Saturday, March 14, 2009

Palin-bot picks fight with ABC News. Lay down your bets folks, who is it going to be? ABC's Jake Tapper? Or Palin butt boy Bill McAllister?

I am going to have to post almost this whole article, because it is simply too good to pick apart.

First up Bill "I can't stop staring at the Governor's ass" McAllister.

A very irate aide to Gov. Sarah Palin contacted ABC News today to explain why his boss's 31 requests for earmarks in the fiscal year 2009 budget, totaling $197 million, represent a victory for fiscally conservative values.

"I am disturbed by this item," wrote Bill McAllister, director of communications for Gov. Palin, referencing a blog entry from last night in which we referred to an article in the liberal magazine Mother Jones noting that Palin -- after what seemed like a campaign against earmark abuse -- was back at the proverbial trough.

"The headline doesn't seem very dignified for a major news organization," said the spokesman for the governor who repeatedly referred to then-Senator, now-President Obama as "palling around with terrorists." He also quibbled with our referencing Mother Jones. (We also reference conservative publications here. But anyway.)

"Let's start with the overwhelming mischaracterization of Gov. Palin's stance on earmarks that has been repeated and repeated since Aug. 29," McAllister wrote. "The governor never said that earmarks should be abolished or that the State of Alaska wouldn't seek or accept any. Didn't happen. What she said well before she was a national candidate (going back at least to October of 2007) was that earmark reform was necessary and the state would need to rely less on federal money than it had been."

McAllister then pointed out that Palin made 51 earmark requests for the FY 2008 budget, totaling $256 million; and 31 requests totaling $197 million, for the FY 2009 budget.

McAllister said that for next year's budget, Gov. Palin will only make eight requests, totaling $69 million, which will include "six ongoing federal appropriations and just two new projects: an upgrade at the Kodiak Missile Defense Facility, which is relevant to national security, and a bridge replacement critical to construction of the pending Alaska natural gas pipeline, also in the national interest."

"Governor Palin is a fiscal conservative," he wrote. "Literally moments ago, the Alaska State House of Representatives passed a budget that differed little from what she proposed, that spends less in the next fiscal year than this one. She has spoken out on reform of the federal process, and it is a disservice to her that her position was so egregiously mis-reported last year and that those same false stories are now being used to make her look like a hypocrite -- adding insult to injury, quite literally."

Wow! That is quite a tirade! It almost seems as if Bill really feels Sarah's pain. Do her tears burn his cheek as she sobs in his powerful, supportive arms? One has to believe that they do.

How could ABC ever answer such a passionate defense of Alaska's Governor?

Alarmed, I asked McAllister how Palin was "literally" injured. Was she okay? Was she infirm?

(Oh that is good! And so deliciously snarky I could have written it!)


"I didn't say physically injured," he wrote back. "Certainly her reputation was injured by the erroneous reporting."

Ah.

In any case, the point is, Gov. Palin as a vice presidential candidate claimed that she "championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending of Congress."

And yet, she has asked for and is still asking for -- and receiving -- tens of millions of dollars in earmarks -- pork barrel spending that does not go through the normal appropriations process.

Including, you might be interested to know, moneys for alcohol bootlegging interdiction and North Pacific fisheries programs.

Her former running mate, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., requests no earmarks.

That's a fiscally conservative position.

Ow! Now that hurts. Jake Tapper used the McCain conservative bludgeon to knock the Palin camp back on their heels. I have to give this round to ABC News and reporter Jake Tapper.

I might feel little bit sorry for Governor Sarah, but I am comforted by the fact that she has the ever present and supportive arms of Bill McAllister ready to provide solace in her time of emotional distress.

15 comments:

  1. Anonymous6:10 PM

    When will she lose her job in AK? That's what needs to happen to stop the insanity. I love AKM's "maeT hAraS" post today, too. Sounds like some of them are FINALLY seeing GINO for who she really is....Could it be that the rose-colored glasses are finally being tossed aside? Soon, will we hear McAllister say "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous7:39 PM

    What does Mr. Dignity think of Sarah Palin recently pallin' around with the President who supposedly "palled around with terrorists"? Or were Sarah palin's hateful campaign messages just "mischaracterization" of Obama?

    I feel sorry for McAllister. It must be a thankless task to be communications director for someone who communicates so poorly on her own. He probably spends half the day trying to figure out what the hell SP's saying.

    And BTW, if Sarah palin's "reputation was injured", it happened long ago and it is due to her own cluelessness, Todd's delusional belief that he was Lt. Governor, and her perpetual family three-ring circus.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:19 PM

    The thing that is so undignified, so unworthy of someone in the highest office in the State of Alaska is that Sarah seems to respond to each and every unflattering item in print-- nasty letters to ADN regarding proof/no proof of giving birth to Trigg, calling up People Magazine to complain that kids who aren't attending high school are called dropouts, responding to the Star about the Bristol story-- I know, the Star-- it ain't the New York Times! Talk about thin skin-- she called Obama the worst kind of names during the campaign but can't handle reporting about her -- I'm sure that she's still thinking up comebacks to Katie Couric, too. And, I do have to add that I have no idea what the governor of our state's family looks like-- he's working hard, and there are no pictures of luncheons with the kids,starting and ending dog sled contests, in fact, our papers do not have a special column devoted to "Our Governor, send in your photos."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8:21 PM

    Bill "brown nose" McCalister...I thought he left due to illness?
    I didn't say physically injured," he wrote back. "Certainly her reputation was injured by the erroneous reporting."
    WTF reputation WOULD that BE????
    clueless idiot? Vile creature? GINO?
    Heartless B*tch, pathological liar??? What????

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know I'm bad, but I'm just laughing hysterically about her "reputation" being harmed!

    She 'harmed' herself the first time she opened her mouth on the national stage, and it's been like watching a soap opera ever since!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous12:19 AM

    If Palin asks, it's not an earmark, it's a pretty little pig with lipstick. There's a difference you know, especially when you request it from the pal of a terrorist.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I find it interesting that McAllister appears to be taking these pot shots at the Gov. very personal. His appearance when speaking about the Gov. is not very professional. McAllister is way to involved and emotional.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous7:03 AM

    Well, one could be forgiven mistaking palin's intent on earmarks when compared to her Presidential running mate for the GOP.
    John mcCain loathes earmarks and doesn't ask for them.
    Since they were running mates and would have had to stay on the same talking points, one would imagine that palin felt the same way.
    put alas, she must have forgotten those GOP talking points, for shame.
    http://www.nemw.org/taxburd.htm
    In 2005(I know this is before Palin's time, but the earmarks kept getting higher after she became gov.
    Alaska realized a $1.83 from the feds for EVERY $1.00 they sent.
    Poor palin, she really should keep quiet, because we do find these things out!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous7:06 AM

    Palin's butt boy...ha, ha.

    Transparency certainly has become a hallmark of the Palin administration...transparently incompetent, scandalous, and corrupt.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous9:11 AM

    How in the world is Sarah Palin even thinking of running for president when she can't take even one ounce of criticism?? Or, is this the saddest ploy to just get noticed, since the spotlight isn't on her anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  11. No reason to feel sorry for Billy, he was salivating for the governor long before he took that job. He knew exactly what he was getting into. If he has to go back to a media job though who will take him seriously? It's interesting the issues Sarah chooses to get hot about. Why doesn't she scream bloody murder when the national enquirer says she had an affair with her husbands business partner, not a word, but call the new persona non grata Levi, a dropout, and it's a national issue? Huh?

    ReplyDelete
  12. And, as usual, that fawning head-blind devoted-to-Sarah conservative site -- you know the one, P4C? -- saw this skirmish completely differently...they thought Mr. Bill won the argument.

    Amazing. It's like Real Reality gets filtered through a Republican conservative thought generator, and it comes out in that Alternate Reality they all live in.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous12:26 PM

    LOL. Good stuff.

    Of course, I would argue that asking for and creating zero earmarks is neither fiscally conservative nor smart. "Earmarks" in general are not bad things - states need federal moneys for a variety of important projects and programs.

    The problems only occur when money is requested for unnecessary or overly expensive things, such as bridges to nowhere - in Alaska.

    This is why Republican Senators asking for no money for their states, or refusing stimulus money for their states are simply making political points to appear "fiscally conservative" when they are actually underfunding their states and the citizens they represent.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous8:35 PM

    I've been suspended from ebay numerous times. The first time, I sold an item and the buyer paid for it and I shipped it out. But after he received it he claimed that he had never received it, he did receive the package.

    However, no item inside. He sent me back the box, and I had to give him a full refund. What crap is that? I ended up not refunding him and my accounts got closed.

    Now everytime i create a new account I get banned again!! What can I do? I did find this ebook[url=http://www.ebaystealthpro.com] ebay suspension[/url] and I really think its worth the 30 bucks they ask for it.. I'm about to buy it too! If any of you have any suggestions or tips feel free to let me know!


    Thanks again, ralph

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous3:20 PM

    i'd like to take a automobile insurance provider to small claims court? The insurer agency turned down my claim, (I would go ahead and take to blame driver to small claims but I've got no address to serve them or send a demand letter). One other driver was at fault however his insurance firm says there is a difference in our statements so they have to use the word of their insured vs. my word. I do believe they acted in poor trust and did not perform a proper investigation would this be considered a valid claim in small claims court? I wish to use the at fault drivers insurance provider (not my own) to small claims for your damages to my car.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.