Rand Paul refers to Benghazi as "the worst tragedy since 9-11." WTF?

"So we have a review board. Review board finds 64 different things that need change. A lot of them are common sense and should be done, but the question is it's a failure of leadership that they weren't done in advance and four lives were cost because of this. I'm glad that you're accepting responsibility. I think that ultimately with your leaving you accept the culpability for the worst tragedy since 9-1. And I really mean that. Had I been President at the time, and I found that you  did not read the cables from Benghazi. You did not read the cables from Ambassador Stevens, I would have relieved you of your post."

Arrogant little teabagging POS!

Who gives a crap who HE would fire if he were the President, the facts are that he has less chance of being the President than even Sarah Palin.

And Benghazi was the "worst tragedy since 9-11?" Has this idiot been living in a hole in the ground?

As terrible as the Benghazi attack was, it only cost four American lives. Four Americans by the way who KNEW their job was dangerous and who accepoted a certain level of risk.

What about the tragedies that have befallen the American since 9-11, and cost substantially MORE than four lives?

What about Katrina, whihc cost 4,081 lives?

What about the BP oil spill, which took eleven human lives, killed untold thousands of sea creatures, and cost billions of dollars?

What about Hurricane Sandy, whihc took 110 lives and also cost billions of dollars?

Or what about the shootings in Tucson, the Aurora movies theater, and Sandy Hook, which each cost more lives than were lost in Benghazi?

Rand Paul is a joke and he completely undeserving to be sitting in the Senate, and on that committee.

Secretary Clinton deserved a better class of people to be asking her questions today. Sadly it appears this is the best the Republican party is capable of producing these days.

(H/T to Upworthy)