Saturday, January 23, 2010

President Obama's Weekly Address discusses SCOTUS decision.



Transcript:

One of the reasons I ran for President was because I believed so strongly that the voices of everyday Americans, hardworking folks doing everything they can to stay afloat, just weren't being heard over the powerful voices of the special interests in Washington. And the result was a national agenda too often skewed in favor of those with the power to tilt the tables.

In my first year in office, we pushed back on that power by implementing historic reforms to get rid of the influence of those special interests. On my first day in office, we closed the revolving door between lobbying firms and the government so that no one in my administration would make decisions based on the interests of former or future employers. We barred gifts from federal lobbyists to executive branch officials. We imposed tough restrictions to prevent funds for our recovery from lining the pockets of the well-connected, instead of creating jobs for Americans. And for the first time in history, we have publicly disclosed the names of lobbyists and non-lobbyists alike who visit the White House every day, so that you know what's going on in the White House - the people's house.

We've been making steady progress. But this week, the United States Supreme Court handed a huge victory to the special interests and their lobbyists - and a powerful blow to our efforts to rein in corporate influence. This ruling strikes at our democracy itself. By a 5-4 vote, the Court overturned more than a century of law - including a bipartisan campaign finance law written by Senators John McCain and Russ Feingold that had barred corporations from using their financial clout to directly interfere with elections by running advertisements for or against candidates in the crucial closing weeks.

This ruling opens the floodgates for an unlimited amount of special interest money into our democracy. It gives the special interest lobbyists new leverage to spend millions on advertising to persuade elected officials to vote their way - or to punish those who don't. That means that any public servant who has the courage to stand up to the special interests and stand up for the American people can find himself or herself under assault come election time. Even foreign corporations may now get into the act.

I can't think of anything more devastating to the public interest. The last thing we need to do is hand more influence to the lobbyists in Washington, or more power to the special interests to tip the outcome of elections.

All of us, regardless of party, should be worried that it will be that much harder to get fair, common-sense financial reforms, or close unwarranted tax loopholes that reward corporations from sheltering their income or shipping American jobs off-shore.

It will make it more difficult to pass commonsense laws to promote energy independence because even foreign entities would be allowed to mix in our elections.

It would give the health insurance industry even more leverage to fend off reforms that would protect patients.

We don't need to give any more voice to the powerful interests that already drown out the voices of everyday Americans.

And we don't intend to. When this ruling came down, I instructed my administration to get to work immediately with Members of Congress willing to fight for the American people to develop a forceful, bipartisan response to this decision. We have begun that work, and it will be a priority for us until we repair the damage that has been done.

A hundred years ago, one of the great Republican Presidents, Teddy Roosevelt, fought to limit special interest spending and influence over American political campaigns and warned of the impact of unbridled, corporate spending. His message rings as true as ever today, in this age of mass communications, when the decks are too often stacked against ordinary Americans. And as long as I'm your President, I'll never stop fighting to make sure that the most powerful voice in Washington belongs to you.

It is puzzling that the Republicans, and especially the teabaggers, would embrace a decision which opens the door for foreign countries, and their wealthy companies, to buy advertisement on television to support or attack an American candidate.

Personally I think that the Senate should pass a law that from now on the politicians, both local and national, must wear coveralls with patches on them identifying who their corporate sponsors are, just like NASCAR drivers do.

At least then we would know just who had purchased their vote and it which side of a given issue we could expect them to take.

16 comments:

  1. sunnyjane6:43 AM

    Yes, Mr. President! YES!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6:49 AM

    Listened to Rachael and Olberman video this am, and one of them mentioned that there is already a letter from some fairly large companies to congress to stop bugging them for money.

    My great hope is that under this decision, the airways will become so cluttered with business sponsered ads that voters get sick of them and stop paying attention. Then is becomes a question of where else do they get their political info.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gryphen - Agree with you 100% that politicians should have to wear the logos of the organizations that have funded them. What would be especially hilarious would be Congress Critter X on camera with a staffer swapping out baseball caps, a la the Indy 500 winner.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous7:10 AM

    Please please please, Mr. President. Ban "common sense" anything from your speeches. You Know Who is just going to take credit for it and use it against you. And thirty lashes to your speechwriter for putting "Republican" between "greatest" and "president" Teddy Roosevelt. You Know
    Who and all her cohorts are just going to use that, too.

    Otherwise, fantastic speech.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7:51 AM

    Both my husband and I missed the change in font at first, and we thought President Obama was the one recommending the coveralls with corporate patches. Man, we hooted and clapped and laughed and thought it was the greatest idea ever!

    However, once we noted the change in font, we were a bit disappointed, but it didn't change our response that it would be a great idea.

    We realize President Obama couldn't get away with saying something like this, but we sure would like him to get a bit more gritty and forceful some times.

    Thanks for starting our day with the transcript of a solid speech from our President and, better yet, a hearty laugh with your terrific concept. Go, Gryphen, go!

    Your wit is a necessary tool in dealing with some of the issues we face as a country. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:55 AM

    Here is the story at ThinkProgress about the letter that a number of major corporations wrote, opposing the SCOTUS ruling - this was the one mentioned by Keith and Rachel on their shows last evening:

    http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/22/corporations-public-financing/

    Corporations Speak Out Against SCOTUS Ruling, Call On Congress To Approve Public Financing Of Campaigns

    So many people and groups have been calling for SERIOUS campaign reform for years and years. Maybe this is the catalyst that will get it done, and everyone will have an equal chance and not be dependent on masses of $$$ to get elected/re-elected.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous8:03 AM

    Our 'Taliban' SCOTUS has just doomed America so that individual citizens will NEVER be heard on important issues affecting their everyday lives and corporations will ALWAYS be heard and obtain everything their money can buy. As Mudflats discussed today, your own Senator and Rep. have nothing to say on this ruling since they have already been bought by big oil and energy corporations. This ruling signifies the end of America as we have known it and means that our experiment in democracy has failed. There is no way we can 'perfect' our democracy now that corporations will control it.

    I bet our founding fathers are rolling over. We either fight this ruling or American democracy dies - there is no other choice. Sign every petition out there that deals with this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8:59 AM

    Isn't Obama the guy who went back on his promise to take federal financing for his Presidency campaign? And then raised hundreds of billions more than his competitor who kept his word?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous9:02 AM

    Obama has done his part and now it's up to everyone else to do theirs.

    5-4 again, 5-4 again, this is a huge joke America is handing the world to have a good laugh with.

    Will the Repubs support it overall- probaby

    Will Palin support it- you betcha.

    Will Ron Paul support it- If he does his little game is over.

    Think about this long and hard. This is a great populist issue for Obama to take to the bank! But he can't do it alone.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Take away corporate tax shelter in say...the Cayman Islands.

    Force corporations to return to America the jobs that were outsourced and the tax breaks they received for doing so.

    Also, all government subsidies given to corporations....end them!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous9:27 AM

    They should also put limits on what the labor unions and the teacher's unions can give also.
    They should also not be allowed to give to groups like Moveon either so Soros can disguise it as a "public" donation.
    Corporations being big job providers are kind of representing
    the public especially since many of the the democrat policies effect them directly.
    They have to compete with Unions and Hollywood.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If corporations are just like individuals and entitled to the requisite First Amendment protections therein, does this mean that said entities will be entitled to opposite marriage as well? As long as same-sex corporations cannot jeopardize this most sacred, foundational institution, it seems to me a logical extension of the Court's reasoning, n'est-ce pas?

    ReplyDelete
  13. We need to cut to the chase and take away that old ruling which says that corporations are persons. They are not and they should not participate in the political process at all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous4:05 PM

    @ anonymous 7:10 AM

    PO: "It will make it more difficult to pass commonsense laws to promote energy independence because even foreign entities would be allowed to mix in our elections."

    PO: "A hundred years ago, one of the great Republican Presidents, Teddy Roosevelt, fought to limit special interest spending and influence over American political campaigns and warned of the impact of unbridled, corporate spending. His message rings as true as ever today,..."

    On the contrary, anonymous......PO is specifically and deliberately using this language to perk up the ears of the Republican constituency. Why? This devastating decision affects every voter, regardless of their political stripe.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Only 14 comments on this issue? I have to say I'm a bit disappointed in that. Where is the outrage? Your country has just been given away to the highest bidder! We are now the "Corporate States of America". And the reason that they can get away with this is that moew people are interested in what the Kardashians are doing or what Levi is saying about Bristol or who's the Biggest Loser. How are those things going to affect your life? Truly? people in this country no longer know what is important.... sad.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well said, Deb. I proffer two explanations beyond the standard fat, dumb American hypothesis. First, I think most people simply don't grasp the enormity of the decision and, as Gryphen mentioned, many have sorely misinterpreted its inevitable consequences. Second, for those that do grasp what's at stake–which includes, I daresay, this readership–it's so devastating and invokes such feelings of powerlessness are dumbstruck.

    ReplyDelete

Don't feed the trolls!
It just goes directly to their thighs.