Tuesday, May 05, 2009

Is Governor Palin rejecting part of the Stimulus money for political reasons, or because she is simply too ignorant to do her job?

The co-chairs of the state Senate Resources Committee sent Palin a letter Monday urging her to accept the funds, which could go for uses including energy efficiency grants, retrofitting buildings for less energy use and replacing streetlights with LED bulbs that use less electricity and last longer.

It's the only piece of the $931 million federal stimulus package Palin is turning down, saying she doesn't want the money because it requires a state energy code.

Anchorage Republican Sen. Lesil McGuire, one of the lawmakers who wrote the governor, said in an interview that Palin herself set a goal of Alaska receiving 50 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2025.

"And then to come back and reject the implementation of an energy saving code the building community hasn't rejected and that other states are readily adopting, I think it sends a hypocritical message," McGuire said.

Palin spokeswoman Sharon Leighow said the governor's primary concern with the funds is that she believes energy codes should be a local government decision that considers local needs -- not a state mandate.

"We shouldn't have to change our local laws to accept more of this federal package, as the feds already control much of our young state, thus prohibiting our opportunities to responsibly develop," Palin said in an e-mail.

As I read this my first instinct is that Palin is refusing this portion of the money to suck up to the oil companies and to the core Republican base that relies on money from the fossil fuel pimps.

But that really does not seem to make too much sense either. Because though this money is to help our state develop more alternative sources of energy, and to become more energy efficient, it will have no real impact on the ability of the oil companies to drill for oil and continue to make money.

Here let Senator Bill Wielechowski explain it further:

Anchorage Democratic Sen. Bill Wielechowski, the other co-chair of the Resources Committee, said in a written statement that "it makes no sense to turn these funds away when they will just be given to other states. Alaskans need this money far more than residents of many other states with milder climates and substantially lower energy costs."

Wielechowski and McGuire said the state would have eight years to meet the efficiency standards and that much of Alaska already has the energy codes, including Anchorage, Fairbanks, Palmer, Juneau and Skagway. Ketchikan, Soldotna and Wrangell are in the process of introducing codes. Many of the structures built in rural communities are built with public funds through agencies like the Alaska Housing Finance Corp., they said, which also already has the energy code requirement.

They said the code would need to apply only to communities with more than 2,500 people, and structures without plumbing or central heating would be exempt. The senators said the Alaska State Home Building Association presented them with a resolution supporting a statewide building code that would include an energy code. It could be tailored to the different needs of various parts of the state, the two legislators said.

Well that seems pretty straightforward doesn't it? Many of our communities are already in the process of applying new energy codes and with this Stimulus money we will have the funds to do it faster and more efficiently.  Where is the bad?

Palin's spokeswoman said the governor recognizes some Alaska communities already have energy codes and that many buildings meet the standards.

"However, this does not resolve the issue of local control versus a state mandate and enforcement of energy codes," Leighow said in an e-mail. "The fact that Alaska does not currently have a state energy code indicates that there has not been a statewide consensus for imposing such a code on local communities and Alaska residents."

Palin doesn't think it is worth accepting the federal demand that Alaska impose a statewide energy code just to keep Alaska's share of the energy money from being sent to other states, Leighow said.

So it looks like this is really a battle for control.  Palin simply does not want anybody else to have a say in how Alaska moves toward a more energy efficient lifestyle, even if they pay for the privilege.

Well if this were up to me, I would much rather have the Federal Government determining our energy policies rather than, self described "expert on energy", Sarah Palin.  The Governor has shown herself to be much too uneducated and simple minded to manage such important policies.

And the question is still out there as to whether or not it is too late to accept ANY of the Federal funds.

McGuire said Alaska was the only state to miss the initial deadline to apply for the energy money. But the U.S. Department of Energy is still holding Alaska's place open -- at least for now -- so long as the state does not officially notify the department that it is rejecting the funds. Federal energy officials aren't saying when a drop-dead date might be.

McGuire said a Palin veto of the Legislature's appropriation of the money might not even be the end of it, if the governor doesn't also write a letter to the federal government spelling out the rejection.

Do we need any more proof that our Governor is an incompetent fool who is playing fast and loose with the future of Alaskans, in deference to her own ignorance and political aspirations?

20 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:27 AM

    Palin can't figure this AK energy stuff out, Gryphen! How dare you expect your governor to be working on AK issues!

    Palin's going to NYC with Bristol who will be speaking out against teen pregnancy: http://news.prnewswire.com/ViewContent.aspx?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/05-05-2009/0005019442&EDATE=

    Hey, you know, it's also, too, a place where Palin could sign a book deal...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm pretty sure it's reason number 2.

    ReplyDelete
  3. She is incredibly ignorant. For one thing, if she actually has the gall to run for president, anyone she is running against could REALLY use this against her. It makes her look like a complete hypocrite! How can you live in a place so cold and not be for improving energy efficiency. She is so stupid and she also is selfish. She is honestly one of the worst politicians I have ever seen (corrupt) and I wish all of you could do something about her. I can't understand people who support her. They must have a huge blind spot. I think they are people who are so anti-choice, that is all they see. How can they honestly not seeing what a JOKE it is to use Bristol as a person talking out against teen pregnancy?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wolves Shoot Back9:10 AM

    Palin's only real connection to energy is personal GAS and lots of it! She's always looking for drama, and this is more of the same. She waited til after session on purpose since she's trying to assert authority after a miserably failed legislative session which made her look like the idiot she is. She's a dramabilly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In answer to your question....

    No.

    .

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well I hope she at least stays true to her former uterance that abstinence is not realistic. Not that I think it is not possible and the best way to go about it, but I digress. If she now starts to preach abstinence no one will take her seriously and she will look like just another publicity seeking Palin. If she speaks up for safe sex and protected sex in order to guard against unwanted pregancies, it will be so much more realistic and believeable.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Energy expert my foot! Words fail me...

    Bristol as Teen Ambassador for an abstinence only organisation, a joke?

    Sarah Palin writing a book, a cruel joke?

    ReplyDelete
  8. JerryH10:03 AM

    Why don't the people of Alaska demand that Palin step down so we can have a special election ... to elect someone with some brains.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:13 AM

    Energy Czarina Palin has more on her mind than simply being present and actively involved in the health, welfare,growth,and stability of Alaska and its citizens. That would take an evolved and involved governor who works for the Alaskans and the state with the purpose of enhancing and enriching their lives.

    Who has time to govern? Leave that to Meg--or anybody else who has the time. That governor thing is just so time-consuming and doesn't leave any room for her ever-evolving melodrama. Who is more important? mememememe, or? Well, ME. Of course.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anybody else notice Wasilla is missing from the list of communities that give a shit?

    ReplyDelete
  11. FEDUP!!!10:37 AM

    Ah, but there is one catch: If she *accepts* the moneys, and the buildings become more energy-efficient, that means people would need to spend LESS $$$ on heating, and..... TADAH!!! (drum roll, please)... the oil companies would be getting less $$$ from the people! See, right now, every citizen of Alaska gets whatever amount each year, to help pay for heating etc. That money is being taken away from the oil companies - only to be redirected immediatley back INto their coffers!
    It is, IMHO, a very clever 'shell game'!

    ReplyDelete
  12. FEDUP!!!10:42 AM

    Hmmm Ano @ 7:27am: I wonder if Bristol is getting paid for that, and I wonder if that does not go against the Alaskan State Constitution - a public employee or family member of one, getting paid for the only fact that he/she is associated with a public employee. Also, a book deal, wouldn't that be against the same law?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Maybe she's planning to build another energy inefficient house and doesn't want codes to interfere.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:54 AM

    I suppose Sarah now will say they were tricked into becoming advocates for abstinence! They confused the words obstinate with abstinent!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Is this multiple choice? I vote for IGNORANT. Do we get a prize?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I vote for ignorant.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The building codes and standards for housing in the rural areas is horrible, esp for low income. The landlords often do not take care of the buildings and they are often poorly insulated resulting in people having to decide if they want food or heat. Even in a place like Homer there are really no enforced codes nor any building inspectors. There are some really horrible landlords in Homer who are quite abusive to anyone who complains. Accepting this money could help raise the standards and relieve a lot of human suffering. Oh, yea I forgot Palin doesn't care about the people of Alaska.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Energy Expert. *snort* Yeah, right.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous2:02 PM

    Palin is more suited to owning her own company vs working fir the people in government. Her decision making is very AIP and ant- federal government. She can't be president if she keeps referring to them as the "Feds." She does not or is incapable of seeing the big picture. This is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen her do. Not only is it the best thing for Alaska, she declare herself the national leader of energy reform. She is an ignorant self-serving hypocrite. Aren't you all sick of her?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous2:32 PM

    Palin's spokeswoman said, "...The fact that Alaska does not currently have a state energy code indicates that there has not been a statewide consensus for imposing such a code on local communities and Alaska residents."

    Well, with the outrageous fuel costs in Alaska, why not? Seems to me like energy efficient building codes should have been implemented long ago! Then maybe Alaskans could benefit from the monies from the fund instead of turning around and giving it right back to the oil companies via outrageous fuel costs. What an expert, huh?!

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.