.@BernieSanders is annoyed https://t.co/2uyOmzwGht pic.twitter.com/nxZ4IS5oby
— POLITICO (@politico) January 18, 2016This was his response:
"That question annoys me," Sanders said.
Sanders complained that the media put too much pressure on him to attack the former secretary of state.
"I can't walk down the street — Secretary Clinton knows this — without being told how much I have to attack Secretary Clinton. Want me to get on the front page of the paper? I make some vicious attack. I have avoided doing that, trying to run an issue-oriented campaign."
"You didn't have to answer it that way, though," Mitchell said, referring to Sanders answer about Bill Clinton's indiscretions.
"Then if I don't answer it, that's another front-page story," Sanders responded.
He added: "His behavior was deplorable. Have I ever said one word about that issue? No I have not. I'm going to debate Secretary Clinton and Governor O'Malley on the issues facing the American people, not Bill Clinton's behavior."
I think my favorite part of his response was Hillary nodding her head in agreement to everything he said.
Yes, we know that Bill did a bad thing.
We also know that it was over twenty years ago and everybody else has moved on.
Well everybody except for the conservatives who are desperate to use it as an attack against Hillary that is.
Good answer, Bernie!
ReplyDeleteIt just shows the stupidity of conservatives that they would try and campaign against Bill Clinton.
ReplyDeleteBill Clinton would walk it into the White House if he were allowed to run again.
And if they think they can make Hillary look bad for standing by her man...... then they have to hide their own multiple divorces, because if there's one thing conservatives do a lot, it's divorce- they have no higher regard for marriage than Bill Clinton did two decades ago.
Bring it on.
He is an amazing politician. They are fools to go against him.
DeleteTrump is the worst offender, pulling plugs of Ivanka's hair out and raping her. Simply because he did not like the hair plug job done on him by a Doctor recommended by Ivanka. Hence the Orangutan hairstyle.
DeleteReally? I had no idea that was what happened.
DeleteYou mean Ivana.
DeleteIvanka is their daughter, the one he says he'd be dating if she wasn't his offspring.
AFAIC, there is no time limit on being disgusted by reprehensible behavior. Bill Clinton will always disgust me for putting his presidency at risk just so he could get his rocks off - and then lying about it under oath. Fucking self-indulgent chickenshit asshole! Too cowardly to claim his own behavior, because he knew it was low down and crass! I don't give a shit that he is a Democrat. I will always call him out on what he did.
ReplyDeleteFor different reasons, George Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Richard Nixon will also always disgust me. She's not a former president, but Sarah Palin will also always disgust me. These people are are fucking frauds and liars.
@12:29 Why don't you tell us how you really feel?
DeleteI don't recall anyone holding GW responsible for Laura running over and killing a man.
ReplyDeleteBingo!
DeleteShe didn't run over and kill a man. She did, at the age of 17, run thru a stop sign causing an accident, killing a 17yo young man that was a friend of hers.
DeleteThere has never been any cover up of this accident, which happened long before GW. It is well known she was at fault, and she has never disputed this or tried to place blame elsewhere. She has said that she carries deep remorse about the accident to this day.
I wonder if the accident was because of Laura's alcoholism or was actually the impetus...
Delete...anyone know?
It is reported that alcohol was not a factor, and that nobody was drinking in either car, testing was not performed.
DeleteIs Laura Bush running for president 1:22?
1:31 - no, but neither is Bill Clinton. Duh.
DeleteAnd neither is Bill.
DeleteShe killed her ex HS boyfriend in that accident. Many in the area think Laura hit him on purpose. Another case of "affluenza" in Texas.
DeleteAnd yes, there was a HUGE coverup involving the killing of the boy.
How was there this 'huge' cover up 2:38?
DeleteEveryone knew she was at fault. She admitted she was at fault. There was never any question. Cover up?
Was she charged with vehicular manslaughter? If not, the crime was covered up. I wonder how the boy's parents felt about that.
DeleteYou don't get charged with vehicular manslaughter every time someone dies in an accident 6:53. DUHHHHHHHHHH. That is why they are called accidents.
DeleteThe only crime is your general ignorance and stupidity, and there is no covering that up, it is too much.
"You don't get charged with vehicular manslaughter every time someone dies in an accident 6:53. DUHHHHHHHHHH. That is why they are called accidents."
DeleteUh you are supposed to get charged when your reckless actions cause the "accident" She RAN a stop sign and wasn't so much as ticketed for it. That's not how it's supposed to work. So if anyone here is ignorant it is you Anon 7:59
Still trying to package Bill's actions as simple infidelity vs sexual assault eh?
ReplyDeleteAnd still trying to sell the Hillary didn't know, and yet stood by her man garbage too eh?
Don't worry 12:20, everyone will be bringing it should Hillary win the primaries.
She has much to answer for with regards to the threats and character assassinations she helped orchestrate against Bill's stable of victims.
12:35 PM BRING IT,BITCH!
DeleteSo now you are accusing Bill of rape, please show us your proof or do you have him mixed up with Bill Crosby?
DeleteI'm not accusing 1:22, his victims are, much like Cosby's victims are.
DeleteAnonymous1:28 PM Victims? Can you name them? I know of one woman who has made that claim, now your claiming plural women have? Proof please?
DeleteIs this Linda Tripp responding? Did the warm weather hurt dec income in your Christmas shop in Middleburg, VA? Need more plastic surgery?
DeleteWe all accuse Clinton of these infidelties, but remember when the accusations went flying at Bush about his addictions? Look what happened to those folks. There were several "suicides" floating around. In fact Bush 41 was sent to China so he could survive Wategate. He was smack in the middle of Watergate and got away clean. Sr and Jr Bush are both horrible alcoholics.
10cats
I do believe that Bill pulled it out and that woman didn't expect to see and didn't want to "kiss it"
DeleteI also believe that he has made some unwelcome advances.
I don't believe he raped anyone and unlike Cosby, Clinton prefers women present during sex as opposed to Cosby who prefers corpses.
Anonymous victims because slander?
DeleteAnonymous victims?
DeleteI didn't realize they repealed the 22nd Amendment and Bill Clinton was running for President again. I also didn't realize it was 20 years ago.
DeleteIf we truly want to live in an exceptional country, we need to demand th removal of bullying slander sites like tmz, radar, wonkette, and such things. The low lives who work for them drag down the moral compass because they're given attention (if only a smigeon) and compensated for being lying scumbags who make money off fabricated drama of movie stars. No righteous person will ever link to them or legitimize writers like that. Our trashy slander media is the thing that divides us from Canada, who doesn't have massive media problems.
ReplyDeleteSarah Palin and Bristol Palin sell their photos to those rags, excepting wonkette. Why do you think that TMZ and RADAR are always the first to post a Palin generated propaganda piece?
DeleteI love Wonkette. The people who founded it know politics and AM Cox is a well respected journalist and pundit who's often on TV. She left the mag a while ago, but the Wonk has been in capable hands. They know DC inside and out. They have a lot of fun mocking hypocrisy and enjoying irony and just being smart-trashy as they report on what is really going on. Wonkette is a completely different mag from the gossip mags listed.
DeleteWonkette is on your list? hahaha All they do is call attention to the absurdity. Damn them to hell for being smart and calling a spade a spade!
DeleteGryph has it right.
DeleteAnd, man, did Fiorina look like an ass last week when she made her comment about Hillary and Bill in terms of how Fiorina does enjoy spending time with her husband. What a calculated piece of ugly meanness. But then the coward couldn't face up to what she'd said when she went on Hardball and Chris Matthews repeatedly tried getting her to explain what she meant.
But not Breitbart right? Snort.
DeleteWonkette is awesome and nothing like TMZ or Radar.
DeleteBut please go over to Wonkette and complain in their comments section. Then they can post your comment and make fun of you (perhaps they've done this in the past, huh?).
And Fiorina's heavily mascara-covered eyelashes kept sticking together. haha Matthews did badger her into giving him an answer. I thought she was going to stomp off after he finally cut her off.
DeletePeople that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
ReplyDeleteTrump had an affair while married and now it remains to be seen if Canadian Cruz is illegitimate.
I would prefer that they concentrate on the issues, but republicans are unable to do that since they don't have any ideas or don't understand the issues.
Since they leave us no choice, we should look at their criminal behavior. Cruz committed campaign finance fraud and Trump hires illegal aliens.
People also forget that Marla Maples gave birth to her daughter with Trump out-of-wedlock. He married her after Tiffany was born. Such good Christian Values.
DeleteInread he was trysting with one of the new trophies in a church.
DeleteBernie has integrity and character. I love this about him. I also found the debate so refreshing. They discussed detailed issues in a civilized personable intelligent manner. What a contrast to that other debate.
ReplyDeleteSurprised at Andrea Mitchell asking that question. It is water under the bridge, Hillary has obviously forgiven Bill, and they move on.
Spot on. The indiscretions are theirs and theirs alone to deal with. Hillary showed tremendous character; I doubt their fridge is dented from canned goods free for alls.
DeleteI've always believed that Bill and Hillary Clinton had a partnership and an understanding that worked for them. My beef with Bill (and I imagine, Hillary's beef with him as well) is that he wasn't discrete enough and couldn't keep it in his pants for the eight years he was president. It looked bad for him and for her and exposed him (pun not intended) to a lot of criticism and ultimately resulted to him lying about his behavior.
DeleteBut, bottom line, who are we to question what another couple does within or outside of their marriage?
When Hillary Clinton starts running on a platform of traditional family values, then we can criticize her about what goes on in between her and her husband.
2:28 PM
DeleteAmen. Hear that, $arah?
Bingo 2:28. Hillary is not running on a phone "family values" campaign but on a platform that values real families of every kind.
DeletePaul Krugman Says Hillary Clinton is Right and Bernie Sanders is Wrong on Healthcare
ReplyDelete....Most Democrats probably agree that single payer is better than what we have. It is what most of us wanted to begin with, after all. But how practical is it as a goal? Krugman reminds us that we barely got Obamacare even with a Democratic controlled Senate. If single payer had been a possibility, we would already have it....
...In Krugman’s opinion, the candidates should “focus their main efforts on other issues.” You know, those we haven’t already won, even if the victory was not all we had hoped for. Krugman lists the many problems with pushing for single payer, including the massive influence of the insurance companies, the necessity of raising taxes to pay for it – not only the rich but the middle class – and the disruption to people who already have insurance they are satisfied with.
Krugman makes a powerful argument when he says “progressives must set some priorities,” and calls Sander’s goal of single payer “a quixotic attempt at a do-over, not of a political failure, but of health reform — their biggest victory in many years.” Any president only has so much political capital. There are battles we haven’t fought and won – to any degree whatsoever – that it might make more reasonable objectives for an incoming president...
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/01/18/paul-krugman-hillary-bernie-wrong-healthcare.html
Ugh. Here's yet another reason for idiot-failure Sarah Palin to think she's relevant:
ReplyDeletehttp://variety.com/2016/tv/news/sarah-palin-gary-hart-ross-perot-pbs-16-for-16-1201682161/
Bernie is not my candidate right now, but I was cheering his response. That's how you run a respectable campaign. The moderators should be ashamed for asking such a stupid, irrelevant, tabloid question, and Bernie kindly put them in their places. I'd be happy to vote for him if he's the nominee.
ReplyDeleteSeriously, if the Clintons were Republicans, the old boy network would be patting Bill on the back and making dirty jokes in the backroom.
ReplyDeleteThey would have Hillary on a pedestal, commending her for standin' by her man.
Republicans didn't have a problem with GW being a drunk and Laura not divorcing him, so why do they continuously harp on Bill and Hillary, my conclusion is personal attacks is all they've got and we know from just watching their last debate, they love personal attacks.
Is Laura Bush running for president 1:31? Was George Bush accused of sexual assault and silencing and smearing victims with his wife's help?
DeleteMy thoughts exactly. It was always confused listening to conservative women in my workplace during the Clinton years. I would have bet my bottom dollar they would root for Hillary being such a “stand-by-your-man” woman during that time. Nope. They verbally beat her to a pulp for staying with him. Curiously the two most ardent bashers were women whose husbands were cheating on them. And, they are still married to their cheating hubbies! Projection is a hard mistress.
DeleteAny woman who knowingly fucks around with a married man is just as guilty as the man, in my opinion.
DeleteInfidelity is one thing 2:14, sexual assault and cover up is entirely different.
DeleteAren't you the perfect little Christian!
DeleteLaura push was a drunk ( still is) and a pill popper.
DeleteGWB was a cocaine addict, IIRC
DeleteWell GW and Laura aren't running.
DeleteBut Hillary is running with womens rights heavily on her platform, even though she is accused of covering for a serial rapist.
"Accused" is the operative word (so is "rapist").
DeleteRIP Glenn Frey. What a loss!
ReplyDeleteTake it easy Glenn!
DeleteOT http://midnightsunak.com/2016/01/18/will-palin-endorse-trump-on-tuesday/
ReplyDeleteWill Palin Endorse Trump on Tuesday?
Delete----------
Oh boy, will that be the end of Trump?
If she does it will be because she can't get any press right now and she is desperate for attention.
DeleteI don't think she can do it, she plays up her alliance with Cruz way too much to alienate him and his supporters to offer her firm support to Trump. Her FB post from the other day was very vague regarding her support of any specific candidate basically stating that our next President was on stage (during the last debate) but getting no more specific than that.
DeletePlus, the way Palin operates regarding political patronage, is to wait until the person appears to be a sure thing and only then throw her support behind them. That's been her MO since claiming to have been responsible for 50% of the GOP candidates that won Congressional seats in 2010, she'd wait until they were leading and then jump in with a visit, a tiny amount of cash and a stump speech, then declare that it was her influence that brought them victory.
The problem is that while the Lewinsky affair was 20 years ago, it is highly likely he has not been behaving well more recently so there are more affairs to reveal. Sanders was great with his response - yes. But there is more smearing to come and that will be a big problem for Hilary.
ReplyDeleteWhy will it become a big problem for her? It seems like the easiest thing in the world to deflect. It's nobody's damned business what goes on in her marriage and it certainly has nothing to do with her ability to be an effective POTUS. Anyone who pushes the issue will come across as petty and desperate.
DeleteWhy? She isn't Bill. Maybe the media should look into Cuz' kept prostitute side piece or Rubio's side piece. Or look at Trump's infidelities and the porn whore he "furriner" wife he has.
DeleteYou sound like Karl Rove, 2:18.
DeleteTo the two responders to my post at 2:18 above: I completely agree with you. However, you are looking at the situation logically -- the low information, distracted, impressionable voters may not and we have seen how the GOP/Faux Noise machine gets cranked up and can have an effect. We underestimate the effect of their disinformation and bullsh*t at our peril.
DeleteYou are assuming that an aging Bill Clinton has not changed. I think he has. And anyone coming forward would have done it with all the Cosby crap coming out, right? perfect timing..women are angry and distrustful. So where are all of these supposed victims? I think more than likely there are people like Monica, who chased after a dynamic, attractive powerful man until he let them into his world. Most powerful men have a strong sex drive. Not that what he's done is right, but I do understand. And none of it has a thing to do with Hillary.
DeleteIs that the only reason that Andrea Mitchel was on stage?
ReplyDeleteO/T Gryphen, but not to be missed!
ReplyDeleteGuitarist Carlos Santana compares Donald Trump to a furious poop-slinging ape in hilarious open letter
Musician Carlos Santana mocked Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in an open letter posted on his Facebook page, according to International Business Times.
The message, obtained by Clutch magazine, praised President Barack Obama after his State of the Union address, and then compared Trump to an angry ape. But the open letter was deleted from Santana’s page a few days after he posted it.
“Regarding Mr. Trump,” Santana wrote. “I remember when I was a child living in Tijuana…I often crossed the border to visit the San Diego Zoo. I would hear loud screams and commotion in the distance. As I came closer to the sound, I noticed everyone was staring at an ape in a glass cage. The ape was staring back at the crowd that gathered. With an angry look of disgust, the ape defecated in his hand and threw it at the crowd. This is what I hear when Mr Trump speaks.
“He lacks consciousness as well as integrity. The Republicans and Mr Trump are selling hate and fear. That is the opposite of what our Country stands for. Let’s go forward with light and love into the future. Global Peace is within our grasp in this lifetime. Pull humanity up, take the high road and look at the aerial view. Peace on Earth now, not later.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/guitarist-carlos-santana-compares-donald-trump-to-a-furious-poop-slinging-ape-in-hilarious-open-letter/
‘A poisonous corrosive man’: Watch this British MP bring the hammer down on Trump’s ‘violent ideology’
British Member of Parliament Tulip Siddiq urged her colleagues on Monday to support a ban on Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, arguing that he would put Britons at risk by importing “violent ideology.”
The British Parliament on Monday debated banning Trump over his anti-Muslim rhetoric after more than 570,000 Britons signed a petition calling for him to be barred from entering the U.K.
Although MPs who spoke all agreed that Trump’s vitriol against immigrants had been out of bounds, most argued that banning him was not the best way to deal with the issue.
Siddiq, however, insisted that Trump would be endangering British Muslims if he was allowed into the country.
“This online petition signed by nearly 600,000 people shows that when people feel a sense of justice, when people feel we need to stop a poisonous corrosive man from entering our country, they will act in good conscience.”
“His words are not comical, his words are not funny, his words are poisonous,” she continued. “They risk inflaming tension between vulnerable communities.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/a-poisonous-corrosive-man-watch-this-british-mp-bring-the-hammer-down-on-trumps-violent-ideology/
Evangelical leader unleashes righteous fury on Donald Trump — the ‘golden calf’ candidate
A top evangelical leader rebuked Donald Trump as the Republican frontrunner wooed conservative Christians with a speech Monday at Liberty University.
Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, posted a series of withering tweets as Trump spoke to what he described as a “record” crowd at a mandatory convocation at the Virginia university founded by Jerry Falwell.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/evangelical-leader-unleashes-righteous-fury-on-donald-trump-the-golden-calf-candidate/
Andrea Mitchell is married to Alan Greenspan. No way should she have been asking these gotcha questions to Bernie.
ReplyDeleteAm I the only one who remembers when BJ-Gate was going on in real time hearing that Monica Lewinski told her friends she went out and bought knee pads and was moving to DC to get herself a President? Maybe that was reported on one of those trashy gossip TV shows like Inside Edition and it wasn't really true but I distinctly remember that being the story.
ReplyDeleteWe forgot about the Starr Report and the millions it cost us to tell us something we already knew, Bill was man enough to finally admit it, Hillary and Chelsea handled themselves with grace and dignity throughout the whole matter. Linda Tripp advised Monica to save the blue dress, and got all her plastic surgery paid for free, then both slithered under their rocks.
ReplyDeleteI'm in no way condoning what Bill did, but Hillary had nothing to do with it, and it shouldn't be an issue now that she's running. Not every marriage is perfect and it's a private matter between the couple how or if to move forward.
I have to give Bernie a lot of credit for his response. We have more pressing issues to discuss than infidelity. Like Marla Maples giving birth while Trump was still married and how he'd steup the brains out of Ivanka if he wasn't her daddy.
Wait until the rubes find out Melania is from Slovakia!
Deletehttp://theslot.jezebel.com/woman-to-hillary-clinton-does-believing-rape-victims-i-1746185809
ReplyDeletecould be true
The right to be believed is very different from blind belief without looking at the totality of evidence.
Deletepure dirt
ReplyDeletehttp://heavy.com/news/2014/07/energizer-bill-clinton-mistress-ronald-kessler-book/
or
http://www.infowars.com/bill-clinton-and-the-pedophile-the-sex-scandal-that-could-destroy-hillarys-presidential-ambitions/
Infowars? Do they also claim that Hillary is a lizard person?
DeleteAnd did the Clintons arrive on a big green spaceship in New Mexico?
DeleteI really don't care what a married man does to his own family when he has an affair. What I give a f*ck about is when this man or woman is the president of the USA and is doing this. It puts our nation's security at risk. I say no to BILLARY_2.0.
ReplyDeleteOK, I'll bite. Can you please explain to me how a POTUS's wandering dick "puts out nation's security at risk".?
DeleteOr how the past affairs of the husband of the POTUS puts our nation's security at risk?
Delete4:01-you do know that virtually every man in the Oval Office from Washington on had affairs right? Just because Clinton was being targeted by Rove and company does not mean he's the first or the last. I'd say GWB was probably faithful because he has the sex appeal of a beagle, and Obama is faithful because of the man he is, but Clinton did not put the country at risk. Not once. Grow up.
DeleteOkay, 6:42PM: Who is the person or persons the president is sleeping with other than his wife? Really, who are these people , who are they connected to? And least of all, are we paying for their security detail too? Really, you didn't think Billary's affairs jeopardize the nation? YOU can suck it, 6:42PM.
DeleteWhat do a Bill Clinton's affairs 20 years ago have to do with Hillsry running today or being POTUS next year?
DeleteLet's hope we are!
ReplyDeleteAre We Headed for Leftward Shift in Next 30 Years?
...Apart from making everyone who saw it feel all tingly inside, a commentator for the Atlantic Wire saw something deeper in this ad, namely an insight into one-fifth of the American electorate in the 2012 election known as millennials: the voters younger than 35 who, according to the Atlantic, support “the usual liberal” ideas like gay marriage and climate change.
That is true: more than 70 percent of these voters believe in legal gay marriage and nearly 66 percent of millennial voters say climate change is real, with over 80 percent of them wanting far-reaching action on climate change. (It gets to 80 percent because, amazingly, more than half of the 27 percent of millennials who have doubts about climate change still support regulation to clean up the environment and reduce fossil fuel consumption for the common good.)
Still this pigeonholing of millennials masks a deeper truth: that the youngest generation of voters has grown up committed to both personal activism and an activist government.
The most extensive survey of the millennials’ attitudes reveals almost two-thirds believe in aggressive government regulation of the economy and environment. Also, over 80 percent of these millennials say Social Security and Medicare have benefitted America and they want these programs managed—not privatized—until they retire.
A few conservatives have hit the panic button and are encouraging Republicans to change their approach, while others dismiss them as a non-factor, saying they aren’t worried about the “basement brats”—a term referring to the fact that a record number of millennials (36 percent, according to the census) are still living with their parents.
Yet conservatives should be worried: early in September, essayist Peter Beinart presented his theory that millennials will be the core of a “New Left” movement in America.
http://washingtonspectator.org/are-we-headed-for-leftward-shift-in-next-30-years/#.Vp04GlKDhLG
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/are-we-headed-for-a-leftward-shift-in-the-next-30-years/
The world should follow UK's lead. Not just yes, but HELL YES, Drop him off in Iran and let him make his own version of "The Amazing Race". Iranians stop me all the time and say Donald is Fantastic!
ReplyDeleteMeant to post that on the next thread, sorry Gryphen
ReplyDeleteOne only needs to look at Republicans for sexual scandals. OMG the hypocrisy, and it's all they talk about. If that's all they've got, they must be pretty damn worried and look so stupid.
ReplyDeletePerhaps $arah would like to weigh in on her dalliances.
Andrea Greenspan should NOT have been asking questions. MSNBC has Rachel and Melissa Harris-Perry, and they choose Mitchell, who is almost as big a GOP suck as Toadie the News Director? Poor choice.
ReplyDeleteMSNBC wants to become the new Faux Lite. Does anyone like the new line-up of Right-leaning shows? There's Morning Shmoe in the morning (I choose to watch Stephanie Miller when I can) and then 5:00 to 7:00 there's back-to-back Conservative Chuck Toad and then the two dickheads that had that one-hit-wonder with Game Change and were given their own show time on MSNBC even though it's on Bloomberg TV at the same time. Too bad MSNBC went to the dark side.
DeleteAlmost Half of the Michael Bay Benghazi Movie's Meagre Opening Weekend Revenue Came From Theaters in the South
ReplyDeletehttp://gawker.com/almost-half-of-the-michael-bay-benghazi-movies-meagre-o-1753489876
Linda Tripp has reared her fat head again, claiming that Bill had sex with THOUSANDS of women. That's right. Thousands. I guess she needs some tweaks to the brand new unrecognizable face she bought herself after the last time she squeezed herself into the political world.
ReplyDeleteHaving Chuck Todd & Andrea Mitchell as debate moderators proves MSNBC is another Fox Lite. Current MSNBC "leadership" has chosen to move into the dark side of the RW. Mitchell ought to hang her head in shame for asking Bernie about his one time remark about Bill Clinton. She won't. I refuse to watch either of their shows & the rest of the right leaning idiots they're bringing in now. Chuck & Andrea have been just like "Morning Joe" for years. Fuck em!
ReplyDeleteThis is why they need to be running mates, not matter who is on the top of the ticket.
ReplyDeleteThey compliment each other and will be able to work together to get more done than either would separately.
I am not a fan of Hillary's. I think Obama was right on point when he said that she was "likeable enough". Hillary has not been as decent to Obama or to Sanders as they have been to her. Don't like her personality, but I will have to vote for her anyway.
ReplyDelete