Monday, July 07, 2014

Open Carry demonstration in Virginia attracts two.

Courtesy of the Roanoke Times:  

More than 300 people were invited on Facebook to walk down Cary Street on July Fourth with handguns, rifles and other so-called “long guns” proudly displayed. 

Two showed up — and they were the organizers of the midday event in the family-oriented Carytown shopping district. 

“I don’t know why,” said organizer Jason Spitzer, 29, when asked to explain the low turnout for what he described as an Independence Day demonstration to “spread Constitutional awareness” of Americans’ Second Amendment right to bear arms. 

“But even if nobody came I’d still walk,” the Chesterfield County steel mill worker said, holding a large American flag in his hands, with a rifle slung over his shoulder and a holstered handgun on his hip. “It’s the Fourth of July and I love my country.”

Yes and loving your country inspires you to terrify its residents during a holiday?

The fact that nobody except these two nitwits felt that the demonstration was a good idea is nice to know, but exactly what the hell is the motivation for these people?

Salon thinks they have the answer:  

Meditate for a moment on the notion of making people comfortable with the sight of guns in public via habituating them to the instinctual terror of seeing one, and two issues immediately arise: firstly, it resembles other illogical forms of activism in which the goal is wholly incompatible with the means, such as murdering abortion providers to achieve a culture of life; secondly, it is, above all else, an effort at achieving control. 

After all, it isn’t as though the advocates of openly carrying guns in public are unaware of the effect they have on the public; they are usually met with resistance precisely because they terrify innocent bystanders, while their constitutional concerns – such as they are – tend to be swallowed up by the technique of their “protest.” It is rather the case that they claim the period of fear they deliberately inspire is one they intend to force the public to endure until they are no longer met with resistance. If their narrative is to be thought genuine, then their intention is literally to forcibly habituate the public to the idea that they are constantly in danger, and that there is little that can be done about it. Or, as Open Carry Texas puts it, the goal is to: “condition Texans to feel safe around law-abiding citizens that choose to carry [guns].” Of course, the fact that they are willing to inflict terror to achieve, bizarrely, a sense of safety demonstrates that people feeling safe isn’t really a goal here; otherwise pictures of guns or speech campaigns would surely suffice. The fear is, in other words, intentional.

In other words these folks are attempting to terrify us with their guns into also carrying guns so that we will not longer feel defenseless against their guns.

So what we are dealing with are bullies.

Bullies who have no problem terrifying you, and putting you in fear for the lives of your children, simply so that they can intimidate you into buying and carrying a gun of your own to put your mind at ease.

However this will undoubtedly fail, because most of us are far too civilized to believe that having more guns around increases our safety.

Especially in the hands of individuals who believe in using fear tactics to get their message out.

19 comments:

  1. Sally in MI12:08 PM

    We were at a family reunion over the weekend, and all of these folks are rabid Republicans and Fox viewers. They got into a discussion about gun safety, and they were ALL against being armed at home, as more often than not, a family member is shot dead. So if this Obama-hating, flag-waving crew doesn't agree with these jokers, I'm not sure who does. Like old Clif, this latest attempt to force people to accept government overthrow will fail. Deep down, Americans value their safety and health.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:40 AM

      Anon at 3:00 pm. I just read the article on line. While the shooting should never have happened (eight bullets to subdue a 13 year old?), it was a county sheriff's deputy who did the shooting, not a federal agent of any kind. Locals tend to be more gun happy than federal agents. That's why no one was shot at the Bundy Ranch. Now had local deputies been threatened by a bunch of 13-year olds with pellet guns, who knows what might have happened.
      Beaglemom

      Delete
  2. Anonymous12:21 PM

    They don't want freedom to bear arms to protect us that don't take advantage of this right, they can't wait to lord their power over th with their guns, in a libertarian paradise.

    ReplyDelete
  3. London Bridges12:59 PM

    I noticed that Hobby Lobby appears to be spending big money on advertising a sale via the InterNet. Hopefully, the boycotts hit them very hard.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous1:05 PM

    Everywhere I look it's , "sarah palin is a hoot to be around." Sounds like a fun lady

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:34 PM

      Sarah Palin is a hoot alright!
      Much fun to laugh at her and her idiotic mouth. She probably thinks people are laughing with her but most are laughing AT her.
      I wish she would go on "The View". Whoopi would make mince meat of her in about 5 minutes.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:21 PM

      Why bring up the piece of white trash from Alaska in this section of the blog? No one was even discussing her! A rather nice treat!

      And, by the by - Alaskans do NOT think her a hoot to be around! She has no quick laughter or sense of humor, is not easily relaxed with easy smiles, no outgoing laughter or a reputation for joking around.

      But, if you think she is a total joke and you laugh at that about her - perhaps then she is a hoot? This is directed at 1:05 p,m.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous1:14 PM

    These guys are using the guns as a penis substitute. They need to strut their stuff and are too timid to whip out their dicks in public.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:42 PM

      That's because they know most people don't carry microscopes with them.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:33 PM

      +1000000 @3:42

      Delete
  6. Anonymous1:46 PM

    http://www.loveadvice.com/Articles/Gennifer.HTM

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous2:10 PM

    So now all the ladies of Craytown know who has the smallest penises there.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous2:13 PM

    I still think that our rights to live our lives peacefully and without the fear of gun-wielding idiots trumps their right to bear arms whenever and wherever they choose. No one has the right to intimidate others and walking around armed to the teeth is intimidation.
    Beaglemom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Boscoe3:47 PM

      It's terrorism, really. How can you tell if it's a lunatic out to live some psychotic murder fantasy or a dumb-ass "patriot"? Until now, the gun was the dead giveaway.

      So, either we take the ammo fetishist's "rights" away (not sure where in the constitution it says idiots have the individual right to carry their guns anywhere they want, I only remember something about the right of "well organized militias" to be armed) or we live in a world where we ALL have no choice but to go out armed because there is, in fact, no way to determine whether it's a good guy or a bad guy with a gun until it's too late.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous2:54 PM

    It HAS to be backed and funded by those that don't take money from the nra. That is the reason so many politicians aren't getting up to fight this insanity, they have no balls.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous4:44 PM

    The article isn't suggesting that the public will think it needs to buy guns. Rather, it is saying that the ammosexuals parading with their guns in public do intend to make people afraid at first, but their hope is that after suffering fear a few times, seeing a person with a gun in public will no longer startle or threaten anyone - it will seem normal. Don't be afraid. Just hand over your lunch money now and no one will get hurt. No problem.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anita Winecooler6:23 PM

    Even two of those guns can take out innocent lives, one is one too many. They may gloat that they're "patriotic", but I guarantee if they re instate the draft, these two chicken shits will high tail it to Canada.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous9:15 PM

    Ammosexuals are primarily a bunch of male children with debilitating self esteem issues.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous8:15 AM

    Treasonous Ex American Party?

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.