In what should come as little surprise to most of you, and despite what that batshit crazy person from the dead lake said yesterday, polls indicate that President Obama is getting a lot of credit for how well he handled the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.
Courtesy of TPM:
A number of new polls have shown that the American public has positive views of President Obama's response to the damage along the eastern seaboard caused by Hurricane Sandy.
A UPI poll released Saturday showed 77 percent of Americans had a positive take on Obama's response to the storm and an additional 65 percent thought "the destructive storm and its aftermath gave the president a chance to connect better with voters," the news service wrote. An ABC News/Washington Post national tracking poll released on Wednesday of last week also found 78 percent of likely voters had a positive view of the president's efforts. A pair of swing state polls released Saturday from NBC/Marist showed the same thing -- 70 percent of likely voters in Florida and 73 percent of likely voters in Ohio approved of the response.
Apparently most Americans do not agree that the President simply showed up for a "photo op." They saw a President taking his job very seriously and getting things done as quickly as humanly possible.
As a matter of fact some in the Republican party have seen the writing on the wall and are already positioning themselves to credit Obama's inevitable win to the Hurricane, so as not to blame their candidate or their policies.
This from Politico:
“If you hadn’t had the storm, there would have been more of a chance for the Romney campaign to talk about the deficit, the debt, the economy. There was a stutter in the campaign," Rove told the Washington Post on Friday. "When you have attention drawn away to somewhere else, to something else, it is not to his advantage.”
He characterized the stutter as a "subtle disadvantage" but said the storm has had a significant impact on the race.
"It’s the October surprise. For once, the October surprise was a real surprise," he told the Post. Rove, former senior adviser and deputy chief of staff to George W. Bush, said the president "has temporarily been a bipartisan figure this week. He has been the Comforter-in-Chief and that helps."
Of course that ignores the poll numbers which have been heading in Obama's favor long before the storm hit and the early voting numbers which have also been favoring the incumbent in key swing states.
But blaming the storm gives the Republicans an out to that they don't have to honestly address how out of touch they are with the American people.
Sounds good to me. That way they will continue to be vulnerable for many elections to come.
Would it be so far out of line for one to suggest that any type of aid goes to those in Republican districts last?
ReplyDeleteThose who don't believe in big government should still get the benefits of "big government programs" - like FEMA - only they should be on the bottom of the list.
While they're waiting, perhaps they could call some millionaires - maybe Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, or hey, how about Mitt Romney? - and ask them for help - since said millionaires got the tax breaks that would have funded the fire and police departments...
Hey, maybe that's slogan-worthy?
"If you believe in tax breaks for the rich, then the next time there's a major disaster - call a millionaire for help, cause big government got drowned in Grover Norquist's bathtub."
...too wordy?
Jesse, you have to read Amy MacPherson's articles.
ReplyDeletehttp://amymacpherson.wordpress.com/
I wish someone in the media would have the guts to remind the public about George Bush's abysmal response to Katrina and constantly compare it to President Obama's handling of Sandy. I hope George Bush has it thrown in his face for the rest of his life. I hope Republicans are forever humiliated that their guy showed himself to be an incompetent Commander in Chief who couldn't do the job and the real man in a crisis turns out to be the black guy that they hate so much.
ReplyDeleteA true October surprise indeed. I'm here in Westchester, NY, and I'm one of the several hundred thousand still without power. I could be real angry about it, but two things keep me going: seeing our Comforter in Chief (the best backhanded complement from Turdblossom) connecting as one hurting human being to another and the fact that I'm better off right now than billions of other humans on this planet.
ReplyDeletePeace to All. VOTE!!!
Great Attitude! I hope things get better quickly for you and everyone effected.
DeleteDon't boo, VOTE and GOTV.
Let's hope that all of these people vote on Tuesday and that they vote straight Democratic tickets. In North Carolina that means voting for President Obama and then voting for a straight Democratic ticket. How weird is that!
ReplyDeleteBeaglmom
I saw that on Rachel and my jaw dropped! We need voting reform asap.
DeleteMore rare than an albino unicorn .....
ReplyDeleteA photo of Mitt or Ann hugging a poor person.
The Mittster's campaign MUST be sinking if Carl Rove is bailing.
ReplyDeleteI wanna see Hannity's head explode on Tuesday night.
Sheesh
Apparently, some Republican voters are resigning themselves to the inevitable. I am seeing lots of "Lets put this election in perspective" type posts on FB pages and blogs of the few sane Republicans I know. The posts have references to the view of the earth from space or the universe.
ReplyDeleteWonder how many of the "sane" Republicans realize they wouldn't be able to see the earth from space in photos if it hadn't been for those pesky science-y types-? Uh, guess it all started with that pesky Pres. Kennedy (D).
DeleteWild Tortoise
Actually, WT, I believe you can go back even further than Kennedy. Without the push for education made by President Eisenhower - who was more of a Democrat than many Democrats, even though he was actually Republican - the engineers who actually made it possible wouldn't have been around.
DeleteKennedy provided the public support and enthusiasm. Eisenhower provided the brains!
But BOTH of them existed back in the days when the idiots in Congress at least tried to WORK TOGETHER!
Romney had greater self imposed disadvantage because he is opposed to government helping, has refused interviews and avoided questions from the press for weeks. It was not an option evidently that they risk Mitt even remarking on responders nor support of Governors and mayors actions in a disaster.
ReplyDeleteThe Romney campaign chise to downplay scheduled campaign rallies collecting goods randomly. IMO Mitt was in a position to rally people in a major disaster motivating them but instead he minimized the effort to trash removal on a football field.
This is another example of Romney Ryan tem solely focused on a win by any means. They do not think things through before leaping to crush, twist facts etc. They shoot theirselves in the foot.
While the Romney campaign could never hope to equal the political advantage of being a responsive President during a natural disaster, they could have done soooo many things that would have made their candidate seem more compassionate and presidential.
DeleteThey chose, as incompetently as they've run the rest of the campaign, to do the most tacky, clearly pandering thing they could think of. Like the great international fiasco during the Olympics, he was exposed as the cheap politician he is.
Rove's reputation as a "kingmaker" is in jeopardy. Well, he made $$$millions from this election. It would have helped if the repubs. had put a likeable, intelligent, down to earth, REAL human being on the ballot. Unfortunately, they had - MITTENS.
ReplyDelete"Likeable, intelligent, down to earth, real human being"...
DeleteSorry, none of that was listed in the job description for Republican candidate for President of the United States. All they asked for was "someone with enough working digits to hold a pen" and that's what they got. They have already given "you people" everything you need and nothing more will be released.
More "not qualifications" from Grover Norquist:
"We're not looking for a fearless leader"...
"We're not looking for someone to show us what direction to take"...
Well, Mitt certainly lived up to Republican expectations, didn't he? These guys would have been great in a hurricane.
7:42? I would love to SEE them in a hurricane -as regular people, not as someone who can BUY the help needed before, during and after said hurricane!
DeleteHow long would they survive?
Every voter in the country should watch this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZENtH3psXl4
Coming Post-Election GOP Freak Out
ReplyDelete...In the political realm, we have this hate machine, this massive propaganda apparatus, that tells conservatives that any turn of bad luck is not merely bad luck but the result of a conspiracy that society has hatched against them. Thus, Mitt Romney--whom conservatives used to hate, before they were forced to embrace him--has made no mistakes on the campaign trail. The furor over the 47 percent remarks, the two debate losses, and much else--these aren't signs of his misjudgment or fallibility. To conservatives, they're all part of the broader plot against him, and more importantly against them.
And so, when you look at the world that way, the conspiracy never dies, the rope never stops spinning. If Obama wins, the excuses will start coming; the excuses will mushroom quickly into reasons why the victory was illegitimate; illegitimacy thus "established," the next mission is to oppose Obama at every turn with even greater fervor. Any political means necessary to stop or even remove him will become justified. It's all as predictable as a goose sh*tting. And if Obama does win, it will start Wednesday morning. What am I saying? I meant Tuesday night.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11/04/michael-tomasky-on-the-coming-post-election-gop-freak-out.html
Yeah, it's the beginning of Whaaaaaahmageddon!
DeleteSorry but I'm sooo jealous of that sweet looking lady all snug in POTUS arms! Sigh..
ReplyDeleteAn Open Letter To President Obama
ReplyDelete...As a photographer, I felt compelled to share visually in some way, the impact you and your political success had on my son's life. I think perhaps this image says it, far better than my words could ever convey. I do not know where his dreams will take him, but I do know that the path you carved in your life will benefit him as he grows as a man, in ways he will probably never fully understand. I realize the possibility of my son and/or myself meeting you personally is quite unlikely. So I wanted to take this opportunity to share my gratitude.
Thank you on behalf of all mothers of mixed-race children for making the words "You can do anything you want in life" feel like the truth. You have changed the lives of children across the globe and that, Mr. President, is a wonderful gift. And more personally thank you on behalf of my son ... thank you.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-messina/moms-open-letter-to-president-obama_b_2001956.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003
That is a wonderful letter and an amazing photograph.
DeleteI am a middle-aged, middle-class, white female but teach in a city school where most of the students are African-American or mixed race. When President Obama was elected, I was perhaps most excited about what that would mean for my students. Not only did it show them that someone just like them can accomplish anything but, more importantly, it emphasized how critical a good education is to achieving your goals.
Many of the students in our school district assume that they will follow the path of many before them into poverty and incarceration. President Obama's success showed them, in a way that we white teachers could not, that there WAS another way and ANY of them could make something special and important of their lives.
As thankful as I am for many of the accomplishments of this President, I am probably most grateful for that.
Liz Messina's letter was so touching and inspiring for all mothers, but especially mothers of bi racial kids. The power of her one image expresses the ties between race, humanity, and identity so clearly.
DeleteIn nature, the most beautiful flowers are hybrids, and the same holds true for people.
President Obama lived the struggle, and shows that all things are possible for all of us.
Wait. So the right, led by belligerant indignant voices from Fox, are complaining that government isn't doing a fast enough job. Yet, it's they who don't want big government.
ReplyDeleteWait. The conservatives are barking about lack of swift recovery to the victims of hurricane Sandy - from government? So to them, the crowded government agencies they hate - are slow and innefective and didn't respond quick enough.
Wait. They preach that instead of big government, churches and charitable people and neighbors should help in times of need. No one needs no stinking government, they say.
Hurricane-affected neighbors ARE helping, but whose going to help these same neighbors when their food runs out? Who's going to get water, food, and gas to them? Is Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity? Limbaugh? Huckabee? How come Franklin Graham's Samaritan Purse didn't respond immediately and air-drop supplies around the unreachable neighborhoods? Even charity organizations had to wait until the roads were all clear.
Wait. Where were the mockers, and indignant anti-government, anti-Obama barkers, since last week's arrival of hurricane Sandy? Did anyone see any of them there helping firemen, police, ambulances rescue missing victims, clean broken trees off roads, bring pumps, and equipment to clear water, natural gas leaks? I don't seem to remember hearing anyone on Fox telling us they invited some homeless victims to stay at their place until they get FEMA aid to find living arrangements. Seems they were all seated at their Fox desks, like clockwork, all nicely dressed, rested, relaxed, perfect makeup and hair, ready to deliver their unfair biased critical untimely cruel insults and criticism towards the ONLY method that works. But wait again, it does work and they're so lacking in compassion and sympathy, they won't give one ounce of gratitude towards the only thing that works, because it was run under the administration of a man of color.
Right wing conservatives are the least introspective group of people I have ever known. They do not spend time contemplating their navels. They do not question past actions, they do not apologize and they never, ever, admit they were wrong.
ReplyDeleteThese are not traits that lend themselves to maturity or an ability to correct missteps and learn from them.
And the modern Republican party will collapse under the weight of its own inability to adapt and change.
"And the modern Republican party will collapse.."
DeleteHere's hoping..
Irish Betting Site Calls Race Early — Pays Out Obama Victory Bets Two Days Early
ReplyDeleteRead more: http://www.businessinsider.com/paddy-power-pays-out-on-obama-victory-2012-11#ixzz2BGvnESOm
Obama is the superior choice, take it from a conservative republican.
ReplyDeleteI've had the misfortune of experiencing first hand republican party politic s in my home state of Massachusetts. Those who were not on the Romney band wagon were removed as delegates, even though we were elected by the people. As a result many of us have become alienated and disenfranchised, and do not know for whom to cast our votes.
Had the GOP not treated us, their constituency, so disrespectfully, my attitude toward the presidential elections may be more cool. However, my associations with republicans have caused me to rethink my allegiances and positions. In a twist on the words of Groucho Marx, I don't want to belong to any club that would have Mitt Romney as a member.
What are the results of my rethinking my allegiances and positions? They are several. For one, the liberal press (vs the conservative press), is far more interested in accurate and honest reporting. As a result, I have begun to view liberals as more honest and willing to examine unfavorable facts about their candidate than the average conservative. This honesty is reflected in the candidates that they choose to represent them. While Obama isn't the perfect politician, he doesn't dodge facts or shift positions. He tells you his vision of America, even if it is controversial. Obama isn't ashamed of his political philosophy, and he explains his positions with clarity and detail.
I believe democrats care far more about the individual than republicans do. Republicans are only out for their selves, and as a result they nominated someone who is only our for his self. Romney doesn't even care about his own party. Democrats, on the other hand, care about each other, and as a result they nominated someone who shows an honest respect for his fellow citizen, regardless of partisanship. Obama cares about this country and its people, it clearly shows when he addresses us.
Democrats show a deeper respect for the political process. In my experience, democrats are more willing to accept victory or defeat as long as the political process was carried out fairly. They value the system, when carried out properly, for the results that it produces. Republicans, on the other hand, do not respect the system. They are greedy, deceitful, and full of malice.
I don't believe republicans are able to grasp reality if it doesn't line up neatly with their self interests. Democrats do not have this problem, they are far more willing to confront reality head on, and deal with real issues with real solutions.
I don't know about you, but I don't want to live in a world where everyone is at each others throats just to make a buck, where greed and deceit reign supreme. Obama is offering a clear alternative to the nightmarish reality that the republicans are offering. Obama's alternative has the United States seeking peace and cooperation, with honesty and mutual respect being its hallmarks, between ourselves and the rest of the world. Don't let the republicans steal this election. Obama is the superior choice.
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/12l9be/obama_is_the_superior_choice_take_it_from_a/
...But would Obama have won without it? Almost certainly. Before Sandy, Obama had steady, if small, leads in more than enough swing states to win, while Romney had very few options to get to 270. As Marshall notes, taking a deep dive into the numbers: “The big picture is that there’s simply no polling data to support the Sandy Unicorn theory. There has been some trend back to Obama in critical swing states like Virginia, Florida and North Carolina. Small. But all the margins are so small that small changes can matter. Yet those too predate Sandy.”
ReplyDeleteSo the big danger is if the media adopts the Republican narrative and then is becomes the accepted conventional wisdom that Obama merely got lucky.
http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/sunday_best_dont_let_the_gop_blame_sandy/
Romney took a cue from John McCain and went with the winning strategy of picking teh crazy as a VP pick. Rove's Bush had Brown of FEMA fiddling while Rome burned. And was praised for doing a good job!
ReplyDeleteThis election will prove that citizens united was an epic failure. They pumped tons of dirty money into the campaign, and what did it get them? The GOP is held hostage by the radical rwnj's, Boener's cowering in his boots, and Romney's circling the drain.
Rove calling this disaster the cause for Romney's impending wake-up call is laughable. The storm showed President Obama's strength as commander in chief, and exposed Romney's ineptitude with Ryan's soup kitchen photo op and Romney's "Flood Relief Drive" fantasy.