Morality is not determined by the church you attend nor the faith you embrace. It is determined by the quality of your character and the positive impact you have on those you meet along your journey
Right wing hypocrisy has reached unprecidented heights all the while proclaiming their Christian bonefides and love of the country they are trying to destroy for political gain.
Lou Sara disarmed Alaska militia? Well she was just a commonsense constitutional conservative executive exercising the prowess of State's rights over The Fed to regulate well.
Her record, her record is what can always be used against her - because the 'cypher' did things a real politician should do, manage with a levelheadedness above the partisan fray. Her Bible-beating, prayer circles, creationism were kept in the corners for her HS BFF's; but once she got on a national ticket and realized public office as she knew it, was always going to above her grasp - her fundy credentials would sell as a rock thrower.
I hope she invested a lot of her hard earned dollars in Beck's gold.
Why she is even pictured w/those three guys? Makes absolutely no sense to me. She was a quitter governor midterm in Alaska, Mayor of Wasilla (tiny community in Alaska that she left in debt), ran for VP (McCain) and lost, is a cheating wife, has a pimp for a husband, a poorly educated family and raised delinquent kids.
Plus, she's a proven liar, fraud and not smart. And, she's been angry and evil for the past years. Her speechifying (new word!) is always the same - anti President Obama - racist, etc.
GoL, It's pretty obvious what the words mean. Read much? Guess not. Look at the pictures, doofus. Skin color. Republicans don't like Obama because of his skin color when Reagan appears more brown in skin color than Obama.
Fox Ignores Benghazi Witness Testimony Proving Obama Did Not Order Troops To "Stand Down"
Fox News ignored congressional testimony that confirmed military leadership ordered a small team of troops to remain in Tripoli in order to protect embassy staff there from possible threats during the September 2012 attacks on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, instead baselessly speculating that the president must have personally told the force to "stand down."
During the May 8 congressional hearings on the Benghazi attacks, witness Gregory Hicks -- who was the Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. embassy in Tripoli at the time of the attacks -- explained that his team had proposed that a small group of four special forces troops leave Tripoli to provide aid in Benghazi, but that they were not authorized to do so by Special Operations Command Africa, a division of the U.S. military:
REP. ROBIN KELLY: You said that four military personnel were told not to the board that plane and that this call came from Special Operations Command Africa. Is that right?
HICKS: That's what I understand.
VIDEO:
Fox News ignored this portion of Hicks' testimony. On Hannity the night of the hearings, host Sean Hannity disputed Fox News contributor Juan Williams' accurate explanation that "the military made this decision" to baselessly speculate the president, as Commander in Chief, must have been involved in the decision making process to ask the special forces to remain in Tripoli:
HANNITY: Wait a minute, we don't have a Commander in Chief or chain of command,and that somebody along the way, we don't know who eight months later, made a decision and told them to stand down while Americans were under fire and getting killed in Benghazi?
The next morning on Fox & Friends, co-host Steve Doocy continued this smear against Obama, claiming it was still a "big question" who made the decision, and that "to a lot of people's understanding, the only people who could say stand down would be the President of United States or the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta."
As The Wall Street Journal reported, diplomats on the ground the night of the attacks had learned of new threats to the Tripoli embassy complex, and a Pentagon spokesperson confirmed to U.S. News that the assessment of Special Operations Command Africa leadership at the time was that "it was more important for those guys to be in Tripoli" for embassy security.
It will eventually go on the pile with the birth certificate, Solyndra, Fast and Furious, etc.
Basically, they think Obama should have done to Benghazi what was done to Fallujah, except on less than an hours notice.
That is why they are so hung up on Obama not saying the word "terrorism" soon enough. They figure that once something is declared "terrorism" that total war levels of reprisals are on the table.
And that is why they are so desperate to find a witness who can unequivocally state that Obama stopped any sort of "rescue" attempt. No one seriously watching this thinks there was any military assets near by that could have save those 4 Americans. The whole thing just went down too fast. And while right-wing talkers may talk a lot about some sort of rescue team, what they are really aiming at is some sort of fire-and-brimstone response that would demonstrate how strong America is militarily.
And they are hung up on this strong response because "defense hawk" is pretty much the only leg left on the Republican stool. The spending of the Bush years, and the foot dragging of Republican legislators now have demonstrated they are no good on the financial end of things. And they are steadily losing on the conservative social issues on the national level.
In short, the whole Benghazi things boils down to; Obama fucked up, because a Republican president would have punished every Libyan for an American ambassador getting killed.
Now it is just a matter of digging until they find some proof that Obama prevent the military from wiping Benghazi off the map.
A planned terror attack would make his administration look weak so soon before an election so the obfuscated what actually happened so that it didn't look like a planned terror attack so Obama would win reelection.
In a nutshell: It's the closest thing I've heard to a rational explanation and it would almost make sense if it didn't require you to do logical backflips for days.
1021 I couldn't agree with you more. You make some very fine points.
I often wondered why it was important for gop to hear the word "terrorism." I couldn't wrap my head around their stupidity and their immediate need to call the bombing a "terroristic" attack.
It all makes sense now; mccain and graham stating they knew it was a terroristic bombing when they first heard of the attack was very puzzling. It was a WTF moment indeed.
Ironic, isn't it? "Disarming" those nuts in the ASDF was the smartest thing "The Woman who was supposed to live in Juneau" did. The ASDF is the biggest pack of crackpots in Alaska. They absolutely WERE NOT a "Well-Regulated Militia." It's the only damn thing I'd give her credit for.
In today's right wing media news, you'd think there'd be no possible way to try to use the Cleavland incident to attack Obama and social program spending right? Well if you said yes, look at how naive and innocent you are.
Watch out patriots!
ReplyDeleteObama had United Nation storm troopers take away my guns and Home Security has sent me to FEMA Region 6 prison.
They have water boarded me to tell them the names of other gun owners.
Glenn Beck knows this is happening, and he and Sarah are the only ones that can save us.
Send them ALL your money if you value your freedom.
ps: keep buying gold, so the sellers keep paying for ads on Glenn's show.
You know the Internet has a liberal slant, how were you able to get access from the FEMA Re-education camps?
DeleteMy God, move over 700 Club, the modern day grift is here wrapped up in facism.
Right wing hypocrisy has reached unprecidented heights all the while proclaiming their Christian bonefides and love of the country they are trying to destroy for political gain.
ReplyDeleteI hear ya, brudda.
ReplyDelete"They're coming to take me away, Hee hee Ha ha"
HEE HEE HEE HEE
Lou Sara disarmed Alaska militia? Well she was just a commonsense constitutional conservative executive exercising the prowess of State's rights over The Fed to regulate well.
ReplyDeleteHer record, her record is what can always be used against her - because the 'cypher' did things a real politician should do, manage with a levelheadedness above the partisan fray. Her Bible-beating, prayer circles, creationism were kept in the corners for her HS BFF's; but once she got on a national ticket and realized public office as she knew it, was always going to above her grasp - her fundy credentials would sell as a rock thrower.
I hope she invested a lot of her hard earned dollars in Beck's gold.
Yes, Palin did: Read about it on an NRA website!!
Deletehttp://www.meetthenra.org/nra-member/Wayne%20Anthony%20Ross
Why she is even pictured w/those three guys? Makes absolutely no sense to me. She was a quitter governor midterm in Alaska, Mayor of Wasilla (tiny community in Alaska that she left in debt), ran for VP (McCain) and lost, is a cheating wife, has a pimp for a husband, a poorly educated family and raised delinquent kids.
ReplyDeletePlus, she's a proven liar, fraud and not smart. And, she's been angry and evil for the past years. Her speechifying (new word!) is always the same - anti President Obama - racist, etc.
The woman deserves zero coverage anywhere!
Reagan is more brown than Obama.
ReplyDelete825 I wish I understood your sentence so I could have a witty comeback. The ridiculous group of stupid words make absolutely no sense.
DeleteGoL, It's pretty obvious what the words mean. Read much? Guess not. Look at the pictures, doofus. Skin color. Republicans don't like Obama because of his skin color when Reagan appears more brown in skin color than Obama.
DeleteFox Ignores Benghazi Witness Testimony Proving Obama Did Not Order Troops To "Stand Down"
ReplyDeleteFox News ignored congressional testimony that confirmed military leadership ordered a small team of troops to remain in Tripoli in order to protect embassy staff there from possible threats during the September 2012 attacks on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, instead baselessly speculating that the president must have personally told the force to "stand down."
During the May 8 congressional hearings on the Benghazi attacks, witness Gregory Hicks -- who was the Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. embassy in Tripoli at the time of the attacks -- explained that his team had proposed that a small group of four special forces troops leave Tripoli to provide aid in Benghazi, but that they were not authorized to do so by Special Operations Command Africa, a division of the U.S. military:
REP. ROBIN KELLY: You said that four military personnel were told not to the board that plane and that this call came from Special Operations Command Africa. Is that right?
HICKS: That's what I understand.
VIDEO:
Fox News ignored this portion of Hicks' testimony. On Hannity the night of the hearings, host Sean Hannity disputed Fox News contributor Juan Williams' accurate explanation that "the military made this decision" to baselessly speculate the president, as Commander in Chief, must have been involved in the decision making process to ask the special forces to remain in Tripoli:
HANNITY: Wait a minute, we don't have a Commander in Chief or chain of command,and that somebody along the way, we don't know who eight months later, made a decision and told them to stand down while Americans were under fire and getting killed in Benghazi?
The next morning on Fox & Friends, co-host Steve Doocy continued this smear against Obama, claiming it was still a "big question" who made the decision, and that "to a lot of people's understanding, the only people who could say stand down would be the President of United States or the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta."
As The Wall Street Journal reported, diplomats on the ground the night of the attacks had learned of new threats to the Tripoli embassy complex, and a Pentagon spokesperson confirmed to U.S. News that the assessment of Special Operations Command Africa leadership at the time was that "it was more important for those guys to be in Tripoli" for embassy security.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/09/fox-ignores-benghazi-witness-testimony-proving/193981
Fox News couldn't be more biased in their reporting.
DeleteRepublican witch hunt flavor of the month.
DeleteIt will eventually go on the pile with the birth certificate, Solyndra, Fast and Furious, etc.
Basically, they think Obama should have done to Benghazi what was done to Fallujah, except on less than an hours notice.
That is why they are so hung up on Obama not saying the word "terrorism" soon enough. They figure that once something is declared "terrorism" that total war levels of reprisals are on the table.
And that is why they are so desperate to find a witness who can unequivocally state that Obama stopped any sort of "rescue" attempt. No one seriously watching this thinks there was any military assets near by that could have save those 4 Americans. The whole thing just went down too fast. And while right-wing talkers may talk a lot about some sort of rescue team, what they are really aiming at is some sort of fire-and-brimstone response that would demonstrate how strong America is militarily.
And they are hung up on this strong response because "defense hawk" is pretty much the only leg left on the Republican stool. The spending of the Bush years, and the foot dragging of Republican legislators now have demonstrated they are no good on the financial end of things. And they are steadily losing on the conservative social issues on the national level.
In short, the whole Benghazi things boils down to; Obama fucked up, because a Republican president would have punished every Libyan for an American ambassador getting killed.
Now it is just a matter of digging until they find some proof that Obama prevent the military from wiping Benghazi off the map.
A planned terror attack would make his administration look weak so soon before an election so the obfuscated what actually happened so that it didn't look like a planned terror attack so Obama would win reelection.
In a nutshell: It's the closest thing I've heard to a rational explanation and it would almost make sense if it didn't require you to do logical backflips for days.
1021 I couldn't agree with you more. You make some very fine points.
DeleteI often wondered why it was important for gop to hear the word "terrorism." I couldn't wrap my head around their stupidity and their immediate need to call the bombing a "terroristic" attack.
It all makes sense now; mccain and graham stating they knew it was a terroristic bombing when they first heard of the attack was very puzzling. It was a WTF moment indeed.
Wish we could make money on these "Obama is going to take my gun fools".
ReplyDeleteVegas could offer bets ...
Obama will take guns in one year ... 10 to 1 odds
Ironic, isn't it? "Disarming" those nuts in the ASDF was the smartest thing "The Woman who was supposed to live in Juneau" did. The ASDF is the biggest pack of crackpots in Alaska. They absolutely WERE NOT a "Well-Regulated Militia."
ReplyDeleteIt's the only damn thing I'd give her credit for.
Why didn't she disarm the A.I.P.? Was she partial to them?
DeleteThere is no rational debate with Wingnuts. There is only mockery and scorn.
ReplyDeleteThe imbalance between the Right and Left wings concerning the Media is stunning.
In today's right wing media news, you'd think there'd be no possible way to try to use the Cleavland incident to attack Obama and social program spending right? Well if you said yes, look at how naive and innocent you are.
ReplyDeletehttp://tv.msnbc.com/2013/05/08/unbe...ht-get-welfare/