Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has some choice words to day about Sarah Palin's free speech hypocrisy.

Courtesy of Rolling Stone: 

Sarah Palin, ably staying in character in her new role as a professional media ambulance-chaser, was one of the first to rush to Robertson's defense. She posted a photo of herself with the Robertsons and tweeted the following: 

"Free speech is endangered species; those "intolerants" hatin' & taking on Duck Dynasty patriarch for voicing personal opinion take on us all" 

Conservatives have always had trouble grasping the difference between public censorship and private enterprise. With a few exceptions, like whistleblower laws and National Labor Relations Board protections against being fired for off-site discussions about work conditions (exceptions that, in almost every case, conservatives bitterly opposed), there is no legal or constitutional right to free speech on private property. 

You can be fired for calling your boss a dick, and you can just as easily be let go by a profit-seeking media company for imperiling its relationship with advertisers. And incidentally, this is the way true conservatives, and especially true hardcore speech advocates, have always wanted it. 

Could you imagine the uproar if someone passed a law saying that Martin Bashir couldn't be bounced from a broadcast job for saying Sarah Palin was a good candidate to have feces shoved in her mouth? Now that would be censorship. 

Remember, nobody heard a peep from Sarah Palin about free speech after that episode.

Yeah funny how tight lipped she was about free speech and the 1st Amendment while MSNBC was flooded with calls for Bashir's head. 

Palin's inability to grasp the difference between a first-amendment violation and corporate calculation is amazing because she literally just published a book on the subject. Her newly-released War-on-Christmas diatribe, Good Tidings and Great Joy, is all about the efforts by evil Jesus-hating atheists to sue the Christmas out of our public lives. (It's one of the funniest things ever written, by the way. I would write a review but I don't think I could make it all the way to the end without a cardiac episode). 

In writing this new book, Palin presumably spent the whole of the last year or so staring right at the issue of what may be said on private property versus what may be said on public property – the difference between putting up a nativity scene in front of a courthouse and putting one up on your lawn. Yet as this latest controversy shows, the underlying issue is still a total blur to her. 

Of course, Palin has a long history of getting things not just wrong, but exactly wrong. In the book, for instance, she describes buying her husband Todd "a nice, needed powerful gun" in the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings and resulting anti-gun fervor. She described this warm act as a "small act of civil disobedience" that was "fun." 

Essential EVERYTHING that Sarah Palin says, tweets, or has written for her in a book or on Facebook, is in some way objectionable. However since she has no actual employer to kick her to the curb, there is rarely a noticeable consequence.

Though considering the dismal sales of this most recent book perhaps she finally is being censored by the only people left who even care about what she says, the rapidly dwindling, pathetically slow learning, Palin-bots.

Sarah Palin will NEVER stop saying ignorant things. The only question is how soon will she be saying them to an empty room?