Andrew Sullivan talks about newest evidence that Sarah Palin may have skipped that whole pregnancy thing and had little Trig delivered by Fed-Ex.

Essentially there is a recently discovered photograph making the rounds of the internet, which shows Sarah Palin in March 26th, 2008. Not looking very pregnant at all. Here it is:





















The picture originated from the site called Palin's Deceptions, which has been focusing on this story exclusively for many months.

Here is what Andrew Sullivan had to say about the picture.

Maybe this photo has been photo-shopped. Maybe Palin had an anomalous pregnancy that showed far, far less than her previous ones, one that went from close to nothing to a serious bump in two weeks. Maybe the angle in the photo is misleading, and leaning toward us her pregnancy is concealed. Maybe her fifth labor really did take 26 hours combined via a speaking engagement (as amniotic fluid was leaking) and an 11 hour airplane flight (when a birth could have begun at any moment at extreme risk to the child), and maybe the bizarre and, to my mind, incredible stories she has told about the pregnancy and labor are true (there is still a chance they are). But if all these things are true, the Palin camp has had months to provide what would be instantly available records to dismiss all and every "insane" blog speculation about this. And yet none came - on or off the record.

I begged the McCain campaign by private email and in a private meeting to give me something - anything - to kill the story off. I promised to run any evidence that would blow this out of the water. That offer still stands. Please make me look like an idiot for asking these questions. But they didn't offer a thing, asserting that even asking the question was an outrageous reputation-destroying offense.

Sullivan has tried EVERYTHING to get Palin to come clean, and nothing has panned out. I commend him for his dedication to the cause, especially since there are clearly others trying hard to shut him up:

Did you know that Sarah Palin-haters are still trying to prove she didn’t give birth to her youngest son, Trig? These tinfoil hat-wearers are as obnoxious and unhinged as the 9/11 Truth cultists who insist that America engineered the jihadi attacks on itself. The presidential campaign may be over, but there’s no expiration date on Palin Derangement Syndrome. Michele Malkin Dec.5, 2008

I will leave the gauntlet Malkin threw down about the 9-11 attacks for a later time, but what Malkin and others fail to understand is that there really is not an adequate explanation for the birth of Trig Palin.

Either that child is the product of her daughter and some unknown sperm donor, or Palin's water broke, she gave a speech in Texas, and then flew at least eight hours on Alaska Airlines to Anchorage, then drove 60 miles more to Wasilla, and had a bouncing baby boy.

So either she is a liar, or a parent with absolutely horrendous judgement!

If you have ever spent any time on this blog you already know what I think.

So is this the picture that PROVES Sarah is not Trig's biological mother? Probably not. But if you add it to all of the other photographic and circumstantial evidence it makes a very, very strong case against Trig being hers.

In my opinion this story will never go away, and when the truth eventually comes out Alaskans can finally say good-bye to Sarah Palin forever!

And that will be a great day indeed.