Sunday, December 08, 2013

Holiday greeting flow chart.

Source
By they way the thing that people seem to conveniently forget is that the so-called "War on Christmas" has been waging for hundreds of years.

Courtesy of Time Magazine:

The front lines of the War on Christmas were originally manned by none other than the Puritans — and not on the side many conservative news anchors might think. Objecting to the yuletide festivities on the grounds that they didn't square with the Bible's teachings, in 1659 the founders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony banned the holiday; it wasn't reinstated until 1681. For a war often blamed on secular terrorists, these are some pious roots. 

Since then, the perpetrators of the struggle against Santa have taken on many forms; just about every major bugbear on the radical left has at one point or another been blamed. In the beginning, of course, there were the Jews. "The whole record of the Jewish opposition to Christmas...shows the venom and directness of [their] attack," wrote automaker and notorious anti-Semite Henry Ford in 1921, citing efforts around the country to silence Christmas carolers and suppress demonstrations of religion in schools. By the 1950s, blame had shifted to the Communists. "One of the techniques now being applied by the Reds to weaken the pillar of religion in our country is the drive to take Christ out of Christmas," screamed a 1959 pamphlet (the overpunctuated title: "There Goes Christmas?!") issued by the newly-formed John Birch Society. The society also assailed United Nations "fanatics" who were trying to "poison the 1959 Christmas season with their high-pressure propaganda." 

Before it became part of mainstream conservative punditry, the leading proponent of the War on Christmas was a former magazine writer and editor named Peter Brimelow. A virulent anti-immigration crusader whose views were considered extreme by mainstream conservative journals like National Review, Brimelow founded a website called VDare.com that soon was at the forefront of the fight to sanctify Christmas cheer. Beginning in 1999, Brimelow ran a competition to spotlight offenders in the War on Christmas. The inaugural villain was the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which earned the dubious honor for hosting a holiday party dubbed "A Celebration of Holiday Traditions." The following year, Amazon.com became a target of Brimelow's wrath for subjecting consumers to the nondenominational greeting "Happy Holidays!" (In 2003, VDare was classified as a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center for providing a platform for white nationalist viewpoints.) 

Outrage over alleged restrictions against Christmas emblems imposed by stores like Wal-Mart and Sears led conservative mouthpieces like Sean Hannity and O'Reilly to take up the cause in earnest. "I think it's all part of the secular progressive agenda...to get Christianity and spirituality out of the public square," O'Reilly said on Nov. 18, 2005. "Because if you look at what happened in Western Europe and Canada, if you can get religion out, then you can pass secular progressive programs like legalization of narcotics, euthanasia, abortion at will, gay marriage." In an interview with National Review, Gibson lay blame for the phenomenon at the feet of the American Civil Liberties Union: "Generally there is an ACLU component to the Christmas controversy." 

So there you have it: the war on Christmas is a godless plot cooked up by a cabal of latte-sipping liberals, greedy retail tycoons, bearded ACLU communists and Ban Ki-moon acolytes who secretly gather in Bay Area synagogues to smoke pot, deface Bibles and perform abortions. 

This was a ridiculous controversy in 1659, and it remains a ridiculous controversy today. 

It is used by manipulative conservatives to enrage the low information Christians into believing that they are being persecuted.  Only those raised to believe that they are martyrs would fall for it, but churches are overflowing with those who believe that very thing.

Prepare and fertilize the soil when they are young, and you can plant whatever seeds you want to as they grow older, and the paranoia and sense of persecution will grow right along with them.

17 comments:

  1. Randall2:40 AM

    Look, Mr. O'Reilly, Ms. Palin, et. al. ...
    If you want to put up the BIGGEST, most expensive, most lavish nativity scene on your front lawn - go ahead - absolutely no one is stopping you.

    But I know - and I think you do too - that isn't the case.

    You want to put up the trappings of YOUR RELIGION
    on MY front lawn.
    And THAT's the problem.

    "PUBLIC" property is just that: public.
    That means we all own it - those of you that are Xtians as well as the rest of us (and there are many of us).

    But you - being a bully - aren't satisfied that you CAN build great big displays of your religion on your church's property, your business's property, even property you own jointly with other Xtians, as well as your own private property.
    But that just isn't enough for you...

    You selfishly want to ALSO claim exclusive religious rights to property owned by the rest of us.

    And I'm pretty sure you know that, too.
    After all, it really is pretty basic.
    We all learn this kind of thing in Kindergarden for goodness' sake.

    So what it boils down to is -
    you're fooling no one:
    you're just being a big old selfish asshole.

    So, since you ARE fooling aboslutely NO ONE,
    (except maybe each other)
    why don't you just stop it?

    Merry Christmas.


    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:11 AM

    People like Sarah Palin do not know that many of the early Protestant religious groups, like the Pilgrims and the Quakers, did not believe in celebrating Christmas. They thought that the celebrations of their countrymen were too raucous and too libertine. Interesting how Sarah Palin wants to embrace the commercialism of the holiday; I don't think that she understands how it should be celebrated in one's heart though.
    Beaglemom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sally in MI5:59 AM

      She doesn't have a heart, so she has to 'celebrate' with her vile lies. I'm sure Baby Jesus is proud of her, don't you think?

      Delete
  3. PalinsHoax4:26 AM

    Thank you, Gryphen, for showing us a nobler way of how to respond when someone greets us, whether during the holiday season or during any time of the year and occasion !

    Namaste

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice chart, Jesse. I stole it right away...in the spirit of Christmas, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Love that poster. Embodies more of the Christmas spirit, "Heart of Christmas", reason for the season, and so on, than all of the nasty, sniping, vindictive, petty, bitter, angry words in Palin's "book" put together, as well as every whiny money-grubbing ratings grab uttered by Hannity and O'Reilly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous5:56 AM

    I, an Atheist, have no problem wishing people a Merry Christmas. Unfortunately, due to the War, I have begun to get really odd reactions from folks when I do say Merry Christmas. It's as if the warriors have turned the phrase into "fighting words". Palin, O'Reilly and their followers have ruined the beauty of Christmas-time by making it all into a stupid controversy.
    So, how can we get back to Peace on Earth, Goodwill towards Mankind?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leland7:31 AM

      "So, how can we get back to Peace on Earth, Goodwill towards Mankind?"

      Let's see how long a list we can generate.

      I vote for throwing SP, BOR and SH out of the country!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:56 AM

      Refuse to let SP, BOR and SH impinge on our serenity. Laugh at them whenever possible, jeer politely, and don't let them turn us into the negative SOB's they are.
      Oh, and smile as often as possible

      Delete
  7. Thanks for the great flowchart! It's the perfect rebuttal to my normally normal, but temporarily insane, FB friends & family members who suddenly see a conspiracy where non exists.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:06 AM

    Did everyone remember to wish eachother Happy VJ Day yesterday?
    Did we enjoy St. Nicholas Day two days ago?
    Will we offer Solstice Greetings to anyone as it approaches?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leland8:29 AM

      VJ-Day is in August. Yesterday was Pearl Harbor Day!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:00 AM

      Oh, and Happy Feast of the Immaculate Conception, everyone! BTW, today's feast day does NOT celebrate the Catholic belief that Mary gave virgin birth to Jesus. It celebrates the belief that Mary was conceived without the stain of original sin on her soul, which the Catholic Church teaches everyone else is born with. It was lack of sin, not lack of sex, which made Mary "immaculate."

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:08 AM

      oops! Happy Pearl Harbor Day to you, too!
      and a very merry unbirthday to me and you, also, too

      Delete
  9. Anonymous8:59 AM

    Exactly. What an absurdity this whole thing is, that people get upset over the exact words used to wish someone well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous9:31 AM

    The angriest people are actually the holier than thou people like Palin.
    People like Palin and Limbaugh and their cults who cloak themselves in " Christianity " and then spew anger and vitriol and hatred non stop.
    If you have to brag about how good and decent you are like Palin and Limbaugh often do ,
    it's a pretty good bet that you are neither.
    BTW- Has Palin said anything about Nelson Mandela's passing ?
    She must be so conflicted.
    Limbaugh reacted as one would expect from the teaparty bigots.
    But, when Cruz and Gingrich posted positive comments, they were excoriated by the " loving Christians " on FB.
    Palin is a coward , so she'll probably stay silent .

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anita Winecooler5:29 PM

    The world would be a much nicer place to live if everyone understood the simple honesty of that flow chart.

    I remember years ago, my son made friends with a kid up the street and his mother marched her uber Christian bigoted butt to my front door and "informed" me that she doesn't condone nor will allow her son to play with my son because they don't share a common value. I was always one who let the kids work things out for themselves, usually whatever they fought over is eventually forgotten, and they remain friends.
    This time I just couldn't abide by this woman's ignorance, and asked her which values in particular my son didn't possess that would be SOOOO offensive. The answer was "He's a godless heathen and a bad influence, but if only you all accept Jesus as your personal savior......" I closed the door gently and just shrugged my shoulders.

    They've been best friends through grade school and high school. I guess what this taught me was that if something is meant to be, it'll happen DESPITE religion, a made up war, etc etc etc. Nothing can break the human spirit.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.