Friday, August 16, 2013

NSA broke privacy rules thousands of times.

Courtesy of the Washington Post:

The National Security Agency has broken privacy rules or overstepped its legal authority thousands of times each year since Congress granted the agency broad new powers in 2008, according to an internal audit and other top-secret documents. 

Most of the infractions involve unauthorized surveillance of Americans or foreign intelligence targets in the United States, both of which are restricted by statute and executive order. They range from significant violations of law to typographical errors that resulted in unintended interception of U.S. e-mails and telephone calls. 

The documents, provided earlier this summer to The Washington Post by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, include a level of detail and analysis that is not routinely shared with Congress or the special court that oversees surveillance. 

In one of the documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. In one instance, the NSA decided that it need not report the unintended surveillance of Americans. A notable example in 2008 was the interception of a “large number” of calls placed from Washington when a programming error confused the U.S. area code 202 for 20, the international dialing code for Egypt, according to a “quality assurance” review that was not distributed to the NSA’s oversight staff.

These are more disturbing facts that we would not even know about unless Edward Snowden had stolen them, and then disseminated them to journalists. And it cannot be argued that knowing this is NOT important to the American people, or that without Snowden we ever WOULD have known about it.

However, as I have mentioned before, Snowden abdicated his right to be called a heroic whistle blower when he fled to, first China, and then Russia.

It also appears that the relationship between Wiki-leaks, Russia, and Snoweden is convoluted and suspicious at best. 

This from Business Insider: 

Ever since the 30-year-old ex-Booz Allen contractor got on a flight from Hong Kong to Moscow, Russia and WikiLeaks have been working parallel to each other. 

On June 23, after the U.S. voided Snowden's passport while he was in Hong Kong, WikiLeaks tweeted that the organization "assisted Mr. Snowden's political asylum in a democratic country, travel papers ans [sic] safe exit from Hong Kong." 

That was followed by the update that "Mr. Snowden is currently over Russian airspace accompanied by WikiLeaks legal advisors." 

It turned out that Assange convinced Ecuador's consul in London to provide a travel document requesting that authorities allow Snowden to travel to Ecuador "for the purpose of political asylum." The country's president subsequently said the document was "completely invalid." 

When Snowden arrived in Moscow with void travel papers, all signs suggest that Russia's domestic intelligence service (i.e. FSB) took control of him. 

That day a radio host in Moscow "saw about 20 Russian officials, supposedly FSB agents, in suits, crowding around somebody in a restricted area of the airport," according to Anna Nemtsova of Foreign Policy. 

WikiLeaks, meanwhile, insisted that Snowden was "not being 'debriefed' by the FSB." 

Nevertheless, Snowden's FSB-linked Moscow lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, has been speaking for Snowden ever since Snowden accepted all offers for support and asylum on July 12.

You know Snowden COULD have been a real national symbol for privacy concerns in this country. He could have actually been the hero that so many want to believe that he is. 

He could have been those things, but no more.

20 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:39 PM

    Hahaha

    Party at the NSA motherfuckers!!!

    https://soundcloud.com/yacht/party-at-the-nsa

    FUCK dICK cHENENY also too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:50 PM

    If he didn't want to be returned to the U.S. and given the unconscionable Bradley Manning treatment by our lying torture-denying government, Snowden had few choices as to where to flee after he gave Glenn Greenwald his NSA bombshells.

    Face it, those revelations - and more specifically, Obama's NSA-defending reaction to those revelations - i.e. lies -- have made Obama look very very bad.

    Snowden's revelations have not only held up, they keep leading to more revelations. All you have left to use against Snowden is that he, like any smart person aware of the 100% certain consequences, fled the U.S. instead of sticking around to be totally railroaded into prison (via super-secret state secrets trial) for the rest of his life.

    You would be applauding Snowden for that, and snicking at the president for the pickle Snowden's actions put him in, if Bush still happened to be in the WH. No way would you be calling Snowden a coward then. You would be 100% on his side.

    Don't believe me? Then ask yourself if you would expect Snowden to stick around if McCain/Palin won the 2008 election and got reelected in 2012. You wouldn't expect THEM to treat Snowden to a fair trial, so why do you expect Obama's administration to, if you've been paying ANY attention to the way the Obama administration treats whistleblowers?

    When it comes these issues, if anything, Obama is to the right of Bush.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:13 PM

      LOL... You are nuts!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:51 PM

      @12:50 PM:

      You WISH these “revelations” made President Obama look bad, but they don’t. At least not to most sane people who read past the hyperbolic headlines. Last week, President Obama merely said there were “safeguards” in place to prevent any abuses by the NSA. President Obama didn’t say the NSA program, or the safeguards were foolproof. While these “safeguards” are not perfect, the audit shows that these “safeguards,” did put a stop to the violations, once they were became aware of them.

      This latest “revelation” from Edward Snowden still does not show any proof of any INTENTIONAL widespread abuse at the NSA. The Washington Post report said that the majority of the “abuse,” or “violations” were unintentional, and were caused by either “operator error,” or a “system error.” This would be a big story if it was revealed that the majority of the violations were intentional, widespread, and ongoing. But so far, there is no evidence that this was the case. This is another failed attempt by that narcissistic asshole Edward Snowden to monopolize the news cycle.

      The NSA makes about 2 million queries a month, vs. about 3,000 errors per year. That’s actually a good number, because it means that the NSA was in compliance with the law, a large majority of the time. The report also shows that when the NSA was not in compliance with the law, the problem was corrected. And, the fact that the NSA even does a self-audit, is a form of oversight.

      Know how I know these latest “revelations” don’t make President Obama look bad? Because of the media coverage. This wasn’t even one of the top stories on Wolf Blitzer’s show. If the media believes something makes President Obama look bad, it would have been the THE #1 news story ALL DAY, and cable news would have given it non-stop coverage, with blaring ‘Drudge Report’ type headlines, and “breaking news” every 30 minutes. This “revelation” was not the top story on most news outlets. The majority of the major news outlets think Egypt, and A-Rod are more important.

      There was some “outrage” this morning when the story first broke. But as the day progressed, the “outrage” got quieter, and the story seemed to get less, and less attention from the media throughout the day. Why? Because upon closer inspection, this story is a whole lot of NOTHING! This story did not reveal any long-term, widespread, intentional criminal wrongdoing. Therefore, it is boring. Stories about the NSA making thousands of mistakes (mostly caused by computer glitches) doesn’t generate as many clicks, or help boost ratings.

      Wolf Blitzer has a 2-hour news show, and Wolf Blitzer (who hates President Obama) didn’t get to this topic until 1 hour, and 30 minutes into his show. Wolf Blitzer waited until his show was almost over to talk about this non-story. Wolf Blitzer talked about how most of the violations were “mistakes” caused by computer glitches, or typographical errors, etc., about privacy, and how more oversight is needed, blah, blah, blah. These “revelations” may be a little embarrassing to the president, because of the comments he made last week, but it doesn’t make him look like a lying, dirty, rotten scoundrel. If these revelations did make the president look lying, dirty, rotten scoundrel, the cable news reaction would have been VICIOUS. But it wasn’t.

      I’m sure emos such as Chris Hayes, and Rachel Maddow will be losing their shit over this, tonight. But, that is to be expected from those two, because their shows aren’t news shows. Chris Hayes, and Rachel Maddow’s shows are political talk shows. There is a difference. Other than emos, and libertarians, nobody else really cares about this non-story.

      P.S., Fuck you!

      Delete
  3. Sally in MI1:02 PM

    I am amazed that Fox hasn;t jumped all over this as evidence of Obama's wanting to take over America, but if they did, all fingers would point right back at THEM for trumpeting the goodness of the Patriot Act, right? I knew when that was passed that it was government over reach, but the right was mum, because old George was 'keeping us safe.' Right. Old George, who did nothing to keep those 3400 New Yorkers safe, was suddenly our protector. Old George, who planned before 9-11 to invade Iraq and avenge Daddy, and waste the money Clinton and Dems had left him..after all, what's a budget surplus for if not to appease the morons with an unneeeded tax break, and then send the rest to the war contractors? This is so disgusting. All of it. And Dems are the bad guys? Sorry, conservatives, you are part of a party of liars and cheaters, and the sooner you accept that, the sooner we can vote them all out and get back to making America work for all of us.
    O/T, but Dave Camp, my 'retiring' 11 term Congresscreep, had thought about running for Levin's MI Senate seat. Today he announced that he would not be running for Senate, but will continue to be in the House and run the Ways and Means Committee. A little cocky, huh, since the election is next year, and when we vote out the GOP, Camp will also lose his chair?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:10 PM

      This "Patriot Act"was a bipartisan buttfucking of the Constitution.

      2001 Roll Call Votes
      Yea Nay
      House Republican 211 3 (Paul,Otter,Ney voted Nay)
      House Democrat 145 62
      House Independent 1 1 (Good Yea Sanders Nay)

      Don Young from Alaska (aka Yon Dung), and eight others did not vote.
      clerk.house.gov/evs/2001/roll398.xml

      Yea Nay
      Senate Republican 49 0
      Senate Democratic 48 1 (Feingold voted Nay)
      Senate Independent 1 0 (Jeffords voted Yea)
      www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00313

      Yeah. This really was totally the Republicans fault.



      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:49 PM

      It's not ALL the republicans fault, but it is mostly the republicans' fault, because this is a fucking republican policy, that was signed into law, by fucking republican president!

      Now, many of the very same people (democrats and republicans) who voted for this policy, are pretending to be outraged, and are trying to blame the whole thing on the black president!

      This is more proof that the republicans' unconstitutional butt-fucking policies suck!

      Delete
  4. Anonymous1:18 PM

    Stop idolizing the traitor Snowden.None of this information matters in the slightest unless you are conducting terrorist business over the phone.I don't care in the slightest if the NSA wants to sit down and listen to all of my phone calls,because I am not a terrorist,a criminal,pedophile,or anyone else who needs to be worried about what I say on the phone.
    Maybe living in Alaska has given you a skewed idea of the real world.I know that a lot of people went there to hide for some of those very same reasons,being a criminal or a pedophile,and went on to raise families.My exhusband worked there in the late 70's and I stayed a few months.In that time I met some of the shadiest,inbred,strangest people on the planet. I can only assume that their influence has helped shape the viewpoint of the Alaskan residents who grew up there.

    It seems that the fact that in a world where acts of terror happen everyday,very few happen in the USA. We are being kept safer because of a host of policies aimed at doing so.Are they perfect ? No. Nothing ever is.Do people make mistakes ? Yes. A programmer made a mistake and a couple thousand phone calls had their outgoing and incoming numbers recorded. Someone in charge of reporting may have been afraid of losing his job and a bad decision was made to not report it.

    Get over it ,be thankful no one placed a bomb in a Cafe your daughter visited,or on a plane she flew in,or in a vehicle parked next to hers. These things happen every day around the globe.Something keeps them from happening here. Trust me,its not your hero,Snowden. He is a thief,a traitor,and a coward,just like so many who ran from the Lower 48 to Alaska decades ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you believe that only Alaskans are concerned with privacy?

      This is kind of a big story, that is receiving a big reaction nationwide. Are you not paying attention?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:49 PM

      I have been paying attention to you and your hero worship of Snowden ever since he revealed his traitorous ass. This is a big story hyped by the GOP,the Evangelicals,The Militias,FoxNews,and people like you.You were my hero at one time. Not any more. You have supported Snowden,cheered him,tolerated him,and only seemed to feel any negativity toward him after readers here took you to task and he practically defected to Russia.

      What exactly are you afraid would be found out if one of those phone calls was yours ?

      Delete
  5. Randall2:19 PM

    I don't know...

    I mean...

    We're willing to go to the airport and let any old rent-a-cop snicker at naked scans of our wives', moms', and daughters' bodies and we don't complain.

    We're willing to put up with the police setting up "sobriety check-points" where they stop us citizens just in case we might be breaking the law
    (Congress persons are exempt)
    ...and we don't say a word.

    Just about every black kid in the country has been pulled over for "driving while black" and no one (except those black kids) are outraged.

    We allow ourselves to be subjected to drug tests
    (hey YOU - you're going to piss in this cup while I watch)
    at work, or in order to get work - just in case we might be breaking the law.
    (Congress persons are exempt)
    ...and we don't complain a bit.

    We send e-mails at work knowing full well that every geek-ass IT guy in the company can
    - and does -
    read every one of them any damn time he wants...


    Cell phones are radio transmitters - every time you talk on a cell phone every thing you say is being broadcast and any nerd that wants to, with a handful of parts from Radio Shack, is able to listen in on every word you say.

    Hell - MOST OF US POST THE MOST INTIMATE DETAILS OF OUR LIVES ON Facebook for the whole world to see for Chrissakes!

    ---But NOW our feelings are supposed to be all hurt because "somebody is spying on us"?

    ...I don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That stinking bitch could never be a hero. NEVER! The asshole lied and stole gov records. Hero my ass.

    One jerk isn't in charge of our data. Bush and his privatizing of gov jobs and no regulation doesn't help.

    His father isn't any better. Both should live in Russia forever!

    ReplyDelete
  7. angela2:32 PM

    I don't find any of this surprising or even that disturbing. What the hell about the Patriot Act and the bullshit going off the road with it did everyone not understand? Are we all that naive?

    Hell--Facebook, Google, Amazon, your cell phone company, VISA, your bank, and Paypal already know where you are, what you bought, what you read and how long it took you to read it and what sites you go to. Everyone is living in an age of very open technology but are still acting like its 1958. It like we have not mentally or emotionally caught up with the technology we use everyday and the ways others might use it against us or even in our best interest. The boat has sailed.

    Ever get a ticket in the mail 'cause a camera caught you speeding at four in the morning? When I come to this sight all I have to type is I. Hell Disqus stores for the whole world to see everything you have ever posted to it.

    I worry more about Julian Assange celebrating Matt Drudge and talking about how the far right will save this country along with that racist ass Rand Paul. Then I wonder who is truly paying Greenwald. I also think how Snowden's father thinks his son is being used by Greenwald and Assange.
    Its a clusterfuck.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1250 oh plz snowden put the military and the US in danger. He's a coward and a Traitor. He will get his just dessert.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous3:17 PM

    kEEP sMOKING tHE hOPIUM oBOTS.

    "NSA Violations ‘Just the Tip of a Larger Iceberg,’ Say Wyden, Udall

    Democratic Sens. Rob Wyden of Oregon and Mark Udall of Colorado, both members of the Intelligence Committee, said in a joint statement that there are more details to come:

    “The executive branch has now confirmed that the rules, regulations and court-imposed standards for protecting the privacy of Americans have been violated thousands of times each year. We have previously said that the violations of these laws and rules were more serious than had been acknowledged, and we believe Americans should know that this confirmation is just the tip of a larger iceberg.

    While Senate rules prohibit us from confirming or denying some of the details in today’s press reports, the American people have a right to know more details about the scope and severity of these violations, and we hope that the executive branch will take steps to publicly provide more information as part of the honest, public debate of surveillance authorities that the Administration has said it is interested in having.

    In particular, we believe the public deserves to know more about the violations of the secret court orders that have authorized the bulk collection of Americans’ phone and email records under the USA PATRIOT Act. The public should also be told more about why the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has said that the executive branch’s implementation of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act has circumvented the spirit of the law, particularly since the executive branch has declined to address this concern.”"

    blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/nsa-violations-just-the-tip-of-a-larger-iceberg-say-wyden-udall/



    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous4:40 PM

    @3:17PM:

    And you Snowbots can keep giving Snowjob a blowjob!

    I don't know why this statement has gotten you so excited. I'm not sure what you think is going to come of this, but you are sadly mistaken if you think President Obama is going to be impeached over this. President Obama isn't going anywhere. The black guy is going to finish his second-term, so get over it!

    Ron Wyden, and Mark Udall can both shut the fuck up! Ron Wyden is a grandstanding piece of shit! Ron Wyden keeps calling for more "transparency," and calling for the Obama administration to declassify all the information. Yet, as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Ron Wyden has access to all the stuff, that senators like Mark Udall are claiming they have not been allowed access to.

    The Senate Intelligence Committee rules state that any member of the Senate Intelligence Committee (such as Ron Wyden) can show classified documents to senators who are not on the committee. Ron Wyden doesn't even need permission from the other senators on the committee. If that asshole Ron Wyden really wanted transparency, then he could take that first step.

    Why won't Ron Wyden show his buddy Mark Udall the classified documents he already had access to? Because he's full of shit, that's why! They both are!

    Don't hold your breath! Because in the end, the NSA, and Patriot Act aren't going anywhere, any time soon! Neither is Barack Obama!

    ReplyDelete
  11. The problems with the NSA are the same problems we have with the TSA.

    You have given a bunch of low level government employee clowns absolute power. And it corrupts. Absolutely.

    The TSA is feeling up grandmas and stealing out of luggage. That's right. STEALING!

    Do you really think the NSA wasn't going to push the limits all they want? Just wait until the reports of NSA employees stalking women and eavesdropping on celebrities, etc. come out. Bet they're doing a little insider trading too. Just think of the stuff they have access to.

    There are a lot of Snowdens out there and they aren't so altruistic or dumb enough to reveal themselves. They are working in secret for personal gain.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous10:10 AM

    More importantly, this was an internal audit, which means… oversight! It turns out, yes, obviously, NSA has multiple layers of oversight and exhaustive internal audits of the agency and its analysts as a means of both weeding out problems and then mitigating them. The elephant in the room is that the purpose of Gellman’s document, presumably from NSA’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG), is to keep detailed tabs on the agency. But Gellman never explicitly mentioned the OIG, just that the document is an “audit.” But it’s a fair to reach such a conclusion since internal audits are performed by various OIGs within all government agencies and departments.

    We’ve been led to infer by Greenwald and others, however, that NSA is a rogue, reckless agency without any oversight; operating in total secrecy and with limitless impunity. That’s simply not the case, and the existence of this document, as well as Gellman’s article, proves it.

    Here are some additional positive areas of oversight as reported by Gellman:

    –There was a “quadrupling of NSA’s oversight staff” in 2009 after the Obama administration came into office.

    –There are “semi-annual reports to Congress” about NSA “errors and infractions.”

    –The public can read abbreviated versions of these audits. “The limited portions of the reports that can be read by the public acknowledge ‘a small number of compliance incidents.’” Obviously, a full public disclosure of agency errors would reveal the nature of NSA’s top secret SIGINT operations. But this is evidence that the public can attain a limited peek at NSA’s audits anyway.

    –There are “regular audits from the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and periodic reports to Congress and the surveillance court.”

    –Regarding the surveillance court, Gellman’s article reveals a summary of a now infamous 86-page October 2011 decision by the FISA court, which determined that a then-brand new NSA operation was unconstitutional and must be discontinued.

    The very existence of this FISC decision utterly neuters the “FISA is a rubber stamp court” narrative peddled by Greenwald and his groupies. In total, the article decimates the notion that NSA operates without oversight or self-correcting measures that yield to constitutional mandates.

    While we’re here, what are some other layers oversight?

    http://thedailybanter.com/2013/08/new-snowden-bombshell-reveals-internal-nsa-oversight-to-flag-and-correct-errors/

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous12:53 PM

    WTF ? Four whole paragraphs of facts n' junk before we get to the Snowden bashing ???

    Keep on diluting the NSA story with silly details (like information about the NSA) and -- just like Christmas -- people will forget its REAL meaning: that Snowden is a treasonous, traitorous punching bag who don't need no stinkin' trial.

    Remember the inspirational words of that paragon of secrecy, George H. W. Bush: "Gotta, y'know ... stay the course."

    IOW, stick to your opinions, forget the facts and keep on whacking away at Snowden like he was a piñata.

    Nobody said character assassination was easy, so thanks for making it seem like fun.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.