Sean Hannity has a freshly scrubbed and deloused Sarah Palin on his show to lie about the President, ALMOST apologize for being a bitch, and to teach us all a little about history. (You don't HAVE to drink alcohol before reading this, but I strongly suggest it.)

In response to a survey which indicates that Americans have a more favorable opinion of socialism than he can stomach and a less favorable opinion of capitalism than he considers patriotic, Hannity decides to ask the Lunatic from Lake Lucille her opinion, because well contractually he still has to.

"I think what the survey represents Sean is perhaps some survey recipients (I'm pretty sure she met "participants" here) who answered the questions are confusing corrupt, dirty crony capitalism with genuine free market capitalism. Which is the good kind of capitalism. You know we've shown a bright light on the problems caused by crony capitalism in recent months and last year to, and I think that capitalism in general has taken a hit because of this new public awareness, because of that light that has been shown on crony capitalism perhaps people are believing that capitalism in general isn't such a good thing, of course that's a mistake to believe that."

In his next question Hannity COMPLETELY misrepresents the President, the situation the country faces, and the reason for the situation. Of course mooseshit is where Palin wallows, so she doesn't bat an eye in responding.

"Well first let's address President Obama's flip flop on his philosophy thee when it comes to raising the debt ceiling, he certainly condemned President Bush in those years of raising the deb ceiling and..uh..look where he's taken this country. (Obama explains the change in his point of view about the debt ceiling here: "I think that it's important to understand the vantage point of a senator versus the vantage point of a president. When you're a senator, traditionally what's happened is, this is always a lousy vote. Nobody likes to be tagged as having increased the debt limit - for the United States by a trillion dollars. As president, you start realizing, you know what, we, we can't play around with this stuff. This is the full faith and credit of the United States. And so that was just an example of a new senator making what is a political vote as opposed to doing what was important for the country. And I'm the first one to acknowledge it." Oh and look he even takes responsibility for his naivete.) 

Snowdrift Snooki continues: He's taken us in to a state of bankruptcy...um..with his changed idea on it being a good thing to raise the debt ceiling. A very scary proposal was recently revealed to by Geitner essentially saying let the President have free rein in raising the debt ceiling to whatever level he wants it. That's a very scary thought because Barack Obama is a socialist, He believes in socialism, in redistributing the wealth, in confiscating hard earned dollars of our small business men and women so that they cannot reinvest their dollars and hire more people, and grow and expand. Instead he believes in these failed socialist policies, and I say that not to personally condemn our President (Ri-i-i-ght!). I say it because I face reality (I'm sorry, you face what?), and I see what's going on, and I see the path that we are on and the fact that Barack Obama has not had a budget in the four years he's been in office and not been worried about it and continues to spend recklessly other people's money, and that is a sign of that idea of loving socialism."

Next Ins-Hannnity makes us all chuckle when he tries to use "math" to make his argument and then uses the old Romney talking point of claiming that people want "free stuff" and that is why they support Obama. He then reminds Klondike Kardashian that she called Republicans "wusses" during her interview with Greta.

"Well I guess I shouldn't call politicians names."

Hannity: "Why not?"

"I apologize for calling the "wobbly ones" wusses (Did Palin just apologize? Can somebody check the temperature in hell for me?) because that distracts from the point that has to be made (Oh never mind, still hot as ever, and likely to stay that way), and the point is that we are a bankrupt country sixteen trillion dollars in debt, and with entitlement..um..future lookings..um..really we're sixty...seventy...eighty dollars in debt. (Did that economic genius Sarah Palin just arbitrarily increase the national debt by sixty plus trillion dollars? Are we sure her father was a teacher?) There isn't enough money in the world to pay back the future generations that we have stolen from, AND foreign countries that we have borrowed from, AND through quantitative easing..uh..the money that's been printed out of thin air so I say, Republicans, go back to what the planks in your platform represent. It represents reining in government, putting back the power and the responsibility in the individual, not in the state, not in government. Again, that gets us towards socialism. What goes beyond socialism…is communism. I know I’m going to get slammed for speaking so bluntly about what’s going on here, but that’s exactly what is going on. Just, you know,  read history, see what's going on, see how these once very mighty empires have fallen because of government being so burdensome on the people and taking away opportunity, and freedom. Taking away individuals work ethic that leas to the downfall of that country, of that empire.” (You know interestingly enough historian Mark Curtis attributes the fall of the English empire, to in his book 'Web of Deceit: Britain's Real Role in the World', to the exactly appositive reason: "The reality is that British governments bear significant responsibility for global poverty-not only as a former colonial power that shaped many of the current unjust structures, but in their championing of a world trade system and economic ideology that enriches the few and impoverishes many more...Yet I do not think I have ever seen a media article that mentions that Britain might in some way systematically contribute to poverty in the world. Is this not extraordinary?" Remarkable certainly, and extraordinary perhaps so, but somehow this tallies with everything anyone who merely wishes to be honest about the British Empire, and about the realities of empire; those of unequal power and wealth relations, and of little or no moral culpability or responsibility. The fuel of the British Empire was not coal or wool after all, but an incredible lack of concern for those trampled underfoot in the quest for bigger and bigger profits.)

Wow, math lessons from Sean Hannity and History lessons from Sarah Palin, I can almost hear my brain cells screaming in anguish.