Courtesy of the Daily Beast:
Russian-funded covert propaganda posts on Facebook were likely seen by a minimum of 23 million people and might have reached as many as 70 million, according to analysis by an expert on the social-media giant’s complex advertising systems. That means up to 28 percent of American adults were swept in by the campaign.
On Wednesday, Facebook’s chief security officer, Alex Stamos, revealed that Russia had “likely” used 470 fake accounts to buy about $100,000 worth of advertising promoting “divisive social and political messages” to Americans. It was Facebook’s first public acknowledgment of the role it unwittingly played in the Kremlin’s active measures campaign. Stamos’ statement was also conspicuous by what it omitted. Facebook has refused to release the ads. More significant, it hasn’t said what kind of reach Russia attained with its ad buy.
There may be a reason for that. On the surface, $100,000 is small change in contemporary national politics, and 3,000 ads sounds like a drop in the pond when Facebook boasts 2 billion monthly users. But it turns out $100,000 on Facebook can go a surprisingly long way, if it’s used right. On average, Facebook ads run about $6 for 1,000 impressions. By that number, the Kremlin’s $100,000 buy would get its ads seen nearly 17 million times.
The article goes on to explain that the initial 17 million hits would extrapolate out if the propaganda went viral, which of course we know it did as both Trump and Bernie supporters gobbled up anything negative about Hillary.
They in turn would link to the propaganda, which would then show up all across Facebook, and probably Twitter as well.
I actually have a friend who said that he did not trust Hillary based on a phony picture of her standing with dead bodies at an undisclosed location with the words "War hawk" emblazoned across the image.
That was literally all it took for him, so I certainly know how effective this strategy could be.
And the Russians have been honing this particular skill for quite some time:
Russia has meddled in the affairs of at least 27 European and North American countries since 2004 with interference that ranges from cyberattacks to disinformation campaigns, according to an analysis by a surveillance organization.
The findings, provided to USA TODAY, show the meddling started in former Soviet republics allied with the West and spread to Western Europe. More recently affected are Canada and the United States, where Congress and an independent prosecutor are investigating possible Russian involvement in the 2016 presidential election.
The alleged Russian interference abroad was compiled by the Alliance for Securing Democracy of the German Marshall Fund, a nonprofit organization that fosters closer bonds between the United States and Europe. In August, the group began tracking Russian efforts to influence U.S. public opinion through a network of Twitter accounts that disseminates messages considered helpful to the Kremlin.
One can only imagine how thrilled Putin was to have Edward Snowden fall into his lap and present him with the tools to supercharge his program of political manipulation.
I go on Facebook to communicate to a sister. The news that pops up on the side, I never pay attention to. But I seem to remember seeing where the Pope favored Trump. And stuff on Hillary that were negative. But lucky for me, I don't believe just anything. Lucky for me, I can spot bullshit when I see it. Take Bernie Sanders for instance, last night on Steven Colbert.
ReplyDeleteAll bluster and no substance. He does promise ponies. Sounds more like unicorns that shat rainbows though.
The Pope seems to be subtweeting against Trump today.
DeleteWe had a relative who shared fake news that was some ridiculous to crazy stuff. He never took time to fact check any basis in reality. People like him are vulnerable to and share manipulative false information.
DeleteWas the friend someone with the last name Johnston? They're special like that.
ReplyDeleteI believe the last name was Manglesdorf. Give it a fucking rest, Alicia.
DeleteI cannot recommend George Lakoff's blog enough. He is a linguist and really knows his stuff.
ReplyDeletehttps://georgelakoff.com/2017/09/08/why-hate-speech-is-not-free-speech/
"Freedom in a free society is supposed to be for all. Therefore, freedom rules out imposing on the freedom of others. You are free to walk down the street, but not to keep others from doing so.
The imposition on the freedom of others can come in overt, immediate physical form — thugs coming to attack with weapons. Violence may be a kind of expression, but it certainly is not “free speech.”
Like violence, hate speech can also be a physical imposition on the freedom of others. That is because language has a psychological effect imposed physically — on the neural system, with long-term crippling effects.
Here is the reason:"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/us-appeals-court-rules-against-trump-effort-to-broadly-enforce-travel-ban_us_59b1cde0e4b0dfaafcf6cb7d?section=us_politics
ReplyDelete"A U.S. appeals court on Thursday ruled against President Donald Trump’s effort to broadly enforce a temporary travel and refugee ban on people from certain Muslim-majority countries that the Republican president said was necessary for national security."
Someone needs to give Trump a refrigerator and a case of canned tuna fish.
I love and live on Facebook. I'm a Grandma. I joined in 2007 to see the Grandbabies. I also know about advertising which pays stay at home people a few dollars. I am able to recognise their bullshit. Unfortunately, people with busy lives may not.
ReplyDeleteHow sad that the only way you can see your grandbabies is via Fakebook. What terrible parents they must have.
DeleteLiving on facebook sounds like a terrible way to live. Never joined never will. Welcome to the data machine.
DeleteI never joined FB and I am so GLAD I didn't, because this just shows how they colluded with the Russians to give us Trump. That BBC footage of "Project Alamo" shows that FB provided their employees to work in the Trump campaign.
DeleteThis is arbitrary but I want to see if anyone has noticed this. I'm a guidance counselor at a high school. I love my job and school. But every day I am reminded of one little high school truth that has been evident since the 70s. Teenage girls only date boys who are less attractive than they are. I went to to schools, and I've worked in 3 schools. I've NEVER found any evidence to the contrary. Interesting.
ReplyDeleteLike that "hottie" Bristol? Get a life.
DeleteWell, Barstool Payme is ugly as a post both inside and out and dated a really handsome guy (Levi), so there's your evidence right there.
DeleteOFF TOPIC and stupid. You're welcome.
DeleteI feel sorry for the students at your school. If you are looking at people's looks and making conclusions based on kids in high school and their looks, they ought to take your certificate away from you! Boy, you are a real jerk!
DeleteI would say only the insecure ones.
DeletePeople tend to date those on the same "attractive" scale as themselves.
That's why it's such a shock Mnuchin scored that Scottish actress. Either she has really low esteem, is looking for a greencard or is a gold digger. It is NOT a love match.
Same could be said of Trump. Melania is way above him on the attractive scale so it was money/citizenship. Sorry, but no one believes this was a love match either.
OT" “Fox News Channel is canceling ‘The Specialists,’ and Eric Bolling and Fox have agreed to part ways amicably,”"
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-parts-with-eric-bolling-after-sexual-harassment-probe
Fox News terminates Eric Bolling after sexual harassment probe
Delete...A former commodities trader, Bolling was accused of harassing women and sending them vulgar and sexually charged text messages and emails, including a photo of his genitals.
Occidental College associate professor Dr. Caroline Heldman said that Bolling made lewd comments about her on the air and attempted to seduce her during a trip to New York City.
“Once, he took me up to his office in New York, showed me his baseball jerseys, and in the brief time I was there, let me know that his office was his favorite place to have sex,” Heldman revealed. “I know other women have had similar experiences with Bolling, which means that lots of folks at Fox knew about his behavior well before 2017.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/09/fox-news-terminates-eric-bolling-after-sexual-harassment-probe/
https://www.thestreet.com/story/14297197/1/north-korea-s-foundation-day-will-there-be-another-nuclear-test-.html
ReplyDelete"North Korea tested what most experts believe was a hydrogen bomb on Sunday, Sept. 3"the weaponry North Korea tested last week. Experts think the hydrogen bomb had a 100-kiloton yield when it triggered a 6.3 magnitude artificial earthquake underground."
"South Korean intelligence suspects a launch could happen on Foundation Day or on the anniversary of the country's Communist Party Foundation Day on Oct. 10."
Or Upcoming Winter Olympics in Feb...Or...
https://thinkprogress.org/north-korea-might-test-another-missile-tomorrow-5db4c6a9f035/
Delete"On Wednesday night, shortly after the United States asked the U.N. Security Council to slap fresh sanctions on North Korea, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Secretary of Defense James Mattis, Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Joseph Dunford met in a closed session with Congress to discuss the twin crises of Afghanistan (aka, America’s Longest War) and an increasingly defiant North Korea."
" (KCNA) on Friday said the United States will have to pay a dear price for comments made by U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley""KCNA accused Haley of having a “hysteric fit,” and delivering a “tongue-lashing.”"
“The North Koreans have learned to do without,”"“It is considered an acceptable loss for a segment of the population to perish — and this is the most tragic thing here — as long as the vital interests of the regime remain intact,” said Person."
This has got to be the all time STUPIDEST idea I have ever read.
ReplyDeleteSome 22 year old gun nut in Florida is encouraging people to shoot their guns into Irma. No. Really. There are 46,000 people signed up to join him. They even have charts on how to do it so the bullet doesn't come back and hit you in the head. Too bad. That eliminates 46,000 people from winning the Darwin Award they so richly deserve.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/florida-gun-owners-encouraged-apos-213111921.html
"A Florida man who suggested shooting guns at Hurricane Irma out of "stress and boredom" has found that his idea has captured peoples' imaginations - with over 46,000 signing up to join in."
"But Ryon Edwards, 22, came up with a novel way of amusing himself during the storm: firing bullets into it.
He started a Facebook "event", and as of Friday evening 46,000 people say they are interested."
"Since Mr Edwards came up with his "masterplan", other similar Facebook pages have been created - including one suggesting using flame throwers to scare away the storm.
"It's time we took a stand against this bully!" reads the event description. "This is our home, nobody drives us out of our own territory.
"Join me in this fight as we shoot flames at Hurricane Irma and dissipate her on the spot.""
Can't decide if it's gun owners that are stupid, Floridians that are stupid or Facebook users that are stupid. Probably a combination of all three.