Well first off Hillary gave MSNBC's Chuck Todd an interview almost immediately afterward:
"Why do you believe you did not violate the law?" Todd asked, referring to rules regulating government employees' handling of classified information.
Clinton reiterated that she "never received nor sent any material that was marked classified" while she was secretary of state.
Some of the emails that had not been considered classified during Clinton's tenure were labeled as such after the fact.
Clinton dodged Todd's question about who gave her permission to operate a private email server to conduct government business. She insisted that no wrongdoing was committed. "I've released more than 55,000 pages of my emails for the public to read for themselves," she said, adding "I will continue to be as forthcoming as I can."
The presumptive Democratic presidential nominee said that she was "eager" to meet with officials handling the case, and said that she was pleased to "assist the department in bringing its review to a conclusion."
I listened to that interview yesterday and I have to say even as a Hillary supporter I found some of her answers a little evasive.
But then again considering the scrutiny that every one of her answers to ANY question receives perhaps that should not be unexpected.
However she also, in no way, sounded as if she was worried charges against her are imminent.
And probably for good reason.
Right around the time of this interview CNN was announcing that its sources were telling them that there would be no charges filed by the FBI.
Vice President Joe Biden also expressed strong doubt that Hillary had done anything criminal.Sources tell CNN's Evan Perez: expectation is that there will be announcement of no charges in Clinton email probe w/in next two weeks or so— Edward Mejia Davis (@TeddyDavisCNN) July 2, 2016
As you might imagine this did not go down well with those on the Right.
For one that crazy ass Judge Jeanine Pirro simply lost her every loving mind over that possibility.
And of course Donald Trump now adds it to his ever growing list of conspiracy theories.
So to the question of "what now?"It was just announced-by sources-that no charges will be brought against Crooked Hillary Clinton. Like I said, the system is totally rigged!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 2, 2016
Well Hillary supporters will respond with "I told you so," while the anti-Hillary folks will say "No we told YOU so," as the Right Wing tries to find ways to keep this issue alive until November, and once she wins use it against her during her entire presidency.
In short, much like Vince Foster, Whitewater, and Benghazi, this will continue to be a cudgel to beat Hillary over the head for as long as she remains in politics.
It is going to be a long, and fairly brutal, four years my friends.
ReplyDeleteThe CNN guy that reportedly said no charges vs Hillary seems to have never said it but a CNN producer is attributing it to him via his twitter but reporter hasn't put it on his twitter. Attribution comes with disclaimer, as long as Saturday interview found no wrong doing. Sounds like BS, an attempt to control narrative, get in front of story.
CNN is owned by Time Warner and TW has given $700k to Hillary.
https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00000019&cycle=Career
Gotta protect their investment.
Another 4chan butt hurt troll.
Delete@9:53
DeleteThat all you got?
Lame deflection of reality...
10:16 - you have NOTHING either.
Delete$700k is tip money to Time Warner
Delete8:58 never has had anything yet posts 'his' nothings over and over again as if they will influence folks. Delusional.
DeleteIs that true? I'm gonna look it up.
DeleteAnd report back if it isn't(I refuse to be anyone's 'patsy'). Instead of insults and minimizations, maybe somma the rest of us could do the same? Just a suggestion, service in hopes of the truth?
8:58, If you are trying to imply that CNN is 'in the tank' for Hillary, you might want to try to explain then why between 1/3/16 and 5/1/16, Sanders was on the CNN Sunday morning program 11 times (11 out of 18) while Clinton was on only 4 times.
DeleteAnd he wasn't being "gotcha'd" by CNN - they were regular, normal straightforward interviews. Bernie came off well in them.
So once again, what is your proof that CNN is being pro-Hillary because Time-Warner donated to her campaign? My real evidence shows that CNN did not favor Hillary at all. If anything, it can be shown that CNN favored Sanders, by their coverage of him, 61.1% to Hillary's 22.2%.
Our little trollie friend is so cute. For a while I responded to it, closing with "is that all you got?" And, like the small-brain parrot that it is, it picked up the phrase and now spits it back. Training bird-brains is so much fun. What shall we teach it to say next?
DeleteCONtrollies are always (are they paid to do so) out to hi-jack any Hillary/Dem narrative?
DeleteOr are just so hate-hillaried that they can only crank out nothing else?
dowl
It is going to be a long, and fairly brutal, four years my friends.
ReplyDelete-----------
It's going to be a long and fairly brutal four months!
Teddy Davis is a long term democrat operative now CNN producer who artfully 'leaked' no indictment for Hillary story by attributing leak to a lower level CNN reporter who has made no comment on the issue.
ReplyDeleteLame ass.
Bqwhtever
DeleteAny Democrat elected will have to take the heat. Look how they've treated Obama! Republicans get a pass, of course. I think H can take it, she's had plenty of practice.
ReplyDeleteWhat now? That's easy - let's have an investigation of the $25000 the Trumpster gave to FL AG Pam Bondi's campaign while she was deciding whether to join the lawsuits against Trump U. (Not surprisingly, she decided not to.)
ReplyDeleteI suspect the oppo research that is ready to be unleashed on The Donald will be far tougher than his name calling! He's got no money to answer the hell that is going to rain down on him after the conventions and going into November. And I can't think of a more deserving POS.
DeleteShari -
DeleteI suspect you are 100% correct. The Clinton machine has been running campaigns for a very long time and know what they're doing. Unlike 2008, they also have the Obama team, which has been proven as top notch, on board with them.
Trump has no clue what he's in for when he becomes the official candidate. The most damaging information is undoubtedly being saved for after the GOP convention to insure that they don't somehow choose another candidate.
If we're lucky, this will not only destroy his short political career, but do enough damage to his businesses that he will disappear from the spotlight for a long time.
Trump has nothing on hillary now and is struggling with the skeletins in his own closet including charges of rape of a 13 yr old child. Tic Toc..
DeleteYeah, that's the thing. The sum and total of the Drumpf arsenal was email, Bill Clinton's affairs, and Benghazi! Alas, rubbing a woman's nose in her husband's infidelities proves to be a losing game to attract female voters. And now the other two horses have been beaten to death...and it's barely July. In short, Drumpf has shot his wad from that pathetic little pecker of his. Outpacing him by miles with both brains and balls, one sure assumes there is mountain of dirt on Little Donny, and it will be used wisely over the coming months.
DeleteIt seems that Donnycon will be quite disappointed by his own dumbassedness.
DeleteHoisted by his own petard?
dowl
Well, let's see now:
ReplyDelete1. At the time the private server was installed, there was no State Dept policy against it.
2. It's been proven that she neither received nor sent Classified (at the time) material.
Tell me again why she has been raked over the coals for not doing anything wrong? Oh yes, it's simply habit -- a 30-yr-long habit of the GOP.
If I were Hillary, and by some horribly strange twist of fate I didn't win the Presidency, I would hire the strongest, wiliest team of lawyers I could find and sue the bloody hell out of the GOP and all the media (and their pundits) who kept promoting the fiction that I had done something wrong.
How she manages to keep her feelings hidden is also a good reason why she should be elected. If her American enemies can't do her in, what chance to America's external enemies have?
Actually 1 and 2 are both incorrect based on the IG report and admissions by State Dept. The FBI and DOJ have yet to conclude Clinton didn't do anything wrong.
DeleteGods know she can afford to hire the best lawyers money can buy.
DeleteLink, please, 12:48. Thank you.
DeleteActually it would be helpful if both 9:10 and 12:48 would provide links/references. There are a lot of misstatements (lies?) out there that just keep being passed around as if they were true.
DeleteI've worked for the Federal government since the 1990s. There WAS no government email in my agency when I started. As the technology rolled out, technology got ahead of the bureaucracy, leaving the bureaucrats to play catch up. In 2009, when HRC became Secretary of State, there was no State Dept policy against having a private email account. Lots and lots and lots of people used private accounts. Does anyone imagine this was a secret? (Hello?!)
DeleteThe whole damn thing is absurd, and always has been. The Cheney/Bush White House outright deleted thousands of official emails, for Christ's sake. When is someone going to hold those thugs accountable?
Colin Powell would have to face charges also, too, if Hillary does. He did the exact same thing, except he is a repub. (in name only) Maybe THAT is why he claims to remain a gop supporter just to aggrevate people?
ReplyDeletePowell didn't do the "exact same thing." Powell used an email account set up by the State Dept that ran on a server and desktop computer setup in his office before the State Dept had its own email system. That's not a right wing opinion, that's straight out of the IG report.
DeletePowell used an AOL account so he used AOL servers! Much worse!
DeleteThe sickness that is the RW in this country will blast "the system is rigged" everywhere of course. I expect to see it here with the trolls. They have a candidate who lies pathologically and won't release his tax returns and they cry the system is rigged. They truly are the dumbest of the dumb.
ReplyDeleteAs a woman of Hillary's age I am certain none of this would have made the slightest difference if she'd been a (white) male. I was a college student the same time she was and I know the condescension and outright harassment women were subjected to in academia and in our careers afterward. There was no recourse - EEOC ignored gender discrimination complaints during the early 70s (look it up). "Take America Back" terrifies me- young women have no idea what it was like to be hired at 25% less than a man doing the same job because "he has a family to feed". That is, if she got the job at all. Talented women were told flat out "no woman will ever pass this pre-med program" or "we don't want women in our engineering program".
ReplyDeleteGood for Hillary for getting where she is - those of us who walked that same path know just how hard she struggled.
-meh
I was there too and chose to get in a male-dominated field. Of course, it was assumed that I slept my way to the position (did not.) Most of the problems I faced in my job were because of this attitude, but I still managed to be quite effective, much to the chagrin of my male counterparts.
DeleteIf Hillary were to personally save someone's life, on camera, she would still be subjected to the Anti-Hillary filter that has been in place for decades.
I'm a female who graduated from college in 1970. Resumes back then included age, gender, race, height, weight and marital status. Obvious discrimination that we (both females and males) could do nothing about (at that time).
DeleteI was in high school in the early 70's and was told by my guidance counselor that I couldn't take the drafting class because that was for boys only !!!
DeleteI had to fight to be allowed to take anatomy class because we had to dissect a cat and the girls might faint.
I agree, some young women do not realize how recent these changes have taken place.
On my first job interview (mid 70s) I was asked "I know I'm not supposed to ask this, but how can you possible work with a child? Who will take care of her?" We found that we female engineering and IT (data processing at the time) professors were all hired at the lowest instructor rate while males were hired at thousands of dollars more as assistant, associate or even full professors. Neither our union nor EEOC cared to even look at our data. And of course we never caught up.
Delete-meh
The then-top-tier law firm in Denver asked female applicants from my law school class in 1973 if they were married, and, if so, if they planned to have children (because if so, they wouldn't hire them). My classmate developed the perfect response. With a tear in her eye, she would answer (lying); "I'm not able to have children . . . "
DeleteETA: OMG, it's worse than I rembembered. The law firm asked us if we were on birth control. :-(
DeleteYes,we sure do know how hillary/women have struggled. Been there,done that. Now,I'm the boss. ;-)
DeleteLiz, your classmate friend was a very, very clever woman. Kudos to her!
DeleteHere's a true story: In the early 80's, I got a promotion to a position where I was the first woman to do a rather technically challenging job. While training the young man who filled my old position, I discovered this new hire was not only being paid more than I was for that job - he was being paid more than me in my new position.
DeleteWhen I confronted the bosses, I was told, without hesitation, that the young man was being paid more because he had a family to support.
Here's how that ended: I told a friend in the media about this and he published an op-ed that drew a lot of outrage over this inequity.
The bosses reluctantly gave me a raise. BUT not before giving me a thinly veiled threat to keep company business out of the newspaper in the future if I planned on having a long career in that line of work.
I did just fine.
12:23 you just reminded me of something from my jr high years- early 60s! I wanted to take shop instead of homemaking because 1) I already knew how to cook and sew and 2) I knew I wanted to study science and I thought shop would be more useful. The only way this could happen was a letter of request from my mom- and she refused! She said I was "weird enough." Although she denies it to this day she was always proud of her feisty physicist daughter.
DeleteI was told not to take advanced math in high school because girls couldn't do hard math. By my 8th grade math teacher. For whom I was tutoring all the boys. He was right. I couldn't do advanced high school math, I could do advanced college math.
DeleteBack in the early 90s, I worked in a government agency with an engineering department. Nearly all of the engineers were middle-aged white men. There was one young woman in the department who also happened to be African-American. It was extremely hard for her to be taken seriously by the men, but she plugged away and finally gained their grudging respect.
DeleteThen we got a memo from the regional director, explaining that this woman was going to be out on medical leave for 4 months and would return as a male after sexual reassignment surgery.
It was the first transgender person I ever knew and I remember being so awed by this person's courage. First to be a black woman working in a male-dominated profession, and then to return after surgery and deal with the ignorance and prejudice of being black AND transgender.
They will spend millions more trying to bring her down and they will find nothing, per usual. America is too dumb to stop the GOP and Clinton-hating, that's the main reason that Trump wants Gingrich: his Clinton-hating history. Think of all the families in the US who could have been feed for the $7 million cost of Benghazi. Now, imagine the millions more they will waste on "e-mails." The GOP is criminal!
ReplyDeletePeople can say what they want, and boy do they, but who has cracked that glass ceiling more than Hillary? Of course she evades answers; what politician doesn't? She still is most qualified.
ReplyDeleteTake one look at her and then at $arah. There IS no comparison whatsoever. $arah is no more than a common gutter rat.
Even a common gutter rat has more compassion than Sarah Palin.
DeleteShe has every right to be "evasive" with UpChuck Todd. After all she's gone through hours and hours of questioning & scrutiny like nothing I've ever seen before. I blame the Republicans of course because they even admitted that their witch hunts are political and I blame the media too because they ASSUME she's guilty and must defend herself. They try their best to put her on the defensive because it makes headlines. Clinton has handled it well so why would she give them even more details about all the lies told about her? Will they only be satisfied if they can put a microscope up her vagina? She's not about to let them and I don't blame her since she hasn't done anything wrong in the first place. Just my opinion!
ReplyDeleteMy understanding is that Hillary has not been directly under investigation by the FBI and that it was a probe of the emails/server looking for any evidence of hacking, etc.. The possibility the investigation could expand to include her exists and has been exaggerated/misrepresented/exploited by the GOP like everything else Clinton.
ReplyDelete@10:36
Delete"My understanding is that Hillary has not been directly under investigation by the FBI and that it was a probe of the emails/server looking for any evidence of hacking, etc.."
NOPE.
School time!
Hillary's server private server violated at least 4 federal criminal laws:
> #18USC1924
> #18USC793f
> #18USC2071
> #18USC1519
12:04 - obsessed delusional know nothing.
DeleteHillary's server private server violated at least 4 federal criminal laws:
Delete--------
Well you better quick contact the FBI since they missed this information.
@12:23
DeleteDenial ain't a river in Egypt.
Look those statutes up and come back to talk.
Hillary spent 3.5 hours being questioned about it at FBI headquarters.
Your understanding is wrong. Investigators always question their primary target last.Clinton was last.
Delete@12:26
DeleteYou can sleep well tonite knowing that the FBI is very aware of those statutes and how they directly apply to Hillary.
Look 'em up!
@12:40
Correct.
They already have all the other statements from others and know half the answers to their questions.They are looking to slap perjury charge(s) on top of everything else.
That's what got Bill...
12:04 PM When are you going to drag Hillary into court for prosecution? Answer: NEVER!!! Get a life stalker, you are insane.
Delete12:40 - do you realize how foolish you are to all of us? Sad.
DeleteSo, anti-Hillary Troll, when Hillary is not indicted will you be on suicide watch?
DeleteWhat gets me too is that they marked some emails as classified AFTER the fact and that they NEVER EVER EVER talk about the fact the other politicians had private email servers but hey they don't care about that.
ReplyDeleteOr worse, they used services like AOL. Yeah, I trust Yahoo to keep my emails safe, yup, yup.
Delete"I trust Yahoo to keep my emails safe, yup, yup!"
DeleteWould you agree, $arah dumb@ss?
What happened to all of W's and Cheney's emails, or rather what did KARL ROVE do with those missing emails when the CIA operative, Valerie Plame was exposed and her contacts around the world were most likely murdered after being outed? IOKIYAR.
DeleteAs long as Hillary Clinton lives, the right-wing media will continue to attack her. I think when she arrived in Washington in the early 1990's she terrified the GOP because she was a confident, intelligent, articulate and capable woman who had a great future of her own in politics. She had to be smacked down. Thank God she has stood up to all of them although none of it should ever have happened. (There's a bit of divine justice at work with the recent news that Kenneth Starr had to resign his fancy Baylor Univ. post that he never deserved. Trey Gowdy had better never take a job there.)
ReplyDeleteBeaglemom
Official statement just after FBI interview:
ReplyDelete“Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was Secretary. She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion.”
*Officially admitting that with the last 'interview of the security review' / last interrogation of the criminal investigation (potayto/potahto), she is the target.
The statement continues:
“Out of respect for the investigative process, she will not comment further on her interview.”
Yet she immediately goes and gives her comments on MSNBClinton??? Couldn't just leave it hanging out there on its own with no framing. Nice cover.
♎
Then she went to see Hamilton with her husband! Go Hillary!
Delete1:37pm
DeleteSo you're okay with your donations being spent on Broadway foolery?
3:52 - you fool! It was a Democratic fundraiser! Lin-Manuel Miranda's dad is a Democratic activist. Are you that far out of the loop?
Delete3:52PM, they have their own money, bone head.
DeleteWhat an asshole you are, Trump gets more coverage on MSNBC than Clinton ever has.
DeleteNo matter what any investigation finds, Clinton will face lies and innuendo for her entire term. If it wasn't the emails it would be another rehash of Benghazi, and I would prefer them to focus their obsession on the emails for one reason.
ReplyDeleteIf the GOP perseverates on the emails, at least the families of those who died at Benghazi won't have to relive their pain and listen to their loved ones being used as political pawns over and over again.
They will go after Clinton just like they have Obama for the last 8 years. This is what the GOP does - spend billions of taxpayer dollars on futile witch hunts. Don't just vote during the presidential election - vote EVERY TIME!
Delete@11:20
DeleteAlso unsecure homebrew server that was hacked and who knows who looked at all the info on it...
11:59 No it wasn't hacked. The state dept server was hacked.
Delete@11:25, well I hope you contact the FBI with this information subito!!!
Delete@12:27
DeleteGuccifer2.0 hacked it bigtime and has released proof.
"Emails from March 2015, a month before Clinton announced her presidential bid, detail talking points to “defend the good work of the Foundation.”
One 313-page document focuses on foreign policy arguments, using research from debates between Obama and Mitt Romney and covers all angles of foreign policy, from counter points to attacks on Romney.
Another document details donations from PACs and contact details of PAC lobbyists.
There is also a document revealing Clinton’s travel on private jets and who paid for them - big banks feature frequently in this document."
https://www.rt.com/usa/349193-guccifer-clinton-expenses/
@12:29
The FBI is all over it.
Ask Gryph to check with his "FBI pals"!
@12:55 PM Your obsession with the Clintons will change nothing. You are a carnival barker and nothing more. Fuck you and guccifuck.
DeleteThe FBI is done with it, clown. Now they are on to real issues. #Orlando
DeleteWhy are you going by "Anonymous", Celia? Be proud and loud.
Delete@1:38
Delete"The FBI is done with it, clown."
Uh-huh.
Keep telling yourself that,fool.
And you are aware the Clinton Foundation is a separate investigation by the FBI,no?
@1:48
Not Celia,she posts her picture when she comments.
@1:27
"guccifuck"?
The Feds drug his ass all the way from Romania to give them statements and he in fact hacked Hillary.
Obama specifically told her not to hire Blumenthal and Guccifers hack shows she exchanged classified emails with Blumenthal and even instructed her aides to clip off identifiers of his emails before forwarding them to the WH.
What.The.Fuck.
The FBI is done and so are you, sad clown
DeleteElijah
Delete@2:24 PM Get some treatment for your condition. You are bat shit crazy.
Delete@1:27
Delete"This blog is dedicated to finding the truth, exposing the lies, and holding our politicians and leaders accountable when they fall far short of the promises that they have made to both my fellow Alaskans and the American people."
4:30 - are you Gryphen? Otherwise the quote does not apply to you. It's his blog, the "my" refers to him, not you. Are you really that dumb? Go start your own blog!
DeleteFrom the Magic Kingdom of Don we hear "Like I said, the system is totally rigged!"
ReplyDeleteShould he somehow in our worst nightmares become President, he had better hope he is right because it will take a lot of rigging to polish that turd.
The system is rigged so that Donald pays no taxes, and uses donations to purchase Tim Tebow memorabilia, and can rape his wife without being charged..
DeleteIMHO, the next four years can't be much more brutal than the last eight... Especially not, if we get the scum ReThugs out.
ReplyDeleteVOTE BLUE - ALL THE WAY THROUGH!!!
HILLARY CLINTON WILL NOT FACE FBI CHARGES?
ReplyDeleteOh oh that's not what Jane wants to hear.
Jane Sanders only path to the White House is through the FBI.
@11:45
Delete"HILLARY CLINTON WILL NOT FACE FBI CHARGES?"
Sez who?
Sez her surrogates loudly and repeatedly. What else would they say?
Delete12:52 PM Get your weak ass ready for another "nothing burger". BWAHAHAHA.
DeleteSays President Obama, fool!
Delete@1:18
DeleteGet ready for a hu-u-u-ge side of lies with your "nothingburger"!
4:27 - stop it, Elijah!
DeleteCan we please stop using that ridiculous term "nothingburger"??????
Delete4:39 - no. Are you unaware of its genesis?
DeleteAs long as you have your "but then again(s)" to sooth your conscious...
ReplyDeleteIt's soothe and conscience. Is English not your first language?
Delete12:07pm
DeleteWhat if English isn't the commenter's first language? Aren't you liberals all for encouraging immigration?
1:03 -- You pathetic ass. Ad hominem, I know (ad hee-haw inem?) but sometimes one just can't restrain onself.
Delete1:03 - "Aren't you liberals all for encouraging immigration?"
DeleteDamn. Your sense of reality is completely warped. You obviously have no idea what a liberal is. What a fool.
Do only liberals know how to think and spell, 1:03? I agree!
Delete1:39pm
DeleteLast I checked you libs were all for teaching your kids Spanish as a second language so that the poor immigrants from South America didn't need to learn English.
Still doesn't explain why the snotty commenter at 12:07pm slammed the original commenter for poor usage of the English language, if you guys are all for making America a multi-lingual country.
What a bunch of poorly crafted arguments, but certainly, carry on, one of you might actually say something that makes some sense.
3:37 PM
DeleteYou have your head up your ass.
3:37pm: You spout hyperbolic nonsense that has nothing to do with the real world. Is that what they 'teach' you in the RW echo chamber of absurdity?
DeleteAnonymous 3:37 You have your point of view about learning a second language expressed which is limited and grounded in ignorance. I find your belief about being bilingual absurd and frankly repulsive.
DeleteI am delighted and proud my four American adult children can know even French terms commonly used in restaurants in the USA. I am happy they were educated to represent their employers working in other countries and treated with respect doing business not speaking in English!
I was over the moon to host an exchange student from France so she improve her second language, English, and my daughter go to Paris and got a job there on a student visa.
Hell yes some of my grand kids know Spanish when they are three!
Fuck people like you who are morons with a narrow skewed opinion anti education for Americans. Go to hell
We are going to have to hear about Benghazi and the emails for the next 8 years because the Republicans have nothing. Maybe if we take the House and Senate, sanity will reign.
ReplyDeleteAll they have is a candidate that is destroying their party and they want take down the whole USA with them.
Trump will continue to call her corrupt to divert the attention away from his own corruption like Trump U and he is setting up the scenario now that the system is rigged for when they find him guilty.
hahaha gee Sarah isn't this what you want in your case? one would think you would be happy with this!
ReplyDeleteThe bigger question is why does a right wing butt boy like Chuck Todd have a job?
ReplyDeleteHeh heh, Chuck Toddy IS a right wing butt boy. Jimmy Dore called him out on his hair plugs that were in essence bought and paid for by the Kock bro's.
DeleteI'd like to see a male politician undergo this level of scrutiny for this many years over nothingburger deluxes with a side order of onion rings.
ReplyDeleteStarting with the OUTRAGE during the 92 campaign that Hillary Rodham Clinton dared to keep her maiden name as part of her name.
DeleteThen, when Hillary Rodham Clinton dared to say she couldn't be satisfied with "baking cookies" the right wing exploded.
Finally, because she couldn't settle on a hair style, the Right wing's transformation of this amazing, smart, talented woman was complete.
Whitewater and Vince Foster were just add ons.
It was misogyny, pure and simple, from the beginning.
The RW wing loves nothingburgers. They binge on them. It's why their noodles are so scrambled.
DeleteIt's a nothingburger:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/7/3/1544765/-Better-anyone-than-me-better-me-than-no-one-Hillary-Clinton-will-not-be-indicted
Gosh golly, isn't it amazing how the resident anti-Hillary, anti-Obama troll sounds exactly like the resident pro-Palin, pro-Bristol troll? This Alicia person might be in the mix, but she surely ain't the only troll in these parts...or even the biggest troll in these parts.
ReplyDeleteJust finished reading Fox Nation vs Reality. We already new about this transparrot effort, but to read it? Again. and again. The world will not be destroyed by evil but by those who watch and do nothing. It starts at home. Teach your children well. Teach all the children around the world to respect life, to love life, have hope and dreams and help each other, lift each other.
ReplyDeleteYes... one more reason (excuse) the right will use in order to avoid discussing REAL issues.
ReplyDelete