Nancy French, pretending to be Bristol Palin, brags about all of the attention that the post she wrote, as Bristol Palin, received from journalists who thought she was Bristol Palin.

"Don't trust you eyes, I'm really Bristol!"

Courtesy of Brancy's blog:  

It seems it was a big deal that I poked fun of Miley Cyrus’ interview with Paper Magazine. Apparently, calling out those who claim to be tolerant when they are actually being condescending and contradictory is breaking news. I admit I was pleasantly surprised at how viral my post went! 

But the most hilarious article covering the so-called “Bristol versus Miley” thing was written by the Washington Post’s Jessica Contrera. 

French then goes on to feature a portion of what Contrera wrote for the Post: 

In the pre-Internet days, Palin would have needed to be a guest on a talk show or the subject of an interview for her anti-Miley message to reach anyone… But this is 2015, where celebrities don’t need media middlemen or nudity to start trending on Facebook. Heck, they don’t even need a whole blog post. If Cyrus tweets back a response, it won’t go unwritten about. 

This is America: Palin is entitled to her opinion and Miley is entitled to bare all. 

The rest of us are entitled to… try to avoid hearing all about it. Good luck with that.

Of course Contrera's point was that in this internet age even pseudo celebrities can garner attention without much effort or much risk. Unlike Cyrus who exposed not just her body for Paper magazine, but also honest feelings about things that she knew would create controversy.

To which French gleefully responds with:  

Um… so let’s just get this straight. This writer writes an article lamenting the fact that… other writers are covering the same topic? She apparently thinks it’s absolutely absurd that so many publications are talking about the so-called “Bristol versus Miley” thing that she just had to add join in with her feelings about the “Bristol versus Miley” thing? 

Here’s the real truth. The Washington Post is lamenting that there are no gatekeepers anymore. With the advents of social media and blogs — even the icky “ultra Christians ones” like this Patheos one! — newspapers are no longer the arbiters of the cultural conversation. 

Deal with it, Washington Post!

"Deal with it?" You know French really has this poison Palin pen thing down pat. 

And look how thrilled she is that she was noticed by the Washington Post of all publications. You can almost imagine the breathless e-mails that went back and forth between French and her employer.

And speaking of truth, HERE'S the truth.

That employer is NOT this person....

...which would be bad enough.

It is THIS person....

...which is much, much worse.

And the reason that it is worse is because Sarah Palin has usurped her daughter's identity in order to push her hateful agenda while absolving herself from any direct blame. And by doing so is damaging Bristol's name, before she even has the chance to decide who she wants to be in life.

In other words Sarah is like the bully that grabs your wrists and hits you with your own hands while saying "Why are you hitting yourself, huh, why are you hitting yourself?"

Bristol may not fully understand it yet, but the vicious attacks and hateful words written on "her" blog will follow her the rest of her life, regardless if she wrote them herself or not.

And that brings me to Nancy French, who is, if possible, even MORE pathetic.

Here is a published author joyfully reporting on attention that a blog post she wrote, while posing as the daughter of a has been politician, has received from a publication that would NEVER have even noticed it if it did not have the name "Palin" attached to it.

This is a level of pathetic that almost boggles the mind.