ReplyDeletehttp://theobamadiary.com/
(REUTERS) EARLY VOTING: In North Carolina and Maine, Democrats seem to be voting in higher numbers than 2008
ReplyDeleteAtlanta Mayor Kasim Reed is going to be on Meet The Press today. Now, that’s must see TV. He is such a vigorous defender of Pres. Obama and Democratic principles. He is one proud Democrat and never apologizes for it.
ReplyDeleteJen Granholm and Stephen Colbert will be on MTP too.
Predicted winner:
ReplyDeleteThis RAND poll shows respondents by 54-42 expecting a reelection of President Obama.
https://mmicdata.rand.org/alp/?page=election#predicted-winner
Beautiful endorsement for PBO, do read it in it's entirety!
ReplyDeleteNo Etch A Sketch
America doesn't need an Etch A Sketch president whose positions change with the type of audience he's speaking to. It also doesn't need a president who makes foreign-policy speeches suggesting the nation needs to become entangled in even more foreign disputes. Families are tired of seeing their sons and daughters in the armed forces venture into harm's way for causes that no longer seem as important, especially with the nation continuing to struggle to end an economic crisis. If anything, polls show, most Americans think the troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere can't come home soon enough.
In that regard, Obama deserves more than the grudging credit Republicans are giving him for being the commander in chief who finally got Osama bin Laden. America is safer as a result of that. America will be healthier, with more people insured, as a result of Obamacare. More Americans are employed, although not nearly enough, because of Obama's saving the auto industry and promoting policies that are creating jobs. What Obama has already been able to accomplish in the face of unrelenting partisan opposition suggests he could have a remarkably successful presidency if given a second term
BARACK OBAMA is the better candidate in the presidential race. A vote for him is an investment in a strong future, which is why The Inquirer endorses his reelection.
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/inquirer/174057321.html
Great article--- IMO, this one deserves its own post. Well-written and straight down the middle of the plate. Thanks for the link.
Delete"The GOP would prefer the nation repeat history rather than remember it..."
If folks will stop for a moment and realize the truth of this statement and its implications for all of us in America, this will be a landslide victory for Obama/Biden approaching 2008 EV levels.
Thanks so much for the link! What an articulate and accurate description of President Obama, the President, the man, and the content of his character. It's his ACTIONS that back up his words. When he makes a promise, he keeps it.
DeleteMitt will say or do whatever his audience wants to hear. He uses troops as props, when he dodged the Viet Nam war by pulling some strings with his cult. Add his non disclosure of his financial information and, well, there's too much to write, but you get it.
I love coming here for Gryphen's posts and reading everyone's comments.
I find links like this an "added value".
Not too shabby for a "now defunct blog". huh?
I think we have to assume that OH is a lost cause -- because of the Diebold machines. But I'm pretty sure that Obams can win without it!
ReplyDeleteExcuse me? He's already winning Ohio and he won it last time...so it's a lost cause? Because of these magical voting machines you concern trolls constantly whine about? They must not work very well because Ohio is going for Obama. That must really upset you since you are constantly trying to discourage Dems with your incessant shrieking about magical vote-eating machines. Sack up why don't you. They can only steal it if we ALLOW them to do so, and that is not going to happen. LANDSLIDE FOR OBAMA BIDEN!!! Quit whining and go vote!
DeleteAnonymous5:51 AM
DeleteGet lost, troll!
Joe Biden Authored the Violence Against Women Act so Fox News Calls Him a Sexist
ReplyDeleteFox News is still so angry over the debate beating that Joe Biden gave Paul Ryan that they are insinuating that the Vice President of the United States is sexist.
http://www.politicususa.com/joe-biden-authored-violence-women-act-fox-news-calls-sexist.html
Great.
ReplyDeleteI was looking forward to Paul rAyn* being as potentially close to the Presidency as a certain her, petty ego driven, self-created-royal, Alaskan-Highness. Er, Ms. Alaskan-Lowestness.
*For anyone missing the rAyn reference.
rAyn = Paul Ryan + Ayn Rand.
No wonder Paul rAyn is so eager to run as VP. He'd get to be with Mitt Galt Rmoney.
I like how Paul rAyn backtracked a bit on his admiration for Ayn Rand when he 'discovered' her atheism!
DeleteHer economic policies, oh hell yes, but when it's pointed out to him her views on religion, well, oh hell no.
So, what is it, Mr. Future of the Republican Party?
The answer, anon 6:38, to the question of "What is it, Mr. Future...?" is this:
DeleteAny and all of the above!
Ayn Ryan may have show some biceps in those pathetic studio portraits, but his brain is limping along with whatever sounds good enough to feed his audience at the time.
He only backed off when a bunch of Catholic Bishops called him out. And I don't believe for a second he is not still a private fanboy. And not just for the economic policies. Rand makes white men feel like kings who don't have to care about anyone but themselves.
DeleteFor a supposedly smart "wonky" guy, he surely went heels over head for Ayn, hook, line and sinker.
DeleteI'm heavily into reading, and got screwed by Amazon ONCE, sneaking Christian themed books that looked like interesting reads.(Yes, they DO credit your account if you are persistent) Now I google the author FIRST before ordering.
I can't believe this man read her books, especially Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead, and came away thinking this utopia - like society she writes of represents any facet of our democracy.
Well, this is certainly making me feel better today.
ReplyDeleteYou know what's funny? (But not real funny.)
Fox News was all up in arms just a few weeks ago (before the debate) when the polls were really tilting to Obama. The talking points memo all over Fox and it's so-called pundits/reporters was that you cannot trust polls. They don't matter, blah, blah, blah. The polls are biased, etc.
But when a poll comes out after the debate in favor of Romney, oh my gosh! Fox News cannot get enough of that! They run with that 'news' 24/7. It's almost funny, almost. Their talking points memo became 'what's happened to the Obama campaign? How is it that he has 'lost' it?"...
Those people are insane.
Oh, as usual they were just broadcasting what they were already planning to do because since the debate there have been several conservative-leaning polls shown to over-sample older white southern republicans to tilt the numbers toward Romney/Ryan...remember, when Republicans scream about how Democrats are doing something, that's a clear indicator that they are doing, or are preparing to do, exactly what they are screaming about. IT NEVER FAILS. They are masters at projection, so never let them get you down!
DeleteI have three favorite "B's" and two of them are on the campaign trail for Barack! (Barack, Bruce and Bill!)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/13/bruce-springsteen-obama_n_1963598.html
My Husband and I are in Colorado and we will be getting our mail in ballots this week. I predict Colorado will go Blue this year! We may even pass the Marijuana legalization initiative (one can hope rationality will win out). Our police have better things to do and we could really use the tax revenue.
ReplyDelete"Koch Sends Pro-Romney Mailing to 45,000 Employees While Stifling Workplace Political Speech" http://inthesetimes.com/article/14017/koch_industries_sends_45000_employees_pro_romney_mailing
ReplyDeleteThose poor Koch employees. I was working for an insurance company in 2008 that was very anti-Obama. They went so far as to have a company meeting prior to the election to let us know why it was nec. to vote for McCain. Needless to say, it was a very stressful work-environment for us that were identified as Democrats.
Check out yesterday's "The Dish" by Andrew Sullivan with excerpts from the Objectivist (Ayn Rand) dating site. Also, yesterday's Dish post before that about how the Randians can never be "we" because they're always "me." This is the core of Paul Ryan.
ReplyDeleteAnd why I think he actually doesn't respect Mitt Romney all that much, in the end, and that he'll operate his own independent political operation from the VP office, if, heaven forbid, they're elected. I see fireworks ahead.
Gryhen and anyone else who lives in a deep-dyed Red State: your Democratic vote still counts, in demonstrating the strength of liberals in the midst of Liberty Land, and how your votes might affect future state races and fundraising. Never give up!
Just as, living in a totally Blue state (Mass.), it's worth voting to give Obama and all the down tickets strength, and, especially here, to show how little support our former governor has throughout the state. He wasn't bipartisan, except with Teddy Kennedy's help,, to get Romneycare, and, otherwise, was barely seen by either party. He was above it all, because he didn't want to be just a puny Governor but be annointed President.
"It's our turn," as Ann Romney said so clearly.
Ayn Rand basically wrote rape scenes in place of sex scenes. Anyone who would date a Rand fanboy is a fool.
DeleteWhen are Democrats going to make an issue of Mitt regarding Libya? Mitt first went after Obama for apoligizing for our values. Mitt did not have facts leaping to attack the President without thinking of foreign relationships during a crisis. Mitt acted in self serving ways making shit up.
ReplyDeleteRomney's campaign has made a tactical maneuver to strike Obama down again over this. I expect this to be a major attack during the debate.
Why most polls done in Nevada are garbage
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/why-most-polls-done-nevada-are-garbage
"Who do you believe--Mitt, or your lyin' memory?"
ReplyDeletehttp://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2012/10/who_do_you_believe--mitt_or_yo.html
Roger Ebert is a national treasure.
Obama2012
NEVADA!!!
ReplyDeleteThe latest from the SOS and Clark County:
The Democrats now are up to a 124,000-voter lead over the Republicans in Clark County, about where they were in 2008. Not that the world is the same, but: Barack Obama won Clark County, 58 percent to 39 percent with the same registration edge.
Of course, Mitt Romney is not John McCain. McCain essentially abandoned Nevada and did not really campaign here. But you get the point.
The statewide lead is now more than 85,000 for the Democrats. It was 100,000 at the close of registration in 2008.
http://www.ralstonreports.com/blog/numbers-game-update-dems-move-past-85000-voter-edge-statewide-124000-clark
Endorsements: Barack Obama for president
ReplyDeleteVoters often say they want their elected leaders to keep their promises and, at crucial moments, show real political backbone. President Barack Obama deserves a second term largely because he has delivered on both of these fronts.
Obama ran on pledges to end the war in Iraq, hunt down al-Qaida leaders and restore the nation's reputation in the world. He has followed through. The foreign policy disasters created by the Bush administration were a heavy burden to inherit. But Obama has successfully extricated the United States from Iraq and removed Osama bin Laden from the international stage. Moreover, he has strengthened our relationships with democratic allies and sent a clear message to dictators in the Arab-Muslim world that, unless they open up their societies, their people will rise up and end their rule.
In his first two years, Obama could have played it safe and hoarded his political capital. He did not. One of his campaign pledges was to reform the health care system that has left so many Americans uninsured, at a crippling cost both to themselves and the nation. Despite the non-negotiating stance of Republicans – even those who once supported a system such as that in Massachusetts – Obama passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/10/14/4907756/barack-obama-for-president.html#storylink=cpy#storylink=cpy
David Gregory needs to be fired from MTP. What a crepe hanger. Oh, the outrage of Biden's laughing at L'Ayn Ryan at the debate. No mention, of course, of RMoney's interruptions and smirks in the first deabte.
ReplyDeleteAnd I was waiting for Jennifer Granholm to call out The Vagovernor (as in Vaginal Probe Governor) for his hypocrisy about the government getting into women's private health decisions. RMoney's default surrogate.
I've given up on Meet the Press. David Gregory creeps me out. He looks like a stand in for "Planet of the Apes" movies and his journalism is beyond sloppy. I know he had huge shoes to fill and could never come close, but how they keep him on this show is beyond me.
DeleteIve followed Nate Silver's blog for the last six months. Since the first debate, Obama dropped from 85% chance of winning to 60%. Given that Romney's former employees and current bundlers own the company supplying voting machines in several swing states, I am very nervous.
ReplyDeleteHere Are The Charts That Should Get Obama Reelected...
ReplyDeleteRead more: http://www.businessinsider.com/charts-that-should-get-obama-reelected-2012-10?op=1#ixzz29IDVrP8o
And here is an example of exactly what is being talked about: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/2012/romney-vs-obama-electoral-map
ReplyDeleteStudy it carefully and look at what has been happening to the swing states since the Obama/Romney debate. Note that Obama was 265 strong before that debate. Also note that they show the changes day to day. One bright side for Obama is N.H. going from yellow to light blue on the 14th., but otherwise it's all been change in Romney's direction. And so, the coming debate is going to tell the story. Can Obama at least hold even with Romney in that debate? Is Obama capable of winning a debate against Romney? Judging from the last debate, I have some serious doubts!
Now it's not that I don't want to see Obama win because of course I do. If Romney wins he's going to be Bush2 on steroids. It's just that a little bit of being objective and truthful is sometimes called for. And send my luv to gina too.
Relax. The president will do fine.
DeleteFuck.off.
DeleteLuv,
Gina's House
The sky is falling!
DeleteThe Republicans have ticked so many voters off by now, especially women, that President Obama will have a second term.
ReplyDeletePersonally I have voted Republican most of my life, until the train wreck aka McCain/Palin came onto the national political stage. Since then, the GOP has successfully destroyed my confidence and faith in Republican 'values'.
Parading SP around like a eye candy for gross old men, thus dehumanizing women - is disgusting and soul destroying. Most of these old geezers are warmongers and freaktoids - ranking and raving, totally devoid of intellectual discourse and reason. They hate women. They want to control women. But they love war. They love death. They love having control and power over others. And they want to rule the entire planet.
While I do not like ALL of President Obama's policies, such as the executive order NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act which in essence, allows ANYBODY seemed a 'terrorist', can be arrested without just cause, warrants, or legal representation), that E.O. is NOT good and reeks of human rights violations. HOWEVER, Romney would be MUCH WORSE. He is a warmonger and corporate raider to the max. And yes, Mormonism IS a cult, speaking from experience.
Also attractive about President Obama is his close family - emotionally speaking, I simple adore his relationship with Michelle, Sasha, and Malia, not to mention the First Dog, Bo. And yes, those emotions are important for women, for we are the givers of life and nurturers. We need politicians that are on our side. Thus, President Obama is clearly the better choice.
You can tell the tide is turning in President Obama's favor. I flipped though the sunday news shows, the polls are turning bluer and the gap is widening again in Ohio, where the majority of early voters are voting Dem in the exit polls.
ReplyDeleteOne clip showed Romney and Angry Ann who LOVES us wimmin folk, walking arm in arm out of church. (say WHAT? Shouldn't he have done this religion thing, like months ago? Whatever)
Romney's feeble attempts at drumming up the base aren't working. It's too little, too late. Whatever bump he got from the first debate slid off the griddle after the VP debate. Even the MSM is apoplectic over Biden's enthusiasm, but they're not talking about the issues he pointed out.
One comment made me laugh. "Does it matter how many times Biden laughed or how many gallons of water Ryan drank?" HA!