Oh man you have got to read this!
Here is how Governor Sarah starts the exchange:
Subject: More "mistakes"?
Hello Mr. Doyle and Mr. Dougherty!
Please, say it aint so: did you really allow a story to run in your paper today claiming Levi Johnston is a high school drop out? Did I read that right?
And did you really print a story last week suggesting I had any connection with Sherry Johnston's activities in the past six months or so and you won't correct the story? Did I read that right?
And is your paper really still pursuing the sensational lie that I am not Trig's mother? Is it true you have a reporter still bothering my state office, my very busy doctor (who's already set the record straight for you), and the school district, in pursuit of your ridiculous conspiracy?
And, oh, I could go on...
Come on Mr. Doyle and Mr. Dougherty, I so desperately want to have even a tiny bit of faith in the ADN. You're stripping me of even a shred of faith in your reporting if any of the recent aforementioned strange and untrue reports were taken seriously by the ADN. Would you shed some light on what you're thinking regarding these false reports you've pursued and/or printed?
Editor Pat Dougherty goes through her complaint point by point and explains why she is completely off base with her complaints.
Here is the section where he addresses her question asking if the ADN has a reporter working on the Trig Palin birth story:
Yes, it's true.
You may have been too busy with the campaign to notice, but the Daily News has, from the beginning, dismissed the conspiracy theories about Trig's birth as nonsense. I don't believe we have ever published in the newspaper a story, a letter, a column or anything alleging a coverup about your maternity. In fact, my integrity and the integrity of the newspaper have been repeatedly attacked in national forums for our complicity in the "coverup." I have personally received more than a 100 emails accusing me and the paper of conspiring to hide the truth.
(I should note, however, that many people who commented on adn.com have alleged a coverup. Many of those were deleted as soon as we saw them, but many were not.)
I want to be very clear on this: I have from the beginning and do now consider the conspiracy theories about Trig's birth to be nutty nonsense.
If that's true, then why has Lisa Demer been asking questions about Trig's birth?
Because we have been amazed by the widespread and enduring quality of these rumors. I finally decided, after watching this go on unabated for months, to let a reporter try to do a story about the "conspiracy theory that would not die" and, possibly, report the facts of Trig's birth thoroughly enough to kill the nonsense once and for all.
Lisa Demer started reporting. I don't believe she received any cooperation in her efforts from the parties who, in my judgment, stood to benefit most from the story, namely you and your family. Even so, we reported the matter as thoroughly as we could. Several weeks ago, when we considered the information Lisa had gathered, we decided we didn't have enough of a story to accomplish what we had hoped. Lisa moved on to other topics and we haven't decided whether the idea is worth any further effort.
Even the birth of your grandson may not dissuade the Trig conspiracy theorists from their beliefs. It strikes me that if there is never a clear, contemporaneous public record of what transpired with Trig's birth that may actually ensure that the conspiracy theory never dies. Time will tell. (It looks like Pat Dougherty is just as frustrated by Palin's lack of convincing medical evidence as the rest of us.)
It is definitely worth your time to read entire article.
Wow I am a little proud of my local paper right now! It has been quite a while since I have been able to say that.
Thank you for pointing that out. I forget to check the "editor's blog" when I'm over there at the ADN site, but I wouldn't have wanted to miss that one. Wow.
ReplyDeleteWas this video actually broadcast back in April? If it wasn't, then we only have Gusty's word about when it was made. Considering that the photos only appeared on Flickr in August, the video only proves that perhaps they were not photoshopped, but nothing else.
ReplyDeleteOnce again she just throws out charges but makes no effort to actually clear the air. There is no reason to think she wrote the email it is to grammitically correct and is in clear english. The answer to her email is concise and answers every thing in detail and is very plain spoken. If only she could understand it now.
ReplyDeleteMore unprofessionalism from Palin. Palin's letter is simply unprofessional from a governor's office.
ReplyDelete