Tuesday, November 07, 2017

Donna Braziles' new book has some serious problems.

One of the charges in Brazile's book is that an agreement which the DNC signed with the Clinton campaign gave the campaign control over who the DNC hired.

However Sam Stein with the Daily Beast sees a problem with that contention.

Courtesy of the Daily Beast:  

From early June 2015 until mid-September of that year, the Democratic National Committee operated without a communications director. 

In normal years, this would have been a problematic, perhaps embarrassing, staffing failure—and nothing more. But the timing of this particular vacancy made it operationally catastrophic. Just as the presidential campaign was heating up, the party’s main political arm was understaffed in a key department. 

When the committee finally filled the void, it settled on Luis Miranda. 

Miranda had served in the Obama administration’s communications shop and was well liked among his peers. One thing he was not, however, was the first, second, or even third choice of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. 

In fact, he hadn’t really been on the campaign’s radar at all. Clinton’s team had sent the DNC several other options for the post, top among them Jess McIntosh, who had been serving at the time as the communications director of Emily's List. But according to half a dozen sources, their requests were ultimately set aside by then Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who was won over by Miranda’s pitch to emphasize her as the election year ramped up.

In other words Wasserman Schultz hired whoever the hell she wanted, and seemingly did not give two shits what the Clinton campaign recommended.

This does not sound as if the Clinton campaign had final say over anything.

But that is nothing compared to this.

Courtesy of Yahoo: 

Axios reported on Sunday that the book's dedication reads, “In loving memory of my father, Lionel Brazile Sr.; my beloved sister, Sheila Brazioutlanle; my fearless uncles Nat, Floyd, and Douglas; Harlem’s finest, my aunt Lucille; my friend and mentor, David Kaufmann; my DNC colleague and patriot, Seth Rich; and my beloved Pomeranian, Chip Joshua Marvin Brazile (Booty Wipes). I miss y’all.”

Now if the name "Seth Rich" leaps out at you it is likely because his death was part of the conspiracy theory pushed by Russian trolls, Alex Jones, and even Fox News, which claimed that Rich was the true source of those emails that Wikileaks was releasing and not Russian hackers, and that the Clintons had him killed in order to cover that up.

There was also this later in the book: 

Rich also appears elsewhere in Brazile’s book, as the Post reported earlier in the weekend. She wrote that Rich’s murder haunted her and that she installed surveillance cameras at her home and would keep the blinds in her office window closed so she could not be seen by snipers, according to the Post.

Now if Brazile accepted the official police report that Seth Rich's death was the result of an attempted robbery gone bad then why would she be so paranoid?

Look I know that people have great respect for Donna Brazile, and I have certainly come to her defense in the past, but there is something really off about all of this.

37 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:43 PM

    Pray for Democrats.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2:00 PM

    Brazile is all about Brazile. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2:03 PM

    As a regular IM’er I want to share an idea to kick off your holiday season on Thanksgiving. I plan on offering an old cocktail, White Russian, renaming it Robert Mueller.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great idea! I have always loved those.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous2:12 PM

    She has screwed herself royally in the eyes of many, many Americans. She's going to be sorry she ever penned that book (which I'd not waste my money on).

    ReplyDelete
  5. She's working with the Russians!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous2:22 PM

    FUCK THE SELF SERVING BITCH! she can rot in hell.

    Following damning accusations made by Donna Brazile, the Democratic Party’s favorability rating plunged to a low not seen in 25 years Tuesday

    https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/poll-favorable-view-of-democrats-plunges-to-37-percent/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous2:25 PM

    One year after flipping from Democrat to Republican and supporting Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, voters in those counties across America have buyers remorse and think America is now “worse off” than when Barack Obama was president.

    Just 32 percent of voters in flipped counties “believe the country is better off now than it was before Trump became president,” according to a new NBC/WSJ poll. A plurality, 41 percent, says the country is “worse off” one year later.

    The poll sampled residents in more than 400 counties that either flipped from voting Democratic in the 2012 presidential election to Republican last year, or saw a significant surge for Trump last year.

    The counties in Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin, are generally “whiter, more rural, less educated and older than the nation as a whole,” according to NBC.

    In order words, they represent Trump’s base, and they’re not impressed with his presidency.

    https://shareblue.com/a-year-later-support-in-trump-counties-craters-as-voters-admit-america-is-worse-off/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:49 PM

      Friends were here for a few days. The husband who is certainly hyperactive verbally told my husband that he voted for Jill Stein. If we had thought that he was intelligent, we no longer do so. What a waste!
      Beaglemom

      Delete
  8. Anonymous2:29 PM

    In a instant...
    OT:
    "“It was up for about 10 seconds before a couple protesters ran over, explained what was happening, and threw it to the ground and ripped it up.”" “Alt right strikes first at Columbia Cernovich event, plants NAMBLA-branded sign in front of protest march,” Right-wing tweeter Jack Posobiec has previously planted a “Rape Melania” sign to incriminate leftist protestors, and posed as a representative of the Women’s March at a pro-net neutrality rally where he distributed flyers claiming to thank net neutrality advocates for “protecting our quality violent porn content,” including “ritual Satanic porn videos.” he had been discussing rape fantasies, and that the tweet was appropriate in context."

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/alt-right-frames-protesters-as-pedophiles-with-fake-nambla-sign

    " man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused.

    A woman enjoys intercourse with her man — as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.

    The man and woman get dressed up on Sunday — and go to Church, or maybe to their ‘revolutionary’ political meeting.
    Have you ever looked at the Stag, Man, Hero, Tough magazines on the shelf of your local bookstore? Do you know why the newspaper with the articles like ‘Girl 12 raped by 14 men’ sell so well? To what in us are they appealing?

    Sanders Sanders then goes on to explain his ideas about gender roles and eventually gets at a sharper point — that traditional gender roles help create troubling dynamics in men’s and women’s sex lives.

    “Many women seem to be walking a tightrope,” he writes, as their “qualities of love, openness, and gentleness were too deeply enmeshed with qualities of dependency, subservience, and masochism.”

    One way to read the essay is that Sanders was doing (in a supremely ham-handed way) what journalists do every day: draw the reader in with an attention-getting lede, then get to the meat of the article in the middle.

    You can draw divergent conclusions from the article itself. On the one hand, he’s talking about liberating people from harmful gender norms. On the other, with his nameless hypothetical “man-and-woman” characters, he also seems to imply that men fantasize about raping women or that women fantasize about being raped." <'72 Bernard Sanders

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous2:34 PM

    Ugly Mug 'T'rumpy Frumpy

    https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/internet-rips-criminally-ignorant-kim-davis-for-seeking-re-election-to-a-job-she-refuses-to-perform/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous2:52 PM

    https://wonkette.com/625335/donna-brazile-who-the-fuck-are-you-kidding
    CANCER?
    https://wonkette.com/625474/look-what-you-made-taylor-swift-do

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous2:58 PM

    Methinks someone is looking for attention.
    What a shame.
    Go home Donna. You are done here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:28 AM

      Ditto for Sarah Sociopath.
      Go jump down a mineshaft.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous3:17 PM

    Why did her book come out just before the election,is she getting revenge by helping trump et al?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous3:28 PM

    Democratic Party cannibalism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous6:40 PM

      In case you haven't noticed the Dem party is in as big a shambles as is the GOP.

      Delete
  14. Anonymous3:48 PM

    I will admit I can’t get a handle on this Donna Brazile. She shared debate question with the Clinton campaign during the primaries. If she thought things were rigged, why’d she do that? Why is she releasing this book now? Is it the truth? Does she have an ax to grind? Is she looking for fame? Money? It’s a head scratcher for sure. One thing for sure, she won’t be welcome at any DNC function!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:08 PM

      May it tank in sales. I'm tired of ALL of it; this country has gone to SHIT and it only took a year.

      See 2:25 PM above. YEP, they thought they were so damned smart believing every last thing dRumpf said. There goes their healthcare, there goes their taxes.

      Don't come whining, just take out your trusty AR-15 and mow innocents down because you're so fucking unhappy how your life turned out.

      Delete
  15. Anonymous3:58 PM

    She is a disingenuous, slippery little fuck, now isn't she? she threw a match on dry kindling and now she's whining that there's a fucking bonfire!

    The former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee said the whole reason she wrote the book was to draw more attention to the Russian hacking of the organization.

    But so far, no one is really talking about those parts of her book. And that is frustrating her.

    Brazile’s book came out at a delicate time for the Democratic Party ― on Election Day, with Democrats nervously waiting to see if they can pull out a win in Virginia’s gubernatorial race. She’s faced a significant amount of backlash from some folks who wonder why she had to unveil the book now, unhappy with the fact that it was reopening intra-party wounds from 2016.

    “Folks are pissed. Pissed at the timing,” said a former DNC staffer. “Pissed that she released this particular excerpt instead of something about Russia attacking our democracy. Pissed that she did not include context that Bernie was offered a JFA [joint fundraising agreement] and just didn’t do anything to help the party.”

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donna-brazile-hacks_us_5a0200fde4b06ff32c93e3a7?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous3:59 PM

    Well maybe she should have worked behind the scenes rather than trying to make a buck off of it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous4:00 PM

    Maybe you could have released it next week, eh? So that it wasn't dropped right before the election? I don't understand Donna Brazile. I don't mind if you tell your story, I want to hear it, but be thoughtful about how and when you tell it. If you have to go around explaining what you meant, then you didn't spend enough time crafting your story in the first place. Make sure you get your context and facts straight first.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous4:01 PM

    The truth...slowly but ultimately ends up winning out in the end. Her punting on DWS-picked communications director Luis Miranda (not a Clinton plant) sort of breaks the myth she tried less than surreptitiously to relay in her book. I'm sure she wants to get the current little conflagration behind her...she's getting bad press, but even bad press can sell a book, which is pretty much the point of the polemics she used in cognizant fashion.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous4:01 PM

    If she wanted a conversation she wouldn’t have taken the cash from whoever wanted her to do a hatchet job on the Democrats for Trump and the republicans. As far as I’m concerned she can keep her mouth shut because I’m not interested in anything she might have to say

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous4:02 PM

    Poor Donna Brazile, searching for relevancy any way she can get it. Someone needs to tell her she's way past her expiration date.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:23 PM

      Rings a bell, doesn't it?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:58 PM

      It sure does 4:23.... it sure does.

      Delete
  21. Anonymous4:27 PM

    Donna managed Gore’s campaign and lost bigly! To me, it seems like she is just trying to detract from how poorly the DNC did in the elections.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:00 PM

      And it wasn't her fault, right? I can't do videos of any politician anymore.

      Delete
  22. Anonymous4:40 PM

    Dems Win!
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/11/07/virginia-and-new-jersey-voters-pick-new-governors-and-set-tone-2018-elections/841506001/

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous4:58 PM

    The DNC should never have permitted Sanders to run on the Democratic ticket, should never have shared so much with him. Stupid! And look where we are - Jill Stein and Bernie should have been on their own - Stein had Putin and Sanders grifted everything he could from the DNC. Somebody needs to take charge. Let's hope Perez can and does.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:26 PM

      Here, as elsewhere, the Bernie bots have raised their heads again. Does it really make any difference? They’re ALL in it for themselves. The sooner we realize that, the better.

      Hold your nose and vote, and I’m an optimist!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:38 PM

      5:26pm

      Speaking of "holding your nose and voting" many of us Bernie supporters did just that, held our nose and voted for Hillary. Lotta good that did, huh?

      Delete
  24. Anonymous6:18 PM

    Liberal Redneck - On Guns

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73GicaeMo_E

    ReplyDelete
  25. I had no idea this book was already out for all of us to read and draw our own conclusions.

    I find it so interesting that Hillary's panty sniffers have been so indoctrinated that they'd turn on Elizabeth Warren so quickly for just one statement against their goddess. Not hard to see why they'd throw Brazile under the bus, considering all of the shit they forgave that Debbie Hillary's BFF Wasserman-Schultz pulled.

    The DNC has been doing poorly since Howard Dean stepped down. It is pervasive. They sucked up to Wall St., think they know it all and have ignored the PEOPLE. They ignore their own local people who have been trying to tell them what voters care about. But nooooo. They all think they know better. That's why they are still pushing this "A Better Deal" crap. They aren't going to get anywhere by kicking out the progressives. Not the way to win over Ellison supporters.

    ReplyDelete
  26. This is one chapter. Chapter 10.

    Brazile wrote the book to focus on the HACK. That starts at Chapter 11.

    I have to wonder why the focus is on ch. 10 Hillary shit and not ch. 11 Russian Hacking?

    Do you think the object is to divert attention from the hacking and get the Hillary bootlickers and the Progressives at each other's throats again?

    Smearing and tearing down Elizabeth Warren would just be a perk.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.