Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Sarah Palin really wants to prove to the naysayers that she WILL sue the New York Times. I'm a naysayer, and I say no she won't.

Courtesy of the New York Times:

Sarah Palin, former vice-presidential candidate, filed a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times Company on Tuesday, saying the newspaper had published a statement about her in a recent editorial that it “knew to be false.” 

In the lawsuit, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Ms. Palin contends that The Times “violated the law and its own policies” when it linked her in an editorial to a mass shooting in January 2011.


The article points out that it issued a correction both online and on Twitter, however apparently that is not good enough for the attention whore.

Ms. Palin said in the lawsuit that The Times’s response “did not approach the degree of the retraction and apology necessary and warranted by The Times’s false assertion that Mrs. Palin incited murder.”

Aww, poor baby. So upset that somebody called her out for her inflammatory rhetoric.

However perhaps Palin and her attorney should carefully read the end of this Times article: 

In a statement, a spokeswoman for The Times said, “We have not reviewed the claim yet but will defend against any claim vigorously.”

I would contend that the Times has vastly more legal resources at their disposal than does this dried up has been. 

And if she thinks they will settle with her, then she probably does not realize that the Times is engaged in almost constant litigation for one reason or another, and does not make a habit of settling.

It would take literally no time at all, in fact I volunteer my services as a resource, for the Times to establish a pattern of Sarah Palin inciting violence against others.

I know there are multiple folks in Alaska who would be willing to testify, as would the family of the now deceased Joe McGinniss who were harassed to aggressively they were forced to change their contact information.

Hell, one of her supporters even threatened to shoot me at the school where I worked.

And let's not forget that she even fomented violence within her own family, which led to a brawl on the streets of Anchorage and her son brutalizing his fiance while waving a gun around.

No the truckloads of evidence available to paint Sarah Palin as an individual who aggressively fanned the flames of hatred and inspired death threats and even acts of violence all across the country will prove insurmountable to any legal team that Palin could afford to put together.

Having said that I actually hope that she calls my bluff and goes for it.

I have been writing about the lunacy surrounding Donald Trump for far too long now, and I welcome the opportunity to write about Sarah Palin getting her ass handed to her yet again.

136 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:22 AM

    It would be interesting to find out who is actually paying the legal bills for Palin's desperate attempt to claw back for ANY media attention. She has no $ and even if she did, she is terminally cheap and would not spend her own funds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:44 AM

      I highly doubt anyone else would pay for her legal bills, she is really of no use for anyone politically.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:08 AM

      You can be sure some right winger with deep pockets is paying for this suit, but a judge will likely dismiss it out of hand. An editorial is not a news story, a retraction is a retraction, and Gabby Giffords herself said on TV before the shooting that she was targeted by the crosshairs.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:20 AM

      I think there are plenty of ignorant, hateful right wingers who would be glad to pay her legal bills just because they hate everything "leftist."

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:55 AM

      On another note why is sarapac page still up. Still the full of shit grifter she has always been.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:51 PM

      Russia ogliarchs. Who else?

      Delete
    6. Anonymous1:14 PM

      I read in one of the articles that she's being represented by the same attys who represented Hulk Hogan against gawker....

      Delete
    7. If that is so, 1:14, that means they are attempting to stifle another news source. They want to kill freedom of the press.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous8:03 PM

      2:21 yep. I hope it's not true but wouldn't be surprised given our political atmosphere right now. I'm sure she's salivating thinking she might get a multi million settlement.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous8:07 PM

      1:14 PM - Baby's got a butt hurt! Pobrecita puta. Probably Koch money funded.

      When you can't stand on your own, you're no grizzly mama. You're a side of the road handout in Yellowstone Park.

      Delete
  2. Bluff, hell! I think you should contact that NYT person and offer your info and willingness to testify

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:45 AM

      This case will never see a court room, the Times lawyers will bury Sara in discovery and motions until she has no more money.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:21 AM

      Yes! Maybe the teacher and guy in the airport that Toad snd she harassed could speak as well.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous8:27 AM

    OT
    U.S. Treasury turns over thousands of pages of financial crime records on Donald Trump and Russia
    http://www.palmerreport.com/politics/reasury-financial-crimes-donald-trump-russia/3648/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:18 AM

      "FinCEN website which revealed that the Trump Taj Mahal casino had been FINED $10 MILLION in early 2015 for a series of money laundering violations which took place back when Donald Trump still held ownership"We believe that the Trump Taj Mahal money laundering investigation records are in FACT part of the thousands of pages of documents that FinCEN has now surrendered to the Senate Intel Committee. If these records reveal that it was the Russians who were laundering money through Donald Trump’s casino, it will establish that Trump and Russia were doing illegal financial business together, as has long been suspected."

      http://www.palmerreport.com/politics/treasury-donald-trump-money-laundering/2319/

      "the Trump Taj Mahal had engaged in “Significant and Long Standing Anti-Money Laundering Violations.” And the violations occurred while Donald Trump was still a key shareholder in the company."
      " all of the Trump Taj Mahal money laundering violations occurred while Donald Trump was part owner. And with the Treasury Department stating that the money laundering took place “over many years,” it means at least some of it took place back when Trump still owned a predominant stake. So this wasn’t merely a Trump connected property being busted; this was Donald Trump being busted." the question of why, when Trump first entered the race, the media didn’t bother to report that he and his hotel had just been caught up in money laundering three months earlier." <AN$WER THAT<

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:20 PM

      Tool - Schism

      Delete
  4. Anonymous8:34 AM

    If Sarah Palin's name or face was on a poster with rifle scope crosshairs on her name or face, would she have hired a lawyer and sued whoever designed that poster for emotional damages against her, Todd, her children and grandchildren, her parents and every Heath?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:02 AM

      The answer to that question is yup, in a fucking heartbeat if she could get paid.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous8:36 AM

    C-ynical
    U-neducated
    N-arcissistic
    T-rollop

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/giffords-tucson-shooting-christina-taylor-green-born-911/story?id=12578816

    THIS WILL BE YOUR CUM-e-up-ance>FUCK YOU $ara!
    PS.
    https://sarahpalinhasaserpentsheart.blogspot.com/2013/08/rip-curtis-menard-jr.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous9:01 AM

      NEVER FORGET:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Tucson_shooting

      Delete
  6. Anonymous8:40 AM

    Did Sarah hire the SarahPac lawyer for this lawsuit?

    How about Bristol's lawyer(s) she used against her babies daddies or Track's lawyer(s)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:53 AM

      Why I Resigned Attorney?
      Where is that pitbull at?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:52 PM

      Heading to Geneva. Bombshell.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous8:43 AM

    If I were Sarah, I would file lawsuits against President Obama, Vice-President O'Biden and John McCain for preventing her rightful place as VP.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:46 AM

    LMAO! I think a big ass chicken has moved to Wasilla Alaaaska to roost in Palins dirty wig.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:57 AM

      We need your name to add to the lawsuit.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:11 AM

      Add mine, also too: Palin's FAKE birth and fraudulent concealment of records will someday be revealed.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:33 AM

      Excuse me! Dave Parker is here to keep the fox out of the henhouse. Oh Dave where out thou? Haha.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:12 AM

      It would be a kick in the ass to see Sarah on the stand. Wonder if they'd bring in Todd and Bristol too. What a hoot - Alaskans would have in watching or reading about it. Doubt there would be national TV coverage on the matter by the big stations.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:53 PM

      Who would it be and why would she "wig out" about it?

      Delete
  9. Anonymous8:47 AM

    Get on board:"Dr. Benjamin Franklin, 'we, hang together.'"

    http://lnr.politicususa.com/independence-derailed-denial-alternative-facts-2314/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8:51 AM

    CUM HERE CUM HERE 'o'

    http://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/the-president-grabbed-vaginas-cnn-panel-on-trumps-ogling-of-woman-reporter-goes-off-the-rails/

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous8:51 AM

    Plain has $$ in her eyes. She thinks the time is ripe for her to cash in on the "fake news" train that Trump is driving. Let her sue! I still think Trump and company are going to get their comeuppance, and Palin will go swirling down the drain with him.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous9:02 AM

    It was arguably accurate and they retracted so there is really no case. On top of that, she is a public figure so she would need to prove malice. Since they did retract and apologize there is no evidence of that. She is just trying to stifle free speech, which people like her love to talk about but only actually believe in when it works in their favor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:37 PM

      9:02 not necessarily true. It is possible to have malice aforethought and issue both a retraction and an apology.... if there was reckless disregard and The NY Times intended the statements to be harmful, their actions after the fact are not mitigating circumstances, the damage is done by that point. Not stating she has a case, just stating the law

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:48 AM

      It's extremely difficult to legally prove malice aforethought in a case like this, to prove a malicious intention. I asked a lawyer.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:35 AM

      3:48 I am a lawyer as well, and I never said it wouldn't be difficult. Difficult, yes. Impossible, no. I only said that the retraction and apology are irrelevant since it goes to the intentions at the time it was published

      Delete
  13. Anonymous9:03 AM

    She will have to prove some kind of damage occurred as the result of the NY TIMES printing the story. As she has no reputation to damage, she loses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:30 AM

      True. Melania's suit was based on the money she hoped to grub out of being famous as part time First Lady. What does Sara imagine she is going to do for money?

      Delete
  14. Anonymous9:04 AM

    I love that it took her 6 years to make this decision. Bank account must be dwindling as no one is knocking on her door. Fade away, Sarah, fade away.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous9:04 AM

    Yeah, and she never sued in 2011, so why now? Everyone saw her ad with the bulleyes. Everyone knows she and Trump incite violence. Doe she really want to go there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:25 AM

      July 1st deadline?

      Delete
  16. Anonymous9:04 AM

    First of all, it can be argued that putting crosshairs on Gabby Giffords face contributed to the violent climate that existed in political rallies. Secondly, as a public figure in order to succeed in a defamation case , you must prove malicious intent. She's not going to be able to do that not given her rhetoric. She's probably looking for just fifteen more minutes of fame.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous9:05 AM

    Must be running low on funds and looking for a new influx of cash since the rubes aren't as into her as they used to be. With luck she'll lose and be stuck with the legal fees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:07 AM

      No doubt she will be begging for funds somewhere in order to support her fight.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous9:05 AM

    Oh please hold the case in NY. I'm sure many there would agree her drawing bullseyes on certain democrats, including Giffords - and then someone following up on this threat - is a direct link. You simply do not draw bullseyes on someone without a veiled threat intended. Never.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:10 PM

      But she's so far away in Alaska, right? Hard for her to get away? I swear I hear Donald Rump say that.!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:48 PM

      Donald Rump did say that after her embarrassing endorsement speeches Iowa/Oklahoma.

      Once again, the former veep nod is told to stay away from now TWO RNCs. Why is that? It certainly wasn't the distance! She's a VIP! :)

      Delete
  19. Anonymous9:06 AM

    She did contribute to the culture of gun violence, and still does. This smacks of "can dish it but can't take it". Sorry, Sarah, you're deplorable and I hope this lawsuit costs you.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous9:07 AM

    Let's see if this is correct: she wants to be in court, under oath, with the New York Times? Has she read Sullivan? Does she understand that everything that she has ever said about guns and violence and politicians will be fair game? Its as though she were putting on a moose suit while the former governor of Alaska circles above in a helicopter with a large bore hunting rifle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:13 AM

      Palin, like Trump, never learned how to read anything more than the simplest of sentences.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:26 AM

      Yea totalling with Harry.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:09 PM

      I'm on board (with the analogy)!

      Delete
  21. Anonymous9:11 AM

    Why would Sarah Palin sue a news organization when she is making big bucks on Facebook?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:10 AM

      That is a joke! She's NOT making huge bucks on Facebook.... most of her followers were purchased by her and have zero significance! She's a liar and fraud and it's been proven time and time again throughout the ten past years!

      Delete
  22. Chenagrrl9:26 AM

    Guess she wants to get turned inside out. Not a pretty picture. One wonders what she thought that ad/poster conveyed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:36 AM

      Butt the old old man made me do it. While he grabbed her prissy. Hey Alex!

      Delete
  23. Crystal Sage9:35 AM

    I still remember her "Blood Libel" Speech which she gave despite advice from Roger Ailes at FOX. Always the victim, our Lady-of-the-Lie is looking for a quick monetary settlement. Not going to happen, Sarah.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous9:36 AM

    Hard to imagine any lawyer would be dumb enough to take such an obvious loser case, or that there are enough $$$ in SarahPAC coffers to bankroll a serious legal battle if the case isn't done on contingency.
    Maybe she imagines there's a chance of an easy settlement/payday, but I assume it's less a $$$ grab than a desperate attempt to interject herself back into the public eye, riding the Trump wave.
    Alas -- too bad so sad -- dear Sarry has been thoroughly trumped, out-grifted and out-shined by our Grifter-in Chief. That 15 minutes of fame (and fortune) might have lasted way longer than it should have, but guess what, dearie, it ain't coming back.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous9:44 AM

    Did I read that she seeks $75,000 in damages?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:04 PM

      Gee Sarah don't forget to stop in Oregon for a logging convention now.
      $2.4 billion losses since 2007. Who should SUE You?
      You cost how much loss?

      Lawsuit here it comes!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:39 PM

      She deserves far more than that for all the media libel.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:54 PM

      4:39 PM - can't be libel when you're telling the truth. All those interviews on video, but that's right. All the "good" stuff was left on the editing room floor, right? Wasn't that the excuse???

      Delete
    4. Anonymous8:23 PM

      4:39 PM - if you say so! I've got one for you! Answer this one -- Matt Lauer asking her about Track beating Jordan. She was SO mad, "we weren't supposed to talk about that!" Read your contracts, $arah.

      Everything you swear she's not, she is! Who the hell are you trying to convince? That whole family is scum.

      Delete
  26. Anonymous9:52 AM

    OT? Piper? "The report analyzes the impact of child marriage on the national budgets and economic growth of 25 countries where at least one in three women marry before age 18. Its conclusion: By 2030 child marriage will cost developing countries billions of dollars in health-care and education costs as well as lost earnings potential."

    http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/27/534452699/the-billion-dollar-cost-of-child-marriage?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20170627

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:53 AM

      Little Christina Taylor Green, who was murdered by the same gunman who shot Ms. Giffords in the head, would be the same age as Piper palin if she had lived.
      Betcha $ara NEVER thinks about that murdered child, or her parents who have to visit their daughter in a grave yard now.

      Delete
  27. Anonymous9:55 AM

    Sarah is going to win fifty twenty billion dollars when she wins this suit.

    Track is also suing Jordan Loewe for injuring his hand when he hit her face. He will win a zillion billion dollars.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:05 AM

      LOL!!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:14 PM

      And bristol is going to sue candies for being their spokeslut for eleventy billion dollars for defamed character as well. It really slowed down her random whoring. All she got was a fake moh thats pudgy with chicklet teeth and man boobs big enough for a training bra. Winning!!!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:38 PM

      Bristol wasn't defamed, other than by her ex's proven lies. She enjoyed her charity work.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:13 PM

      4:38
      I guess maybe fucking anybody that was down for it is charity in alaska.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous3:55 AM

      Levi 'lied" when he said $ara rarely drinks alcohol and doesn't swear at all. He was pressured into it. Bitch cusses like a sailor and drinks like a fish.

      Delete
  28. Anonymous10:07 AM

    WATCH This $hitgibbon speaking in the 3rd party 'trumps'?>
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMmiLWDpCno

    tiny djt 'Shoot Somebody' hahaha you know?
    'Catch me if you can'-Courts!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:53 AM

      Noun. SPAZED (plural spazzes) (slang, pejorative, offensive in Britain) A stupid or incompetent person. [ (slang, pejorative, offensive in Britain) A hyperactive person. (slang, pejorative, offensive in Britain) A tantrum, a fit."
      "to become more angry than a situation warrants 4. to twitch: He was spazzing and muttering to HIM$ELF, like the old $PEED FREAK he is."ATTACK !

      Delete
  29. Anonymous10:11 AM

    The truth is always a defense to any legal action, which means Sara Palin, fishwife from Alaska, will fail.
    But I do hope the Times demands and gets their legal fees covered for this frivolous lawsuit.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous10:27 AM

    Has she taken to wearing the gigantic Star of David necklace again? The one she wore constantly after her 'blood libel' video?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:57 AM

      It won't save her from demons! Evil consumes her!

      Delete
  31. Anonymous10:32 AM

    "There is beastiality in this that challenges the courage and imagination of ordinary people."two estranged populations who regard one another with a hatred that defies conciliation."Trump’s most powerful rival for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016 was Ted Cruz." there is one thing about these people that is terribly clear: they are haters. Their agenda is to dominate, to persecute, to revel in others’ degradation."They “take no prisoners.” They will never give ground or say “enough.” They seek not only to defeat liberalism but to destroy a fabric of enlightened compromises"to ban abortions with no exceptions whatsoever — even in cases of incest or rape — and to protect the “right” of psychotics to obtain deadly weapons whenever they feel the itch to KILL."

    https://theliberalnetwork.com/2017/06/26/america-crisis-second-civil-war-making/

    http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/164534

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:56 AM

      What the hell does sex with animals have to do with it? Eww!

      Delete
  32. Anonymous10:35 AM

    This was an opinion piece in the Times so the suit won't go anywhere. Gabby Giffords should sue Grifterella for causing the shooting, not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous10:41 AM

    Moron.... you do realize that every news outlet is reporting this as she has already sued and you're the only mental patient that is saying she didn't.
    I don't think you understand that even if she loses the case, she still wins.
    Her attorneys will be able to go through all of the NYT correspondence notes emails etc and they will have to be deposed for hours and days to prove that they're innocent.
    She wins.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wait, I know you.

      You are the same genius who kept insisting that I was an idiot for saying that Palin would never run for president. And kept insisting that she had a secret plan and that we would all be eating crow someday.

      Gosh, where have you been?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:59 AM

      Alex. Whose pussy you got?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:57 PM

      There is a pool of eels waiting for you Alex.
      You evil bastard.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous3:11 PM

      Hahaha, Sara you are a piece of work . I mean that in the sense that you are the only human ,that gets dumber by the day.
      Thank you for bringing attention to the hideous crime that you perpetrated. You know full well what you were doing!The retarded shooter may not have seen it.
      Nonetheless you are always trying to incite violence! "Kill him!" remember those shouts after your hateful campaign rethoric!
      I hope you get what you deserve,you are a heartless ,grifter and 100 percent skank!
      This plea for relevance may just be your final nail in your wood coffin .By your own hand. Suffer you sewage rat!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous3:34 PM

      3:11PM - That's her modus operandi. "I handed them the gun but I didn't pull the trigger!" Lily white! What a christian, eh???

      Delete
    6. Anonymous4:37 PM

      Her supporters knew she wouldn't run. They hoped since she's strong but she puts innocent people first and hates to have anyone abused. It hurts her heart, something you don't have.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous6:39 PM

      Is thst RIGHT, 4:37 PM? Then how come she HID Track's abuse of women? The brawl? Cans denting the fridge? Who the HELL are you trying to convince? Yourself?

      Huts her heart. hahahahaha

      Delete
  34. Anonymous11:07 AM

    She did incite the killing of that little girl and the shooting that occurred to Gabby! Sarah Palin IS to blame and the majority of Americans know it...especially when talking with Alaskans!

    I hope the New York Times stings her out forever and costs her and Todd their last dime! She needs to be taken to the cleaners and would deserve it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:30 AM

      No she didn't. There is no evidence the AZ shooter ever saw the Palin target graphic. This was some crazed asshole hell bent on making history. Stop being hysterical about blood on her hands. The only thing Palin is guilty of is felony stupid by putting gun sights on map and then saying they were surveyor marks to protect herself. I hate Palin like most but stop with the bs.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:43 PM

      Wrong 11:30 AM She was the disgrace that promoted the death (of that darling child) and harm to Gabby. I'll never believe otherwise and there are millions that feel as I do.

      Sarah Palin is a joke to Alaska and the country and as evil as a human can be!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous1:05 PM

      12:43. You're a fool with a million voices in your head. Your twisted ideas are no different than a wing nut ranting about Obama when he was POTUS. It may be wise for you to get away from your computer, go outside and get some fresh air because the internet is causing you to lose touch with reality.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous1:38 PM

      Turning your words back to you, 1:05 PM You come across as a blowhard!

      Delete
    5. Anonymous1:39 PM

      Lol! Sarah Palin does not believe in coincidence, remember? Loughner took a gun and shot exactly where Sarah Palin had set her gun sights. She planted the idea.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous4:21 PM

      Nothing is more fun to login and see than a grammatically and spelling-challenged argument between two idiots! Thanks you guys, you both made my day :-)

      Delete
    7. Anonymous9:36 AM

      1130a is a frigging poster child for the point that mentally unbalanced people do not live in a bubble world, but rather are influenced by incendiary political rhetoric. Where do you think "radicalized terrorists" come from? Organizations ranging from ISIS to today's GOP know exactly how to fuel and prey on paranoid and delusional tendencies of individuals suffering from mental illness. May they rot in Hell (together.)

      Delete
  35. Anonymous11:10 AM

    http://tmttactical.com/celebrity-handguns/sarah-palin/

    https://twitter.com/JebBush/status/699706718419345408/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Ftime.com%2F4226677%2Fjeb-bush-america-gun-tweet%2F

    AmeriKa!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous11:29 AM

    NO BODY wants to play with ME:
    http://www.politicususa.com/2017/06/28/trump-mini-meltdown-sports-teams-white-house.html

    ReplyDelete
  37. Anonymous1:27 PM

    Sarah just wants to be like Melania who settled with the the Daily Mail for a bundle. Trump will still not like you Sarah! I bet Melania is smarter than Sarah, she did land a big fish VS a fish picker.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:36 PM

      Sarah covets no one.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous7:38 PM

      The internet is FOREVER, 4:36 PM.

      https://www.adn.com/politics/article/alaskans-line-whiff-ivana-april-3-1996/1996/04/03/

      Delete
  38. Anonymous1:53 PM

    Can't wait for discovery.....especially of her phone & computer for evidence of her "writings" about reloading.

    PMom_GA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:50 AM

      Guns,Guns,Guns!!-Sarah

      Delete
  39. I don't think this will go any where as it was an opinion piece, she can't demonstrate malice, she won't be able to prove damages, and as a public figure, the bar she needs to meet is higher.

    Will it get her a ton of publicity as poor wronged always a victim Sarah Palin?

    Maybe. For about five minutes. Then her has-been stupid self will slide right back down the chute into the garbage dumpster that is her life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:34 PM

      You can only cry "wolf" for so long and she's way past her expiration date on that.

      If she's thinking this will get coverage like the Bill Cosby trial? hahahaha A mention and that's about it.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:40 AM

      And let's not forget, whereas Bernie came out with an immediate condemnation of violence following the Scalise shooting, Palin popped with her now-famous, it's-all-about-meeeee blood libel speech. Class to the core, that woman.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:48 AM

      Sarah is so yesterday yet she still feels an itch to remind us of the unemployed grifter she'll always be. Still a jobless bum,looking for a handout from strangers. Everything is on record,sarah. The bullseye you put over Obama's pic. Your chants of Kill Him. All of your ugliness will be on display by the media and they will pick you apart like magpies,which you rightly deserve.

      Delete
  40. Anonymous2:51 PM

    Just another cry for attention. You're a hopeless asshole, Sarah. You really fucking are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:04 PM

      Isn't she though?
      It is to LAUGH how pathetic she is.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:36 PM

      So you WANT the media and bloggers to continue to lie and bully?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:59 AM

      @436
      $ara, is that you or Sally?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous7:40 AM

      Sarah Inkkk has stalked, tried to kill, has killed folks. So please spare us your Saint Sarah spell.
      We KNOW Sarah Inkkk. Thanks!

      Delete
  41. Anonymous2:55 PM

    A Sarah Palin fan was responsible for killing a black guard at the Holocaust Museum in 2009.

    Any woman whose catchcry is 'Don't retreat- reload' is going to get precisely nowhere in court, which I'm sure she has been told. She is gagging for attention, so desperate she must have blown through a lot of millions like the trailer trash she is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:00 AM

      LOTS of court costs & child support monies associated with her first-spawned from the past 2 years. More than she ever figured!!

      Delete
  42. Anonymous2:57 PM

    ah...she's just wants more free money. Stupid ass woman think she'll ge a settlement like traitor-trump's wife.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Anonymous3:20 PM

    Around the 2:24 mark here:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7046bo92a4

    This was before Giffords was shot and six people lost their lives. Whether or not Loughner had it out for her before the gun sights graphic, in this "money see monkey do" society we now live I certainly hold Palin complicit and I always will.

    She may not have fired the shots, but she amped up the hate to fever pitch and did all through President Obama's tenure. Her hands aren't cle4an and never have been!

    That is my *opinion,* as was the NYT editoral. An opinion, not fact, shortly retracted afterward.

    Defamation of character? Is that what this is about? She destroyed her own character years ago! Certainly not the NYT's fault!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:27 PM

      Everyone and their dog has figured out who she is. A has been with a huge chip on her shoulder that she wasn't embraced as the Queen Esther she had envisioned in her oh-so-sick mind, but the dumb@ss she is.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:45 PM

      A Christian she isn't - has never practiced the faith she was taught. Check the facts about her life and how she actually lied and cheated in business and government. And, check into the facts of why she really resigned (midterm) from being guv of Alaska those many years ago!

      Delete
  44. Anonymous3:20 PM

    This was on the palin thread on 'The Right Scoop'-a CONSERVATIVE site- last night:

    Howard Roark
    a day ago
    Please send Sarah Palin $19.95 immediately.

    Dial 1-800-ScamPAC

    If you call now you will be automatically pre-approved for the Grizzly MasterCard with 0% balance transfer and low, low introductory 2% APR on all new purchases.

    Call now, operators are standing by...

    Reply

    AimToMisbehave Howard Roark
    a day ago
    Unless you're trying to claim that Palin somehow scammed the NYT into libeling her, your comment here is a giant non-sequitur.

    Reply


    Texican AimToMisbehave
    a day ago
    If she was so interested in defending her honor, this same story was out there in 2011, when it happened.

    Reply


    AimToMisbehave Texican
    a day ago
    Except then it wasn't backed up by a completed and closed investigation, with a solid conclusion that her political activities had nothing whatsoever to do with the nutjob shooter who was obsessed with Giffords long beforehand.

    Reply

    nc ✓s & balances AimToMisbehave
    a day ago
    And then they repeated the lie again just after the Scalise shooting. That's why now.

    Reply

    stephmcg✓Fᵉᵈᵉʳᵃˡ ᶦˢᵗ AimToMisbehave
    a day ago
    No she scammed conservatives in 2016. So I could care less about her and her case.

    Reply

    AimToMisbehave stephmcg✓Fᵉᵈᵉʳᵃˡ ᶦˢᵗ
    a day ago
    I care about it in the sense that the NYT has it coming, and has had it coming for a long time. Kinda like the Hulk Hogan lawsuit that took out Gawker.

    Reply

    Howard Roark AimToMisbehave
    a day ago
    Have you received the Palin solicitation email yet?
    I just did.
    LOL

    Reply

    gary4205 Howard Roark
    a day ago
    Seriously?

    Reply

    Howard Roark gary4205
    21 hours ago
    yes

    Reply

    AimToMisbehave Howard Roark
    a day ago
    I'm not a particular fan of that stuff either, but it really has nothing to do with the fact that the NYT libeled her. Those two things can be true at the same time.

    Reply

    stephmcg✓Fᵉᵈᵉʳᵃˡ ᶦˢᵗ Howard Roark
    a day ago
    Ha ha ha...that is so true. She is using this as a platform to scam people once more

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:50 PM

      Send money NOW! Lord knows that the bitch won't pay her own bills. She's SPESHUL!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:42 PM

      If Sarah files a suit, it ain't gonna work! Betcha! Hope they make her spend millions in going up against them. They are a much bigger and better entity than she ever thought of being.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous5:39 PM

      If she thinks that she's going to shut down the NYT or make them a fake news source over her little snit fit, she's got another thing coming. Her reputation was made long ago. ALL of her own doing.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous5:42 PM

      If the media wins? Does Sarah have to pay their legal fees?
      Oh my bad, Penguin Parnell did that in Alaska for Sarah.

      Delete
  45. Anonymous3:29 PM

    Right Scoop has an article about it and someone made the comment that they had recieved a "solicitation" email from Palin.

    She is scamming for money again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:45 PM

      Right Scoop is where many of the old c4p crowd moved to when they figured out that she was nothing but a fraud.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:35 PM

      Sarah doesn't take handouts ever.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous4:45 PM

      4:35 AM - HAH!

      Delete
    4. Anonymous6:49 PM

      Sarah is a hand out honey!
      Her shelf life expired long ago and far far away! Word is, no one wants seconds.
      Thanks, but no thanks. Ouch.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous9:42 AM

      435p, since the SarahPAC gravy train dried up, I assume you mean. I agree that she might not take handouts ever again...but it won't be for lack of trying.
      Remind us how she and her brood are making an honest living these days? I'm looking for specifics here. Thanks.

      Delete
  46. Anonymous3:36 PM

    Sarah the Sideshow to upcoming investigations into the Russia hacking? Money laundering. Etc.
    Hop up on that legal soapbox!
    Tell us how HARD it's been. Gag.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous4:41 PM

    Oh, honey....Levi and his family are well regarded in Alaska! On the other hand, the Palins are NOT! They tried so damn hard to defame Levi and it didn't work! There is a God that protected Levi and his sweet family.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous6:02 PM

    $arah $arah $arah....

    Isn't it better to turn the other cheek and move on? I thought you now lived your life by the Bible. There went that!

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous7:29 PM

    So many people in this country suffering over dRump's new laid plans scared out of their wits for their livelihood, of whom she supports whole heartedly, yet this bitch is suing for something said about her as a personal opinion.

    There's a word for that. Actually, plenty, and she is of the people? Good LORD.


    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous7:51 PM

    Nowadays a Christian don't mean squat. If you say you are a christian today, it means you are a loud mouth ass hat. Long time ago those types of people tried to actually help the down and trodden. Now you can expect these veloceraptors like Sarah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:34 PM

      It's the so-called religious right that most sincerely deserves to burn in Hell: the sorts of folks who like to ask, WWJS, and then support a man who mocks a disabled reporter and brags about assaulting women. Hypocritical sanctimonious shitheads.
      There are a few folks who have shown genuine principles throughout the shit show: Pope Francis, Mitt Romney and much of the Mormon community, John Kasich. I don't agree with them on a lot of big issues, but props to them for not putting their integrity and faith on sale to the highest bidder.

      Delete
  51. Chenagrrl9:44 AM

    A jury trial would be great. The tabloids would have a field day with regular breathless reporting on tacky outfits, too-big shoes, verbal gaffs. She would be a regular feature with the sideshows overwhelming the issues.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.