Monday, September 04, 2017

While most states agree that they need to prepare for more cyber attacks in the coming election cycles, few are ready to spend the money necessary for increased security.

Courtesy of Politico:  

The U.S. needs hundreds of millions of dollars to protect future elections from hackers — but neither the states nor Congress is rushing to fill the gap. 

Instead, a nation still squabbling over the role Russian cyberattacks played in the 2016 presidential campaign is fractured about how to pay for the steps needed to prevent repeats in 2018 and 2020, according to interviews with dozens of state election officials, federal lawmakers, current and former Department of Homeland Security staffers and leading election security experts.

These people agree that digital meddlers threaten the public’s confidence in America’s democratic process. And nearly everyone believes that the danger calls for collective action — from replacing the voting equipment at tens of thousands of polling places to strengthening state voter databases, training election workers and systematically conducting post-election audits. 

But those steps would require major spending, and only a handful of states’ legislatures are boosting their election security budgets, according to a POLITICO survey of state election agencies. And leaders in Congress are showing no eagerness to help them out. 

Not only are they showing "no eagerness to help them out," they are actively cutting funding from the agencies that currently DO help out.

In fact, some in the Capitol are trying to defund the 15-year-old federal agency that helps states and counties administer elections. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which has three full-time staffers examining elections, would also see budget cuts in the pending congressional spending bills.

“We just don’t fund elections,” said Lawrence Norden, deputy director of the Democracy Program at New York University Law School’s Brennan Center for Justice, who co-wrote a recent report on digitally securing America's elections. “Nobody’s really sure who’s responsible for this.”

“Nobody’s really sure who’s responsible for this?" Well that is certainly comforting.

I'm just going to say it, because it needs to be said.

The Republicans don't WANT to secure our voting systems because they habitually take advantage of the lack of security and if the Russians hacking helps to put THEIR guy in office they see no reason to do anything about it.

And that leaves the rest of us, you know the people who believe in free and fair elections, simply pondering a future where we will never be able to completely trust the outcome of any election in America for the foreseeable future.

9 comments:

  1. That's because Trump shut down the Federal agency in charge of that and diverted funds to pay for his racist boondoggle WALL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:37 PM

      miaiuppa, he is getting me more and more worried. He can't even fake empathy.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous3:13 PM

    After 2016, I don't know how any of us can trust elections again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:52 PM

      Hillary won the popular vote, what don't you trust? The machines work fine, it's gerrymandering that's the problem.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous3:17 PM

    I'm willing to bet that the GOP-run states that have experienced cyber interference with elections will opt not to spend any money on increased security. We need to go back to paper ballots, counted by human beings with representatives of both (or all) parties present. If it takes a few hours longer to announce results on television, so be it. Saving our nation from any more of the GOP-run kleptocracy is worth the wait.
    Beaglemom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:27 PM

      Beaglemom @3:17 PM. That is the only way to go. Paper ballots, period! How do we go about getting this done?

      Delete
  4. Anonymous6:09 PM

    I vote to go back to numbered hemp paper ballots.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:11 AM

    San Fran could become first to use open-source voting system

    http://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/amp/San-Francisco-could-become-first-local-government-12170869.php

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:19 AM

    This new system in Georgia sounds excellent.

    http://www.myajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/exclusive-details-georgia-test-use-paper-ballots-elections/YyV47c41Q2MmbMcCc5F9OL/

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.