Courtesy TPM:
A Missouri lawmaker has proposed what ranks among the most anti-evolution legislation in recent years, which would require schools to notify parents if "the theory of evolution by natural selection" was being taught at their child's school and give them the opportunity to opt out of the class.
The bill had its first public hearing Thursday after being introduced in late January.
State Rep. Rick Brattin (R), who sponsored the bill, told a local TV station last week that teaching only evolution in school was "indoctrination."
"Our schools basically mandate that we teach one side," he told KCTV. "It is an indoctrination because it is not objective approach."
And as troubling as this is for Missouri schoolchildren, it is even more troubling that similar laws are being introduced all along the Bible Belt.
The bill is one of several anti-evolution proposals that have already appeared in statehouses across the country; the Daily Beast counted four states (Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Virginia) where legislation had been introduced. The proposals would allow for a range of approaches to evolution, from presenting a "debate" over evolution versus creationism to requiring that local school boards allow intelligent design to be included in biology courses.
However Missouri is still in the forefront of sabotaging their children's education.
But Brattin's bill appears to be the only one, and perhaps the first, that would mandate parental notification that their children were being taught evolution in school, the curriculum that most mainstream science teacher groups endorse.
“It’s an absolute infringement on people’s beliefs,” Brattin told the Kansas City Star of requiring schools to teach evolution. “What’s being taught is just as much faith and, you know, just as much pulled out of the air as, say, any religion."
As scientific investigation provides more and more answers about our origins, and the origins of out planet and universe, we are seeing what can only be defined as a panicked response to somehow preserve the teachings of religion by protecting children from the influence of critical thinking.
In year passed, as many of you here have pointed out, there was NOT this great movement to attack science and it was felt that religion and science could live together in harmony.
However today with the climate change debate, the rise in non-theism, and new discoveries being made, seemingly on a daily basis, that disprove much of what is written in the Bible, there has arisen an orchestrated attack on Evolution specifically, and science in general, that threatens to undermine the very future of our country.
You know what sometimes is not made clear in discussions about Evolution is that human being benefited greatly from its discovery in way that many simply do not understand.
It provided a framework and model that has been used in zoology, botany, biology, medicine, and many other scientific disciplines with great success.
Without Darwin that flu shot we all rush to get every year may not be nearly as effective, we may never have mapped the human genome (Which by the way shows evidence of the continued evolution of humans.), or today it is even giving us new insights into dealing with Alzheimer's.
It is NOT important that every public school pupil have a degree in Evolutionary Biology, but it IS important that they recognize its importance and do not disregard it out of hand simply because it does not comport with their religious beliefs, whatever form those might take.
It may be important to note that there are scientists working in the field of Evolution who come from a background in Hinduism, Buddhism, Catholism, Islamism, Protestantism, and virtually every other religious discipline.
But when they put on their lab coats, they are scientists. And scientists deal with facts.
And so should American school children.
IF we teach Creationism alongside Evolution
ReplyDeleteshould we also teach...
- astrology alongside astronomy?
- demon-theory alongside germ-theory?
- Earth-centric alongside helio-centric solar system? (They should never have released Galileo from his imprisonment!)
- flat-earth alongside ovoid-shaped planets?
- expanding galaxies and planetary orbits along with "heavenly bodies stuck in an immovable firmament"?
- Virgin- or human- or burnt- sacrifice alongside agronomy?
- Faith-healing and prayer alongside medicine and surgery?
Maybe we should use the Roman "XX + VII - XIV = XIII" rather than the Arabic (Islamic!) "20 + 7 - 14 = 13" numerals?
WHY do I see so many "devout Christians", so many "True Believers" wearing glasses rather than praying for perfect sight?
WHY are so many "Christians" willing to fight and kill, so willing to hate over the details of the stories in their Bible
rather than embrace the values that Jesus taught:
don't lie
don't steal
don't cheat
don't hate
don't be greedy
Why don't they pass another law mandating that schools teach children the earth is flat.
ReplyDeleteIntelligent design (formerly known as creationism) doesn't pass muster with the facts. The world didn't just pop up 6,000 years ago. If it did, we would not be finding fossils much older than that. We would not have dinosaur bones or oil for that matter.
It is ridiculous that this conversation is even happening in 2014. But my money is on the kids. With technology, kids are finding out there is a big old world out there that goes well beyond the bible belt. And children all have a rebellious stage when they hit their teens. Hopefully, there will be a rematch of the "Scopes" trial at many dinner tables across the South.
And of course, there is the argument that taxpayer dollars should not be used to promote religion. But the same folks who yell CONSTITUTION against any Democrat are the same one who conveniently forget the portions of the First Amendment to that document.
Caroll, while I sincerely hope your praise concerning the power of technology to aid the children of these idiots is correct, I'm afraid you are missing a critical part of the problem. These kids are BRAINWASHED from birth into this ridiculous "thought process". The overwhelming majority of them will never break away from it primarily because they won't get a chance to be exposed to it except through that technology. (It is FAR more easy for someone to break this kind of indoctrination with another human being helping them. This is one of the reasons there is such a huge push to teach creationism and argue AGAINST evolution!) And don't forget that same technology can be blocked from the kids' computers through parental controls.
DeleteWhile the PARENTS may not be smart enough or educated enough to block things themselves, there are thousands of people down here perfectly willing to do it for them.
I'm sorry to say that you probably have absolutely NO idea of how powerful these idiots are down here.
And they have no compunctions about beating any kind of disagreement out of the kids, either! (When my father tried that with me, it only made me mad, but we were transferred down here and I wasn't exposed to this crap from birth.)
It's easy. If you keep people stupid, you can easily keep them scared, and scared people vote Republican.
ReplyDeleteNice drawing of Todd ... when did he grow his beard?
ReplyDeleteWhen any student takes a class and deviates from 'general' science standards (as much as I hear education professionals complain about it, I guess that would be one good thing about Common Core?), it should be noted on their transcripts- "student opted out of evolution portion of science classes." Colleges should know that these students haven't applied themselves like their fellow students have.
ReplyDeleteOn that note, do these students have other assignments to make up the points? How do they get away with doing less work than others? I guess they're just *special snowflakes*?
Interesting point. How many lab hours did the student do involving work to understand "intelligent design"? And how many lab hours were skipped to avoid doing science? Colleges and employers need info on students to make good selections for college or employment.
DeleteIf my child was being taught "intelligent design" in science class, I would NOT opt out. A child and subsequent adult has to hear and combat nonsense. It's very good training to debate.
ReplyDeleteMy 1950s-60s schooling had some pretty outrageous content. My parents taught me to debate the teachers that were reasonably non-vindictive and to silently endure the teachers that would punish independent thinking. Learning to pick the battles was really useful. And successfully undermining some idiot teaching with subversive activity was both entertaining and instructive. My 5 year war on the infallibility of the pope is a fond memory of elementary school.
7:16, if MY child was ever even TOLD anything about that crap I would sue. Period. I would take on the teacher and the school board and the state if I had to. It is patently illegal and needs to be eradicated.
DeleteI was slammed by one of these idiots when I was in high school in the early sixties. She raised hell about a book I was carrying. (CARRYING, mind you, not reading at the time!) It was called the Naked Ape, written by Desmond Morris. She started screaming at me about it and slamming me for even THINKING about reading "such trash"!
When she failed to even consider that she had no right to even comment on what I read, I very quietly got up and walked out - with my books - and went straight to the Principal's office to file a complaint. He listened very closely to my complaint then walked me back to the class, whereupon he asked the teacher for her side. When she admitted she had reacted that way (she had to, the rest of the students were angry with her as well), she was summarily ordered out of the class room and told to go home. The matter was taken before the school board, and she was fired.
We need to start doing that every time they try this shit. And if that means we file in federal court each time, so be it. Especially since it appears the Justice department isn't going to do anything about it!
By the way, I was 15 at the time. I did my best to remain calm and polite - which only served to tick her off even more.
I have NEVER suffered fools or idiots.
If they allow this we want to opt out of creationism, and prayers at school. We want to opt out of any kind of programs to teach children what to do when a gun killer comes to school. We want to opt out of paying for wars.
ReplyDeleteGAHH!!! What *is* it with the south and the mid-west? Are they all a bunch of lobotomized freaks?!?
ReplyDeleteThe more I think about it. They have church's, Sunday schools, and homes where they can learn all about creationism if they want to . Public schools should expand the mind and hearts of children.
ReplyDeleteThat has always been the way it worked in the past.
DeleteWhy is it so hard to understand that evolution is a scientific model that is shaped to conform to all empirical evidence? That's all it is. There are gaps in the theory because people are not omnipotent--and there is no reason to fill the gaps with baseless assumptions or random guesses.
ReplyDelete10:13, I believe part of the problem lies in simple basics. They probably couldn't even pronounce "Empirical" let alone understand what it means!
DeleteIf they really wanted to teach alternatives to evolution, they would have to teach the creation theories of all religions, not just Christianity. But since they are not presenting it in this way, it shows how politicians are just trying to push the Christian agenda.
ReplyDeleteThey are (in my book) deliberately misunderstanding the fact that while the majority of the PEOPLE who helped create the country - at the time - may have been christian, the COUNTRY is NOT christian. And until they have that crammed down their throats, they will never allow that.
DeleteYou miss it and it shows up in an exam, it's on you for "opting out". No shoes, No shirt, No attendance, you fail, no exceptions.
ReplyDelete“What’s being taught is just as much faith and, you know, just as much pulled out of the air as, say, any religion."
ReplyDeleteScience is not faith, it is facts... religion is pulled out of the air.