Friday, October 06, 2017

Rachel Maddow explains what we know is factual about the Russian dossier, and that despite what they say the Senate Intelligence Committee can talk to Christopher Steele essentially anytime they want.

This came on last night right after I had finished reading through some rather ignorant comments on my post yesterday about the Senate Intelligence Committee.

So here was Rachel doing her deep dive to explain all of the things we know that are factual about the Russian dossier, and also putting to rest the allegation from Richard Burr that Christopher Steele will not return his phone calls.

If you ever had any doubts about the importance of this dossier I think Rachel does an excellent job of explaining, in detail, what makes it so important, and how hard people are working to damage its credibility or make the dossier itself the scandal.

Now let me take a moment to point out that during the 2016 election IM received an unusual amount of visits from Russia.

This started well before we knew much about the Russian interference and at first I was kind of puzzled.

Typically the most visits come from the US and the second highest number are from Canada, and way back in third place is usually Australia. 

But in the spring of 2016 that changed and suddenly the second highest number of visits were coming from Russia, and now I think we all know why that was the case.

Well now that is happening again.

So if you read a comment on IM where somebody is working a little too hard to call into question the validity of the Russian investigations, or poo pooing this dossier, just keep in mind that they may have an agenda. 

25 comments:

  1. Anonymous8:08 AM

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/senate-russia-probe-is-not-really-investigating-russia-staffers-say

    "Grassley’s role in the congressional probes into Russian meddling in the 2016 election has perplexed and concerned members of his own party, Republican staffers on the committee told The Daily Beast.
    The probe appears to have already missed one of its own deadlines. And rather than publicly needling potential Russian meddlers, Grassley has primarily used his bully pulpit to rip an opposition-research firm and the FBI."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The entire Senate probe in Russia isn't about Russia. They are more concerned with the FBI's role and say Russia probe is for the Senate Intel committee-managed by wingnuts so there isn't much intelligence there.

      As for Grassley, I send him email reminders every now and then what I think of him as a human and a wingnut Sinator.

      Delete
  2. SallyinMI8:19 AM

    Thank you! I've been running into a couple of posters here and at HuffPO who are still slamming Clinton, still saying there is 'nothing there' with this investigation, etc. I will stop responding as of now!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:22 PM

      Gowdy said there was no there,there. Total Wtch hunt$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:29 PM

      12:22 here. That was in regards to the Clinton witch hunt.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous8:20 AM

    Bots will crawl about - trolls, too - with enough homegrown maga morons to add a dollop of authenticity to the comments.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8:40 AM

    Ohhh ... the pee is gonna hit the fan!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous9:01 AM

    Lol.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:08 AM

    Gryphen, can you flag which comments are coming from Russia?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, not in real time.

      But if you see a comment that dismisses the Steele dossier out of hand, or claims that Rachel Maddow takes too long to get to the point, that is probably them.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous9:46 AM

      She had a point?

      Shot of vodka for every arm wave!

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:10 AM

      Maybe the lazy ones who brag they can see Amerika from their dacha.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:33 AM

      Did you notify Lisa Murkowski or someone else who could pass along this info to the appropriate people?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:51 AM

      Lisa Murkowski has fallen down on her job horribly for Alaskans. She doesn't communicate well with her state...too much in line w/Trump!

      Delete
    6. I really don't think that Lisa Murkowski, or anybody in the Senate, is actually responsible for going after Russian trolls on the internet.

      Delete
    7. If the IPs are from Russia, can't they be blocked.

      Or gee, maybe have people register so at least we have names to match to all of the anonymous spewing.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous9:17 AM

    Oh my, she claims to have contacted an unnamed 'associate' of Steele, hold the boat! Why can't she just get Steele on the show if he is so open for discussion?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:19 AM

      Are you lost again? Breitbart is that way.

      Delete
  8. Anonymous9:34 AM

    It’s obvious to ME, Trump is ranting about “fake news” because he has quite a bit he does not want to come out. What better way to muddy the waters than to call any type of news you don’t like “fake”? Hes been hammering this for 2 years (after he was a purveyor of it for years himself) Why there are some people too stupid to see this is disgusting and worrisome. People really do not have good critical thinking skills. I really think the United States we know is in danger.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jimmy Kimmel did a lovely take down of Trump's Fake News. Kimmel has really stepped up on Trump lately. I think the whole health care thing motivated him to take off the gloves.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous2:30 PM

      Remember John Barron, the purveyor of real fake news?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous6:15 PM

      All of the news about Puerto Rico Trump wanted to control his message. No doubt post hurricane facts infuriated him also.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous9:47 AM

    So is Sen. Burr compromised? I have faith in Sen. Warner, but maybe that is misplaced as well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous10:50 AM

    What would we do w/o Rachel Maddow's wonderful show? Never miss her!!! She's always well researched, truthful and somehow manages to retain a sense of humor in her reporting!

    She should win Emmy's right and left for being such an outstanding journalist!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous4:17 PM

    Can you post the statistics from your web tracker? We'd all like to actually see the historic data on the location of the visitors. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.