Can I just call BS on this? Oh, and SarahPAC seems to be having a little trouble with their books.

Captioned over at the Grizzled Mama's Facebook page as "A Mother's Day bear hunt..."

Bristol also has a similar picture on her ghostwritten blog.

However on her post this comment was left. (Right up until it was removed that is.)

Anonymous9:33 AM That photo was taken in or near Denali State Park with the Dutch Hills, Mt.Foraker, Mt. Hunter and Denali in the background. This is near where their cabin (the one they didn't pay taxes on) is located at Safari Lake. From the angle of the light and the snowpack I'd have to agree that this photo was taken a good month ago as there would not be that amount of snowpack still at that elevation, and we haven't had clear skies like that since early last week. It simply couldn't have been this weekend as it's been overcast and warm. 

Also, during this time of year the extended Petersville road would not be passable for a truck carrying a snowmachine trailer, thus this photo was taken at some point earlier when they were able to ride the groomed trails from the Safari Lake area. 

Okay now I don't know for sure, because I have not been up around Denali State park recently, but it DOES have a ring of truth to it.

What's more some have pointed out that these photos look suspiciously like those posted over at Brancy's blog during Easter weekend.

Besides that wasn't Palin just in Arizona pimping herself out for attention only two days earlier?

I swear NOTHING these people say about themselves is the truth.

Speaking of telling the truth, it appears that there may be even more problems coming Palin's way other than just faking a couple of Facebook photos. 

This was recently sent to the SarahPAC treasurer, Tim Crawford:  

Dear Treasurer: Response Due Date 06/14/2013 

This letter is prompted by the Commission's preliminary review of the report referenced above. This notice requests information essential to full public disclosure of your federal election campaign finances. Failure to adequately respond by the response date noted above could result in an audit or enforcement action. Additional information is needed for the following 3 item(s): 

1. The beginning cash balance of this report does not equal the ending balance of your 2012 30 Day Post-General Report (10/18/12 - 11/26/12). Please correct this discrepancy and amend all subsequent reports(s) that may be affected by the correction. (2 U.S.C. § 434)(b)(1)) 

2. The totals listed on Line(s) 6(c), 11(a)(i), 11(a)(ii), 11(a)(iii), 11(d), 19 and 20, Column B of the Summary and Detailed Summary Page(s) appear to be incorrect. Column B figures for the Summary and Detailed Summary Pages should equal the sum of the Column B figures on your previous report and the Column A figures on this report. Please file an amendment to your report to correct the Column B discrepancies for this report and all subsequent report(s) which may be affected by this correction. Note that Column B should reflect only the Calendar Year-to-Date totals. (2 U.S.C. § 434(b)) 

3. Your calculations for Line 8 appear to be incorrect. Cash on hand at the close of the current reporting period should always equal the closing calendar year to date cash on hand amount. Please provide the corrected total on the Summary Page. (2 U.S.C. § 434(b)) 

Please note, you will not receive an additional notice from the Commission on this matter. Adequate responses must be received by the Commission on or before the due date noted above to be taken into consideration in determining whether audit action willbe initiated. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act may also result in an enforcement action against the committee. Any response submitted by your committee will be placed on the public record and will be considered by the Commission prior to taking enforcement action. Requests for extensions of time in which to respond will not be considered. 

Electronic filers must file amendments (to include statements, designations and reports) in an electronic format and must submit an amended report in its entirety, rather than just those portions of the report that are being amended. If you should have any questions regarding this matter or wish to verify the adequacy of your response, please contact me.

Uh oh! Has somebody NOT been providing the Federal Election Commission with accurate data?